8000 Add Flf::RecognizerNodeV2 by SimBe195 · Pull Request #106 · rwth-i6/rasr · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Add Flf::RecognizerNodeV2 #106

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 61 commits into from
Apr 4, 2025
Merged

Add Flf::RecognizerNodeV2 #106

merged 61 commits into from
Apr 4, 2025

Conversation

SimBe195
Copy link
Collaborator
@SimBe195 SimBe195 commented Mar 5, 2025

Adds a new Flf node RecognizerNodeV2. This is a node that performs segment-wise recognition using a SearchAlgorithmV2. It is much more minimalistic than the original RecognizerNode and doesn't provide any additional functionality apart from running recognition and converting the result into an Flf lattice.

Depends on #101.

Simon Berger and others added 30 commits February 19, 2025 19:10
Implement simple lexiconfree time-sync beam search
1e7035e
Add some comments
bf0a8ce
Add createSearchAlgorithm to Search::Module
d6689b4
Fix compilation
664945c
Refactor traceback/lattice building and construct proper (nonlinear) …
488fb0e 
…lattice from beam
Factor out time statistics into new Core::StopWatch class
1599302
Don't copy sibling from predecessor
9a60916
Better handling of blank index
8e96423
Apply suggestions from code review
536ac82
Implement StopWatch class
f21935e
Use TIMER_START and TIMER_STOP macros instead
5f82460
Simplify AdvancedTreeSearch PerformanceCounter by inheriting from Sto…
4779dd5 
…pWatch
Small fixes in StopWatch class
f5a3182
Make StopWatch a member of PerformanceCounter instead of inheriting
97e5bd7
Implement LatticeTrace class
b77cf23
Make predecessor and sibling public members
5fcfff7
Look for initial trace instead of associating empty trace with initia…
3152300 
…l state
Remove redundant includes
0b676f9
Add assertions for assumptions in lattice building
159fbd8
@SimBe195
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/lattice_traces' into lexiconfree…
f2f4cf7 
…_beam_search
@SimBe195
Remove wrong assertion
0577e79
@SimBe195
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/lattice_traces' into lexiconfree…
04b6ac4 
…_beam_search
@SimBe195
Remove initial item in performTraceback
b454e39
@SimBe195
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/lattice_traces' into lexiconfree…
b3d5f02 
…_beam_search
@SimBe195
Fix arc scores
d393c7e
@SimBe195
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/lattice_traces' into lexiconfree…
b1ed20e 
…_beam_search
@SimBe195
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/stopwatch' into lexiconfree_beam…
f112113 
…_search
@SimBe195
Update traceback/lattice building logic
d67cf45
@SimBe195
Make elapsed functions const
54535e6
@SimBe195
Merge branch 'stopwatch' into lexiconfree_beam_search
f0832f8
@SimBe195 SimBe195 mentioned this pull request Mar 27, 2025
Merged
Base automatically changed from lexiconfree_beam_search to master April 4, 2025 10:49
curufinwe
curufinwe requested changes Apr 4, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor
@curufinwe curufinwe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only minor stuff. Did not check lattice building code as I assume you copied that with only small modifications from AdvancedTreeSearch, correct?

@curufinwe curufinwe merged commit 9db7971 into master Apr 4, 2025
1 check passed
@curufinwe curufinwe deleted the flf_recognizer_v2 branch April 4, 2025 13:50
@larissakl larissakl mentioned this pull request Jun 9, 2025
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@larissakl larissakl larissakl approved these changes

@curufinwe curufinwe curufinwe approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@SimBe195 @curufinwe @larissakl
0