[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/305556.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The value added chain in the mechanism of public-private partnership for the development of the land use economy of rural territories

Author

Listed:
  • Tretiak, Anton
  • Tretiak, Valentina
  • Sakal, Oksana
  • Kovalenko, Andrii
  • Tretiak, Nataliia
  • Shtogryn, Halyna
Abstract
Purpose. The aims of this paper are (i) to explore public-private partnerships as a tool for economic development of rural economies in developing countries and countries with economies in transition in order to ensure sustainable use of nature and increase public welfare of rural communities through the added value chain; (ii) to develop proposals for the implementation of public-private partnerships on land management and land use in Ukraine. Methodology / approach. The methodological approach involves study of the world’s PPP practice in land management and land use (including the use of land in forestry), study of the connections between PPP projects and scientific approaches to the concept of sustainable development and the added value chain, as well as analysis of domestic scientific bibliography, which relate to the subject of this study. Results. The authors found that the declared priorities of the Agenda for Sustainable Development until 2030 require the application of integrated approaches. In particular, the programme in the mechanism of sustainable development management in the form of PPP to ensure sustainable use of nature and increase the social welfare of rural communities. Because the programme approach here involves investing in natural resources and environmental protection and should cover the entire value chain, which directly or indirectly affects the efficiency of natural rural assets, as well as the use and application of innovative technologies. Originality / scientific novelty. It is substantiated that progress in achieving the declared priorities, in particular in the field of environmental protection, growth of public rural welfare, etc. is possible only in a combination of strengths of all PPP partners, which will eliminate the shortcomings and weaknesses of rural communities. In contrast to existing approaches to the development of the land use economy of rural territories, the basis of the synergy of the parties to PPP is a special natural resource – land, which performs environmental, economic, legal and socio-cultural functions, and determines the form and content, which actually builds sustainable development, including rural. A wide range of PPP forms has been further developed, varying in the degree of involvement and risk taken by the private party in relation to the development of the land use economy of rural territories. The approach to the value chains organization in the development of PPP projects on land management and land use and providing security of land use in terms of taking into account the land use of farmers, formed on different rights, has been improved. The author’s project PPP in the production of pellets a private investor in lumber logging waste provided by some state-owned enterprise both subject to the extension of the moratorium and without its effect is developed. Practical value / implications. The authors’ research shows that the introduction of the value chain in the mechanism of public-private partnership will lead to significant effective changes in the development of the land use economy, in particular of rural territories. Namely, with the use of appropriate policies it will ensure the provision of sustainable use of natural resources and growth of public welfare, in particular rural communities. This approach allows to involve all stakeholders (government, community, business) for effective management of natural assets in general and agriculture in particular and will increase their level of capitalization and investment attractiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Tretiak, Anton & Tretiak, Valentina & Sakal, Oksana & Kovalenko, Andrii & Tretiak, Nataliia & Shtogryn, Halyna, 2020. "The value added chain in the mechanism of public-private partnership for the development of the land use economy of rural territories," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 6(3), September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:305556
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.305556
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/305556/files/7_Tretiak_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.305556?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maksim Levochkin, 2016. "Problems Of Public-Private Partnership In Ukraine And Ways Of Solving Them," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 2(2).
    2. Hamulczuk, Mariusz & Makarchuk, Oksana & Sica, Edgardo, 2019. "Searching for market integration: Evidence from Ukrainian and European Union rapeseed markets," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    3. Oleksandr Bondar, 2018. "Public Administration In The Field Of Land Use And Protection And State Land Policy In Ukraine: Problems Of Correlation," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 4(3).
    4. Malek, Žiga & Tieskens, Koen F. & Verburg, Peter H., 2019. "Explaining the global spatial distribution of organic crop producers," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    5. Rogito, Jeremiah Magoma & Makhanu, Everlyne & Mombinya, Beatrice Kerubo & Nyamota, Geoffrey, 2020. "Relationship between access to financial services and youth involvement in agricultural value chains in Kakamega county, Kenya," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 6(2), June.
    6. Andriy Popov, 2015. "The Formation Of Institutional Environment Of Agricultural Land Consolidation In Ukraine," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 1(2).
    7. Delmon,Jeffrey John, 2010. "Understanding options for public-private partnerships in infrastructure : sorting out the forest from the trees : BOT, DBFO, DCMF, concession, lease . . ," Policy Research Working Paper Series 5173, The World Bank.
    8. Hermans, Frans & Geerling-Eiff, Floor & Potters, Jorieke & Klerkx, Laurens, 2019. "Public-private partnerships as systemic agricultural innovation policy instruments – Assessing their contribution to innovation system function dynamics," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 88, pages 76-95.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yoshihiko Okabe & Orest Furdychko & Oksana Drebot & Nina Palianychko & Stepan Dankevych, 2021. "On the way Towards a Balanced Forestry Land Use: The Economy of State Forestry Enterprises in Small Polissia of Ukraine in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 4, pages 115-128, December.
