[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea02/19757.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Market Structure, Market Share, And Profits In The Surface Freight Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Kari, Fatimah
  • Jaafar, Abdul H.
  • Allen, Albert J.
  • Couvillion, Warren C.
Abstract
The surface freight industry was deregulated in 1980. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between profitability and market power in the trucking industry that transport agricultural commodities. Fulfilling this objective would allow us to determine whether the market structure that has emerged is one that is based on competition. The research method will be based on the structure-conduct-performance paradigm. Results of this study indicated that efficiency is the driving force behind performance of firms. These suggest that the 1980 Motor Carrier Act had produced its intended purpose in the agricultural commodities transport industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Kari, Fatimah & Jaafar, Abdul H. & Allen, Albert J. & Couvillion, Warren C., 2002. "Market Structure, Market Share, And Profits In The Surface Freight Industry," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19757, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea02:19757
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.19757
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/19757/files/sp02ka01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.19757?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Keith Hartley & Richard White & David Chaundy, 1997. "Government and industry performance: a comparative study," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(9), pages 1227-1237.
    2. Gerard Go & David Kamerschen & Charles Delorme, 1999. "Market structure and price-cost margins in Philippine manufacturing industries," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(7), pages 857-864.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hanekom, J.W. & Willemse, B.J. & Strydom, D.B., 2010. "Structure, Conduct and Performance in the South African Potato Processing Industry," 2010 AAAE Third Conference/AEASA 48th Conference, September 19-23, 2010, Cape Town, South Africa 96643, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    2. Mohamad Rosli & Fatimah Kari, 2008. "Malaysia's National Automotive Policy and the Performance of Proton's Foreign and Local Vendors," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 103-118.
    3. Edwards, Seanicaa & Allen, Albert J. & Shaik, Saleem, 2006. "Market Structure Conduct Performance (SCP) Hypothesis Revisited using Stochastic Frontier Efficiency Analysis," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21350, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohamad Rosli & Fatimah Kari, 2008. "Malaysia's National Automotive Policy and the Performance of Proton's Foreign and Local Vendors," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 103-118.
    2. Yang, Qing & Zhang, Lei & Wang, Xin, 2017. "Dynamic analysis on market structure of China's coal industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 498-504.
    3. Song-Ken Hsu & Ming-Fang Tsai & Chih-Hai Yang, 2008. "Market structure, external exposure and industry profitability: evidence from taiwan," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 201-214.
    4. D. R. Kamerschen & J. E. Morgan, 2004. "Collusion analysis of the Alabama liquid asphalt market," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(7), pages 673-693.
    5. Mita Bhattacharya & Jong-Rong Chen, 2009. "Market dynamics and dichotomy: evidence from Taiwanese manufacturing," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(17), pages 2169-2179.
    6. Aidan R. Vining, 2016. "What Is Public Agency Strategic Analysis (PASA) and How Does It Differ from Public Policy Analysis and Firm Strategy Analysis?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-31, December.
    7. André p. Liebenberg & David R. Kamerschen, 2008. "Structure, Conduct And Performance Analysis Of The South African Auto Insurance Market: 1980‐2000," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 76(2), pages 228-238, June.
    8. Arzu Akkoyunlu-Wigley & Sevinc Mihci, 2006. "Effects of the customs union with the European Union on the market structure and pricing behaviour of the Turkish manufacturing industry," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(20), pages 2443-2452.
    9. Setiawan, Maman & Emvalomatis, Grigorios & Oude Lansink, Alfons, 2012. "The relationship between technical efficiency and industrial concentration: Evidence from the Indonesian food and beverages industry," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 466-475.
    10. Antonio Fonfria & Paulina Correa-Burrows, 2010. "Effects Of Military Spending On The Profitability Of Spanish Defence Contractors," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 177-192.
    11. Javier Garc�a-Est�vez & Elisa Trujillo-Baute, 2014. "Drivers of R&D investment in the defence industry: evidence from Spain," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 39-49, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Marketing;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea02:19757. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.