Abstract
Using an extended full-cycle carbon model from the Faustmann framework, which allows for management strategies of several uses concurrently implemented in the same area of forest, this paper investigates the selection of management objectives that are beneficial and optimal for forest plantations in Vietnam. Three scenarios are considered: Scenario 1 investigates the management objective of maximizing the land economic value (LEV) of timber as a single production. Scenario 2 investigates the joint production of timber and bioenergy sources. Scenario 3 analyzes the joint production of timber, bioenergy production, and carbon sequestration. The findings reveal that if growers pursue a timber management objective (Scenario 1), the farming business only provides considerable benefits under the government-subsidized credit scheme of 8.4%. For a higher non-subsidized interest rate of 15.24% of commercial banks, such gains reduce substantially and become negative value under the mean interest rate of 19.08% of private credit sources. Altering the management objective to a joint production of timber and raw bioenergy production (Scenario 2) will boost the LEV by a moderate level, but at the expense of timber production and thus carbon stock. However, the reduction tendency of timber and carbon balance is not substantial due mainly to the relatively small proportion of bioenergy production compared to timber production; therefore, decision-making frameworks targeting carbon uptake may be capable of incorporating such levels of confliction. Further internalizing the carbon value of the forest into management objectives generally leads to a longer rotation length, thus improving both carbon sequestration and income gains. Shifting the current timber-dominant management objective to a joint production of timber and bioenergy sources, or, alternatively, a joint production of timber, bioenergy production, and carbon sequestration when the carbon market is emerging, is a good alternative strategy for forest management in Vietnam.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Data availability
The data sets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Abbass K, Qasim MZ, Song H, Murshed M, Mahmood H, Younis I (2022) A review of the global climate change impacts, adaptation, and sustainable mitigation measures. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:42539–42559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19718-6
Amarasinghe WVTD, Terada T, Yamamoto H (2021) Enhancing the carbon sequestration of high-elevation Eucalyptus plantations in Sri Lanka for future carbon market activities. J For Res 26:351–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/13416979.2021.1927501
Arshad M (2011) Bioethanol: a sustainable and environment friendly solution for Pakistan. J Comsats Sci Vision 16 & 17:21–26
Assembly VN (2016) Five year social-economic development plan. Vietnam National Assembly
Bateman IJ, Lovett AA (2000) Estimating and valuing the carbon sequestered in softwood and hardwood trees, timber products and forest soils in Wales. J Environ Manag 60:301–323. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2000.0388
Bayrak MM (2019) State of forest governance in Vietnam: where are the local communities? In: James H (ed) Population, development, and the environment: challenges to achieving the sustainable development goals in the Asia Pacific. Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, pp 273–295
Benítez P, Obersteiner M (2006) Site identification for carbon sequestration in Latin America: a grid-based economic approach. For Policy and Econ 8:636–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2004.12.003
Bjørnstad E, Skonhoft A (2002) Wood fuel or carbon sink? Aspects of forestry in the climate question. Environ Resour Econ 23:447–465. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021379306349
Blanco-Canqui H, Lal R (2009) Crop residue removal impacts on soil productivity and environmental quality. Crit Rev Plant Sci 28:139–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680902776507
Brukas V, Thorsen B, Helles F, Tarp P (2001) Discount rate and harvest policy: implications for Baltic forestry. For Policy Econ 2:143–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00050-8
Bruun O (2020) Environmental protection in the hands of the state: authoritarian environmentalism and popular perceptions in Vietnam. J Environ Dev 29:171–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496520905625
Casasempere A, Walter C, Carson MJ (2004) Planning, Appraisal and Risk Analysis in Clonal Forestry Projects. In: Walter C, Carson MJ (eds) Plantation forest biotechnology for the 21st century. Research Signpost, Kerala, India
Chang W-Y, Li Z, Lu K, Chang SJ (2022) Optimal eco-compensation for forest-based carbon sequestration programs: a case study of larch carbon sink plantations in Gansu, Northwest China. Forests 13:268. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13020268
Chinh NV, Anh NT, Anh HN, Hung BM (2020) Determining the best density for eucaluptus PNTC3 plantations to supply paper material wood in Phu Ninh, Phu Tho. J For Sci Technol 1:34–43
Clement F, Amezaga JM (2008) Linking reforestation policies with land use change in northern Vietnam: Why local factors matter. Geoforum 39:265–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.05.008
