Camptown

Did you know? was updated. On 26 August, 2007, a fact from the article Climate of North Dakota, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--DarkFalls ^talk 02:07, 26 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

On 26 August, 2007, Did you know? was updated with facts from the articles Den (Battle Angel Alita), and Strand School, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 13:54, 26 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Did you know? was updated. On August 27, 2007, a fact from the article signatories of the Act of Independence of Lithuania, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:29, 27 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Hey, thanks for successfully nominating Den for a DYK; after finishing it up I was thinking, nah, this doesn't qualify for DYK at all. BTW, the hook should have said "Battle Angel Alita manga", but what's done is done. Cheers, BrokenSphere^{Msg me} 05:48, 27 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

On 27 August, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Hula Girls, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 16:45, 27 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Did you know? was updated. On 27 August, 2007, a fact from the article Warren A. Cowdery, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Andrew c ^[talk] 23:20, 27 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Alice Timander, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Alice Timander satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alice Timander and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Alice Timander during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Crassic (^T+^C) 23:34, 27 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Don't take any offense to my AfD. I personally did not see any relevance of the article at the time. After reading sources, I have somewhat changed my opinion. Either way, Happy Editing. Crassic (^TALK!) 22:09, 30 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Did you know? was updated. On 28 August, 2007, a fact from the article Pas sur la bouche (2003 film), which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Peta 06:10, 28 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hello, thank you for information. I added some inline citations, hope it will be enough for such small article. Also, maybe you would like to think some new hook for DYK as proposed to some looks too simple. Cheers, M.K. 12:19, 28 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Did you know? was updated. On 28 August, 2007, a fact from the article Klaipėda Castle, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Andrew c ^[talk] 20:33, 28 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Did you know? was updated. On August 29, 2007, a fact from the article Grand Choral Synagogue of St. Petersburg, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

thanks again, Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:42, 29 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

On 30 August, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Duncan Spears Casper, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks for your nomination! Daniel 05:42, 30 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Thanks for suggesting Thomas J. Ryan (admiral)'s infobox pic, which got used. BrokenSphere^{Msg me} 00:16, 31 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

On 1 September, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Alice Timander, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks for your contributions! Daniel 02:49, 1 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Did you know? was updated. On 3 September, 2007, a fact from the article Shepton Mallet (HM Prison), which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Carabinieri 20:40, 3 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

On 5 September, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Coffee borer beetle, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Cheers, Daniel 09:21, 5 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Did you know? was updated. On 8 September, 2007, a fact from the article Martin Hoop, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

---- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 02:59, 8 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi, thanks for the nom, I hope it makes it onto the front page. Incidentally, I've always understood it to be 'British Somaliland', or 'the British Somaliland protectorate'. Did you have a particular reason for using '...the British Somaliland'? Or am I ok to change it? Benea 20:59, 8 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Not a problem, fingers crossed! --Benea 22:40, 8 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Did you know? was updated. On 9 September, 2007, a fact from the article HMS Ceres (D59), which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Allen3 ^talk 10:52, 9 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Alkivar just nominated El Hormiguero for deletion for not being notable, because he couldn't find English-language sources on it. Of course, all the votes on it are keep, so it may not be open much longer. I am alerting you as you are one of the major contributors to the article, so you can leave any additional comments or claims of notability in the AfD discussion. Zzxc 07:14, 10 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have tagged Image:Time-Magazine Ingmar Bergman.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. UIN revo 18:26, 14 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have tagged Image:Parlino-logo.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. UIN revo 18:35, 14 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have tagged Image:Seb logo.jpg‎ as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. UIN revo 18:37, 14 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

