PixOOD: Pixel-Level Out-of-Distribution Detection

1. Bae, J., Lee, J.H., Kim, S.: PNI: industrial anomaly detection using position and neighborhood information. In: ICCV, pp. 6373–6383, October 2023

   Google Scholar 

2. Bergmann, P., Fauser, M., Sattlegger, D., Steger, C.: MVTec AD – a comprehensive real-world dataset for unsupervised anomaly detection. In: CVPR, June 2019

   Google Scholar 

3. Besnier, V., Bursuc, A., Picard, D., Alexandre, B.: Triggering Failures: out-Of-Distribution detection by learning from local adversarial attacks in Semantic Segmentation. In: ICCV (2021)

   Google Scholar 

4. Blum, H., Sarlin, P.E., Nieto, J., Siegwart, R., Cadena, C.: The Fishyscapes benchmark: measuring blind spots in semantic segmentation. arXiv:1904.03215 (2019)

5. Bovcon, B., Muhovič, J., Vranac, D., Mozetič, D., Perš, J., Kristan, M.: MODS-A USV-oriented object detection and obstacle segmentation benchmark. ITS (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2021.3124192

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Cai, Y., Liang, D., Luo, D., He, X., Yang, X., Bai, X.: A discrepancy aware framework for robust anomaly detection. IEEE Tran. Indust. Info. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2023.3318302

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Chan, R., et al.: SegmentMeIfYouCan: a benchmark for anomaly segmentation. In: NeurIPS Datasets and Bench (2021)

   Google Scholar 

8. Chan, R., Rottmann, M., Gottschalk, H.: Entropy maximization and meta classification for out-of-distribution detection in semantic segmentation. In: ICCV, October 2021

   Google Scholar 

9. Cho, M., Alizadeh-Vahid, K., Adya, S., Rastegari, M.: DKM: differentiable k-means clustering layer for neural network compression. In: ICLR (2022). https://openreview.net/forum?id=J_F_qqCE3Z5

10. Defard, T., Setkov, A., Loesch, A., Audigier, R.: PaDiM: a patch distribution modeling framework for anomaly detection and localization. In: ICPRW (2020)

    Google Scholar 

11. Di Biase, G., Blum, H., Siegwart, R., Cadena, C.: Pixel-wise anomaly detection in complex driving scenes. In: CVPR, June 2021

    Google Scholar 

12. Dosovitskiy, A., et al.: An image is worth 16x16 words: transformers for image recognition at scale. In: ICLR (2021). https://openreview.net/forum?id=YicbFdNTTy

13. Galesso, S., Argus, M., Brox, T.: Far away in the deep space: dense nearest-neighbor-based out-of-distribution detection. In: ICCVW, October 2023

    Google Scholar 

14. Gao, Z., Yan, S., He, X.: ATTA: anomaly-aware test-time adaptation for out-of-distribution detection in segmentation. In: NeurIPS (2023). https://openreview.net/forum?id=bGcdjXrU2w

15. Grcic, M., Bevandic, P., Segvic, S.: DenseHybrid: hybrid anomaly detection for dense open-set recognition. In: Avidan, S., Brostow, G., Cissé, M., Farinella, G.M., Hassner, T. (eds.) ECCV 2022. LNCS, vol. 13685, pp. 500–517. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19806-9_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

16. Grcić, M., Šarić, J., Šegvić, S.: On advantages of mask-level recognition for outlier-aware segmentation. In: CVPRW, June 2023

    Google Scholar 

17. Grcić, M., Bevandić, P., Kalafatić, Z., Šegvić, S.: Dense out-of-distribution detection by robust learning on synthetic negative data. In: arXiv:2112.12833 (2023)

18. Gu, Z., Zhu, B., Zhu, G., Chen, Y., Tang, M., Wang, J.: AnomalyGPT: detecting industrial anomalies using large vision-language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.15366 (2023)

19. Gudovskiy, D., Ishizaka, S., Kozuka, K.: CFLOW-AD: real-time unsupervised anomaly detection with localization via conditional normalizing flows. In: WACV, pp. 98–107, January 2022

    Google Scholar 

20. Hendrycks, D., Gimpel, K.: Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs). arXiv:1606.08415 (2023)

21. Kingma, D.P., Ba, J.: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014)

22. Liang, S., Li, Y., Srikant, R.: Enhancing the reliability of out-of-distribution image detection in neural networks. In: ICLR (2018). https://openreview.net/forum?id=H1VGkIxRZ

