Extended Generativity Theory on Digital Platforms
Authors: 
Daniel Fürstenau, Abayomi Baiyere, Kai Schewina, Matthias Schulte-Althoff, Hannes RotheAuthors Info & Claims
Pages 1686 - 1710
Abstract
The assumption that generativity engenders unbounded growth has acquired an almost taken-for-granted position in information systems and management literature. Against this premise, we examine the relationship between generativity and user base growth in the context of a digital platform. To do this, we synthesize the literature on generativity into two views, social interaction (expansion of ecosystem boundaries) and product view (expansion of product boundaries), that jointly and individually relate to user base growth. Both views help us explain how opening a platform relates to the emergence and resolution of conflicting expectations in a platform ecosystem that result in new functions and expanded use. We adopt a panel vector autoregressive approach combining data from six large transaction platforms that engaged with open-source developer communities. We found that the dominant narrative of generativity engendering growth, although generally supported by our analysis, obscures the fact that the inverse is also true; that is, growth can lead to expansion of product boundaries (inverse generativity) and that generativity can be bounded; that is, growth can stabilize ecosystem boundaries (bounded generativity). Against this background, we propose an extended generativity theory that presents generativity and growth in an integrative view and raises awareness about the limitations of the “unbounded growth” claim. We conclude that there is value in separating the two views of generativity conceptually and analytically, along with their relationship to user base growth, and we call for research on the pathways through which generativity produces growth.
History: Ola Henfridsson, Senior Editor; Robert Wayne Gregory, Associate Editor.
References
[1]
Abrigo MRM, Love I (2016) Estimation of panel vector autoregression in Stata. Stata J. 16(3):778–804.
[2]
Adomavicius G, Bockstedt JC, Gupta A (2012) Modeling supply-side dynamics of it components, products, and infrastructure: An empirical analysis using vector autoregression. Inform. Systems Res. 23(2):397–417.
[3]
Adomavicius G, Bockstedt JC, Gupta A, Kauffman RJ (2008) Making sense of technology trends in the information technology landscape: A design science approach. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 32(4):779–809.
[4]
Andersen JV, Bogusz CI (2019) Self-organizing in blockchain infrastructures: Generativity through shifting objectives and forking. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 20(9):1242–1273.
[5]
Autio E, Thomas LDW (2020) Value co-creation in ecosystems: Insights and research promise from three disciplinary perspectives. Nambisan S, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y, eds. Handbook of Digital Innovation (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK), 107–132.
[6]
Baig R, Roca R, Freitag F, Navarro L (2015) Guifi.net, a crowdsourced network infrastructure held in common. Comput. Networks 90:150–165.
[7]
Barrett M, Davidson E, Prabhu J, Vargo SL (2015) Service innovation in the digital age: Key contributions and future directions. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 39(1):135–154.
[8]
Boland RJ Jr, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y (2007) Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering, and construction. Organ. Sci. 18(4):631–647.
[9]
Borges H, Tulio Valente M (2018) What’s in a GitHub star? Understanding repository starring practices in a social coding platform. J. Systems Software 146:112–129.
[10]
Boudreau K (2006) Too many complementors? Evidence on software developers. Preprint, submitted November 9, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.943088.
[11]
Boudreau K (2012) Let a thousand flowers bloom? An early look at large numbers of software app developers and patterns of innovation. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1409–1427.
[12]
Boudreau K, Jeppesen LB (2015) Unpaid crowd complementors: The platform network effect mirage. Strategic Management J. 36(12):1761–1777.
[13]
Bygstad B, Hanseth O (2018) Transforming digital infrastructures through platformization. Bednar PM, Frank U, Kautz K, eds. Proc. 26th Eur. Conf. Inform. Systems (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta), 1–13.
[14]
Cennamo C, Santaló J (2013) Platform competition: Strategic trade-offs in platform markets. Strategic Management J. 34(11):1331–1350.
[15]
Cennamo C, Santaló J (2019) Generativity tension and value creation in platform ecosystems. Organ. Sci. 30(3):617–641.
[16]
Chen CM, Delmas MA, Lieberman MB (2015) Production frontier methodologies and efficiency as a performance measure in strategic management research. Strategic Management J. 36(1):19–36.
