-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.8k
remove experimental guard for buildkit #37686
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Andrew Hsu <andrewhsu@docker.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
twiddle-dee-twiddle-dom
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
experimentalProvider
could be removed in a followup.
But since buildkit relies on /session
endpoint, that would also need to graduate out of experimental (remove router.Experimental in api/router/session)
Signed-off-by: Andrew Hsu <andrewhsu@docker.com>
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #37686 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage ? 36.04%
=========================================
Files ? 609
Lines ? 45041
Branches ? 0
=========================================
Hits ? 16235
Misses ? 26575
Partials ? 2231 |
@tiborvass I think Andrew has updated the PR. Can we get this one in first to avoid conflicts? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Looks like I forgot to follow-up on this one to update the docs; so, with some delay: #40028 |
- What I did
Allow buildkit builds to run without experimental mode enabled. Buildkit can now be twiddled with a specific flag #37593
- How I did it
- How to verify it
- Description for the changelog
- A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)
🐈