[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ecoapn/53.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Industrie-, Technologie- und Klimapolitik gemeinsam denken!

Author

Listed:
  • Bittó, Virág
  • Koch, Philipp
  • Schwarzbauer, Wolfgang
Abstract
Im Februar 2023 stellte die EU-Kommission den ambitionierten Green Deal Industrial Plan for the Net-Zero Age vor. Das Ziel dieser Initiative ist insbesondere den Umstieg auf eine nachhaltigere und klimafreundlichere Produktion von in Europa industriell hergestellten Gütern zu unterstützen. In der grünen Transformation der österreichischen Ökonomie sowie des europäischen Wirtschaftsraums spielt die Produktion im Inland zwar eine relevante Rolle. Tatsache ist aber auch, dass der Innovation und der Forschung & Entwicklung eine ebenso wichtige Rolle zukommt: Zukünftige Spezialisierungsvorteile in der heimischen Produktion Österreichs oder Europas werden von der aktuellen Forschung & Entwicklung mitbestimmt. Darüber hinaus wird ein bedeutender Teil der Treibhausgasemissionen, die in der Produktion jener Güter anfallen, die in Europa konsumiert und investiert werden, nicht in Europa ausgestoßen. Ganz im Gegenteil: Westliche Staaten sind häufig Nettoimporteure von CO2-Emissionen. Vor diesem Hintergrund sollten Anstrengungen zur Bekämpfung der Klimaerwärmung und zur Begleitung der grünen Transformation nicht ausschließlich auf die Produktion in Europa abzielen. Ein Fokus auf Innovation allein, oder die ausschließliche Fokussierung auf den Konsum sind ebenso wenig zielführend, um dem Umstieg zu einer klimafreundlicheren Ökonomie nachhaltig zu schaffen. Vielmehr bedarf es wirtschaftspolitische Hebel stets vor den drei Säulen der grünen Transformation - der Industrie-, Technologie- und Klimapolitik - zu beleuchten und bewerten. (...)

Suggested Citation

  • Bittó, Virág & Koch, Philipp & Schwarzbauer, Wolfgang, 2023. "Industrie-, Technologie- und Klimapolitik gemeinsam denken!," Policy Notes 53, EcoAustria – Institute for Economic Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ecoapn:53
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/271080/1/1844477975.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cesar A. Hidalgo & Ricardo Hausmann, 2009. "The Building Blocks of Economic Complexity," Papers 0909.3890, arXiv.org.
    2. Guendalina Anzolin & Amir Lebdioui, 2021. "Three Dimensions of Green Industrial Policy in the Context of Climate Change and Sustainable Development," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 33(2), pages 371-405, April.
    3. Hoffmann, Peter & Kremer, Manfred & Zaharia, Sonia, 2020. "Financial integration in Europe through the lens of composite indicators," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    4. César Hidalgo & Pierre-Alexandre Balland & Ron Boschma & Mercedes Delgado & Maryann Feldma & Koen Frenken & Edward Glaeser & Canfei He & Dieter F. Kogler & Andrea Morrison & Frank Neffke & David Rigby, 2018. "The Principle of Relatedness," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1830, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jul 2018.
    5. Ivan Haščič & Mauro Migotto, 2015. "Measuring environmental innovation using patent data," OECD Environment Working Papers 89, OECD Publishing.
    6. Jehan Sauvage, 2014. "The Stringency of Environmental Regulations and Trade in Environmental Goods," OECD Trade and Environment Working Papers 2014/3, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mealy, Penny & Teytelboym, Alexander, 2022. "Economic complexity and the green economy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(8).
    2. Bernardo Caldarola & Dario Mazzilli & Lorenzo Napolitano & Aurelio Patelli & Angelica Sbardella, 2023. "Economic complexity and the sustainability transition: A review of data, methods, and literature," Papers 2308.07172, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
    3. Balland, Pierre-Alexandre & Broekel, Tom & Diodato, Dario & Giuliani, Elisa & Hausmann, Ricardo & O'Clery, Neave & Rigby, David, 2022. "Reprint of The new paradigm of economic complexity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(8).
    4. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/6m5kss847r91no96hiublu6anu is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Claudius Gräbner & Anna Hornykewycz, 2022. "Capability accumulation and product innovation: an agent-based perspective," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 87-121, January.
    6. Colozza, Federico & Boschma, Ron & Morrison, Andrea & Pietrobelli, Carlo, 2021. "The importance of global value chains and regional capabilities for the economic complexity of EU-regions," MERIT Working Papers 2021-051, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    7. Aistleitner, Matthias & Gräbner, Claudius & Hornykewycz, Anna, 2021. "Theory and empirics of capability accumulation: Implications for macroeconomic modeling," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(6).
    8. O’Clery, Neave & Kinsella, Stephen, 2022. "Modular structure in labour networks reveals skill basins," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(5).
    9. Napolitano, Lorenzo & Sbardella, Angelica & Consoli, Davide & Barbieri, Nicolò & Perruchas, François, 2022. "Green innovation and income inequality: A complex system analysis," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 224-240.
    10. Hausmann, Ricardo & Stock, Daniel P. & Yıldırım, Muhammed A., 2022. "Implied comparative advantage," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(8).
    11. Fritz, Benedikt & Manduca, Robert, 2021. "The Economic Complexity of US Metropolitan Areas," SocArXiv 2gw9c, Center for Open Science.
    12. Andres Gomez-Lievano, 2018. "Methods and Concepts in Economic Complexity," Papers 1809.10781, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2018.
    13. Marin, Giovanni & Vona, Francesco, 2023. "Finance and the reallocation of scientific, engineering and mathematical talent," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(5).
    14. Bellelli, Francesco S. & Xu, Ankai, 2022. "How do environmental policies affect green innovation and trade? Evidence from the WTO Environmental Database (EDB)," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2022-3, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    15. Inga Ivanova & Nataliya Smorodinskaya & Loet Leydesdorff, 2020. "On measuring complexity in a post-industrial economy: the ecosystem’s approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 197-212, February.
    16. Arnaud Persenda & Alexandre Ruiz, 2023. "Autocatalytic Networks and the Green Economy," GREDEG Working Papers 2023-16, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    17. Perruchas, François & Consoli, Davide & Barbieri, Nicolò, 2020. "Specialisation, diversification and the ladder of green technology development," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(3).
    18. Benjamin Davies & David C. Maré, 2021. "Relatedness, complexity and local growth," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(3), pages 479-494, March.
    19. Balland, Pierre-Alexandre & Boschma, Ron, 2022. "Do scientific capabilities in specific domains matter for technological diversification in European regions?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(10).
    20. Mealy, Penny & Teytelboym, Alexander, 2017. "Economic Complexity and the Green Economy," INET Oxford Working Papers 2018-03, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, revised Feb 2019.
    21. Serenella Caravella & Valeria Costantini & Francesco Crespi, 2021. "Mission-Oriented Policies and Technological Sovereignty: The Case of Climate Mitigation Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ecoapn:53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecoauat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.