Talk:Beer in Serbia

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Serbia High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Beer Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Beer, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Beer, Brewery, and Pub related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BeerWikipedia:WikiProject BeerTemplate:WikiProject BeerBeer articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization: "Pivo". Svet Kompjutera. September 1, 2004.

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

You mention Pecka Pivara is operating out of Belgrade - without wanting to drag this into a Kosovo / Serbia discussion, the old Pecko Pivo brewery is still operating, as Biere e Peja (sp?), and, while it is whidely acknowledged to have deteriorated in quality, is still, at least technically, a brewery in Serbia.

Thanks for the info! Nikola 10:18, 28 Sep 2003 (UTC)

Does Simbol still exist I remember having drunk it at the Beer festival in 'Bus' in the summer of 2001 or 2002

I wouldn't know, but it doesn't matter. Even former brews should be mentioned, and even if this is a former brew, it might get reactivated if the company gets some export opportunities. Nikola 08:41, 2 Oct 2003 (UTC)

There is also a List of commercial brands of beer that you might want to add to Dori | Talk 02:47, Nov 7, 2004 (UTC)

samo napred, brate...! Boky 09:42, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

At the bottom of http://www.economicexpert.com/a/Beer:in:Serbia:and:Montenegro.html, you will see the following text:

This article is from Wikipedia licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Beer in Serbia and Montenegro".

And that notice is actually linked to the Wikipedia article, which in my book is conclusive proof. It is probably taken from an older version of the Wikipedia article. This is why I have placed a tag on the reference as it should be removed as a violation of WP:RS#Primary, secondary, and tertiary sources. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:21, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Reference removed. (Thanks.) Pdfpdf (talk) 05:24, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Beer in Serbia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101024134426/http://www.valjevskapivara.co.rs/ to http://www.valjevskapivara.co.rs/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060128153520/http://travel.independent.co.uk/news_and_advice/article335722.ece to http://travel.independent.co.uk/news_and_advice/article335722.ece

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:44, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]