Dao TM, Yanagisawa M, Kono Y (2017) Forest transition in Vietnam: a case study of Northern mountain region. For Policy Econ 76:72–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.09.013
de Brauw A, Herskowitz S, Ambler K, Hoa NL, Trang TTT, Thuy NT, Anh BT, Trung NC, Moyes T, Middleton M, Toth R (2020) Agriculture value chain finance in Viet Nam. In: Agriculture value chain finance in Viet Nam. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Canberra, Australia
Den Elzen MG, De Moor AP (2002) Analyzing the Kyoto Protocol under the Marrakesh Accords: economic efficiency and environmental effectiveness. Ecol Econ 43:141–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00181-7
Diaz-Balteiro L, Rodriguez LC (2006) Optimal rotations on Eucalyptus plantations including carbon sequestration - a comparison of results in Brazil and Spain. For Ecol Manag 229:247–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.04.005
Dong L, Lu W, Liu Z (2018) Developing alternative forest spatial management plans when carbon and timber values are considered: a real case from northeastern China. Ecol Model 385:45–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.07.009
Dong L, Lu W, Liu Z (2020) Determining the optimal rotations of larch plantations when multiple carbon pools and wood products are valued. For Ecol Manag 474:118356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118356
Dung V, Dien C (2022) Developing large timber forests attached to agricultural restructuring, Vietnam Agriculture Newspaper, Hanoi. Accessed 26(03):2023
Duong PB, Izumida Y (2002) Rural development finance in Vietnam: a microeconometric analysis of household surveys. World Dev 30:319–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00112-7
Dwivedi P, Alavalapati JR, Susaeta A, Stainback A (2009) Impact of carbon value on the profitability of slash pine plantations in the southern United States: an integrated life cycle and Faustmann analysis. Canad For Res 39:990–1000. https://doi.org/10.1139/X09-023
Engin T, Amiot M, Evans M, Lord R, Burks B (2022) In: Burke RM (ed) Carbon pricing, in various forms, is likely to spread in the move to net zero. S & P Global Research
Faustmann M (1849) Calculation of the value which forest land and immature stands possess for forestry. Allg Forst Jagdzeit 25:441–455
Friedlingstein P et al (2022) Global carbon budget 2021. Earth Syst Sci Data 14:1917–2005. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-1917-2022
Gashayie A, Singh M (2015) Agricultural finance constraints and innovative models experience for Ethiopia: empirical evidence from developing. Res J Finance Account 6
Government of Vietnam (2022) National determined contribution (NDC). Government of Vietnam, Hanoi
Ha N, Benedikter S, Kapp G (2022) A value chain approach to forest landscape restoration: insights from Vietnam’s production-driven forest restoration. For Soc 6:311–334. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v6i1.18038
Hai VD (2009) Study on carbon sequestration ability of the Eucalyptus urophylla plantations in Vietnam. Sci Technol J Agric Rural Dev 1:102–106
Hampicke U (2001) Remunerating nature conservation in central European forests: scope and limits of the Faustmann–Hartman approach. For Policy Econ 2:117–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00048-X
Hieu NV, Nam NH (2021) Current situation of greenhouse gas emissions in Vietnam: opportunities and challenges. Vietnam J Hydrometeorol 728:51–66
Hoang H, Hoshino S, Hashimoto S (2015) Costs comparison between FSC and non FSC acacia plantations in Quang Tri Province, Vietnam. Int J Environ Sci Dev 6:947–951. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJESD.2015.V6.727
Hoen HF, Solberg B (1994) Potential and economic efficiency of carbon sequestration in forest biomass through silvicultural management. For Sci 40:429–451. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315182681-25
Howard AF (1995) Price trends for stumpage and selected agricultural products in Costa Rica. For Ecol Manag 75:101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(95)03534-H
Huu-Dung N, Yeo-Chang Y (2012) Optimum harvesting time and clone choices for eucalyptus growers in Vietnam. For Policy Econ 15:60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.09.011
IEA (2022) Global energy review: CO2 emissions in 2021. International Energy Agency
IPCC (2000) Land use, land-use change, and forestry. Special report of the Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, UK, p 375
Iwanaga S, Hoang DT, Kuboyama H, Duong DT, Tuan HH, Minh NV (2021) Changes in the Vietnamese timber processing industry: a case of Quang Tri Province, North Central Region. Forests 12:984. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12080984
Jayakrishnan KU, Bala G, Cao L, Caldeira K (2022) Contrasting climate and carbon-cycle consequences of fossil-fuel use versus deforestation disturbance. Environ Res Lett 17. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac69fd
Johnsson F, Kjärstad J, Rootzén J (2019) The threat to climate change mitigation posed by the abundance of fossil fuels. Climate Policy 19:258–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1483885
