8000 UI: Make single method views consistent, add max width by hellobontempo · Pull Request #30660 · hashicorp/vault · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

UI: Make single method views consistent, add max width #30660

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
May 19, 2025

Conversation

hellobontempo
Copy link
Contributor
@hellobontempo hellobontempo commented May 16, 2025

Description

After the design walkthrough, we decided to simplify the form and show the same single method view direct links and visible mounts. Follow on to #30521 and #30580.

The original login form did not have a set max-width so on larger screens it would stretch. Per design, the new login form expands no larger than 600px

This PR also converts the page component to typescript (prep for custom login feature)

before

Method renders in bold text
Screenshot 2025-05-16 at 2 56 52 PM

after

Method type renders as single tab
Screenshot 2025-05-16 at 2 57 37 PM

before/after max-width

Screenshot 2025-05-16 at 3 08 41 PM

max is 999.99
Screenshot 2025-05-16 at 3 10 47 PM

TODO only if you're a HashiCorp employee

  • Backport Labels: If this fix needs to be backported, use the appropriate backport/ label that matches the desired release branch. Note that in the CE repo, the latest release branch will look like backport/x.x.x, but older release branches will be backport/ent/x.x.x+ent.
    • LTS: If this fixes a critical security vulnerability or severity 1 bug, it will also need to be backported to the current LTS versions of Vault. To ensure this, use all available enterprise labels.
  • ENT Breakage: If this PR either 1) removes a public function OR 2) changes the signature
    of a public function, even if that change is in a CE file, double check that
    applying the patch for this PR to the ENT repo and running tests doesn't
    break any tests. Sometimes ENT only tests rely on public functions in CE
    files.
  • Jira: If this change has an associated Jira, it's referenced either
    in the PR description, commit message, or branch name.
  • RFC: If this change has an associated RFC, please link it in the description.
  • ENT PR: If this change has an associated ENT PR, please link it in the
    description. Also, make sure the changelog is in this PR, not in your ENT PR.

@hellobontempo hellobontempo added this to the 1.20.0-rc milestone May 16, 2025
@hellobontempo hellobontempo requested a review from a team as a code owner May 16, 2025 19:59
@github-actions github-actions bot added the hashicorp-contributed-pr If the PR is HashiCorp (i.e. not-community) contributed label May 16, 2025
@hellobontempo hellobontempo changed the title UI: Make single method views consistent UI: Make single method views consistent, add max width May 16, 2025
Copy link

Build Results:
All builds succeeded! ✅

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No need for this component now that the view is the same as the tabs 🙃

Copy link
github-actions bot commented May 16, 2025

CI Results:
All Go tests succeeded! ✅

@hellobontempo
Copy link
Contributor Author
Screenshot 2025-05-16 at 3 19 22 PM

beagins
beagins previously approved these changes May 17, 2025
@hellobontempo hellobontempo merged commit 6964c09 into main May 19, 2025
32 of 33 checks passed
@hellobontempo hellobontempo deleted the VAULT-36227/form-updates-per-design branch May 19, 2025 13:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hashicorp-contributed-pr If the PR is HashiCorp (i.e. not-community) cont 4BB8 ributed pr/no-changelog ui
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants
0