[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

Low-voltage and low-power Ku-band CMOS LNA using capacitive feedback

  • Published:
Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An ultra-wideband (12–18 GHz) low-noise amplifier (LNA) using a 65 nm CMOS technology is proposed, in which a common-source cascode structure with capacitive feedback technique is employed, leading to the excellent gain flatness. In order to provide the unconditional stability at all frequencies, a notch filter is placed in the input matching network. The post-layout simulation results confirm the S21 of 11.33 ± 0.33 dB, the input/output return loss of −7.5 to −32.7 dB and −10 to −17 dB, respectively. Moreover, reverse isolation (S12) better than 27 dB, noise figure (NF) of 4.6–5.47 dB and third-order input intercept point (IIP3) of −5.39 to −12.32 dB are obtained over the 12–18 GHz band of interest. The LNA power consumption, excluding the output buffer stage, is only 2.2 mW from a 0.8 V power supply. The LNA layout area is 0.255 mm2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. M. Bansal, R. M. (2019) "Utilizing CMOS low-noise amplifier for bluetooth low energy applications," in applications of artificial intelligence techniques in engineering: Springer, pp. 239–251.

  2. Ku, Y.-T., Wang, S.-F. (2018) "A new wide-band low-voltage low-noise amplifier with gain boosted and noise optimized techniques," IETE Journal of Research, pp. 1–7.

  3. Parvizi, M., Allidina, K., & El-Gamal, M. N. (2015). A sub-mW, ultra-low-voltage, wideband low-noise amplifier design technique. IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration Systems, 23(6), 1111–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kraemer, M., Dragomirescu, D., & Plana, R. (2011). Design of a very low-power, low-cost 60 GHz receiver front-end implemented in 65 nm CMOS technology. International Journal of Microwave Wireless Technologies, 3(2), 131–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nejdel, A. (2015) "Flexible Receivers in CMOS for Wireless Communication," Lund University.

  6. Parvizi, M., Allidina, K., Nabki, F., El-Gamal, M. (2013) "A 0.4 V ultra low-power UWB CMOS LNA employing noise cancellation," in 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS2013), Beijing, China, pp. 2369–2372: IEEE.

  7. Hoe, D. H., Jin, X. (2015) "The design of low noise amplifiers in deep submicron CMOS processes: a convex optimization approach," VLSI Design, vol. 2015, p. 16. Hindawi Publishing Corporation.

  8. Traversi, G., Gaioni, L., Ratti, L., Manghisoni, M., Re, V. (2012) "Perspectives of 65 nm CMOS technologies for high performance front-end electronics," in "The 21st International Workshop on Vertex Detectors,"

  9. Chiou, H.-K., Liao, H.-Y., & Liang, K.-C. (2008). Compact and low power consumption K-band differential low-noise amplifier design using transformer feedback technique. IET Microwaves, Antennas Propagation, 2(8), 871–879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mirabito, M. M., & Morgenstern, B. L. (2004). New communications technologies. Focal.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Cheng, D., Li, L., Wu, X., & Sheng, B. (2020). An image rejection Ku-band CMOS low noise amplifier with bridged-tee band-stop filter. IEEE Access, 8, 188889–188896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhao. C., Kang, K. (2019) "A Ku-band Miniaturized LNA in 0.18-µm CMOS Process for Low-cost Phased Array Application," 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Radio-Frequency Integration Technology (RFIT), pp. 1–3.

  13. Peng, N., Zhao, D. (2019) "A Ku-band low-noise amplifier in 40-nm CMOS," 2019 IEEE International Conference on Integrated Circuits, Technologies and Applications (ICTA), pp. 9–10.

  14. Wang, Y. L., Her, M. L., Hsu, M. W., Ko, W. (2013) "A Ku-Band Low Noise Amplifier Based on Transformer," in Advanced Materials Research, vol. 655, pp. 1550–1554: Trans Tech Publication.

  15. Y. C.-C, Y. J.-H, S. L.-C, L. H.-Y, and C. C.-C, (2011) "A low-voltage and low-power low noise amplifier for ku-band application," in progress in electromagnetics research symposium, Suzhou, China, pp. 538–540: PIERS.

  16. Okushima, M., Borremans, J., Linten, D., Groeseneken, G. (2009) "A DC-to-22 GHz 8.4 mW compact dual-feedback wideband LNA in 90 nm digital CMOS," in 2009 IEEE radio frequency integrated circuits symposium, pp. 295–298: IEEE.

