User talk:Vinnylospo

I want to take.

Hello, Vinnylospo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun interactive editing tutorial that takes about an hour)
• Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Jim1138 (talk) 06:32, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adding references is how we ensure that content is valid. Without references, a reader can not easily validate information and there is no presumption of accuracy. See Help:Referencing for beginners and Help:footnotes. This is covered by the Wikipedia policy of wp:verifiability (WP:V). Please wp:cite your edits with wp:reliable sources (RS). Per WP:V unsourced content can be removed.

Regarding images, see wp:Images for tips, tricks, and tutorials.

The documentation for the wp:template and wp:infobox should be available on {{Infobox sports rivalry}} If you want to find examples, from that page, in the far-left column of the page click on Tools/What links here. You should see a list of articles where it is used. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 06:32, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You had closed the {{unbulleted list}}, with two curly braces: "}}", but had not closed the infobox itself. I closed it. Also, you have two parameters which are not in {{Infobox sports rivalry}}:

• | all-time = GB: leads 18-17
• | regular season = GB: leads 14-13

I wp:commented both out (with <!-- hidden comment -->. If you use wp:preview, you would see some template error messages. Show preview can be helpful in preventing mistakes being saved and minimize server overhead. i.e. less information stored on the server. You can see my edit here. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 06:44, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am not always available. You might get a faster response at the wp:teahouse. Jim1138 (talk) 06:44, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Are generally not copyrightable in the US. See [[wp::Logos#Copyright-free logos]] Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 06:55, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Donkey Kong (SSB) Amiibo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Nthep (talk) 23:50, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Mario (SSB) Amiibo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Nthep (talk) 23:51, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vinnylospo. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 15:36, 15 June 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Hello, Vinnylospo. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by PrimeHunter (talk) 09:56, 19 June 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Hi there,

Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! You may have seen notifications that I reverted some of your edits. This is because, while the subjects you added may or may not be associated with the alt-right, we need to explicitly make that connection in their articles (based on citations of reliable sources) before adding them to such a template. Even if it's obvious to everyone that the sorts of positions a person/magazine/whatnot takes are also positions of the alt-right, Wikipedia needs to base claims (especially claims that may be contentious) on reliable sources first. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 23:42, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vinnylospo. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 00:39, 28 June 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Hi Vinnylospo! You created a thread called How do I unbold text? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Delivered by Tigraan-testbot, an automated account. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Tigraan-testbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. This functionality is currently being tested. If you received this notification by error, please notify the bot's maintainer.

Hi, Vinnylospo. You are cordially invited to join WikiProject National Football League, a project dedicated to improving articles in relation to the National Football League. Please visit the project's talk page to see what areas/topics need help and to discuss any questions you may have. Thank you! WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 20:11, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2016 2nd All-Pro Team has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:48, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How did you find Morten Andersen's hall of fame ID. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 01:54, 7 August 2017 (UTC) I was typing numbers at random honestly. I don't even know any of the ID numbers[reply]

Thanks, we were having a discussion at here about it. Feel free to give your input. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 03:10, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Where did you see the map showing where Trump visited? No one answered your question and I don't know how this works, but if I knew where the map was, I might be able to come up with some answers.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:20, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I knew I had seen some information about Trump's visits. You received an answer here and unless you can do what was suggested, the map will not be changed.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:23, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 662#Trump trips has a more detailed response. I had not seen it earlier this week. This makes more sense than what you were talking about earlier, so I suppose the result you want could happen if there was consensus for your view.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:17, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sonic Forces. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. It is unhelpful to add POV commentary into a Wikipedia article. BruzerFox 23:50, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your addition of Clay Travis to the Template:Alt-right footer, as per ongoing discussions on the talk page, inclusion of people should only be done when they have extensive, intimately documented ties to the (loosely defined) alt-right, not merely "ties" or narrow interaction. WP:BLP issues also arise. --Animalparty! (talk) 22:08, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vinnylospo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited James Marsden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Production (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Bagumba. Your recent edit to the page Jeremy Lin‎‎ appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 09:56, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I wanted to explain why I reverted an edit you made to The Girl in the Spider's Web (film). The problem was that you didn't include a source for the addition of a production company to the infobox. Right now, we have a citation there to Variety Insight, Variety magazine's film database. Sometimes companies are listed on promotional material, such as posters or trailers, and it's not immediately obvious what role they may have had – financial investment, production, distribution, or maybe they're just a rights-holder. This is why we use citations to reliable sources to determine who the production companies are. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:35, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vinnylospo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Vinnylospo