When adding infoboxes, it would be nice if you didn't delete the one already there, especially if it has more or more accurate information than the one you're adding.... Relata refero 12:55, 15 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Regarding image Michelangelo Antonioni..This image was originally uploaded from it.wikpedia. That person uploaded the image from flickr. On both flickr and it.wikpedia, the license attached to the image clearly states that it is non-commercial.... however, now that the image is on wikipedia, the attached license permits commercial use....is this a mistake. The reason for my concern.I would like to use this image in a book I'm writing, and I need to know if commercial use of this image is allowed Thanks, --Danwex 16:55, 15 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Licenses with NC (non-commercial use only) are not OK here. As the image is not OK, consider asking the author to release the work under a free license such as CC-BY (Creative Commons Attribution license) or CC-BY-SA (Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike). --Camptown 21:42, 15 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for looking into this matter. Since you were the person who originally uploaded this file from it.wikipedia, I think you are the best person to contact HumanBehavior at flickr about releasing this work under a free license. I am a newcomer to Wikipedia and wouldn't know how to go about it, whereas you are an experienced professional. Thanks again--Danwex 02:28, 16 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please do not insert false information in articles. According to WP:HOAX that may be considered a form of vandalism. // Liftarn

There is no such consensus about using the name "Nobel Prize in Economics" in all articles that include some statement about the Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel. All comments in Talk:Nobel Prize in Economics about this have ended in no consensus. Also, the policy that you are claiming that states that the common name should be used only applies to the title of an article, not to the content of an article. So please stop citing those as reasons for changing the name of the prize in all articles related to it. Furthermore, changing the name to the correct name of the prize, as Liftarn has been doing, is not vandalism.

I assume you're an economist or someone interested in economics and economists. IMHO, you're doing a huge disservice to the prestige of the prize by calling it a Nobel Prize.

Anyway, I've left a question for you in Template talk:Nobel Prize in Economics Laureates 2001-2025 and would appreciate a reply. –panda 16:03, 16 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

If you find the long official name more relevant, please consult the endless debate and votes at Talk:Nobel Prize in Economics. So far, a broad majority obviously finds the short form correct enough, but if you initiate another vote, you might get a different result. Furthermore, if you find the term "Nobel Prize in Economics" so offending and incorrect (or a "lye" and a hoax as user:Liftarn sometimes puts it), why don't you ask the Nobel Foundation in Stockholm to stop sponsoring the prize, which is the case as the foundation indeed issues the diploma, organizes the Nobel lectures, awards the medal, and hands over the prize cheque (from the Swedish Central Bank - a bank btw which has never been called "Bank of Sweden"). Of course the prize might be called the "Sveriges Riksbank's Prize in Economic Sciences", but again, the community does not, for a number of reasons, share that opinion. What user:Liftarn is doing is plain vandalism, as he/she on a continuous basis and rather violently pushes for the long form in violation to the consensual votes. As regards the use of long or short name, I understand that user:Liftarn has been warned and even blocked for similar violations in the past. --Camptown 21:26, 16 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

BTW. What a waste of time! Why do you demand a reply here as you two are currently involved in a campaing for the long name elsewhere? --Camptown 21:44, 16 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

I've left a comment for you in Template talk:Nobel Prize in Economics Laureates 2001-2025 and would appreciate a reply. –panda 15:55, 17 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

It is official - but isn't quite used anymore. --PaxEquilibrium 11:55, 17 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yes. The ruling coalition of Milo Djukanovic adopted it in 2004 on an irregular session of the parliament, in a partially illegal way. For years now, especially nowadays that the new Constitution is being drafted, experts and politicians are discussing whether or not it should be legalized. The main reason why article Montenegro uses it is that in 2006 it was internationally recognized (accepted to the UN) under that flag. --PaxEquilibrium 12:02, 17 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Did you know? was updated. On 17 October, 2007, a fact from the article The Four-Gated City, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Allen3 ^talk 15:18, 17 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Camptown. Please be aware that a request for comments has been filed concerning your conduct on Wikipedia. The RFC entry can be found by your name in this list, and the actual discussion can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Camptown, where you may want to participate.

