[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/eurcho/v19y2020i1p53-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mutual Funds and the Income Stabilisation Tool in the EU: Retrospect and Prospects

Author

Listed:
  • Jean Cordier
  • Fabio Santeramo
Abstract
Higher frequency and intensity of extreme weather events have increased farmers’ risk exposure, which has increased the need for integrated risk management. EU Regulation No. 1305/2013 allows subsidies for insurance instruments, for mutual funds compensating production losses, and for mutual funds to compensate for income losses. The EU toolkit in this respect has been largely under‐utilised, and an integrated EU policy for risk management has not been developed. Comparing the situation in different EU Member States leads to conclusions on options for EU policymakers to consider. The existing EU technical documents explaining the content and details do not provide clear explanations and interpretation of the current regulations and so more efficient guidelines for Mutual Funds and sectoral Income Stabilisation Tools should be developed. This could be facilitated by establishing a platform for public consultation, knowledge sharing and learning which would include stakeholders, farmers unions’ representatives and academics, to help the process of building shared experiences or even common benchmarks. The platform would be part of a dissemination and innovation effort to capitalise knowledge in a learning curve and would act as a catalyst for the implementation of MFs and ISTs. L'augmentation de la fréquence et de l'intensité des phénomènes météorologiques extrêmes a accru l'exposition des agriculteurs aux risques, ce qui renforce la nécessité d'une gestion intégrée des risques. Le règlement européen n° 1305/2013 autorise les subventions pour les instruments d'assurance, les fonds de mutualisation des risques compensant les pertes de production et les fonds de mutualisation des risques pour compenser les pertes de revenus. La panoplie d'outils de l'Union européenne (UE) à cet égard a été largement sous‐utilisée et aucune politique européenne intégrée de gestion des risques n'a été élaborée. La comparaison de la situation dans différents États membres de l'UE permet de tirer des conclusions sur les options à envisager par les décideurs de l'UE. Les documents techniques existants au niveau de l'UE expliquant le contenu et les détails de ces outils ne fournissent pas d'explications et d'interprétations claires sur la réglementation en vigueur. Il conviendrait donc d’élaborer des directives plus efficaces pour les fonds de mutualisation des risques (MF) et les outils sectoriels de stabilisation du revenu (IST). Cela pourrait être facilité par la mise en place d'une plate‐forme de consultation publique, de partage des connaissances et d'apprentissage à laquelle participeraient des parties prenantes, des représentants des syndicats d'agriculteurs et des universitaires, afin de contribuer au processus de construction d'expériences partagées ou même de points de repère communs. La plate‐forme contribuerait à un effort de diffusion et d'innovation visant à capitaliser les connaissances le long d'une courbe d'apprentissage et agirait comme un catalyseur pour la mise en œuvre des MF et des IST. Häufigere Extremwetterereignisse mit größerer Intensität haben die Risikoexposition von Landwirten erhöht. Hierdurch wächst die Notwendigkeit für ein integriertes Risikomanagement. Die EU‐Verordnung Nr. 1305/2013 erlaubt Beihilfen für Versicherungsinstrumente und Fonds auf Gegenseitigkeit zur Entschädigung von Landwirten für Ernteausfälle sowie für erhebliche Einkommensrückgänge. Bisher wurden die vorhandenen Instrumente der EU kaum genutzt, und es wurde keine integrierte EU‐Politik für das Risikomanagement entwickelt. Aus dem Vergleich der Situation in verschiedenen EU‐Mitgliedsstaaten lassen sich für die politischen Entscheidungsträger Handlungsoptionen ableiten. Die existierenden technischen Dokumentationen, die den Inhalt und die Ausgestaltung der Instrumente beschreiben, liefern keine klaren Erklärungen und Interpretation der aktuellen Verordnungen. Deshalb sollten effizientere Leitlinien für Fonds auf Gegenseitigkeit (MFs) und sektorale Instrumente zur Einkommensstabilisierung (ISTs) erarbeitet werden. Dies könnte durch die Schaffung einer Plattform für die öffentliche Konsultation, dem Wissensaustausch und das Lernen unterstützt werden, an der Interessenvertreter, Bauernverbände und Wissenschaftler beteiligt wären. Diese Plattform wäre Teil der Bemühungen für die Verbreitung von Wissen und für Innovationen in diesem Bereich, wodurch die Umsetzung von Fonds auf Gegenseitigkeit und Instrumenten zur Einkommensstabilisierung beschleunigt werden kann.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean Cordier & Fabio Santeramo, 2020. "Mutual Funds and the Income Stabilisation Tool in the EU: Retrospect and Prospects," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 19(1), pages 53-58, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:19:y:2020:i:1:p:53-58
    DOI: 10.1111/1746-692X.12210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12210
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1746-692X.12210?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fabio G Santeramo, 2019. "I Learn, You Learn, We Gain Experience in Crop Insurance Markets," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(2), pages 284-304, June.
