Author
AbstractIn traditional auction theory, the auctioneer is usually treated as a non-entity or someone whose incentives are completely aligned with the seller's. In reality, quite frequently that is not the case. Many auctions are administered by third party auctioneers who do not own the product and get a small share of the revenue as a commission. If the auction rules are designed very rigidly, an auctioneer may have little impact on the auction outcome. However, in many real world auctions, auctioneers set the pace of the auction and decide when to end an auction. For example, sellers may advice auction houses on a secret reserve, but frequently auctioneers may have discretion on to what extent they should exercise this secret reserve. When multiple objects are sold in an auction day, auctioneers have discretion on the pace of the auctions. Auctioneers also may decide on the sequencing of the lots to be sold at the same auction. An auctioneer, as an agent, may make decisions that are optimal for him but not the seller who is the principal thus creating a classic agency problem that is common among real estate agents, vehicle inspectors and even physicians. We analyze data from a large well-organized market of tea where auction is used to determine the market price to see how the incentive of the auctioneer affects the market pricing. In these auctions, auctioneers get a small fraction of the revenue as commission. However, some auctioneers also sell tea from gardens owned by their holding company thus pocketing the entire revenue from these lots. We exploit this institutional feature and private information from the seller side that the auctioneers provided us to estimate the impact of the auctioneers' incentives on auction outcomes. We find that auctioneers are more willing to postpone the sale of their own tea to get a higher price. Moreover, they inflate publicly announced estimated value of their own tea. On the other hand, buyers seem to take this inflation of the estimated value into account when they bid for lots owned by the auctioneer. Finally, we find a U-shaped price pattern throught the auction day for a given broker. Auctioneers who also own tea gardens position their own lots to take advantage of this price pattern. Interestingly, when we look at multiple auctions of identical lots that are auctioned off consecutively, we find a flat price pattern as predicted by the auction theory.
Suggested Citation
Matthew Shum & Fahad Khalil & Tanjim Hossain, 2009.
"Auctioneers as Agents,"
2009 Meeting Papers
340, Society for Economic Dynamics.
Handle:
RePEc:red:sed009:340
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:red:sed009:340. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christian Zimmermann (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sedddea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.