-- Liftarn 09:44, 18 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

This cuts both ways. Please don't label edits over content disputes as "vandalism"; it's only going to lead to further aggravation. Chris Cunningham 12:20, 18 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sure, you're right, but the concerted action currently done by two editors are very close to vandalism. --Camptown 16:24, 18 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

And I'm sure that would make an interesting, Wikipedia-specific corollary to Clarke's Third Law ("any sufficiently advanced content dispute is indistinguishable from vandalism"), but nonetheless it's certainly not being contained by adding more fuel. Chris Cunningham 16:28, 18 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

The thing is that the issue is under continious review (and broad majority has repeatedly found the short form correct), but for some reason, these two editors (possibly the same person) are again forcefully and with bad faith trying to change the established short form of the Nobel Prize in Economics. --Camptown 16:34, 18 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

As I've said to Liftarn, the correct procedure therefore is to protect the page until consensus is reached through discussion. A protracted, long-past 3RR revert war will just get everyone blocked, which is hardly an optimal solution. Chris Cunningham 16:38, 18 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Did you know? was updated. On 19 October, 2007, a fact from the article OnSpot, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--PFHLai 09:46, 19 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Thanks for uploading Image:Skype30.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:25, 20 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

I didn't, it is still in the main body and I also copied it under future. Source is also still there but I put it into a template and also kept the older source as that had background information. - J Logan ^t: 16:27, 20 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, forgot to copy that over. Principle behind it though was that we really shouldn't start off by saying it is changing, more explain what it all does before go into a treaty what may not even come into force. Hence it being at the bottom of that section and also in future. - J Logan ^t: 18:06, 20 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please see Template talk:Nobel Prize in Economics#Proposed Template Name & Title. –panda 21:49, 20 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Did you know? was updated. On 21 October, 2007, a fact from the article John Reid (soldier), which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Carabinieri 15:20, 21 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi there -- I think you might have deleted this hook in error from the suggestions for the 18th? If there's a problem with it, please let me know. Regards, Espresso Addict 22:40, 22 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! I was getting paranoid that there was something major wrong with the article. Cheers, Espresso Addict 22:57, 22 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Did you know? was updated. On October 23, 2007, a fact from the article Albin of Brechin, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 (talk) 03:37, 23 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

I would really appreciate your input on the talkpage of a template I locked, Template talk:Nobel Prize in Economics‎#Proposed Template Name & Title. A compromise proposal seems promising, and I'd like to know whether you would be willing to abide with such consensus. Cool Hand Luke 18:50, 23 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

You have not read how the Swedish coat of arms looks. The modern arms does not have all the collars of the old. I am not sure why you do not believe me since it is clear from the images:

 

Look below the shield. Do you want me to draw arrows pointing to them?

Furthermore, why do you insist on reverting to the jpg image, when Image:Sweden greater coa1908.png is better?

Fred-J 19:57, 23 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Did you know? was updated. On 27 October, 2007, a fact from the article Louisiana Tigers, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 10:40, 27 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Did you know? was updated. On 27 October, 2007, a fact from the article United States gravity control propulsion initiative, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 21:15, 27 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

I seem to be edit-conflicting with you. I had picked two of yours already - the only extra one you had was Harry Anderson (artist) but the blurb is probably too long now anyway. I'll let you sort if out. -- !! ?? 10:44, 4 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Ekstrabladet-skurken.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 13:22, 5 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please see Talk:November 7 concerning the shooting at the Jokela school before adding to the article page. Thank you. Geoff Riley 23:41, 8 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Did you know? was updated. On 12 November, 2007, a fact from the article HMS Frobisher (D81), which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Zzyzx11 (Talk) 21:01, 12 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Did you know? was updated. On 13 November, 2007, a fact from the article Günter Wirths, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Rigadoun (talk) 23:46, 13 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Did you know? was updated. On 14 November, 2007, a fact from the article SS Atheltempler, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Zzyzx11 (Talk) 16:01, 14 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Did you know? was updated. On 22 November, 2007, a fact from the article Omar Bundy, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 14:13, 22 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I've nominated Sergei Storchak, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article at Template talk:Did you know#Articles created on November 17, where you can improve it if you see fit. — Komusou ^talk @ 15:22, 21 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for informing me about its WP:ITN, I've removed it from DYK then. Between its "20 November" actuality, and your string of DYK, I guess I shoulda smelled it ;-) Regards, — Komusou ^talk @ 19:06, 21 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I've just discovered that the vessel is actually named Explorer II, [1] could you sort out the page name please? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjroots (talk • contribs) 11:28, 23 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

I agree with your comment. BBC still reporting the wrong name at the moment Mjroots (talk) 13:50, 23 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Rush-Hudson-Limbaugh.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:46, 26 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Did you know? was updated. On 30 November, 2007, a fact from the article Lars-Eric Lindblad, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Cheers, Daniel 11:28, 30 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

You recently added a link to Beating Retreat to the See also section of ICA meat repackaging controversy‎. How is Beating Retreat relevant or related to this controversy? Aecis^Brievenbus 15:47, 9 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Thanks for uploading Image:South Georgia Merchantships stamps.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:40, 15 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Since you've shown interest or made some contributions to Vasa (ship), I'd like to notify you that it has been nominated as an FAC. Your insights and comments would be much appreciated there.