    2. Furdychko, Orest & Drebot, Oksana & Palianychko, Nina & Dankevych, Stepan & Okabe, Yoshihiko, 2021. "On the way to balance of forestry land use of Ukraine: ecological-and-economic aspect," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 7(4), December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maryono, Maryono & Killoes, Aditya Marendra & Adhikari, Rajendra & Abdul Aziz, Ammar, 2024. "Agriculture development through multi-stakeholder partnerships in developing countries: A systematic literature review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    2. Torres-Avila, Angelica & Aguilar-Ávila, Jorge & Santoyo-Cortés, Vinicio Horacio & Martínez-González, Enrique Genaro & Aguilar-Gallegos, Norman, 2022. "Innovation in the pineapple value chain in Mexico: Explaining the global adoption process of the MD-2 hybrid," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    3. Yehia Zahran & Hazem S. Kassem & Shimaa M. Naba & Bader Alhafi Alotaibi, 2020. "Shifting from Fragmentation to Integration: A Proposed Framework for Strengthening Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation System in Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-25, June.
    4. Asha Ally Hatibu & Essegbemon Akpo & Gerald Alex Lukurugu & Joseph Nzunda & Patrick Okori & Chris O. Ojiewo, 2022. "Upscaling Groundnut Seed Production and Delivery through Long-Term Public–Private and Development Organization Partnerships: Experiences from Tanzania," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Ivan A. Kapitonov, 2020. "Transformation of social environment in the application of alternative energy sources," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(8), pages 7683-7700, December.
    6. Shijin Zhang & Weiwei Zhang & Jie Xu & Yichi Zhang, 2023. "Does the Differentiation of China’s Land Policy Promote Regional Economic Development?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, May.
    7. Hua Zhang & Ying Li & Hanxiaoxue Sun & Xiaohui Wang, 2023. "How Can Digital Financial Inclusion Promote High-Quality Agricultural Development? The Multiple-Mediation Model Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-19, February.
    8. Uçak Harun & Çelik Saliha & Kurt Hakan, 2023. "Land Resources and Agricultural Exports Nexus," Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, Sciendo, vol. 23(1), pages 284-300, June.
    9. Ayesha Siddiqui & Mohd Shamim & Mohammad Asif & Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh Al-Faryan, 2022. "Are Stock Markets among BRICS Members Integrated? A Regime Shift-Based Co-Integration Analysis," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-25, April.
    10. Ayrapetyan, David & Befort, Nicolas & Hermans, Frans, 2025. "From local markets to global legitimacy: A materialization perspective on technological innovation system's dynamics," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 54(1).
    11. Andrea Arzeni & Francesca Giarè & Mara Lai & Maria Valentina Lasorella & Rossella Ugati & Anna Vagnozzi, 2023. "Interactive Approach for Innovation: The Experience of the Italian EIP AGRI Operational Groups," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, September.
    12. Luca Cattivelli & Federico Antonioli, 2023. "When cointegration is interrupted: Price transmission analysis in the Italian dairy‐feed industry," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(3), pages 744-761, July.
    13. Ostashko, Tamara & Kobuta, Iryna & Olefir, Volodymyr & Lienivova, Hanna, 2022. "Evaluation of the results and analysis of the impact of the DCFTA with the EU on agricultural trade in Ukraine," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 8(4), December.
    14. Ramírez-Gómez, Carlos Julián & Rodríguez-Espinosa, Holmes, 2022. "Local public-private partnerships to promote innovation in agricultural value chains: the case of cocoa in Colombia," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 60(4), January.
    15. Rajeev Ravindran & Sybrandus Koopmans & Johan P. M. Sanders & Helena McMahon & James Gaffey, 2021. "Production of Green Biorefinery Protein Concentrate Derived from Perennial Ryegrass as an Alternative Feed for Pigs," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-14, September.
    16. Georgios Kountios & Spyridon Kanakaris & Christina Moulogianni & Thomas Bournaris, 2024. "Strengthening AKIS for Sustainable Agricultural Features: Insights and Innovations from the European Union: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-27, August.
    17. Aneta Bełdycka-Bórawska & Piotr Bórawski & Lisa Holden & Tomasz Rokicki & Bogdan Klepacki, 2022. "Factors Shaping Performance of Polish Biodiesel Producers Participating in the Farm Accountancy Data Network in the Context of the Common Agricultural Policy of the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-25, October.
    18. Aleksandra Nowakowska & Magdalena Michalak & Ihor Lishchynskyy & Mariia Lyzun, 2022. "Ukrainian Regional Policy: The Path to European Integration," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 4, pages 1-16.
    19. Santeramo, Fabio Gaetano & Di Gioia, Leonardo & Lamonaca, Emilia, 2021. "Price responsiveness of supply and acreage in the EU vegetable oil markets: Policy implications," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    20. Gordon Dugle & Stephen Debar Kpinpuo & Benjamin Baisie Ghartey, 2021. "From paper to practice: an exploratory study of policy making and implementation in alternative forms of healthcare public‐private partnership in Ghana," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 866-884, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Land Economics/Use;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:305556. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.