Decline reason:

That's not an IP. SQL^{Query me!} 04:39, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Vinnylospo (talk) 01:13, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What is the message that appears when you attempt to edit? —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 04:48, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vinnylospo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Green Bay Packers Wordmark.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 18:53, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sonic the Hedgehog (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tim Miller (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kemba Walker, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. And it can't be done until after the July moratorium passes anyways. Thanks. —Bagumba (talk) 00:43, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. This is a message to inform you that a number of your edits concerning an actor's character in Sonic the Hedgehog (film) have been reverted for failing to heed a small detail - according to the film's official credits, the character's name is not denoted as you had put it down. There is already mention of this on the relevant article's Talk Page, stating this. Please be careful not to use official details on characters from a known franchise, if the media format they are being portrayed in does not use such details. GUtt01 (talk) 09:08, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sonic the Hedgehog (film), without heeding evidence regarding the subject of the article - not heeding this and adding in something that is not true can be construed as conducting either bad-faith edits, vandalism, or disruptive editing. GUtt01 (talk) 07:35, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Aaron Lynch (American football), you may be blocked from editing. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:29, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joe Klecko, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drew Pearson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

FDW777 (talk) 07:14, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Should you continue to amend the death toll at George Floyd protests without providing adequate references, as you have done at 04:39, 31 May 2020, 18:02, 2 June 2020, 04:01, 15 June 2020, 17:05, 17 June 2020, 02:36, 23 June 2020, 02:36, 23 June 2020, 19:51, 26 August 2020, and 23:57, 31 August 2020, I will be requesting discretionary sanctions to be applied. Please read WP:V, specifically the sections at WP:BURDEN and WP:CIRCULAR. Thank you. FDW777 (talk) 07:27, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Lacks any references or sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Vinnylospo/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Vinnylospo/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 02:40, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by IVORK was:

Still lacks any sources as pointed out by Dan arndt 21 days ago.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Vinnylospo/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Vinnylospo/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— IVORK _Talk 02:09, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please do not resubmit without addressing the issues raised. Doing so may lead to the draft being rejected (rather than declined for improvement) or even render it liable to deletion altogether.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Vinnylospo/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Vinnylospo/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 20:48, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Spitting Image 2020 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. ZimZalaBim ^talk 03:54, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I just wanted to notify you that you shouldn't link pages to drafts, such as Draft:Saturday Night Live parodies of Gerald Ford. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 15:38, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of NBA playoff series into List of WNBA playoff series. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 14:15, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Blair is mentioned once, in passing, in the Spitting Image article. Gordon Brown is not mentioned at all. So why do you think their templates should appear on the article? --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 15:12, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Please read through the WP:NAVBOX guidelines. Thanks. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 14:40, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Facu-el Millo. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Peter Parker (Marvel Cinematic Universe), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. El Millo (talk) 05:01, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mario Kart. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. A list of characters has been discussed on and off many times in the past several years. The current consensus is that the table falls under WP:GAMECRUFT. If you have a compelling reason to bring it back, please first bring it up on the article talk page. --ThomasO1989 (talk) 07:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Curbon7 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Curbon7 (talk) 07:37, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This is a clear fail of character notability standards, reception is cherry-picked from trivial mentions of the character. It would be better if there was more discussion about his role in the actual game he starred in than his cameo in another game.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lucas (Mother 3) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lucas (Mother 3), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 09:31, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Cowboys–Packers rivalry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is nothing here to suggest an actual rivalry between these two teams. The fact that they are both teams in the NFL, even in the same conference, means they are bound to play each other on a semi-regular basis, but a rivalry needs some true enmity between the two teams, and none has been demonstrated here.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UW Dawgs (talk) 17:49, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, History of organizational changes in the NBA, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 00:34, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:History of organizational changes in the NBA, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:History of organizational changes in the NBA and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:History of organizational changes in the NBA during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. – Sabbatino (talk) 11:42, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2021 US Capitol Storming has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mgasparin (talk) 07:08, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 All-Pro Team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punter.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 21:42, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 22:17, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Morshu, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morshu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I am not convinced this is a notable spinoff as the reception is largely based on listicles and trivial mentions, not substantive coverage. So far it seems like an article that would be better off in FANDOM.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Metal Sonic and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Metal Sonic, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 08:27, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Big Chungus, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sdrqaz (talk) 22:28, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Football League 2010s All-Decade Team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fullback.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Taylor Jenkins. – Sabbatino (talk) 19:57, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of WNBA playoff series is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of NBA playoff series until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