Peter ^Isotalo 14:11, 18 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Israel Presidential standard.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:41, 19 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Thanks for uploading Image:Time-Magazine Ingmar Bergman.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 14:47, 22 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Middlesex-va.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:48, 1 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Swe-licence pers.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:31, 15 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Have you participated in the discussion to be able with all asureances state that no compromise had not been reached. Why have you changed something that you are not even interested to discuss. What I can presume is that you are not doing this for the goodness of your heart but for other still unexplained reasons. I think that it is most probably the time (which has grown to a boiling point) and that Duje and others like him had drawn ranks and find ample associates for the project of destruction of the compromise that had been reached.

What facts do you speak of and where are the sources for them.

Imbris (talk) 20:46, 2 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

On 11 February, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Raymond Jacobs, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 12:23, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Akademiska-sjh.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:34, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

kun üstünlüğü ile evrensel insan hakları, demokrasi ve çoğulcu değerlerin geliştirilmesi gerektiğine inanmaktadır. Türkiye, Kosova ile komşuları arasında karşılıklı güven ve işbirliği ortamının yaratılmasının zaruret teşkil --Lemmey (talk) 18:16, 18 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your edit on the Serbia site lacks consistency. You added Kosovo as a neighbor, but did not remove Albania. I do not want to indulge in the ongoing lengthly discussion about the status of Kosovo. However, independent from this question, looking at the map it is clear that Serbia cannot have international borders with both territories at the same time. I hope you do not mind that I reedit that. Tomeasy (talk) 10:06, 19 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

I think we have to obey the decisions of the United Nations. I'll get Albania back in the neighboring countries.--Vitriden (talk) 17:05, 19 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Give me one reason it should be accepted. The least you can say is it's bordering Albania via the breakaway province of Kosovo, this way you are making a presumption about the final decision on the status of Kosovo. And, by the words of one Eric Cartman: "This is not over. Oh no, not by a long shot."

And I am not a nationalist. I am just very annoyed by the way this whole thing is being done.--Vitriden (talk) 08:18, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I am a bit puzzled. Is this still a reply to my statement? If so, let me clarify: I did not want to take any stance in this quarrel about the status of Kosovo. I just tried to explain that from any point of view Serbia cannot border Kosovo and Albania together. More explicitly: If you advocated the Kosovo national site, then bordering country would be Kosovo. If you are on the Serbian national site, then the neighboring country would be Albania. Listing both countries is geographically impossible. And about the controversy itself: Let's just wait for some time. Anything else is a waste of energy. Tomeasy (talk) 08:33, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

The second one was a re-reply to the Camptown's reply on my talkpage. A bit confusing, I know, but that's what Wikipedia is...--Vitriden (talk) 12:06, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

I did. The press release says it all.--Trigor (talk) 17:33, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

My full explanation of my edits: The first thing about Putin saying something is interesting and all, but it is hardly a noteworthy news event as is the US’s reaction to its embassy being attack. Both statements simply reiterate established opinions voiced many times before. As for Peru, it’s no big deal that another country recognized Kosovo’s independence. Sixteen other counties have already done so and just because it’s the first one from South America does not make it extraordinary. – Zntrip 23:23, 23 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

I cannot accept your very selective deletions of items you personally happen not to enjoy... --Camptown (talk) 23:34, 23 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

What makes you think this is personal? You really haven’t given me a reason as to why they should be included. – Zntrip 02:07, 24 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

