[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

Generativity Tension and Value Creation in Platform Ecosystems

Published: 01 May 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Platform-based technology ecosystems are new forms of organizing independent actors’ innovations around a stable product system. This collective organization is proving superior to traditional, vertically integrated systems in many sectors because of greater “generativity”—the ecosystem’s capacity to foster complementary innovation from autonomous, heterogeneous firms—which extends the usage scope and value of the platform to users. However, greater generativity can also lead to greater variance in the way ecosystem members’ contributions satisfy users’ needs, and it could potentially hinder the ecosystems’ value creation. We draw on collective action theory to examine generativity’s impact on user satisfaction and the mechanisms driving it. We argue that products enhancing user satisfaction contribute to a collective, shared asset, the platform system reputation, from which all participants benefit. Thus, generativity has both a positive (system reputation) and negative (free-riding) effect on the ecosystem members’ incentives for developing products that enhance user satisfaction. We argue that the negative free-riding effect prevails as the platform system matures and competition with alternative platform systems increases. Using data from the video game industry, we find supportive evidence for the free-riding effect, which generates an average loss in total revenue for first-rate games of about $36.5 million and a drop of about 3.3% in the console’s market share. By identifying the conditions that exacerbate free riding in platform ecosystems, our study contributes to the understanding of the evolutionary dynamics of platform ecosystems. It also highlights one feedback mechanism governing collective action in ecosystems and its implications for value creation.