  17. Gharpurey, R., Kinget, P. (2008) "Ultra wideband: circuits, transceivers and systems," in Ultra Wideband: Springer , pp. 1–23.

  18. Lee, M., & Kwon, I. (2017). 3–10 GHz noise-cancelling CMOS LNA using gm-boosting technique. IET Circuits, Devices and Systems, 12(1), 12–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Das, T "Practical considerations for low noise amplifier design," Freescale Semiconductor, p. 10, Available: www.nxp.com

  20. Ebrahimi, A., Bastan, Y., Ebrahimi, E., & Shamsi, H. (2015). Exploiting cross-coupled and body-driven techniques for noise cancellation of an inductor-less wideband LNA. AEU-International Journal of Electronics Communications, 69(4), 708–714.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lu, W. et al., (2016) "A Ku-band CMOS LNA with transformer feedforward gm-boosting technique," in 2016 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Workshop Series on Advanced Materials and Processes for RF and THz Applications (IMWS-AMP), pp. 1–3: IEEE.

  22. Liu, B., Ma, K., Mou, S., Meng, F. (2017) "A Ku-band LNA in 0.35-um SiGe BiCMOS technology," in 2017 International Workshop on Electromagnetics: Applications and Student Innovation Competition, pp. 168–170: IEEE.

  23. Inanlou, F., Coen, C. T., & Cressler, J. D. (2014). A 1.0 V, 10–22 GHz, 4 mW LNA utilizing weakly saturated SiGe HBTs for single-chip, low-power, remote sensing applications. IEEE Microwave Wireless Components Letters, 24(12), 890–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang, H., Qian, G., Zhong, W., Liu, C. (2016) "A 3–15 GHz ultra-wideband 0.15-um pHEMT low noise amplifier design," in 2016 IEEE International Conference on Communication Systems (ICCS), pp. 1–4: IEEE.

  25. Bu, Q., Li, N., Okada, K., Matsuzawa, A. (2012) "A Comparison between Common-source and Cascode Topologies for 60GHz Amplifier Design in 65nm CMOS," presented at the International Conference on Solid State Devices and Materials, Kyoto, Japan.

  26. Zaker, A.-H., Shamsi, H., Gholami, S., Pourshamsaiee, M. (2011) "Design of a CMOS LNA for the upper band of UWB receivers," in 2011 18th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits, and Systems, pp. 595–598: IEEE.

  27. Razavi, B. (2012) RF Microelectronics Second Edition. Pearson Education, Inc., pp. 33.

  28. Zhang, X., Li, S., Moody, T., Xue, H., Ren, S. (2014) "Multi-finger MOSFET low noise amplifier performance analysis," in NAECON 2014-IEEE National Aerospace and Electronics Conference, pp. 342–345: IEEE

  29. Peng, B., & Lin, C. (2018). Low-Loss I/O Pad With ESD Protection for K/Ka-Bands Applications in the Nanoscale CMOS Process. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, 65(10), 1475–1479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Palani, R. K., Rangarajan, A., & Harjani, R. (2015, August). Chopper stabilized sub 1V reference voltage in 65nm CMOS. In 2015 IEEE 58th International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems (MWSCAS) (pp. 1–4). IEEE.

  31. Souri, K., Shamsi, H., Samadian, S., & Mirzaie, H. (2010, December). A 109dB PSRR, 31µW fully-MOSFET bandgap voltage reference in 0.13 µm CMOS technology. In 2010 17th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems (pp. 182–185). IEEE.

  32. Kikkert, C. J.: Amplifiers: Stability, Noise and Gain'', in: 'RF Electronics: design and simulation' (JCU Press, 2013, 1st edn.), pp. 226–247

  33. Borremans, J., Wambacq, P., Soens, C., Rolain, Y., & Kuijk, M. (2008). Low-area active-feedback low-noise amplifier design in scaled digital CMOS. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 43(11), 2422–2433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hossein Shamsi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declared that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

In order to Simplify the NF calculation, we assume both the buffer stage and cascode transistor \({M}_{2}\) have negligible noise contribution. Besides, among all parasitic elements, only \({r}_{o1}\), \({R}_{{L}_{d2}}\), \({C}_{out}\) and \({C}_{GS1}\) are taken into account as shown in Fig. 