23. Lis, K., Honari, S., Fua, P., Salzmann, M.: Detecting road obstacles by erasing them. In: arXiv:2012.13633 (2020)

24. Lis, K., Nakka, K., Fua, P., Salzmann, M.: Detecting the unexpected via image resynthesis. In: ICCV, October 2019. https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/269093?ln=en

25. Liu, Y., et al.: Residual pattern learning for pixel-wise out-of-distribution detection in semantic segmentation. In: ICCV, October 2023

    Google Scholar 

26. Lu, R., et al.: Hierarchical vector quantized transformer for multi-class unsupervised anomaly detection. In: NeurIPS (2023). https://openreview.net/forum?id=clJTNssgn6

27. Nayal, N., Yavuz, M., Henriques, J.F., Güney, F.: RbA: segmenting unknown regions rejected by all. In: ICCV (2023)

    Google Scholar 

28. Neyman, J., Pearson, E.S.: On the use and interpretation of certain test criteria for purposes of statistical inference. Biometrika (1928)

    Google Scholar 

29. Neyman, J., Pearson, E.S.: Ix. on the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses. Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. Lond. Ser. A Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character 231 (1933)

    Google Scholar 

30. Oquab, M., et al.: DINOv2: learning robust visual features without supervision (2023)

    Google Scholar 

31. Pinggera, P., Ramos, S., Gehrig, S., Franke, U., Rother, C., Mester, R.: Lost and found: detecting small road hazards for self-driving vehicles. In: IROS (2016)

    Google Scholar 

32. R. H. Byrd, P.L., Nocedal, J.: A limited memory algorithm for bound constrained optimization. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 16 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

33. Radford, A., et al.: Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In: ICML, pp. 8748–8763 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

34. Rai, S.N., Cermelli, F., Fontanel, D., Masone, C., Caputo, B.: Unmasking anomalies in road-scene segmentation. In: ICCV, October 2023

    Google Scholar 

35. Roth, K., Pemula, L., Zepeda, J., Schölkopf, B., Brox, T., Gehler, P.: Towards total recall in industrial anomaly detection. In: CVPR, pp. 14318–14328 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

36. Schlesinger, M.I., Hlavac, V.: Ten Lectures on Statistical and Structural Pattern Recognition. Computational Imaging and Vision, Springer, Dordrecht (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3217-8

    Book  Google Scholar 

37. Tian, Y., Liu, Y., Pang, G., Liu, F., Chen, Y., Carneiro, G.: Pixel-wise energy-biased abstention learning for anomaly segmentation on complex urban driving scenes. In: Avidan, S., Brostow, G., Cissé, M., Farinella, G.M., Hassner, T. (eds.) ECCV 2022. LNCS, vol. 13699, pp. 246–263. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19842-7_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

38. Vojir, T., Šipka, T., Aljundi, R., Chumerin, N., Reino, D.O., Matas, J.: Road anomaly detection by partial image reconstruction with segmentation coupling. In: ICCV (2021)

    Google Scholar 

39. Vojíř, T., Matas, J.: Image-consistent detection of road anomalies as unpredictable patches. In: WACV (2023)

    Google Scholar 

40. Vojíř, T., Šochman, J., Aljundi, R., Matas, J.: Calibrated out-of-distribution detection with a generic representation. In: ICCVW, October 2023

    Google Scholar 

41. Wang, H., Li, Y., Yao, H., Li, X.: CLIPN for zero-shot OOD detection: teaching CLIP to say no. In: ICCV, October 2023

    Google Scholar 

42. You, Z., et al.: A unified model for multi-class anomaly detection. In: NeurIPS (2022)

    Google Scholar 

43. Zavrtanik, V., Kristan, M., Skocaj, D.: DRAEM - a discriminatively trained reconstruction embedding for surface anomaly detection. In: ICCV (2021)

    Google Scholar 

44. Zhang, H., Li, F., Qi, L., Yang, M.H., Ahuja, N.: CSL: class-agnostic structure-constrained learning for segmentation including the unseen. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 38, no. 7 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v38i7.28535

45. Žust, L., Perš, J., Kristan, M.: LaRS: a diverse panoptic maritime obstacle detection dataset and benchmark. In: ICCV (2023)

    Google Scholar 

Download references