First of all, you should be credited for your concern about this project. And - I can agree with you that the items are not the most thrilling, but they might very well be interesting and noteworthy enough from the perspective of the recent development. To me, the American warning of retaliation should the Serbs not take adecvate action to protect the U.S. embassy seems noteworthy enough, and it doesn't seem fair just to delete it right away, especially as the item as been further edited by other wp users whose competens I wouldn't question. However, I'll give you the last word and will not further revert your revisions regarding the items in question. --Camptown (talk) 09:43, 24 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

You need to watch some of your edit summaries and rv's yourself too, friend. I've blocked the other editor that you reported for 24 hours. Try and discuss with him from now on please. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. Scarian^{Call me Pat} 19:38, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

See Ijanderson977's talk page. If I'd closed the 3RR, I'd have blocked both of you. — Rlevse • Talk • 21:32, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

do not remove article tags, especially not when their presence is explained on talk, and especially not on Kosovo, which is an article under probation. See also here. If you continue to disrupt the Kosovo article, it will either be locked down, or (more likely) you may be banned from editing. dab (𒁳) 16:55, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Well, start consider your own desructive actions before blaming others. --Camptown (talk) 19:57, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Stifle (talk) 09:15, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ehh...? Edit war?!! When, where, what...? Can this be one of user:Dbachmann's boring "jokes"...? --Camptown (talk) 10:06, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

It was to do with this issue and has nothing to do with User:Dbachmann. Stifle (talk) 10:30, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

you are revert-warring all over the place. Stop restoring the RoK flag to the Kosovo stub templates. I will revert additions of both the Serbian and the RoK flag to these templates, per WP:NPOV. You are clearly violating Wikipedia core policy, and making it worse by pushing your violations by edit-warring. Wikipedia is not built for behaviour like this, and our only solution for people who insist regardless of warnings and admonitions is WP:BLOCK. dab (𒁳) 14:08, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

dab, your pre-rehearsed little threats are so ridiculous. And your POV-pushing doesn't seem to have any limits at all. --Camptown (talk) 14:18, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

yeah, I see you prefer communicating by template messages. I don't know what to say, you insist in blatant violation of NPOV, and call me "POV-pushing". Are you a politician or something? I am not interested in this sort of exchange. Just know that edit-warring will not yield the revision you desire, only compliance with policy ever will. dab (𒁳) 18:09, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

{{WP:DICK}} dab (𒁳) 19:33, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

There's no point putting back a warning when an editor removes it- you know they've seen it. See also Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars. Friday (talk) 19:43, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

The templates should certainly be used with caution, but they are more than legitimate in this case. --Camptown (talk) 20:04, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

You get in a content dispute, and instead of discussing the substance of the issue, you leave warning messages and edit war over them? I don't call that legitimate at all. Friday (talk) 20:08, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

You'd better address your concern about the lack of discussion of the substance of the issue to my opponent in this extremly silly disupute. --Camptown (talk) 20:48, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

"lack of discussion" indeed. If you stop plastering my talkpage with templates, and condescend to defend your edit on a talkpage (like, in a customized explanation relevant to the case, defending how your edits do not violate WP:NPOV), we will have a real dispute. Until you do so, this is no dispute, it is just nationalist trolling. --dab (𒁳) 13:14, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

It is one of the accusations (nationalist) that comes close to Godwins Law. --Tubesship (talk) 08:51, 27 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've recently been accused of being a "Serbian nationalist" as well as a "Albanian nationalist". ;D --Camptown (talk) 09:40, 27 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Per my decision at the AN3 noticeboard, you are now only allowed to make two reversions to an article within a 24 hour period before having to stop. I'm hoping to have you and the other editor in question stop pushing back in forth; instead, please use this time to develop consensus on issues you disagree on. Thanks, and please reply on my talk page so I can be sure you've received this. Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP!☺} 03:25, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ok, 2RR time over. Please try to keep out of edit wars, though. Cheers, Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP!☺} 16:21, 20 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I see you uploaded the maps from CIA world factbook to the commons . I did the same right now because I didn't you would , but however it seems that they were already there : [2] and [3] --Cradel 13:45, 25 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I think you may have got the wrong idea about the Main Page talk page. It's not somewhere for general announcements, it is like any other talk page- to discuss improvements to the corresponding non-talk page. J Milburn (talk) 13:29, 27 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello Mr. Camptown, contrary to a reached consensus there is a splitting going on instead a merging: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Kosovo#Split_completed And I would appreciate your assistance. Thank you! --Tubesship (talk) 04:59, 28 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