– Sabbatino (talk) 13:09, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chet Mutryn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AAFC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:55, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vinnylospo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pro Football Focus All-Pro Team, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:10, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vinnylospo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pro Football Focus All-Pro Team".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:59, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Otho Davis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elgin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Spitting Image (2020) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:23, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ralph Hay Pioneer Award, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ralph Hay Pioneer Award until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Mug Root Beer, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please don't include any inappropriate categories. Thank you. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 16:40, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is he on either of those templates? If so, put them back. If not, leave them off the article. Templates are to navigate articles connected by something in common (and linked on said template), not just for decoration. Rikster2 (talk) 16:03, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You don't seem to have been notified, but Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Basketball Association Martin Luther King Jr. Day games was started on the article you created. Regards.—Bagumba (talk) 09:38, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Riddler, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please don't include any inappropriate categories. Thank you. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 04:54, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Mako001. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Dwayne Haskins, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 15:07, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't add inappropriate categories. I see there is about "memes" isn't a valid reason.

I suggest you stop adding inappropriate categories or I'll take you with WP:ANI. Thank you. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 05:03, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vinnylospo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Matt (Mii character), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 22:11, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kray twins, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 03:26, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Vinnylospo! I don't like to edit others userpages, but I wanted to make sure you were aware of the picture that's on it... I figure maybe it's something you weren't aware of, since you're typically a competent editor who makes constructive contributions. SPF121188 ^{(talk this way) (contribs)} 15:39, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vinnylospo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Morshu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:25, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vinnylospo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of CBA playoff series, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vinnylospo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of CBA playoff series".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:59, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited San Francisco 49ers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Lynch.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this edit, per the Hall of Fame here, Dick Lebeau, Paul Brown, Bill Walsh, and Forrest Gregg are not credited as Bengals Hall of Famers. Gregg and LeBeau because they're inducted as players and were coaches of the Bengals, Joe Walsh because teams they were an assistant on do not get credit for head coaches inducted, and Paul Brown because he was inducted before he founded the Bengals. Please do not add them again.--Rockchalk717 07:03, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! My name is Jordan. Do you happen to be Vincent Lospinuso from American Football International? If not, then this might seem pretty random, but I can't help but notice the similar names and your recent edits on LFA articles. I love the website, by the way. It was much needed in the sport, and I'm sure your readers are happy to see how much it has grown internationally. JTtheOG (talk) 23:52, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

JTtheOG, unfortunately, this user doesn't typically respond to talk page messages (typically.) It would stand to reason, I would think, but we'll see if Vinnylospo responds to ya. Usually, they're a pretty competent editor, so hopefully they see the message from you. Cheers! SPF121188 ^{(talk this way) (my edits)} 14:30, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Licensors are not publishers. Do not add them in again. Luigitehplumber (talk) 02:52, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2001 Major League Baseball contraction plan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Texas Rangers.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:57, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vinnylospo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of GFL playoff games, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:06, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vinnylospo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of GFL playoff games".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:10, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:25, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:34, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vinnylospo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Ok, the reason why I did that was because there are so many other movies who never had a source for their production companies, so I was just thinking that whoever put that there simply forgot about adding them. I didn't mean any harm. I feel a week being banned is a lot, but I am truly sorry and I won't do it again.

Decline reason:

One open unblock request at a time, please. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:20, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Vinnylospo (talk) 01:57, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vinnylospo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello, NinjaRobotPirate, this is the second time I have been blocked by you for "adding unsourced content", the stuff that I added that wasn't sourced, was already listed at the bottom of these films' pages when it comes to categories. For example, for the movie XXX, that is a Columbia movie because the Columbia logo is on the poster and was at the very start of the film. I think blocking on those grounds, in which it is very innocent and understanding is a bit too overboard and I was only going based on what was on the poster for the film as well as what is in the film as it is. I was wondering if you can please unblock me, I have been editing Wikipedia both with and without an account for over 15 years and it is one of my favorite hobbies. If you and I can come to an understanding, I would greatly appreciate it as I request to not be blocked for this anymore. Thank you again, please understand.

