[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v70y2017i22p25-29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Zur politischen Ökonomie von Sezessionen

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Braml
  • Gabriel Felbermayr
Abstract
Die Europäische Union sieht sich zunehmend nationalen Sezessionsbestrebungen gegenüber, denen sie durch die sogenannte Prodi-Doktrin entgegentritt. Sie besagt, dass ein Austritt einer Region auch zwangsläufig zu einem Austritt aus der EU führen muss. Der Artikel zeigt, dass aus polit-ökonomischen und spieltheoretischen Gründen Sezessionen nicht per se abzulehnen sind; dies gilt besonders dann, wenn sich die optimale Staatsgröße aus unten näher beschriebenen Gründen ändert. Für EU- Mitgliedsländer zeigt sich, dass große Staaten nicht mehr oder weniger erfolgreich sind als kleine. Außerdem wird die Maxime der Unverrückbarkeit von Grenzen in Europa anhand historischer Beispiele infrage gestellt.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Braml & Gabriel Felbermayr, 2017. "Zur politischen Ökonomie von Sezessionen," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 70(22), pages 25-29, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:70:y:2017:i:22:p:25-29
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/sd-2017-22-braml-felbermayr-sezessionen-2017-11-23.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jonathan Old & Felix Rösel, 2018. "Sparprojekt oder Milchmädchenrechnung? Die finanziellen Effekte eines Bundeslandes„Mitteldeutschland“," ifo Dresden berichtet, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 25(02), pages 12-17, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:70:y:2017:i:22:p:25-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.