    2. Fabio G. Santeramo & A. Ford Ramsey, 2017. "Crop Insurance in the EU: Lessons and Caution from the US," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 16(3), pages 34-39, December.
    3. F. G. Santeramo & B. K. Goodwin & F. Adinolfi & F. Capitanio, 2016. "Farmer Participation, Entry and Exit Decisions in the Italian Crop Insurance Programme," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(3), pages 639-657, September.
    4. Ramsey, Austin Ford & Santeramo, Fabio Gaetano, 2017. "Crop Insurance in the European Union: Lessons and Caution from the United States," MPRA Paper 79164, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Miranda P.M. Meuwissen & Tsion Taye Assefa & Marcel A.P.M. Asseldonk, 2013. "Supporting Insurance in European Agriculture: Experience of Mutuals in the Netherlands," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 12(3), pages 10-16, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antonioli, Federico & Santeramo, Fabio Gaetano, 2022. "On Policy Interventions and Vertical Price Transmission: The Italian Milk Supply Chain Case," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 47(2), May.
    2. Popp, Thies R. & Feindt, Peter H. & Daedlow, Katrin, 2021. "Policy feedback and lock-in effects of new agricultural policy instruments: A qualitative comparative analysis of support for financial risk management tools in OECD countries," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    3. Kamel Louhichi & Daël Merisier, 2024. "Potential impacts of the Common Agricultural Policy's Income Stabilisation Tool on farmers' incomes and crop diversity: A French case study," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(2), pages 716-739, June.
    4. Fabio G., Santeramo & Ilaria, Russo & Emilia, Lamonaca, 2022. "Italian subsidised crop insurance: what the role of policy changes," MPRA Paper 115299, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Giampietri, Elisa & Yu, Xiaohua & Trestini, Samuele, 2020. "The role of trust and perceived barriers on farmer’s intention to adopt risk management tools," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 9(1), April.
    6. Tappi, Marco & Nardone, Gianluca & Santeramo, Fabio Gaetano, 2022. "On the relationships among durum wheat yields and weather conditions: evidence from Apulia region, Southern Italy," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 11(2), July.
    7. Ruggiero Rippo & Simone Cerroni, 2023. "Farmers' participation in the Income Stabilisation Tool: Evidence from the apple sector in Italy," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(1), pages 273-294, February.
    8. Kovačević, Vlado & Jeločnik, Marko, 2019. "Development of risk management instruments in the EU," Problems of Agricultural Economics / Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej 309063, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).
    9. Laurent Piet & M Benoit & V Chatellier & K. Hervé Dakpo & N Delame & Yann Desjeux & P Dupraz & M Gillot & Philippe Jeanneaux & C Laroche-Dupraz & A Ridier & E Samson & P Veysset & P Avril & C Beaudoui, 2020. "Hétérogénéité, déterminants et trajectoires du revenu des agriculteurs français," Working Papers hal-02877320, HAL.
    10. Ole Boysen & Kirsten Boysen-Urban & Alan Matthews, 2021. "Alternative EU CAP Tools for Stabilising Farm Incomes in the Era of Climate Change," Working Papers 202103, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
    11. Laurent Piet & Vincent Chatellier & Nathalie Delame & Yann Desjeux & Philippe Jeanneaux & Catherine Laroche-Dupraz & Aude Ridier & Patrick Veysset, 2021. "Hétérogénéité, déterminants et soutien du revenu des agriculteurs français," Post-Print hal-03405184, HAL.
    12. Simone Severini & Giuliano Di Tommaso & Robert Finger, 2019. "Effects of the Income Stabilization Tool on farm income level, variability and concentration in Italian agriculture," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 7(1), pages 1-22, December.
    13. Marco Rogna & Günter Schamel & Alex Weissensteiner, 2023. "Modelling the switch from hail insurance to antihail nets," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 67(1), pages 118-136, January.
    14. Kovačević, Vlado & Jeločnik, Marko, 2019. "Development of risk management instruments in the EU," Rural Areas and Development, European Rural Development Network (ERDN), vol. 16.
    15. Santeramo, Fabio Gaetano & Maccarone, Irene, 2022. "Analisi storica delle rese agricole e la variabilità del clima: Analisi dei dati italiani sui cereali [Historical crop yields and climate variability: analysis of Italian cereal data]," MPRA Paper 114135, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 04 Aug 2022.
    16. Ole Boysen & Kirsten Boysen‐Urban & Alan Matthews, 2023. "Stabilizing European Union farm incomes in the era of climate change," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(3), pages 1634-1658, September.
    17. Kamel Louhichi & Daël Merisier, 2023. "Potential impacts of the Income Stabilisation Tool on farmers' income and crop diversity: a French case study [Impacts potentiels de l'outil de stabilisation des revenus sur les revenus des agricul," Post-Print hal-04195630, HAL.
    18. Luigi Biagini & Simone Severini, 2021. "The role of Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) in enhancing and stabilising farm income: an analysis of income transfer efficiency and the Income Stabilisation Tool," Papers 2104.14188, arXiv.org.