Decline reason:

Note that in the article Revolution Studios is sourced- you need a source for Columbia too. Logos can be used for a number of reasons and don't necesarily indicate that they were involved in the production of a film. 331dot (talk) 09:29, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vinnylospo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Ok 331dot, the reason why I did that was because there are so many other movies who never had a source for their production companies, so I was just thinking that whoever put that there simply forgot about adding them. I didn't mean any harm. I feel a week being banned is a lot, but I am truly sorry and I won't do it again.

Decline reason:

Moot as the block has already expired. – bradv 07:07, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Before adding a category to an article, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. This includes adding cats that are not supported by the article content (you already know unsourced-content can lead to a block) and adding cats that are parents of other listed cats (MOS instructs us to only use the more-specific one). DMacks (talk) 05:08, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Jim Valvano, you may be blocked from editing. DMacks (talk) 09:49, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Legendary Entertainment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Walt Disney Studios.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, to add to (and remind you) what DMacks told you above, please take a moment to read WP:PARENTCAT. In short, an article should be categorised under the most specific branch in the category tree possible, without duplication in parent categories above it. In other words, articles should rarely be placed in both a given category and any of its sub- or parent (super-) categories.

For example, you added the category "People from California" to Richard Nixon. However, this article is already included in the category "People from San Clemente, California," which is a subcategory of "People from California" (you can verify this by clicking up through the category tree). Because Nixon's article is already included within this subcategory, it doesn't need to be added to the broader parent category. I've noticed you've done this to many (probably 200+ dozens) articles in the last month. Please do not do this unless you have a specific reason for doing so. Thank you. Aoi (青い) (talk) 08:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Smiling Friends, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. memes are not discussed in article Waxworker (talk) 18:08, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just undid your recent addition of categories to Rocky de la Fuente, because you were placing him in categories that he is already in. Candidates in the XXXX election' is a subcategory of People involved with.... Looking at some of your recent edits, it looks like you may have been doing similar to other pages; could you please review these edits and undo them where appropriate? -- Nat Gertler (talk) 18:23, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Members of the 118th United States Congress has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:51, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Vinnylospo -

I noticed over the past several days that you have made several requests to split portions of articles into smaller articles (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7). I would really urge you to read up on what is suitable for inclusion on Wikipedia (WP:NOTABILITY), and in the future, when opening an appropriate discussion to split, your reasoning should be backed by policy (i.e., "WP" pages like the one I linked about notability). It should not just be that you think some topic needs to have it's own article. there needs to be a decent justification. Otherwise, each discussion on the talk page represents a huge time sink for editors who have to reach a consensus as to opposing or supporting your proposed split.

