[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3009977.3010050acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicvgipConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Classification of Schizophrenia versus normal subjects using deep learning

Published: 18 December 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Motivated by deep learning approaches to classify normal and neuro-diseased subjects in functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI), we propose stacked autoencoder (SAE) based 2-stage architecture for disease diagnosis. In the proposed architecture, a separate 4-hidden layer autoencoder is trained in unsupervised manner for feature extraction corresponding to every brain region. Thereafter, these trained autoencoders are used to provide features on class-labeled input data for training a binary support vector machine (SVM) based classifier. In order to design a robust classifier, noisy or inactive gray matter voxels are filtered out using a proposed covariance based approach. We applied the proposed methodology on a public dataset, namely, 1000 Functional Connectomes Project Cobre dataset consisting of fMRI data of normal and Schizophrenia subjects. The proposed architecture is able to classify normal and Schizophrenia subjects with 10-fold cross-validation accuracy of 92% that is better compared to the existing methods used on the same dataset.

References

[1]
A. Anderson and M. S. Cohen. Decreased small-world functional network connectivity and clustering across resting state networks in schizophrenia: an fMRI classification tutorial, 2013.
[2]
P. Baldi. Autoencoders, unsupervised learning, and deep architectures. ICML unsupervised and transfer learning, 27(37--50):1, 2012.
[3]
B. Biswal, F. Zerrin Yetkin, V. M. Haughton, and J. S. Hyde. Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magnetic resonance in medicine, 34(4):537--541, 1995.
[4]
H. Cheng, S. Newman, J. Goñi, J. S. Kent, J. Howell, A. Bolbecker, A. Puce, B. F. O'Donnell, and W. P. Hetrick. Nodal centrality of functional network in the differentiation of Schizophrenia. Schizophrenia research, 168(1):345--352, 2015.
[5]
D. Chyzhyk, A. Savio, and M. Graña. Computer aided diagnosis of schizophrenia on resting state fMRI data by ensembles of ELM. Neural Networks, 68:23--33, 2015.
[6]
D. Cordes, V. M. Haughton, K. Arfanakis, G. J. Wendt, P. A. Turski, C. H. Moritz, M. A. Quigley, and M. E. Meyerand. Mapping functionally related regions of brain with functional connectivity MR imaging. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 21(9):1636--1644, 2000.
[7]
C. Cortes and V. Vapnik. Support-vector networks. Machine learning, 20(3):273--297, 1995.
[8]
M. D. Fox and M. Greicius. Clinical applications of resting state functional connectivity. Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 4:19, 2010.
[9]
T.-H. Hsieh, M.-J. Sun, and S.-F. Liang. Diagnosis of Schizophrenia patients based on brain network complexity analysis of resting-state fMRI. In The 15th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering, pages 203--206. Springer, 2014.
[10]
S. Huang, J. Li, L. Sun, J. Ye, A. Fleisher, T. Wu, K. Chen, E. Reiman, A. D. N. Initiative, et al. Learning brain connectivity of Alzheimer's disease by sparse inverse covariance estimation. NeuroImage, 50(3):935--949, 2010.
[11]
D. T. Jones, P. Vemuri, M. C. Murphy, J. L. Gunter, M. L. Senjem, M. M. Machulda, S. A. Przybelski, B. E. Gregg, K. Kantarci, D. S. Knopman, et al. Non-stationarity in the resting brain's modular architecture. PloS one, 7(6):e39731, 2012.
[12]
J. Kim, V. D. Calhoun, E. Shim, and J.-H. Lee. Deep neural network with weight sparsity control and pre-training extracts hierarchical features and enhances classification performance: Evidence from whole-brain resting-state functional connectivity patterns of schizophrenia. NeuroImage, 124:127--146, 2016.
[13]
D. Kuang, X. Guo, X. An, Y. Zhao, and L. He. Discrimination of ADHD based on fMRI data with Deep Belief Network. In International Conference on Intelligent Computing, pages 225--232. Springer, 2014.
[14]
N. Leonardi, J. Richiardi, M. Gschwind, S. Simioni, J.-M. Annoni, M. Schluep, P. Vuilleumier, and D. Van De Ville. Principal components of functional connectivity: a new approach to study dynamic brain connectivity during rest. NeuroImage, 83:937--950, 2013.
[15]
N. Leonardi and D. Van De Ville. Identifying network correlates of brain states using tensor decompositions of whole-brain dynamic functional connectivity. In Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging (PRNI), 2013 International Workshop on, pages 74--77. IEEE, 2013.
[16]
X. Li, D. Zhu, X. Jiang, C. Jin, X. Zhang, L. Guo, J. Zhang, X. Hu, L. Li, and T. Liu. Dynamic functional connectomics signatures for characterization and differentiation of ptsd patients. Human brain mapping, 35(4):1761--1778, 2014.
[17]
D. Liu, N. Zhong, and Y. Qin. Exploring functional connectivity networks in fMRI data using clustering analysis. In International Conference on Brain Informatics, pages 148--159. Springer, 2011.
[18]
T. M. R. Network and the University of New Mexico. The center for biomedical research excellence (cobre), 2012.
[19]
A. Ng. Sparse autoencoder. CS294A Lecture notes, 72:1--19, 2011.
[20]
Ü. Sakoğlu, G. D. Pearlson, K. A. Kiehl, Y. M. Wang, A. M. Michael, and V. D. Calhoun. A method for evaluating dynamic functional network connectivity and task-modulation: application to Schizophrenia. Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, 23(5--6):351--366, 2010.
[21]
A. Savio and M. Graña. Local activity features for computer aided diagnosis of Schizophrenia on resting-state fMRI. Neurocomputing, 164:154--161, 2015.
[22]
T. Starck, J. Nikkinen, J. Rahko, J. Remes, T. Hurtig, H. Haapsamo, K. Jussila, S. Kuusikko-Gauffin, M.-L. Mattila, E. Jansson-Verkasalo, D. L. Pauls, H. Ebeling, I. Moilanen, O. Tervonen, and V. J. Kiviniemi. Resting state fmri reveals a default mode dissociation between retrosplenial and medial prefrontal subnetworks in asd despite motion scrubbing. Front Hum Neurosci, 7:802, Nov 2013. 24319422{pmid}.
[23]
H.-I. Suk, S.-W. Lee, and D. Shen. A hybrid of deep network and hidden markov model for MCI identification with resting-state fMRI. In International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pages 573--580. Springer, 2015.
[24]
V. Vapnik. The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Classification of ROI-based fMRI data in short-term memory tasks using discriminant analysis and neural networksFrontiers in Neuroinformatics10.3389/fninf.2024.148036618Online publication date: 20-Dec-2024
  • (2024)Model-Based Approaches to Investigating Mismatch Responses in SchizophreniaClinical EEG and Neuroscience10.1177/1550059424125391056:1(8-21)Online publication date: 15-May-2024
  • (2024)Multitask Learning for Joint Diagnosis of Multiple Mental Disorders in Resting-State fMRIIEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems10.1109/TNNLS.2022.322517935:6(8161-8175)Online publication date: Jun-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Classification of Schizophrenia versus normal subjects using deep learning

