[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
article
Free access

The effects of visual proxemic information in video mediated communication

Published: 01 July 1998 Publication History

Abstract

One of the simplest examples of non-verbal communication is that of proximity, i.e. the distance at which conversants stand (or sit) from each other when interacting. This is known to be guided by certain social rules which take into account personal relationships, culture, personality and the purpose of the discussion, violation of which leads to various psychological and behavioural effects.One such effect is persuasion. Sales people will tend to approach customers closer than other business people. Video has in the past been shown to lead to more effective negotiation and bargaining than audio only conditions in experimental tasks. So far though, it remains unknown whether or not similar effects of proximity exist within video-mediated communication --- or indeed even whether or not proximity can be conveyed through video. This study investigates the role of the proxemic information within the video image in a formal persuasion environment using both subjective and objective measures of attitude and behaviour.A simulation of a customer seeking financial advice from an advisor across a live video link had two proxemic conditions --- the image of the advisor appearing either very close or far away. Subjective impressions of both the task and technology were analysed by questionnaire and showed no subjective differences between conditions. Structural analysis of the dialogues however, indicated customers to be more interactive in the close condition. When the advisor appeared close the customer spoke more often, said more, took longer and made more instances of overlapping speech. The similarity between these results and those of familiarity studies are discussed and a hypothesis of perceived close proximity resulting in perceived familiarity is offered.The study shows that proxemic information is preserved in video conferencing and produces effects similar to those of face-to-face interactions but less pronounced. This is explained by the video conveying only visual proxemic information compared to the multimodal information available in face-to-face interaction.

References

[1]
Albert, S. & Dabbs, J. M. (1970). "Physical distance and persuasion". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 265-270.
[2]
Alexander, C. N. Jr. & Rudd, J. (1981). Situated identities and response variables. In J. T. Tedeschi (Ed.), Impression Management Theory and Social Psychological Research (pp. 83-103). New York: Academic Press.
[3]
Allegier, A. R., & Byrne, D. (1973). "Attraction towards the opposite sex as a determinant of physical proximity". Journal of Social Psychology, 90, 213-219.
[4]
Anderson, A. H., O'Malley, C., Doherty-Sneddon, G., Langton, S., Newlands, A., Mullin J., Fleming, A. M. & Van der Velden, J. (1997). "The impact of VMC on collaborative problem solving: An analysis of task performance, communicative process and user satisfaction". In Finn, K. E., Sellen, A., Wilbur, S. (Eds.) Video-Mediated Communication. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc. Hillsdale. New Jersey.
[5]
Argyle, M. (1988). Bodily Communication. Routledge. London and New York.
[6]
Argyle, M. & Dean, J. (1965). "Eye-contact, distance and affiliation". Sociometry, 28, 289-304.
[7]
Becker, F. D. & Mayo, C. (1971). Delineating personal distance and territoriality". Environment and Behaviour, 3, 375-381.
[8]
Boyle, E. A., Anderson, A. H., & Newlands, A. (1994). "The effects of visibility on dialogue and performance in a co-operative problem solving task": Language and Speech, 37, 1-20.
[9]
Capella, J. N. (1981). "Mutual influence in expressive behaviour: Adult-adult and infant-adult dyadic interaction". Psychological Bulletin, 89, 101-132.
[10]
Capella, J. N. (1983). "Conversational involvement: Approaching and avoiding others". In J. M. Wieman & R. P. Harrison (Eds.), Nonverbal interaction (pp. 113-152). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
[11]
Capella, J. N. (1986). "Reciprocal and compensatory reactions to violations of distance norms for high and low self-monitors". In M. L. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 9 (pp. 359-376).
[12]
Capella, J. N. (1994). "The management of conversational interaction in adults and infants". In M. L. Knapp & G. R. Miller (Eds.) Handbook of Interpersonal Communication 2nd ed. (pp. 380-418).
[13]
Clark, H. H. & Schaefer, E. F. (1987). "Collaborating on contributions to conversations." Language and Cognitive Processes, 2, 19-41.
[14]
Cohen, K. (1982). "Speaker interaction: video teleconferences versus face-to-face meetings." In Proceedings of Teleconferencing and Electronic Communications, pp 189-199.
[15]
Cook, M. (1970). "Experiments on orientation and proxemics". Human Relations, 23, 61-76.
[16]
Doherty-Sneddon, G., Anderson A., O'Malley, C., Langton, S., Garrod, S. & Bruce, V. (1997). "Face-to-face and video mediated communication: A comparison of dialogue structure and task performance". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3, 105-125.
[17]
Efran, M. G. & Cheyne, J. A. (1974). "Affective concomitants of the invasion of shared space: Behavioural, physiological and verbal indicators". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 219-226.
[18]
Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
[19]
Grayson, D. (1996). "Designing a multimedia system: effects on consumer performance and attitudes". Unpublished report, available within NCR.
[20]
Hall, E. T. (1966). The Hidden Dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
[21]
Isaacs, E. A., & Tang, J. C. (1994). "What video can and cannot do for collaboration: A case study." Multimedia Systems, 2, 63-73.
[22]
Johansen, R. (1984). Teleconferencing and Beyond. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
[23]
Johnson, C. F. & Dabbs, J. M. (1976). "Self-disclosure in dyads as a function of distance and subject-experimenter relationship. Sociometry, 39, 257-263.
[24]
Leary, M. R. (1983). Understanding social anxiety: Social, personality and clinical perspectives. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
[25]
Mehrabian, A. & Williams, M. (1969). "Nonverbal concomitants of perceived and intended persuasiveness". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 37-58.
[26]
Muhlbach, L., Bocker, M. & Prussog, A. (1995). "Telepresence in videocommunications: A study on stereoscopy and individual eye contact." Human Factors, 37, 290-305.
[27]
Patterson, M. L. (1968). "Spacial factors in human interaction". Human Relations, 21, 351-361.
[28]
Patterson, M. L. (1977). "Interpersonal distance, affect, and equilibrium theory. Journal of Social Psychology, 101, 205-214.
[29]
Patterson, M. L. (1991). "A functional approach to nonverbal exchange". In Feldman, R. S. & Rime, B. (Eds.) Fundamentals of nonverbal behaviour (pp 458-495). Cambridge University Press.
[30]
Poyatos, F. (1975). "Cross cultural study of paralinguistic "alternants" in face-to-face interaction". In Kendon, A., Harris, R. M. & Key, M. R. (Eds.) Organization of Behaviour in Face-to-Face Interaction Mouton & Co. The Hague. Paris. Pp 285-314.
[31]
Reid, A. (1977). Comparing the telephone with face-to-face interaction. In (I. Pool, Ed.) The Social Impact of the Telephone. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[32]
Rosenfeld, H. M. (1966). "Approval-seeking and approval-inducing functions of verbal and non-verbal responses". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 597-605.
[33]
Sawitsky, J. C. & Watson, M. J. (1975). "Patterns of proxemic behaviour among preschool children. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 6, 109-113.
[34]
Scheflen, A. E. (1970). Territoriality and communication. Final Report NATO Symposium on Non-Verbal Communication, 35-38. Cited in Vine (1975).
[35]
Schober, M. F. & Clark, H. H. (1989). "Understanding by Addressees and Overhearers". Cognitive Psychology, 21, 211-232.
[36]
Short, J., Williams, E. & Christie, B. (1976). The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. London: John Wiley
[37]
Sommer, R. (1959). Studies in personal space. Sociometry, 22, 337-348.
[38]
Tang, J. C. & Isaacs, E. (1993). "Why do users like video? Studies of multimedia-supported collaboration. Computer Supported Collaborative Work (CSCW), 1, 163-196.
[39]
Vaksman, E. & Ellyson, S. L. (1979). "Visual and spatial behavior among US and foreign males: A cross-cultural test of equilibrium theory."Paper presented at the Eastern Psychological Association Convention, Philadelphia. Cited in Patterson (1991).
[40]
Vine, I. (1975). Territoriality and the Spatial Regulation of Interaction. In Kendon, A., Harris, R. M. & Key, M. R. (Eds.) Organization of Behavior in Face-to-Face Interaction (pp. 357-388). Mouton Publishers. The Hague. Paris.
[41]
Whittaker, S. (1995). "Rethinking video as a technology for interpersonal communications: theory and design implications." International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 42, 501-529.
[42]
Williams, E. (1977). Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and mediated communication. Psychological Bulletin, 16, 963-976.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Forty Thousand Fake Twitter Profiles: A Computational Framework for the Visual Analysis of Social Media PropagandaSSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.4899259Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)Forty Thousand Fake Twitter Profiles: A Computational Framework for the Visual Analysis of Social Media PropagandaSocial Science Computer Review10.1177/08944393241269394Online publication date: 1-Aug-2024
  • (2024)QoE Metrics for Interactivity in Video Conferencing ApplicationsProceedings of the 15th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference10.1145/3625468.3647622(178-189)Online publication date: 15-Apr-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM SIGCHI Bulletin
ACM SIGCHI Bulletin  Volume 30, Issue 3
July 1998
40 pages
ISSN:0736-6906
DOI:10.1145/565711
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 July 1998
Published in SIGCHI Volume 30, Issue 3