References

[1]
Adner R (2017) Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. J. Management 43(1):39–58.
[2]
Akerlof GA (1970) The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quart. J. Econom. 84(3):488–500.
[3]
Albanese R, van Fleet DD (1985) Rational behavior in groups: The free-riding tendency. Acad. Management Rev. 10(2):244–255.
[4]
Anderson EG Jr, Parker GG, Tan B (2014) Platform performance investment in the presence of network externalities. Inform. Systems Res. 25(1):152–172.
[5]
Angrist JD, Pischke JS (2009) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
[6]
Armstrong M (2006) Competition in two-sided markets. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):668–691.
[7]
Baldwin C, Clarck KB (2006) The architecture of participation: Does code architecture mitigate free riding in the open source development model? Management Sci. 52(7):1116–1127.
[8]
Baum CF, Schaffer ME, Stillman S (2007) Enhanced routines for instrumental variables/generalized method of moments estimation and testing. Stata J. 7(4):465–506.
[9]
Belsley DA, Kuh E, Welsch RE (2004) Regression Diagnostic: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity (John Wiley & Sons, New York).
[10]
Binken JLG, Stremersch S (2009) The effect of superstar software on hardware sales in system markets. J. Marketing 73(2):88–104.
[11]
Boudreau KJ (2012) Let a thousand flowers bloom? An early look at large numbers of software app developers and patterns of innovation. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1409–1427.
[12]
Bresnahan T, Orsini J, Yin P (2015) Demand heterogeneity, inframarginal multihoming, and platform market stability: Mobile app. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
[13]
Caillaud B, Jullien B (2003) Chicken & egg: competition among intermediation service providers. RAND J. Econom. 34(2):309–328.
[14]
Cennamo C (2018) Building the value of next-generation platforms: The paradox of diminishing returns. J. Management 44(8):3038–3069.
[15]
Cennamo C, Santalo J (2013) Platform competition: Strategic trade-offs in platform markets. Strategic Management J. 34(11):1331–1350.
[16]
Chen F, Xiao W (2005) Salesforce incentives and information screening: Individualistic vs. competitive schemes. Working paper, Columbia University, New York.
[17]
Clements MT, Ohashi H (2005) Indirect network effects and the product cycle: video games in the U.S., 1994–2002. J. Indust. Econom. 53(4):515–542.
[18]
Corts KS, Lederman M (2009) Software exclusivity and the scope of indirect network effects in the U.S. home video game market. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 27(2):121–136.
[19]
Faraj S, Jarvenpaa S, Majchrzak A (2011) Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1224–1239.
[20]
Farrell J, Saloner G (1985) Standardization, compatibility, and innovation. RAND J. Econom. 16(1):70–83.
[21]
Greene WH (2012) Econometric Analysis, 7th ed. (Prentice Hall, Boston).
[22]
Grewal R, Anindita C, Amit S (2010) Governance mechanisms in business-to-business electronic markets. J. Marketing 74(4):45–62.
[23]
Grewal R, Cote JA, Baumgartner H (2004) Multicollinearity and measurement error in structural equation models: Implications for theory testing. Marketing Sci. 23(4):519–529.
[24]
Gulati R, Puranam P, Tushman M (2012) Meta-organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts. Strategic Management J. 33(6):571–586.
[25]
Gupta S, Jain DC, Sawhney MS (1999) Modeling the evolution of markets with indirect network externalities: An application to digital television. Marketing Sci. 18(3):396–416.
[26]
Jacobides M, Cennamo C, Gawer A (2018) Toward a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management J. 39(8):2255–2276.
[27]
Hagiu A (2009) Two-sided platforms: Product variety and pricing structures. J. Econom. Management Strategy 18(4):1011–1043.
[28]
Hagiu A, Wright J (2015) Multi-sided platforms. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 43(November):162–174.
[29]
Henfridsson O, Bygstad B (2013) The generative mechanisms of digital infrastructure evolution. MIS Quart. 37(3):907–932.
[30]
Hui X, Saeedi M, Shen Z, Sundaresan N (2016) Reputation and regulations: Evidence from eBay. Management Sci. 62(12):3393–3672.
[31]
Kalra A, Shi M (2001) Designing optimal sales contests: A theoretical perspective. Marketing Sci. 20(2):170–193.
[32]
Kirmani A, Rao AR (2000) No pain, no gain: A critical review of the literature on signaling unobservable product quality. J. Marketing 64(2):66–79.
[33]
Kumar V, Gordon BR, Srinivasan K (2011) Competitive strategy for open source software. Marketing Sci. 30(6):1066–1078.
[34]
Levine SS, Prietula MJ (2014) Open collaboration for innovation: Principles and performance. Organ. Sci. 25(5):1414–1433.
[35]
Majchrzak A, Markus L (2012) Technology Affordances and Constraint Theory of MIS (SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA).
[36]
Marwell G, Oliver P (1993) The Critical Mass in Collective Action: A Micro-Social Theory (Cambridge University Press, New York).
[37]
Michael S (2000) The effect of organizational form on quality: the case of franchising. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 43(3):295–318.
[38]
Monge PR, Fulk J, Kalman ME, Flanagin AJ, Parnassa C, Rumsey S (1998) Production of collective action in alliance-based interorganizational communication and information systems. Organ. Sci. 9(3):411–433.
[39]
Penttinen E, Halme M, Lyytinen K (2018) What influences choice of business-to-business connectivity platforms? Internat. J. Electronic Commerce 22(4):479–509.
[40]
Olson M (1965) Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
[41]
Ostrom E (2003) How types of goods and property rights jointly affect collective action. J. Theoret. Politics 15(3):239–270.
[42]
Parker G, Van Alstyne M, Jiang X (2017) Platform ecosystems: how developers invert the firm. MIS Quart. 41(1):255–266.
[43]
Rietveld J, Eggers JP (2018) Demand heterogeneity in platform markets: Implications for complementors. Organ. Sci. 29(2):304–322.
[44]
Rietveld J, Schilling MA, Bellavitis C (2016) Reload and relaunch: Strategic governance of platform ecosystems. Working paper, Platform Strategy Symposium, Boston.
[45]
Rochet JC, Tirole J (2006) Two-sided markets: a progress report. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):645–667.
[46]
Roger G, Vasconcelos L (2014) Platform pricing structure and moral hazard. J. Econom. Management Strategy 23(3):527–547.
[47]
Smith K, Sasaki MS (1979) Decreasing multicollinearity: A method for models with multiplicative functions. Sociol. Methods Res. 8(1):35–56.
[48]
Stock JH, Yogo M (2005) Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. Andrews DWK, Stock J, eds. Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg (Cambridge University Press, New York), 80–108.
[49]
Tilson D, Lyytinen K, Sørensen C (2010) Digital infrastructures: The missing IS research agenda. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):748–759.
[50]
Tiwana A (2015) Evolutionary competition in platform ecosystems. Inform. Systems Res. 26(2):266–281.
[51]
Tiwana A, Konsynski B, Bush AA (2010) Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):675–687.
[52]
Tschang FT (2007) Balancing the tensions between rationalization and creativity in the video games industry. Organ. Sci. 18(6):989–1005.
[53]
Van Alstyne M, Parker J, Choudary S (2016) Pipelines, platforms, and the new rules of strategy. Harvard Business Rev. (April) 94(4):54–62.
[54]
Venkatraman N, Lee CH (2004) Preferential linkage and network evolution: a conceptual model and empirical test in the U.S. video game sector. Acad. Management J. 47(6):876–892.
[55]
Visnjic I, Cennamo C, Neely A, Visnjic N (2016) Governing the city: Unleashing value from the business ecosystem. California Management Rev. 59(1):109–140.
[56]
von Hippel E, von Krogh G (2003) Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organ. Sci. 14(2):209–223.
[57]
Wareham J, Fox PB, Cano GJL (2014) Technology ecosystem governance. Organ. Sci. 25(4):1195–1215.
[58]
Yalcin T, Elie O, Oded K, Eyal B (2013) Complementary goods: Creating, capturing, and competing for value. Marketing Sci. 32(4):554–569.
[59]
Yoo Y (2012) Digital materiality and the emergence of an evolutionary science of the artificial. Leonardi PM, Nardi B, Kallinikos J, eds. Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World (Oxford University Press, New York), 134–156.
[60]
Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K (2010) The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):724–735.
[61]
Yoo Y, Boland R, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A (2012) Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1398–1408.
[62]
Zammuto RF, Griffith TL, Majchrzak A, Dougherty DJ, Faraj S (2007) Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organ. Sci. 18(5):749–762.
[63]
Zittrain JL (2006) The generative Internet. Harvard Law Rev. 119(7):1974–2040.
[64]
Zittrain JL (2008) The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).
[65]
Zhu F, Iansiti M (2012) Entry into platform-based markets. Strategic Management J. 33(1):88–106.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Organization Science
Organization Science  Volume 30, Issue 3
May-June 2019
202 pages
ISSN:1526-5455
DOI:10.1287/orsc.2019.30.issue-3
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

