[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/8501.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Health Insurance without Single Crossing: why healthy people have high coverage

Author

Listed:
  • Boone, Jan
  • Schottmüller, Christoph
Abstract
Standard insurance models predict that people with high (health) risks have high insurance coverage. It is empirically documented that people with high income have lower health risks and are better insured. We show that income differences between risk types lead to a violation of single crossing in the standard insurance model. If insurers have some market power, this can explain the empirically observed outcome. This observation has also policy implications: While risk adjustment is traditionally viewed as an intervention which increases efficiency and raises the utility of low health agents, we show that with a violation of single crossing a trade off between efficiency and solidarity emerges.

Suggested Citation

  • Boone, Jan & Schottmüller, Christoph, 2011. "Health Insurance without Single Crossing: why healthy people have high coverage," CEPR Discussion Papers 8501, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:8501
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP8501
    Download Restriction: CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Boone, Jan, 2019. "Health provider networks with private contracts: Is there under-treatment in narrow networks?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    2. Boone, Jan, 2018. "Basic versus supplementary health insurance: Access to care and the role of cost effectiveness," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 53-74.
    3. Boone, Jan, 2020. "Pricing above value: selling to an adverse selection market," CEPR Discussion Papers 15279, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    4. Bilancini, Ennio & Boncinelli, Leonardo, 2018. "Signaling to analogical reasoners who can acquire costly information," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 50-57.
    5. Boone, Jan, 2020. "Pricing above Value: Selling to an Adverse Selection Market," Discussion Paper 2020-023, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    6. Boone, Jan, 2020. "Pricing above Value: Selling to an Adverse Selection Market," Other publications TiSEM 700b2f3e-d1c8-4422-9b54-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. Boone, Jan, 2020. "Pricing above Value: Selling to an Adverse Selection Market," Other publications TiSEM eda6a1de-4db6-49a6-87e4-3, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Christina Aperjis & Filippo Balestrieri, 2017. "Loss aversion leading to advantageous selection," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 203-227, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Health insurance; Risk adjustment; Single crossing;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D82 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design
    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:8501. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cepr.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.