-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24.4k
Fix BytesWarning in torch.load() #74813
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Hi @aphedges! Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community. Action RequiredIn order to merge any pull request (code, docs, etc.), we require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have one on file for you. ProcessIn order for us to review and merge your suggested changes, please sign at https://code.facebook.com/cla. If you are contributing on behalf of someone else (eg your employer), the individual CLA may not be sufficient and your employer may need to sign the corporate CLA. Once the CLA is signed, our tooling will perform checks and validations. Afterwards, the pull request will be tagged with If you have received this in error or have any questions, please contact us at cla@fb.com. Thanks! |
🔗 Helpful links
✅ No Failures (0 Pending)As of commit 81f501a (more details on the Dr. CI page): Expand to see more💚 💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚 💚 This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group. |
Thank you for signing our Contributor License Agreement. We can now accept your code for this (and any) Meta Open Source project. Thanks! |
Pinging @malfet again. I would really appreciate a review. |
@kit1980, thank you very much! |
@pytorchbot rebase |
@pytorchbot successfully started a rebase job. Check the current status here |
Successfully rebased |
f1186a7
to
5750815
Compare
@aphedges I see now at least one test is failing, can you also update this?
|
@kit1980, I'm not surprised that a failure happened, given that it's been so long. I'll push a fix within the next couple of days. |
This failure was caused by 2d4291f, but it's unclear why the change was made in the first place because it was a failure on the commit author's machine, not in CI. I asked for clarification at #77531 (comment), but I have no clue if I'll get a response. In the meantime, I'll push my fix and see if tests now pass. |
5750815
to
81f501a
Compare
Let's land this. |
@pytorchbot merge |
@pytorchbot successfully started a merge job. Check the current status here |
Hey @aphedges. |
@kit1980, thank you very much! |
@aphedges Sorry, but your change broke our slow tests that run on trunk only. :( When you reland this, please ensure the slow tests are run and pass by adding the ciflow/trunk label to your pull request. @pytorchbot revert -m "Broke slow tests in cuda 10.2 https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/6944238177?check_suite_focus=true" -c nosignal |
@pytorchbot successfully started a revert job. Check the current status here |
Reverting PR 74813 failed due to Comment @aphedges Sorry, but your change broke our slow tests that run on trunk only. :( When you reland this, please ensure the slow tests are run and pass by adding the ciflow/trunk label to your pull request. |
@pytorchbot revert -m "Broke slow tests in cuda 10.2 https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/6944238177?check_suite_focus=true" -c nosignal |
@pytorchbot successfully started a revert job. Check the current status here |
This reverts commit 6c2e811. Reverted #74813 on behalf of https://github.com/janeyx99 due to Broke slow tests in cuda 10.2 https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/6944238177?check_suite_focus=true
Fixes pytorch#74812. I have enabled the `-bb` option when tests are run to prevent regressions. I don't think it will make CI run more slowly, but I'm not entirely sure. Pull Request resolved: pytorch#74813 Approved by: https://github.com/kit1980
This reverts commit 6c2e811. Reverted pytorch#74813 on behalf of https://github.com/janeyx99 due to Broke slow tests in cuda 10.2 https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/6944238177?check_suite_focus=true
Fixes #74812.
I have enabled the
-bb
option when tests are run to prevent regressions. I don't think it will make CI run more slowly, but I'm not entirely sure.