[17]
Comeau-Vallée M, Langley A (2020) The interplay of inter- and intraprofessional boundary work in multidisciplinary teams. Organ. Stud. 41(12):1649–1672.
[18]
Constantinides P, Henfridsson O, Parker G (2018) Platforms and infrastructures in the digital age. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):381–400.
[19]
Cusumano MA, Gawer A, Yoffie DB (2019) The Business of Platforms: Strategy in the Age of Digital Competition, Innovation, and Power (Harper Business, New York).
[20]
Dahlander L, Frederiksen L (2012) The core and cosmopolitans: A relational view of innovation in user communities. Organ. Sci. 23(4):988–1007.
[21]
de Reuver M, Sørensen C, Basole RC (2018) The digital platform: A research agenda. J. Inform. Tech. 33(2):124–135.
[22]
Devlin J, Chang M-W, Lee K, Toutanova K (2019) BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. Proc. 2019 Conf. North Amer. Chapter Assoc. Computat. Linguistics: Human Language Tech., vol. 1 (Association for Computational Linguistics), 4171–4186. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N19-1423.
[23]
Eaton B, Elaluf-Calderwood S, Sørensen C, Yoo Y (2015) Distributed tuning of boundary resources: The case of Apple’s iOS service system. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 39(1):217–243.
[24]
Eisenmann TR, Parker G, Van Alstyne M (2008) Opening platforms: How, when and why? Gawer A, ed. Platforms, Markets and. Innovation (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK), 131–162.
[25]
Eisenmann T, Parker G, Van Alstyne M (2011) Platform envelopment. Strategic Management J. 32(12):1270–1285.
[26]
Enders W (2008) Applied Econometric Time Series (John Wiley & Sons, New York).
[27]
Faraj S, Jarvenpaa SL, Majchrzak A (2011) Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1224–1239.
[28]
Faraj S, von Krogh G, Monteiro E, Lakhani KR (2016) Special section introduction: Online community as space for knowledge flows. Inform. Systems Res. 27(4):668–684.
[29]
Foerderer J, Kude T, Mithas S, Heinzl A (2018) Does platform owner’s entry crowd out innovation? Evidence from Google Photos. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):444–460.
[30]
Gawer A (2021) Digital platforms’ boundaries: The interplay of firm scope, platform sides, and digital interfaces. Long Range Planning 54(5):102045.
[31]
Gerring J (2006) Case Study Research: Principles and Practices (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).
[32]
Ghazawneh A, Henfridsson O (2013) Balancing platform control and external contribution in third-party development: The boundary resources model. Inform. Systems J. 23(2):173–192.
[33]
Granger CW (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37(3):424–438.
[34]
Grover V, Lyytinen K (2022) Special issue editorial: Platform competition in the digital era—Overview and research directions. MIS Quart. Executive 21(1):3.
[35]
Hanseth O, Lyytinen K (2010) Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: The case of building Internet. J. Inform. Tech. 25(1):1–19.
[36]
Hein A, Schreieck M, Riasanow T, Setzke DS, Wiesche M, Böhm M, Krcmar H (2020) Digital platform ecosystems. Electronic Marketing 30(1):87–98.
[37]
Henfridsson O, Bygstad B (2013) The generative mechanisms of digital infrastructure evolution. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 37(3):896–931.
[38]
Ho SY, Rai A (2017) Continued voluntary participation intention in firm-participating open source software projects. Inform. Systems Res. 28(3):603–625.
[39]
Hoffmann P, Shmagina V, Halckenhaeusser A, Lueker N (2023) The influence of user feedback on complementary innovation in platform ecosystems: NLP evidence on the value of multihoming. Bui TX, Sprague RH, eds. Proc. 56th Hawaii Internat. Conf. Systems Sci. https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/items/8fbef7e2-fb98-4e39-ab2a-1cada90a19be.
[40]
Holtz-Eakin D, Newey W, Rosen HS (1988) Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data. Econometrica 56(6):1371–1395.
[41]
Hu S, Bettis RA (2018) Multiple organization goals with feedback from shared technological task environments. Organ. Sci. 29(5):873–889.
[42]
Huang J, Henfridsson O, Liu MJ, Newell S (2017) Growing on steroids: Rapidly scaling the user base of digital ventures through digital innovation. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 41(1):301–314.
[43]
Hukal P, Henfridsson O, Shaikh M, Parker G (2020) Platform signaling for generating platform content. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 44(3):1177–1205.