Fig. 15
figure 15

a The simplified model for calculating NF. b The simplified model for calculating \(\frac{{v}_{out}}{{v}_{n}}\)

15(a). According to [30], the NF is given as follows.

$$NF=1+\frac{\overline{{{v }_{n,out}}^{2}}}{4kT{R}_{S}\times {\left|{G}_{V}\right|}^{2}}$$
(13)

where \(\overline{{{v }_{n,out}}^{2}}\) and \(\left|{G}_{V}\right|\) are the voltage noise spectrum at the output node caused by \({M}_{1}\) and the magnitude of voltage gain determined in Eq. 5, respectively. Since \({r}_{o1}\) moderately smaller than the input impedance seen from \({r}_{o1}\), to avoid much complexity in the final equation, we presume that the noise current source in Fig. 15(a) generates the voltage noise spectrum at the drain of \({M}_{1}\) identical to:

$$\overline{{{v }_{n}}^{2}}=4KT{\gamma }_{1}{g}_{m1}{{r}_{O1}}^{2}$$
(14)

and also, we have:

$$\overline{{{v }_{n,out}}^{2}}=\overline{{{v }_{n}}^{2}}\times {\left|\frac{{v}_{out}}{{v}_{n}}\right|}^{2}$$
(15)

where \(\frac{{v}_{out}}{{v}_{n}}\) is the voltage gain from the drain of \({M}_{1}\) to the drain of \({M}_{1}\). By using Fig. 15(b), \({\left|\frac{{v}_{out}}{{v}_{n}}\right|}^{2}\) is derived as:

$${\left|\frac{{v}_{out}}{{v}_{n}}\right|}^{2}=\frac{\left(1+{R}_{S}\left(2{g}_{m1}+{R}_{S}\left({{g}_{m1}}^{2}+{\left({C}_{GS1}\omega \right)}^{2}\right)\right)\right){\left({g}_{m2}{R}_{{L}_{d2}}{L}_{d2}\omega \right)}^{2}}{\left(1+{\left({g}_{m2}{L}_{d1}\omega \right)}^{2}\right)\left({\left({L}_{d2}\omega \right)}^{2}+{{R}_{{L}_{d2}}}^{2}{\left({L}_{d2}{C}_{out}{\omega }^{2}-1\right)}^{2}\right){\left({g}_{m1}{R}_{S}\right)}^{2}}$$
(16)

Considering \({{R}_{{L}_{d2}}}^{2}{\left({L}_{d2}{C}_{out}{\omega }^{2}-1\right)}^{2}\gg {\left({L}_{d2}\omega \right)}^{2}\), we can rewrite Eq. 16 as Eq. 17:

$${\left|\frac{{v}_{out}}{{v}_{n}}\right|}^{2}=\frac{\left(1+{R}_{S}\left(2{g}_{m1}+{R}_{S}\left({{g}_{m1}}^{2}+{\left({C}_{GS1}\omega \right)}^{2}\right)\right)\right){\left({g}_{m2}{L}_{d2}\omega \right)}^{2}}{\left(1+{\left({g}_{m2}{L}_{d1}\omega \right)}^{2}\right){\left({g}_{m1}{R}_{S}\left({L}_{d2}{C}_{out}{\omega }^{2}-1\right)\right)}^{2}}$$
(17)

Finally, by replacing Eq. 17 and Eq. 14 in Eq. 15 and performing a few manipulations, the NF is extracted as follows.

$$NF\approx 1+\frac{{\gamma }_{1}\left(1+{g}_{m1}{R}_{S}\right)\left(\left({{A}_{1}A}_{2}\left({A}_{1}{A}_{3}{{R}_{{L}_{d2}}}^{2}+2{A}_{4}{{L}_{d2}}^{2}{\omega }^{2}\right)+{A}_{4}{{L}_{d2}}^{2}{\omega }^{2}\right)\right)}{{\left({A}_{3}{R}_{{L}_{d2}}\right)}^{2}{\left({g}_{m1}{R}_{S}\right)}^{3}\left(1+{\left({g}_{m2}{L}_{d1}\omega \right)}^{2}\right)}$$
(18)

where \({A}_{1}\), \({A}_{2}\), \({A}_{3}\) and \({A}_{4}\) are identical to gm2rO1, (Ld2CGD1 ω2-1), (Ld2Coutω2-1), and (gm2Ld1(Ld2Coutω2-1)), respectively.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soleimani, F., Shamsi, H. Low-voltage and low-power Ku-band CMOS LNA using capacitive feedback. Analog Integr Circ Sig Process 109, 435–447 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10470-021-01922-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10470-021-01922-y

Keywords

Navigation