Köthke M, Dieter M (2010) Effects of carbon sequestration rewards on forest management—an empirical application of adjusted Faustmann formulae. For Policy Econ 12:589–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2010.08.001
Lal R (2005) World crop residues production and implications of its use as a biofuel. Environ Int 31:575–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2004.09.005
Li Y, Brando PM, Morton DC, Lawrence DM, Yang H, Randerson JT (2022) Deforestation-induced climate change reduces carbon storage in remaining tropical forests. Nat Commun 13:1964. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29601-0
Linh TN, Long HT, Chi LV, Tam LT, Lebailly P (2019) Access to rural credit markets in developing countries, the case of Vietnam: a literature review. Sustainability 11:1468. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051468
Marland G, Schlamadinger B (1997) Forests for carbon sequestration or fossil fuel substitution? A sensitivity analysis. Biomass Bioenergy 13:389–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(97)00027-5
McElwee PD (2012) Payments for environmental services as neoliberal market-based forest conservation in Vietnam: panacea or problem? Geoforum 43:412–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.04.010
McKenney DW, Yemshanov D, Fox G, Ramlal E (2004) Cost estimates for carbon sequestration from fast growing poplar plantations in Canada. For Policy Econ 6:345–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2004.03.010
Minh VT, Dung NH (2017) Economically optimum harvesting time of Eucalyptus plantation in Lang Son province, Vietnam: an application Faustmann model. J Econ Dev 238:74–82
Ministry of Industry and Trade (2018) Vietnam national energy efficiency program 2019 – 2030. Ministry of industry and trade
Nambiar EKS (2021) Strengthening Vietnam’s forestry sectors and rural development: higher productivity, value, and access to fairer markets are needed to support small forest growers. Trees For People 3:100052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2020.100052
Nathaniel K, Frances S (2021) Forests and international carbon markets. The Climate and Land Use Alliance (CLUA)
Nghiem N (2014) Optimal rotation age for carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation in Vietnam. For Policy Econ 38:56–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2013.04.001
Nhan NT, Minh HD, Greiner S, Mehling M (2011) Implementing the clean development mechanism in Vietnam: potential and limitations. In Merrill M, Upston-Hooper (eds) Improving the clean development mechanism: options and challenges post-2012. Lexxion, Berlin, pp 221–246
Pajot G (2011) Rewarding carbon sequestration in South-Western French forests: a costly operation? J For Econ 17:363–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfe.2010.12.002
Pardo C (2021) The Vietnamese furniture industry: a trade discrepancy analysis. USAID
Pearce D, Putz FE, Vanclay JK (2003) Sustainable forestry in the tropics: panacea or folly? For Ecol Manag 172:229–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00798-8
Pearce DW, Turner RK (1990) Economics of natural resources and the environment. Johns Hopkins University Press
Pérez S, Renedo C, Ortiz A, Ortiz F (2020) Residual biomass in Eucalyptus globulus plantations according to stand quality. Biomass Bioenergy 141:105699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105699
Pham S (2021) 90% of imported woods to Vietnam are raw woods, Vietnam Agriculture Newspaper, Hanoi. Accessed 12 April 2023
Pihlainen S, Tahvonen O, Niinimäki S (2014) The economics of timber and bioenergy production and carbon storage in Scots pine stands. Canad J For Res 44:1091–1102. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2013-0475
Polyanskaya O, Shaitarova O, Tereshenko S, Tambi A, Vasilyeva L (2020) Problems and prospects for the development of the furniture industry in Vietnam. IOP Conf Series: Earth Environ Sci 574:012067. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/574/1/012067
Pukkala T (2011) Optimizing forest management in Finland with carbon subsidies and taxes. For Policy Econ 13:425–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.06.004
Que ND, Giang DT (2006) Developing index for afforestation/reforestation under clean development mechanism in Vietnam. In: Research Center for Forest Ecology and Environment. Forest Science Institute of Vietnam
Que ND, Giang DT (2008) Formulating criteria and indicators for afforestation and reforestation projects under clean development mechanism (AR-CDM) in Vietnam. Sci Technol J Agric Rural Dev. Special issue: environment, agriculture, and rural:95–100
Richards G, Evans D, Reddin A, Leitch J (2005) In: System NCA (ed) The FullCAM carbon accounting model (version 3.0) user manual. AGO Department of the Enironment and Heritage, p 46
Rizvi R, Handa A, Sridhar K, Singh R, Dhyani S, Rizvi J, Dongre G (2020) Spatial analysis of area and carbon stocks under Populus deltoides based agroforestry systems in Punjab and Haryana states of Indo-Gangetic Plains. Agrofor Syst 94:2185–2197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-020-00540-3
Sandewall M, Ohlsson B, Sandewall RK, Viet LS (2010) The expansion of farm-based plantation forestry in Vietnam. Ambio 39:567–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-010-0089-1