INFORMS

Linthicum, MD, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 May 2019
Accepted: 20 October 2018
Received: 17 August 2017

Author Tags

  1. platform ecosystem
  2. generativity
  3. complement quality
  4. free riding
  5. complementarities
  6. ecosystem governance

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 09 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Coordination in a Digital Platform OrganizationInformation Systems Research10.1287/isre.2023.122635:1(363-393)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Research on value creation path of logistics platform under the background of digital ecosystemElectronic Commerce Research and Applications10.1016/j.elerap.2024.10142467:COnline publication date: 1-Sep-2024
  • (2023)Regulating Professional Players in Peer-to-Peer MarketsManagement Science10.1287/mnsc.2022.448069:5(2893-2918)Online publication date: 1-May-2023
  • (2023)Extended Generativity Theory on Digital PlatformsInformation Systems Research10.1287/isre.2023.120934:4(1686-1710)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2023
  • (2023)Reconceptualizing platforms in information systems research through the lens of service-dominant logicThe Journal of Strategic Information Systems10.1016/j.jsis.2023.10179132:3Online publication date: 1-Sep-2023
  • (2023)Measuring network effects of digital industrial platforms: towards a balanced platform performance managementInformation Systems and e-Business Management10.1007/s10257-023-00655-x21:4(863-911)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023
  • (2022)The Digital UndertowInformation Systems Research10.1287/isre.2021.105633:1(311-336)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2022
  • (2022)The openness of data platformsProceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Data Economy10.1145/3565011.3569056(34-41)Online publication date: 9-Dec-2022
  • (2022)The Engagement of Complementors and the Role of Platform Boundary Resources in e-Commerce Platform EcosystemsInformation Systems Frontiers10.1007/s10796-021-10236-324:6(2007-2025)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2022
  • (2021)The Race for Online ReputationInformation Systems Research10.1287/isre.2021.100532:4(1262-1280)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2021
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media