[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1010008.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pooled testing of traced contacts under superspreading dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Stratis Tsirtsis
  • Abir De
  • Lars Lorch
  • Manuel Gomez-Rodriguez
Abstract
Testing is recommended for all close contacts of confirmed COVID-19 patients. However, existing pooled testing methods are oblivious to the circumstances of contagion provided by contact tracing. Here, we build upon a well-known semi-adaptive pooled testing method, Dorfman’s method with imperfect tests, and derive a simple pooled testing method based on dynamic programming that is specifically designed to use information provided by contact tracing. Experiments using a variety of reproduction numbers and dispersion levels, including those estimated in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, show that the pools found using our method result in a significantly lower number of tests than those found using Dorfman’s method. Our method provides the greatest competitive advantage when the number of contacts of an infected individual is small, or the distribution of secondary infections is highly overdispersed. Moreover, it maintains this competitive advantage under imperfect contact tracing and significant levels of dilution.Author summary: Due to the emergence of COVID-19, pooled testing has gained significant attention as a method for allocating testing resources more efficiently. In this context, the majority of existing pooled testing methods for the identification of infected individuals are agnostic to the circumstances of contagion. However, individuals for whom a test is ordered are usually traced contacts of an infectious person—they are secondary infections. As a result, their infection statuses are correlated. In this work, we propose a novel pooled testing method that makes explicit use of epidemic parameters describing the distribution of secondary infections. Our method partitions an infected individual’s contacts into pools whose sizes make more efficient use of the available tests. Extensive simulations under a variety of epidemiological conditions informed by the COVID-19 literature show that our method can significantly decrease the expected number of tests under superspreading dynamics, i.e., when the distribution of secondary infections exhibits high variance. The simulations also show that our method maintains its advantageous performance under imperfect conditions, such as significant dilution effects or incomplete contact tracing.

Suggested Citation

  • Stratis Tsirtsis & Abir De & Lars Lorch & Manuel Gomez-Rodriguez, 2022. "Pooled testing of traced contacts under superspreading dynamics," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1010008
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010008
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010008&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1010008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.