Sathre R, Gustavsson L (2009) Process-based analysis of added value in forest product industries. For Policy Econ 11:65–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2008.09.003
Searle S, Malins C (2015) A reassessment of global bioenergy potential in 2050. Gcb Bioenergy 7:328–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12141
Sikor T (2011) Financing household tree plantations in Vietnam: current programmes and future options. Center for International Forestry Research
Sikor T, Baggio JA (2014) Can smallholders engage in tree plantations? An entitlements analysis from Vietnam. World Dev 64:S101–S112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.03.010
Silva C, Mpagalile J, Rooyen C, Rizzo C, Editors (2016) Enabling more inclusive and efficient food and agricultural systems in Africa: FAO session at the IFAMA World Forum 18 June 2014, Cape Town. Food and Agriculture Organization, South Africa
Skog KE, Nicholson GA (1998) Carbon cycling through wood products: the role of wood and paper products in carbon sequestration. For Prod J 48:75–83
SRD (2022) Vietnamese large timber forest: the status and development of policy for large timber forest in the context of implementing EVFTA agreement and VPA commitment SRD
Stephen D, Patrick M, Kim M, Christopher D, Katherine L (2021) State of voluntary carbon market 2021. Ecosystem Marketplace
Thuy PT, Bennett K, Phuong VT, Brunner J, Dung LN, Tien ND (2013) Payments for forest environmental services in Vietnam: from policy to practice. Center for International Forestry Research
Thuy PT, Campbell BM, Garnett S (2009) Lessons for pro-poor payments for environmental services: an analysis of projects in Vietnam. Asia Pacific J Public Admin 31:117–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2009.10779359
Tinh DV (2010) Carbon dioxide sequestration capacity of protection plantations and poor secondary forests in Bo River watershed in Thua Thien - Hue province, Vietnam. Sci Technol J Agric Rural Dev 10:77–81
Tolman WB (2006) Activation of small molecules organometallic and bioinorganic perspectives. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim xvii, 363
Tran TT, Fujimori S, Masui T (2016) Realizing the intended nationally determined contribution: the role of renewable energies in Vietnam. Energies 9:587. https://doi.org/10.3390/en9080587
Trienekens JH (2011) Agricultural value chains in developing countries a framework for analysis. Int Food Agribus Manag Rev 14:51–82
United Nations (2015) Paris agreement. United Nations
Van Holsbeeck S, Srivastava SK (2020) Feasibility of locating biomass-to-bioenergy conversion facilities using spatial information technologies: a case study on forest biomass in Queensland, Australia. Biomass Bioenergy 139:105620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105620
van Kooten C, Binkley C, Delcourt G (1995) Effect of carbon taxes and subsidies on optimal forest rotation age and supply of carbon services. Am J Agric Econ 77:365–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1243546
van Kooten GC, Krcmar-Nozic E, Stennes B, van Gorkom R (1999) Economics of fossil fuel substitution and wood product sinks when trees are planted to sequester carbon on agricultural lands in western Canada. Canad J For Res 29:1669–1678. https://doi.org/10.1139/x99-145
Wilshusen P (2010) The receiving end of reform: everyday responses to neoliberalisation in Southeastern Mexico. Antipode 42:767–799. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00772.x
World Bank (2022a) State and trends of carbon pricing 2022. World Bank
World Bank (2022b) The World Bank data. World Bank
World Bank (2022c) Vietnam country climate and development report. The World Bank Group
World Bank Group (2019) Country forest note: Vietnam. World Bank Group
Xabadia A, Goetz RU (2010) The optimal selective logging regime and the Faustmann formula. J For Econ 16:63–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfe.2009.06.002
Yamanoshita MY, Amano M (2012) Capability development of local communities for project sustainability in afforestation/reforestation clean development mechanism. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 17:425–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-011-9334-6
Zhou W, Gao L (2016) The impact of carbon trade on the management of short-rotation forest plantations. For Policy Econ 62:30–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.10.008
Funding
This research is funded by the National Economics University, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
The authors all agreed to publish the research.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Disclaimer
The paper reflects the authors’ own research and analysis in a truthful and complete manner. The results are appropriately placed in the context of prior and existing research.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Eyup Dogan
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Nguyen, D., Youn, YC., Bui, D.T. et al. Optimal forest management for carbon sequestration, timber, and bioenergy production in Vietnam using an extended full-cycle carbon accounting method. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 101192–101207 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29439-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29439-z