[44]
Jarvenpaa SL, Standaert W (2018) Digital probes as opening possibilities of generativity. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 19(10):982–1000.
[45]
Kalliamvakou E, Gousios G, Blincoe K, Singer L, German DM, Damian D (2016) An in-depth study of the promises and perils of mining GitHub. Empirical Software Engrg. 21(5):2035–2071.
[46]
Kane GC, Johnson J, Majchrzak A (2014) Emergent life cycle: The tension between knowledge change and knowledge retention in open online coproduction communities. Management Sci. 60(12):3026–3048.
[47]
Kao C (1999) Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. J. Econometrics 90(1):1–44.
[48]
Karhu K, Gustafsson R, Lyytinen K (2018) Exploiting and defending open digital platforms with boundary resources: Android’s five platform forks. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):479–497.
[49]
Kellogg KC, Orlikowski WJ, Yates JA (2006) Life in the trading zone: Structuring coordination across boundaries in postbureaucratic organizations. Organ. Sci. 17(1):22–44.
[50]
Kim Y, Jarvenpaa SL, Gu B (2018) External bridging and internal bonding: Unlocking the generative resources of member time and attention spent in online communities. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 42(1):265–283.
[51]
Kretschmer T, Leiponen A, Schilling M, Vasudeva G (2022) Platform ecosystems as meta‐organizations: Implications for platform strategies. Strategic Management J. 43(3):405–424.
[52]
Koutsikouri D, Lindgren R, Henfridsson O, Rudmark D (2018) Extending digital infrastructures: A typology of growth tactics. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 19(10):1001–1019.
[53]
Langley A, Lindberg K, Mørk BE, Nicolini D, Raviola E, Walter L (2019) Boundary work among groups, occupations, and organizations: From cartography to process. Acad. Management Ann. 13(2):704–736.
[54]
Legenvre H, Autio E, Hameri AP (2022) How to harness open technologies for digital platform advantage. MIS Quart. Executive 21(1):6.
[55]
Lehman M, Fernández-Ramil JC (2004) Software evolution. Madhavji NH, Fernández-Ramil JC, Perry DE, eds. Software Evolution and Feedback: Theory and Practice (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK), 7–40.
[56]
Lehman MM, Fernández-Ramil JC, Wernick PD, Perry DE, Turski WM (1997) Metrics and laws of software evolution: The nineties view. Werner B, ed. Proc. 4th Internat. Software Metrics Sympos. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ), 20–32.
[57]
Lessig L (2002) The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World (Vintage, New York).
[58]
Levin A, Lin CF, Chu CSJ (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. J. Econometrics 108(1):1–24.
[59]
Love I, Zicchino L (2006) Financial development and dynamic investment behavior: Evidence from panel VAR. Quart. Rev. Econom. Finance 46(2):190–210.
[60]
Lyytinen K, Sørensen C, Tilson D (2017) Generativity in digital infrastructures: A research note. Galliers R, Stein MK, eds. The Routledge Companion to Management Information Systems (Routledge, London), 253–275.
[61]
Lyytinen K, Yoo Y, Boland RJ Jr (2016) Digital product innovation within four classes of innovation networks. Inform. Systems J. 26(1):47–75.
[62]
Morgan L, Gleasure R, Baiyere A, Dang HP (2021) Share and share alike: How inner source can help create new digital platforms. California Management Rev. 64(1):90–112.
[63]
Niederer S, van Dijck J (2010) Wisdom of the crowd or technicity of content? Wikipedia as a sociotechnical system. New Media Soc. 12(8):1368–1387.
[64]
Parker G, van Alstyne MW, Choudary SP (2016) Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy and How to Make Them Work for You (Norton & Company, New York).
[65]
Parker G, van Alstyne MW, Jiang X (2017) Platform ecosystems: How developers invert the firm. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 41(1):255–266.
[66]
Pauli T, Lin Y (2020) The generativity of industrial IoT platforms: Beyond predictive maintenance? Krcmar H, Fedorowicz J, eds. Proc. 40th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta), 1–6.
[67]
Ren H, Tian J, Nakamori Y, Wierzbicki AP (2007) Electronic support for knowledge creation in a research institute. J. Systems Sci. Systems Engrg. 16(2):235–253.