We have finally got a working NPOV intro done on the Kosovo article, if you have further suggestions please make them regarding the intro. I'd like to discuss the info boxes now and would appreciate your comments. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Beamathan (talk • contribs) 02:37, 1 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

When the Serbs fail on the battle fields, they take their struggle to Wikipeida. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 21:21, 3 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

I take no delight in this action, but your repeated violations of a fundamental rule on Wikipedia deserves administrative attention, not just in this case but also in others. I have reported you for 3RR violation. I hope you do not engage in edit warring again in the future before you participate in a discussion. It helps nobody. Herunar (talk) 17:18, 8 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Images with correct fair-use rationales and licenses are to be left alone, not to be replaced with images of poorer quality and incorrect fair-use rationales. Please keep that in mind next time. Only upload images which will contribute to the encyclopedia better, not just so you can have your name in the upload slot. [4] or [5]? --haha169 (talk) 03:46, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

"*Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Jiang Yu says that Dalai Lama is the head representative of a "serf system, which harbors no democracy, freedom and human rights in any form, [and which] is the darkest slavery system in human history". (China Daily)"

I removed this for three reasons: NPOV, Notability, and hersay. Its propaganda, and from China Daily. I would be extremely supprised if *any* other news agency would carry it, without citing the controversial nature. I will not revert, if you revert the deletion. Better to put it in the article on the Nepal conflict, and call it another mud sling. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.193.2.115 (talk) 16:35, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

I noticed that you are the only one that is archiving discussions at Talk:International reaction to the 2008 Kosovo declaration of independence. It's nice to see someone doing that menial work! :) But, the archives that you created are pretty small (under 75k) and this means that within a year, there will be an insane number of archives. I suggest making the archives bigger instead of breaking them up into chunks, meaning generally 100+ discussions per archive page. I've setup automatic archiving on the talk page, however, and so a bot will archive the page once a day automatically so that every archive page is at most 250k. I'm just giving you a heads up so you don't have to do that anymore. Cheers! Gary King (talk) 22:18, 16 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

On 23 April, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tricia Walsh-Smith, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Bedford 22:11, 23 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

An image that you uploaded, Image:Se-regskylt.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <Flrn^talk> 17:41, 19 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading Image:AlidaRossander2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:32, 14 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK 13:32, 14 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Thanks for uploading Image:Skype10.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:05, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Kozmo.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 05:34, 18 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Swedish Academy (disambiguation), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

unnecessary disamb page, since it only covers two articles that already link to each other, plus it should really be at Svenska Akademien (disambiguation) since that is the name of the band mentioned.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jiiimbooh (talk) 17:04, 19 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns with the referencing which you can see at Talk:Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:22, 6 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Features of Skype is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Features of Skype until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sandman888 (talk) 20:19, 7 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Peter-No-Tail in Americat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to meet WP:NFILMS. No significant coverage in reliable sources, nor are there any in the article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lugia2453 (talk) 18:51, 15 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

Thank you for uploading File:Knut Agathon Wallenberg.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:06, 3 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:51BirchSt.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:25, 27 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

Thank you for uploading File:Bettna-kyrka.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:19, 17 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Stockholm-Roslagens Järnvägar. Since you had some involvement with the Stockholm-Roslagens Järnvägar redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 16:56, 26 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Insignia-Sweden has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:25, 30 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Russian presidential election, 2008 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Steel1943 (talk) 00:43, 2 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

The file File:Kaw2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 4 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:FöreningsSparbanken (logo).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 15 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

The file File:Alexander-II-monument.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Superseded by c:File:Moscow, Alexander II Memorial.jpg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:26, 8 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Ingrid von Rosen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:INVALIDBIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 8 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

The file File:KPC Flag.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Low quality image that is not actually the flag of the KPC from what I can tell, so is irrelevant to the project

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CoconutOctopus talk 12:04, 15 November 2024 (UTC)Reply