Not everything NEEDS its own article. I learned that myself recently when What can be, unburdened by what has been, which I started, was merged into Public image of Kamala Harris; the quote was simply not notable enough and did not have enough of a cultural impact to merit a new article being made. — That Coptic Guy^{ping me!} (talk) (contribs) 17:39, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I’m sorry. Vinnylospo (talk) 01:47, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No need to apologize, just something to keep in mind. Thanks for your many constructive contributions nonetheless. — That Coptic Guy^{ping me!} (talk) (contribs) 01:50, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is, indeed, no need for you to apologize. But, there is a need for you to listen to this sage advice and not turn around and continue to suggest page splits based solely on your opinions. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:54, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Hurricane Dorian, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Please do not add articles to categories to which they have only a trivial relationship. Categories are supposed to be for the defining characteristics of a subject to avoid overcategorization and clutter. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 20:08, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I was going to come by anyway before seeing your recent revert (I won't edit war over it, and think someone will revert you and would be surprised if they don't). It's always good to have more editors working on U.S. presidential navboxes, Wikipedia has quite a well-built and important collection. The reason I reverted your notable deaths additions is that they are very tangential to the topic of an individual's presidency, they just don't fit there. Hard to explain further, as to me it seems obvious. But yes, thanks for trying to better the collection, and I note above that others have thanked you for your good contributions. Nice meeting you along the editing path. Randy Kryn (talk) 02:36, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anytime. Vinnylospo (talk) 05:09, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The vast majority of articles you added these to are not defining and have nothing more than a time overlap in common. I would appreciate it if you stopped adding these and self reverted. PARAKANYAA (talk) 20:28, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. But they are significant ones that defined presidencies. Vinnylospo (talk) 18:18, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Presidency of Joe Biden has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:10, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Political Machine (series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doug Jones.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. I was trying to do the senator. Vinnylospo (talk) 02:25, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted several of your recent category additions to Category:Democratic Party (United States) presidential nominees that were redundant because the category was already diffused to a more specific category. WP:Diffusion and WP:Defining should be helpful to review. Thanks Mason (talk) 21:12, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Category:Dwight D. Eisenhower, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Ok, so after looking over your edit history, it's clear that this is a much larger problem. Mason (talk) 21:29, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Category:George W. Bush, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Please stop overcatting Mason (talk) 10:39, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you manually reverting the category removals I made without explaining why overcat doesn't apply eg [1]? Please use edit summaries as well as the talk pages. Mason (talk) 22:08, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've asked you repeatedly to review EPON and overcat. Mason (talk) 18:01, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vinnylospo! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Category:James A. Garfield several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Category talk:James A. Garfield, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Mason (talk) 18:02, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Category:Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. I have repeatedly invited you to discuss these kinds of changes as well as asked you to review WP:EPONCAT Mason (talk) 23:04, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Category:James G. Blaine did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Mason (talk) 11:48, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vinnylospo! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Category:Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Category talk:Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Please discuss this change on the talk page instead of reverting the category without explanation. Mason (talk) 02:58, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Jamie Whitten has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 21:38, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Joe Manchin has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 21:41, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I feel just worn out. I feel like it almost feels worthless with this. I’m sorry. I feel hopeless. Vinnylospo (talk) 06:52, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Tim Walz has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 21:42, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He is literally the Dems’ VP candidate. That feels odd. Vinnylospo (talk) 06:46, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Terry Branstad has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 21:45, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Glenn Youngkin has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 21:45, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ted Stevens has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 21:45, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There’s a lot of stuff for him. That’s the one I would definitely not remove. Vinnylospo (talk) 06:47, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:John Dingell has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 21:45, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There’s a lot of things connected to him. Truthfully speaking, I don’t think it matters if Dingell has his own category or not. He was in office longer than anyone else. Please. This is a lot and it’s incredibly demoralizing Vinnylospo (talk) 06:50, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what to say, other than these categories all have the same problem related to what belongs in a category. This is not a reflection on the person's importance, this is a reflection on the purpose of categories. My intent is not to demoralize you. I'm happy and willing to give you feedback on what kinds of categories would be beneficial. Learning the ropes for categories is tough. @Omnis Scientia can attest that it takes a while to figure it out. Mason (talk) 20:23, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it did. I actually went back and checked one of the first I ever started and it was quite a mess! 😂 Omnis Scientia (talk) 20:33, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Barney Frank has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 21:45, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Don Young has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 21:45, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Stinkers Bad Movie Award winning films has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 21:46, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted your edit to Category:Gerald Ford. Please explain why is relevant to everything in the category? I asked you repeatedly to review WP:EPONCAT. Mason (talk) 02:56, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Young Frankenstein. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Ordinarily I'd give you a lighter warning for adding a category that was unsupported by the body of the article, but I see from your Talk page history that you have been advised about this before. Please slow down and ensure that categories you're adding are supported by the text of the article. DonIago (talk) 13:43, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page White House Down. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use your sandbox instead, as someone could see your edit before you revert it. Thank you. --Picard's Facepalm • ^{Made It So} _Engage! • 14:29, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at 2001:A Space Odyssey, you may be blocked from editing. You have been warned multiple time regarding incorrect inforation. Please stop. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 11:59, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:MultiVersus characters has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. (Oinkers42) (talk) 14:03, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 46th Saturn Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doctor Sleep (film).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate a lot of your work on categorization. However, please review EPONYMOUS Categorization policies. I've reverted your addition of award winners for Category:Ronald Reagan. Please ask yourself whether the category you're adding applies to the vast majority of the pages within the category. If it doesn't then you should only add it to the page, not the category. Thanks!Mason (talk) 12:14, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Related to that you also need to check that an article's body currently verifiably supports a category before adding it, under WP:CATV. Particularly for ones like Category:Conspiracy theories promoted by Elon Musk which are effectively making unsourced BLP claims when that statement is nowhere in the text. Belbury (talk) 20:01, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I will Vinnylospo (talk) 04:14, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Golden Raspberry Award winners has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Zaathras (talk) 22:15, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Conspiracy theories promoted by Elon Musk has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Partofthemachine (talk) 21:18, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Saturday Night Live hosts has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:30, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest that you refrain from creating new categories for the foreseeable future, and thoroughly read and understand Wikipedia:Overcategorization and related pages before you wind up before WP:ANI. Your recent talk page history is littered with deletion notices for creations are that almost certainly headed for deletion. Of particular concern is the creation of Category:Worst Picture Golden Raspberry Award winners which I have tagged as a speedy deletion. It shows remarkably poor judgement to not only recreate a category that has been previously deleted, but to do so in the wake of Category:Golden Raspberry Award winners, which will close as a deletion soon. Zaathras (talk) 17:37, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I will stop Vinnylospo (talk) 08:01, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't be too discouraged. I think a break is a good idea so that you can get a better feel for how this works and what a defining category is. One approach for you is to start by lurking around CFD to get a better sense of what is and isn't a useful category.^SMason_Garrison 15:08, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for handling Zaathras' request much more gracefully than I did when some of my categories got nominated for deletion. Even though it's embarassing for me I'm going to share that episode with you right here. Would you be open to voluntarily deleting the categories you created per WP:G7? (Even if you say yes, I would need to get input on how to imlement that to avoid WP:REDNOT.) - RevelationDirect (talk) 19:40, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you use the CfD process and the close result is delete, a bot takes care of the cleanup. For a little populated category the manual cleanup is easy, for one with lots of entries, much better to let the bot do it. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:55, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering if there might be a way to save time and voluntarily do some broader cleanup on categories that were repidly created in good faith but don't follow WP:OC. (Maybe what I'm proposing borders on WP:HOUNDING though.) RevelationDirect (talk) 19:59, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cat-a-lot can be used to clean out a category before G7 or C1. However, some of the added categories might be OK to have. The CfD delete process and cleanup leaves a reason trail that heads off misunderstanding problems. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:29, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure Vinnylospo (talk) 01:37, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add categorises to articles that are not supported by the article itself. Lack of any mention in the article is usually a good indication that the category you are adding is not defining. And it also makes it unsourced and unverifiable. For instance, no-one commonly and consistently refers to the song "Bad Romance" as a "Alvin and the Chipmunks song", and there is nothing anywhere to verify it ever was performed by them. Indeed, the cover version fails guidelines for inclusion. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 17:27, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 00:43, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 00:54, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you tagged Category:Trump administration personnel and Category:Trump administration cabinet members for renaming but they haven't been listed at WP:CFD. A discussion cannot formally take place unless they are added to the list. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 20:09, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You've tagged more categories for renaming but you again have failed to nominate them at CFD. Please follow the instructions at WP:CFD#HOWTO to complete the nominations. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 18:05, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Second Trump administration personnel indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:32, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vinnylospo, what happened to the suggested moratorium? I was rather hoping this was something you were going to take seriously. Zaathras (talk) 01:17, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am. I am not adding anything new unless necessary. With the second Trump administration, I figured I had to do it to help others. Vinnylospo (talk) 18:16, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You continue to create a lot of eponymous politician categories. I suggest you live up to your agreed upon moratorium of category creations. You tend to place articles within them that at the very least is a stretch and most often to a topic that is not specifically defining to the individual. I will have to do some pruning. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 03:31, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Songs from Joker: Folie à Deux has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 03:18, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Thomas the Tank Engine, you may be blocked from editing. Opolito (talk) 01:25, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Vinnylospo (talk) 02:12, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What did I do that was poorly sourced? Thomas the Tank Engine is frequently used as an internet meme. Vinnylospo (talk) 02:13, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no source for that in the article. It's purely your claim, and thus not verifiable. Opolito (talk) 02:25, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I will add a source. My apologies. Vinnylospo (talk) 02:41, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Even with a source, Category:Internet memes would be inappropriate for the Thomas the Tank Engine article. That category is for articles about Internet memes and this article is not that. You'd have to start a separate article about the memes based on Thomas, and you'd need very good sourcing to make sure that article met Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Opolito (talk) 02:51, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Vinnylospo (talk) 02:54, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Stinkers Bad Movie Award winning films has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 12:32, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Assassination of Brian Thompson indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:16, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]