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICVGIP '16: Proceedings of the Tenth Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing
      December 2016
      743 pages
      ISBN:9781450347532
      DOI:10.1145/3009977
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      • Google Inc.
      • QI: Qualcomm Inc.
      • Tata Consultancy Services
      • NVIDIA
      • MathWorks: The MathWorks, Inc.
      • Microsoft Research: Microsoft Research

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 18 December 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Schizophrenia
      2. classification
      3. stacked autoencoder
      4. support vector machine

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Funding Sources

      • Ministry of Communication and IT, Govt. of India

      Conference

      ICVGIP '16
      Sponsor:
      • QI
      • MathWorks
      • Microsoft Research

      Acceptance Rates

      ICVGIP '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 95 of 286 submissions, 33%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 95 of 286 submissions, 33%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)63
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7
      Reflects downloads up to 12 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Classification of ROI-based fMRI data in short-term memory tasks using discriminant analysis and neural networksFrontiers in Neuroinformatics10.3389/fninf.2024.148036618Online publication date: 20-Dec-2024
      • (2024)Model-Based Approaches to Investigating Mismatch Responses in SchizophreniaClinical EEG and Neuroscience10.1177/1550059424125391056:1(8-21)Online publication date: 15-May-2024
      • (2024)Multitask Learning for Joint Diagnosis of Multiple Mental Disorders in Resting-State fMRIIEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems10.1109/TNNLS.2022.322517935:6(8161-8175)Online publication date: Jun-2024
      • (2024)Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Methods for Schizophrenia Classification from fMRI Scans2024 IEEE 37th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS)10.1109/CBMS61543.2024.00020(69-74)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2024
      • (2024)Review of Deep Learning Techniques for Neurological Disorders DetectionWireless Personal Communications10.1007/s11277-024-11464-x137:2(1277-1311)Online publication date: 14-Jul-2024
      • (2023)Detection of autism spectrum disorder using graph representation learning algorithms and deep neural network, based on fMRI signalsFrontiers in Systems Neuroscience10.3389/fnsys.2022.90477016Online publication date: 2-Feb-2023
      • (2023)Survey on Structural Neuro Imaging for the Identification of Brain Abnormalities in SchizophreniaCurrent Medical Imaging Reviews10.2174/221155520466622013111263919:2(115-125)Online publication date: Feb-2023
      • (2023)Automated detection of schizophrenia using deep learning: a review for the last decadePhysiological Measurement10.1088/1361-6579/acb24d44:3(03TR01)Online publication date: 6-Mar-2023
      • (2023)Deep learning for neurodegenerative disorder (2016 to 2022): A systematic reviewBiomedical Signal Processing and Control10.1016/j.bspc.2022.10422380(104223)Online publication date: Feb-2023
      • (2023)Classifying schizophrenic and controls from fMRI data using graph theoretic framework and community detectionNetwork Modeling Analysis in Health Informatics and Bioinformatics10.1007/s13721-023-00415-412:1Online publication date: 4-Apr-2023
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media