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. banking
  2. dialogue
  3. familiarity
  4. proxemics
  5. turn-taking
  6. video-mediated communication

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)93
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)12
Reflects downloads up to 26 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Forty Thousand Fake Twitter Profiles: A Computational Framework for the Visual Analysis of Social Media PropagandaSSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.4899259Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)Forty Thousand Fake Twitter Profiles: A Computational Framework for the Visual Analysis of Social Media PropagandaSocial Science Computer Review10.1177/08944393241269394Online publication date: 1-Aug-2024
  • (2024)QoE Metrics for Interactivity in Video Conferencing ApplicationsProceedings of the 15th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference10.1145/3625468.3647622(178-189)Online publication date: 15-Apr-2024
  • (2023)The Friend’s Egg: A Prototype for Spatially Aware, Interpersonal, Audiovisual Remote Communication to Maintain Friendship over DistanceProceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia10.1145/3626705.3631795(523-525)Online publication date: 3-Dec-2023
  • (2023)OpenMic: Utilizing Proxemic Metaphors for Conversational Floor Transitions in Multiparty Video MeetingsProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581013(1-17)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2019)Situating videoconferencing in a connected class toward intercultural knowledge development: A comparative reflection approachThe Internet and Higher Education10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.11.00141(1-10)Online publication date: Apr-2019
  • (2016)Testing the Tangible Interactive Window with Older AdultsGeroPsych10.1024/1662-9647/a00015929:4(215-224)Online publication date: Dec-2016
  • (2016)Teasing apart the effect of visibility and physical co-presence to examine the effect of CMC on interpersonal attractionComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.03755:PA(468-476)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2016
  • (2013)Multimedia Technology in the Financial Services SectorUser Perception and Influencing Factors of Technology in Everyday Life10.4018/978-1-4666-1954-8.ch008(92-106)Online publication date: 2013
  • (2013)Health vlogger-viewer interaction in chronic illness managementProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/2470654.2470663(49-58)Online publication date: 27-Apr-2013
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media