The impact of Group Intelligence software on enquiry-based learning
Pages 84 - 102
Abstract
Despite the increasing use of groupware technologies in education, there is little evidence of their impact, especially within an enquiry-based learning (EBL) context. In this paper, we examine the use of a commercial standard Group Intelligence software called GroupSystems®ThinkTank. To date, ThinkTank has been adopted mainly in the USA and supports teams in generating ideas, categorising, prioritising, voting and multi-criteria decision-making and automatically generates a report at the end of each session. The software was used by students carrying out an EBL project, set by employers, for a full academic year. The criteria for assessing the impact of ThinkTank on student learning were those of creativity, participation, productivity, engagement and understanding. Data was collected throughout the year using a combination of interviews and questionnaires, and written feedback from employers. The overall findings show an increase in levels of productivity and creativity, evidence of a deeper understanding of their work but some variation in attitudes towards participation in the early stages of the project.
References
[1]
Aiken, M., Govindarajulu, C.D. and Horgan, D. (1995) 'Using a group decision support system for school-based decision making', Education, Vol. 115, No. 3, pp.420-425.
[2]
Alavi, M. (1994) 'Computer-mediated collaborative learning: an empirical evaluation', MIS Quarterly, June, Vol. 18, pp.159-174.
[3]
Biggs, J. (1999) 'What the student does: teaching for enhanced learning', Higher Education Research & Development, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp.57-72.
[4]
Carroll, J. (2003) HCI Models, Theories, and Frameworks, Morgan Kaufmann, Elsevier Science, USA.
[5]
Cocea, M. and Weibelzahl, S. (2006) 'Can log files analysis estimate learners' level of motivation?', in 14th Workshop on Adaptivity and User Modeling in Interactive Systems, Hildesheim, 9-11 October.
[6]
Coch, L. and French, J. (1948) 'Overcoming resistance to change', Human Relations, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp.512-532.
[7]
Coopman, S. (2001) Small Group Communications, The McGraw-Hill Companies, available at http://www.mhhe.com/socscience/comm/group/index.html (accessed on 17 February 2009).
[8]
Edelson, D.C., Gordin, D.N. and Pea, R.D. (1999) 'Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design', The Journal of Learning Science, Vol. 8, Nos. 3-4, pp.391-450.
[9]
Faulkner, R. (2005) 'Wired class lets everyone talk at once', The Hamilton Spectator, available at http://groupsystems.files.wordpress.com/2007/09/mohawk-college-class-participation.pdf.
[10]
GroupSystems (2009) available at http://www.groupsystems.com/about_us/ (accessed on 20 June 2010).
[11]
Guzzo, R. and Dickson, M.W. (1996) 'Teams in organizations: recent research on performance and effectiveness', Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 47, pp.307-338.
[12]
Juan, A.A., Daradoumis, T., Faulin, J. and Xhafa, F. (2009) 'SAMOS: a model for monitoring students' and groups' activities in collaborative, e-learning', International Journal of Learning Technology, Vol. 4, Nos. 1/2, pp.53-72.
[13]
Kahn, P. and O'Rourke, K. (2005) 'Understanding enquiry-based learning (EBL)', in Barrett, T., Mac Labhrainn, I. and Fallon, H. (Eds.): Handbook of Enquiry & Problem Based Learning Galway, pp.1-12, CELT, available at http://www.nuigalway.ie/celt/pblbook/.
[14]
Karau, S.J. and Williams, K.D. (1993) 'Social loafing: a meta-analytic review and theoretical integration', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 65, pp.681-706.
[15]
Kravitz, D. and Martin, B. (1986) 'Ringelmann rediscovered: the original article', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 50, pp.936-941.
[16]
Lackney, J.A. (2005) 'New approaches for school design', in F.W. English (Ed.): The SAGE Handbook of Educational Administration.
[17]
Lee, V.S., Greene, D.B., Odom, F., Schechter, E. and Slatta, R.W. (2004) 'What is inquiry-guided learning?', in Virginia, S.L. (Ed.): Teaching and Learning Through Inquiry: A Guidebook for Institutions and Instructors Virginia, Stylus Publishing, Sterling, USA.
[18]
Macaulay, L.A., Tan, Y.L. and Chow, R. (2009) 'Group Intelligence, Creativity and Learning. Centre for Excellence in Enquiry-based learning (CEEBL)', The University of Manchester, UK, pp.21-32, available at http://www.campus.manchester.ac.uk/ceebl/projects/casestudies/57.pdf.
[19]
Manning, L.M. and Riordan, C.A. (2000) 'Using groupware software to support collaborative learning in economics', Journal of Economic Education, Summer, pp.244-252.
[20]
Moore, M.C. (1989) 'Three types of interaction', The American Journal of Distance Education, Vol. 3, No. 2, available at http://www.ajde.com/Contents/vol3_2.htm#editorial (last accessed on 15 February 2009).
[21]
Nunamaker, J. (1989) 'Experience with and future challenges in GDSS (group decision support systems): preface', Decision Support Systems, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp.115-118.
[22]
Nunamaker, J., Briggs, R., Mittleman, D., Vogel, D. and Balthazard, P. (1996) 'Lessons from a dozen years of group support systems research: a discussion of lab and field findings', Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp.163-207.
[23]
Nunamaker, J.F. (1997) 'Future research in group support systems: needs, some questions and possible directions', International Journal of Computer Studies, Vol. 47, pp.357-385.
[24]
Papamichail, K., Alrayes, A. and Macaulay, L.A. (2009) 'Exploring the potential of virtual worlds for enquiry-based learning', Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 5736, pp.376-385, ISBN978-3-642-04753-4.
[25]
Smith, B.L. and MacGregor, J.T. (1992) What Is Collaborative Learning?, Washington Center for Improving the Quality of Undergraduate Education.
[26]
Tan, Y.L. and Macaulay, L.A. (2010) 'Enhancing collaborative learning through group intelligence software', Communications in Computer and Information Science, Springer, Heidelberg, ISBN 978-3-642-16317-3, Vol. 111, pp.453-459.
Recommendations
The impact of web-based collaborative inquiry for science learning in secondary education
ICLS '10: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences - Volume 1Current educational practice in higher education shows a growing use of CSCL-environments. In secondary education, however, we only see the first signs of transformation in the age of technology and the Internet, and many of these signs are particularly ...
Web-based inquiry learning environment "young scientist"
WBED'07: Proceedings of the sixth conference on IASTED International Conference Web-Based Education - Volume 2Some studies question if web-based inquiry is as practical tasks for developing inquiry skills. We have hypothesised that particular effectiveness depends on the support system that outperforms the guidance of a teacher in a classroom situation. For ...
Plagiarism-free inquiry project-based learning with UPCC pedagogy
ASIST '16: Proceedings of the 79th ASIS&T Annual Meeting: Creating Knowledge, Enhancing Lives through Information & Technology(U)nderstanding plagiarism, learning about (P)araphrasing and related skills, generating proper (C)itations with an online citation tool and doing originality (C)heck with an online tool (UPCC) is a pedagogy developed by Chu and his colleagues (2014, ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Publisher
Inderscience Publishers
Geneva 15, Switzerland
Publication History
Published: 01 May 2011
Qualifiers
- Article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 0Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 01 Jan 2025