[68]
Rietveld J, Schilling MA (2021) Platform competition: A systematic and interdisciplinary review of the literature. J. Management 47(6):1528–1563.
[69]
Sandberg J, Holmström J, Lyytinen K (2020) Digitization and phase transitions in platform organizing logics: Evidence from the process automation industry. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 44(1):129–153.
[70]
Shaikh M, Vaast E (2016) Folding and unfolding: Balancing openness and transparency in open source communities. Inform. Systems Res. 27(4):813–833.
[71]
StackShare (2021) Tech stack intelligence. Accessed: June 15, 2021, https://stackshare.io/.
[72]
Stock JH, Watson MW (2001) Vector autoregressions. J. Econom. Perspective 15(4):101–115.
[73]
Taeuscher K, Rothe H (2021) Optimal distinctiveness in platform markets: Leveraging complementors as legitimacy buffers. Strategic Management J. 42(2):435–461.
[74]
Tilson D, Lyytinen K, Sørensen C (2010) Digital infrastructures: The missing IS research agenda. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):748–759.
[75]
Thomas LD, Ritala P (2021) Ecosystem legitimacy emergence: A collective action view. J. Management 48(3):515–541.
[76]
Thomas LD, Tee R (2021) Generativity: A systematic review and conceptual framework. Internat. J. Management Rev. 24(2):255–278.
[77]
Tiwana A (2018) Platform synergy: Architectural origins and competitive consequences. Inform. Systems Res. 29(4):829–848.
[78]
Tiwana A, Konsynski B, Bush AA (2010) Research commentary: platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):675–687.
[79]
Wareham JD, Fox PB, Cano Giner JL (2014) Technology ecosystem governance. Organ. Sci. 25(4):1195–1215.
[80]
West G (2017) Scale: The Universal Laws of Growth, Innovation, Sustainability, and the Pace of Life in Organisms, Cities, Economies, and Companies (Penguin Press, London).
[81]
Wu Y, Kropczynski J, Shih PC, Carroll JM (2014) Exploring the ecosystem of software developers on GitHub and other platforms. Fussel S, Lutters W, eds. Proc. 17th Conf. Comput. Support Cooperative Work (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 265–268.
[82]
Yin RK (2009) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 4th ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).
[83]
Yoo Y (2013) The tables have turned: How can the information systems field contribute to technology and innovation management research? J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 14(5):227–236.
[84]
Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K (2010) The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):724–735.
[85]
Yoo Y, Boland RJ Jr, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A (2012) Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1398–1408.
[86]
Zhang Y, Li J, Tong TW (2020) Platform governance matters: How platform gatekeeping affects knowledge sharing among complementors. Strategic Management J. 43(3):599–626.
[87]
Zhang Z, Yoo Y, Zhang B, Wattal S, Kulathinal R (2014) Generative diffusion of innovations and knowledge networks in open source projects. Myers MD, Straub DW, eds. Proc. 35th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta), 1–10.
[88]
Zittrain J (2008) The Future of the Internet: And How to Stop It (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).
[89]
Zittrain J (2009) Law and technology: The end of the generative Internet. Comm. ACM 52(1):18–20.
Index Terms
- Extended Generativity Theory on Digital Platforms
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Recursive type generativity
Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGPLAN international conference on Functional programmingExistential types provide a simple and elegant foundation for understanding generative abstract data types, of the kind supported by the Standard ML module system. However, in attempting to extend ML with support for recursive modules, we have found ...
Recursive type generativity
ICFP '05: Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGPLAN international conference on Functional programmingExistential types provide a simple and elegant foundation for understanding generative abstract data types, of the kind supported by the Standard ML module system. However, in attempting to extend ML with support for recursive modules, we have found ...
Generativity and dynamic opacity for abstract types
PPDP '03: Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGPLAN international conference on Principles and practice of declaritive programmingThe standard formalism for explaining abstract types is existential quantification. While it provides a sufficient model for type abstraction in entirely statically typed languages, it proves to be too weak for languages enriched with forms of dynamic ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. You are free to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt this work, but you must attribute this work as “Information Systems Research. Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2023.1209, used under a Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.”
Publisher
INFORMS
Linthicum, MD, United States
Publication History
Published: 01 December 2023
Accepted: 24 January 2023
Received: 19 July 2020
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 0Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 22 Jan 2025