[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
article

Becoming a computer scientist

Published: 01 June 2002 Publication History
First page of PDF

References

[1]
Arnold, K. Retaining high-achieving women in science and engineering. In AAAS Symposium on Women and Girls in Science and Technology, (July 1987). Univ, of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
[2]
Barriers to equality in academia: Women in computer science at MIT. Laboratory for Computer Science and the Artificial Intelligence Laboratory at M.I.T., 1983.
[3]
Burton, M. D. Gender differences in professional socialization: A study of women and men becoming computer scientists. Tech. Rep., Carnegie- Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, June 1987. Committee on Social Science Research in Computing, Social and Decision Sciences Department.
[4]
Changing America: The new face of science and engineering --- Interim Rep. The Task Force on Women, Minorities, and the Handicapped in Science and Technology, Washington, D.C., 1988.
[5]
Changing America: The new face of science and engineering - Final Rep. The Task Force on Women, Minorities, and the Handicapped in Science and Technology, Washington, D.C., 1989.
[6]
Etzkowitz, H., Kemelgor, C., and Neuschatz, M. The final disadvantage: Barriers to women in academic science and engineering. Tech. Rep., Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst. Center for Science and Technology.
[7]
Failor, B. 'The History of EYH. Math/Science Network Broadcast, (Winter 1990),.
[8]
Gilbert, L., Gallesich. J. M., and Evans, S. L. Sex of faculty role model and students' self-perceptions of competency. Sex Roles 9, 5 (597-607), 1983.
[9]
Grigolia, M. Computer Science Reentry Program. Comp. Res. News, 2, 2 (April 19, 1990).
[10]
Hall, R. M. and Sandler, B. R. The classroom climate: A chilly one for women? Project on the Status and Education of Women, Association of American Colleges, Washington, D.C., 1982.
[11]
Hall, R. M. and Sandier B. R. The classroom climate revisited: Chilly for women faculty, administrators, and graduate students. Project on the Status and Education of Women, Association of American Colleges, Washington, D.C., 1986.
[12]
Hornig, 1.5. Women in science and engineering: Why so few? Tech. Rev., 87, 8 (31-41), 1984.
[13]
Huff, C. and Cooper, J. Sex bias in educational software; The effect of designers' stereotypes on the software they design. J. Applied Soc. Psych., 17, 6 (J 987), 519-532.
[14]
Riesler, 5., Sproull, L., and Eccles, J. S. Pool halls, chips, and war games: Women in the culture of computing. Psych. of Women Q., 9 (1985), 451-462.
[15]
Lantz, A. An Evaluation of Programs for Reentry of Women Scientists. In S. Humphreys, Ed., Women and Minorities in Science: Strategies for Increasing Participation. Westview Press, 1982.
[16]
Leveson, N. Women in computer science: A Report for the NSF CISE Gross Directorate Activities Advisory Committee, 1989.
[17]
Long, J. S. The origins of sex differences in science. Social Forces. To be published.
[18]
Marriage, family, and scientific careers: institutional policy versus research findings. American Association for the Advancement. of Science. In Proceedings of a Symposium at the Annual Meeting of the AAAS (1989).
[19]
NSF. Research in undergraduate institutions (RUI). Program Announcement, Directorate for Scientific, Technological, and International Affairs, 1989.
[20]
NSF. Visiting professorships for women. Grants for Research and Education in Science and Engineering Program Announcement, October 1989.
[21]
Report on women and minorities in science and engineering. National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C., 1988.
[22]
Sloat, B. Women in science: A university program of intervention, out-reach, and research. In Second International Interdisciplinary Congress on Women (April 1984. Gorningen, the Netherlands).
[23]
Sproull, L. S., Kiesler, S., and Zubrow, D. Encountering an Alien Culture. J. of Soc. Issues 40, 3 (1984), 31-48.
[24]
Sursock, A. The women's science and engineering network. European Journal of Physics, 8, 2 (1987), 151-152.
[25]
Widnall. S, E. AAAS Presidential Lecture: Voices from the pipeline. Science, 241 (1988), 1740-1745.
[26]
Zappert, L. T., and Stanbury, K. In the pipeline: A comparative analysis of men and women in graduate programs in science, engineering, and medicine at Stanford University. Tech. Rep. Working Paper 20, Institute for Research on Women and Gender, Stanford University Stanford, CA, 1984.

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)Improving the computer science pipeline for underrepresented groupsJournal of Computing Sciences in Colleges10.5555/3204979.320501133:5(161-164)Online publication date: 1-May-2018
  • (2011)The Role of Majority Groups in Diversity ProgramsACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/1993069.199307511:2(1-15)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2011
  • (2010)Happenstance and compromise: a gendered analysis of students' computing degree course selectionComputer Science Education10.1080/08993408.2010.52769920:4(317-345)Online publication date: Dec-2010
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM SIGCSE Bulletin
ACM SIGCSE Bulletin  Volume 34, Issue 2
Women and Computing
June 2002
176 pages
ISSN:0097-8418
DOI:10.1145/543812
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 June 2002
Published in SIGCSE Volume 34, Issue 2

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 12 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)Improving the computer science pipeline for underrepresented groupsJournal of Computing Sciences in Colleges10.5555/3204979.320501133:5(161-164)Online publication date: 1-May-2018
  • (2011)The Role of Majority Groups in Diversity ProgramsACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/1993069.199307511:2(1-15)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2011
  • (2010)Happenstance and compromise: a gendered analysis of students' computing degree course selectionComputer Science Education10.1080/08993408.2010.52769920:4(317-345)Online publication date: Dec-2010
  • (2008)Twenty-first Century Australian Women and IT: Exercising the power of choiceComputer Science Education10.1080/0899340070153812017:3(215-226)Online publication date: 31-May-2008
  • (2004)Women in information technologyStrategies for managing IS/IT personnel10.5555/969812.969822(165-193)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2004

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media