    19. Simone Severini & Cinzia Zinnanti & Valeria Borsellino & Emanuele Schimmenti, 2021. "EU income stabilization tool: potential impacts, financial sustainability and farmer’s risk aversion," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 9(1), pages 1-21, December.
    20. Bertolozzi-Caredio, Daniele & Bardají, Isabel & Garrido, Alberto & Berry, Robert & Bijttebier, Jo & Gavrilescu, Camelia & Harizanova, Hristina & Jendrzejewski, Błażej & Meuwissen, Miranda M.P. & Ollen, 2021. "Stakeholder perspectives to improve risk management in European farming systems," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 84, pages 147-161.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruggiero Rippo & Simone Cerroni, 2023. "Farmers' participation in the Income Stabilisation Tool: Evidence from the apple sector in Italy," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(1), pages 273-294, February.
    2. Tappi, Marco & Nardone, Gianluca & Santeramo, Fabio Gaetano, 2022. "On the relationships among durum wheat yields and weather conditions: evidence from Apulia region, Southern Italy," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 11(2), July.
    3. Tappi, Marco & Carucci, Federica & Gatta, Giuseppe & Giuliani, Marcella Michela & Lamonaca, Emilia & Santeramo, Fabio Gaetano, 2023. "Temporal and design approaches and yield-weather relationships," MPRA Paper 117488, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Marco Rogna & Günter Schamel & Alex Weissensteiner, 2023. "Modelling the switch from hail insurance to antihail nets," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 67(1), pages 118-136, January.
    5. Fabio G., Santeramo & Ilaria, Russo & Emilia, Lamonaca, 2022. "Italian subsidised crop insurance: what the role of policy changes," MPRA Paper 115299, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Fabio G Santeramo, 2019. "I Learn, You Learn, We Gain Experience in Crop Insurance Markets," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(2), pages 284-304, June.
    7. Giampietri, Elisa & Yu, Xiaohua & Trestini, Samuele, 2020. "The role of trust and perceived barriers on farmer’s intention to adopt risk management tools," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 9(1), April.
    8. Möhring, Niklas & Dalhaus, Tobias & Enjolras, Geoffroy & Finger, Robert, 2020. "Crop insurance and pesticide use in European agriculture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    9. Giuseppe Timpanaro & Gaetano Chinnici & Roberta Selvaggi & Giulio Cascone & Vera Teresa Foti & Alessandro Scuderi, 2023. "Farmer?s adoption of agricultural insurance for Mediterranean crops as an innovative behavior," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 25(2), pages 155-188.
    10. Jean Cordier, 2017. "Critical issues for the implementation of a mutual fund compensating for production loss under Article 38 of Reg. (EU) No. 1305/2013," Post-Print hal-02786417, HAL.
    11. Alessandro Banterle & Daniela Vandone, 2019. "Price volatility and risk management: The case of rice in the EU," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 21(2), pages 255-274.
    12. Fabio Gaetano Santeramo, 2018. "Imperfect information and participation in insurance markets: evidence from Italy," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 78(2), pages 183-194, February.
    13. Rippo, Ruggiero & Cerroni, Simone, 2021. "Farmers’ Participation in the Income Stabilization Tool: Evidence from the Apple Sector in Italy," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315191, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Vilenchuk, Oleksandr, 2018. "Трирівневий Аналіз Функціонування Ринку Аграрного Страхування В Україні," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 4(2), June.
    15. Bertolozzi-Caredio, Daniele & Bardají, Isabel & Garrido, Alberto & Berry, Robert & Bijttebier, Jo & Gavrilescu, Camelia & Harizanova, Hristina & Jendrzejewski, Błażej & Meuwissen, Miranda M.P. & Ollen, 2021. "Stakeholder perspectives to improve risk management in European farming systems," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 84, pages 147-161.
    16. Coletta, Attilio & Giampietri, Elisa & Santeramo, Fabio Gaetano & Severini, Simone & Trestini, Samuele, 2018. "A preliminary test on risk and ambiguity attitudes, and time preferences in decisions under uncertainty: towards a better explanation of participation in crop insurance schemes," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 7(3), December.
    17. Jørgensen, Sisse Liv & Termansen, Mette & Pascual, Unai, 2020. "Natural insurance as condition for market insurance: Climate change adaptation in agriculture," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    18. Richard KOENIG & Marielle BRUNETTE, 2023. "Subjective barriers and determinants to crop insurance adoption," Working Papers of BETA 2023-25, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    19. Geoffroy Enjolras & Magali Aubert, 2018. "Does crop insurance lead to better environmental practices? Evidence from French farms," Post-Print hal-02048349, HAL.
    20. Simone Severini & Cinzia Zinnanti & Valeria Borsellino & Emanuele Schimmenti, 2021. "EU income stabilization tool: potential impacts, financial sustainability and farmer’s risk aversion," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 9(1), pages 1-21, December.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:19:y:2020:i:1:p:53-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.