[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

Collaboration Drives Individual Productivity

Published: 07 November 2019 Publication History

Abstract

How does the number of collaborators affect individual productivity? Results of prior research have been conflicting, with some studies reporting an increase in individual productivity as the number of collaborators grows, while other studies showing that the free-rider effect skews the effort invested by individuals, making larger groups less productive. The difference between these schools of thought is substantial: if a super-scaling effect exists, as suggested by former studies, then as groups grow, their productivity will increase even faster than their size, super-linearly improving their efficiency. We address this question by studying two planetary-scale collaborative systems: GitHub and Wikipedia. By analyzing the activity of over 2 million users on these platforms, we discover that the interplay between group size and productivity exhibits complex, previously-unobserved dynamics: the productivity of smaller groups scales super-linearly with group size, but saturates at larger sizes. This effect is not an artifact of the heterogeneity of productivity: the relation between group size and productivity holds at the individual level. People tend to do more when collaborating with more people. We propose a generative model of individual productivity that captures the non-linearity in collaboration effort. The proposed model is able to explain and predict group work dynamics in GitHub and Wikipedia by capturing their maximally informative behavioral features, and it paves the way for a principled, data-driven science of collaboration.

References

[1]
Juan Camilo Bohorquez, Sean Gourley, Alexander R. Dixon, Michael Spagat, and Neil F. Johnson. 2009. Common ecology quantifies human insurgency. Nature, Vol. 462, 7275 (dec 2009), 911--914. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08631
[2]
Frederick P. Brooks. 1995. The mythical man-month: essays on software engineering. Addison-Wesley Professional. 322 pages.
[3]
Harold R. Carey and Patrick R. Laughlin. 2012. Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems: Effects of induced strategies. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 15, 2 (mar 2012), 231--242. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430211419174
[4]
Maxime Derex, Marie-Pauline Beugin, Bernard Godelle, and Michel Raymond. 2013. Experimental evidence for the influence of group size on cultural complexity. Nature, Vol. 503, 7476 (nov 2013), 389--391. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12774
[5]
Massimiliano di Penta, Mark Harman, Giuliano Antoniol, and Fahim Qureshi. 2007. The Effect of Communication Overhead on Software Maintenance Project Staffing: a Search-Based Approach. In 2007 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance. IEEE, 315--324. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSM.2007.4362644
[6]
Samer Faraj and Lee Sproull. 2000. Coordinating Expertise in Software Development Teams. Management Science, Vol. 46, 12 (dec 2000), 1554--1568. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.12.1554.12072
[7]
Peter G Fennell, Zhiya Zuo, and Kristina Lerman. 2018. Predicting and Explaining Behavioral Data with Structured Feature Space Decomposition. (oct 2018). arxiv: 1810.09841
[8]
Roger Guimerà, Brian Uzzi, Jarrett Spiro, and Luí s A. Nunes Amaral. 2005. Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance. Science, Vol. 308, 5722 (2005), 697--702. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1106340 arxiv: NIHMS150003
[9]
Guido Hertel, Norbert L. Kerr, and Lawrence A. Messé. 2000. Motivation gains in performance groups: Paradigmatic and theoretical developments on the Kö hler effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 79, 4 (2000), 580--601. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022--3514.79.4.580
[10]
Eirini Kalliamvakou, Georgios Gousios, Kelly Blincoe, Leif Singer, Daniel M. German, and Daniela Damian. 2014. The promises and perils of mining GitHub. In Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories - MSR 2014. ACM Press, 92--101. https://doi.org/10.1145/2597073.2597074
[11]
Aniket Kittur, Ed Chi, Bryan A Pendleton, Bongwon Suh, and Todd Mytkowicz. [n. d.]. Power of the few vs. wisdom of the crowd: Wikipedia and the rise of the bourgeoisie. World wide web, Vol. 1, 2 ( [n. d.]), 19.
[12]
Aniket Kittur and Robert E Kraut. 2008. Harnessing the wisdom of crowds in wikipedia: quality through coordination. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, 37--46.
[13]
Michael Klug and James P. Bagrow. 2016. Understanding the group dynamics and success of teams. Royal Society Open Science, Vol. 3, 4 (apr 2016), 160007. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160007
[14]
Patrick R. Laughlin, Erin C. Hatch, Jonathan S. Silver, and Lee Boh. 2006. Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems: Effects of group size. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 90, 4 (2006), 644--651. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022--3514.90.4.644
[15]
Mary J Lindstrom and Douglas M Bates. 1988. Newton-Raphson and EM Algorithms for Linear Mixed-Effects Models for Repeated-Measures Data. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., Vol. 83, 404 (1988), 1014--1022.
[16]
Thomas Maillart and Didier Sornette. 2016. Aristotle vs. Ringelmann: A response to Scholtes et al. on Superlinear Production in Open Source Software. arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.03608 (2016).
[17]
Andrew Mao, Winter Mason, Siddharth Suri, and Duncan J. Watts. 2016. An Experimental Study of Team Size and Performance on a Complex Task. PLOS ONE, Vol. 11, 4 (apr 2016), e0153048. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153048
[18]
Katrina D Maxwell, Luk Van Wassenhove, and Soumitra Dutta. 1996. Software development productivity of European space, military, and industrial applications. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 22, 10 (1996), 706--718.
[19]
Azadeh Nematzadeh, Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia, Yong-Yeol Ahn, and Alessandro Flammini. 2016. Information Overload in Group Communication: From Conversation to Cacophony in the Twitch Chat. (oct 2016). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1193147
[20]
Lingfei Wu, Dashun Wang, and James A. Evans. 2019. Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology. Nature, Vol. 566, 7744 (feb 2019), 378.
[21]
Stefan Wuchty, Benjamin F. Jones, and Brian Uzzi. 2007. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, Vol. 316, 5827 (2007), 1036--1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099 arxiv: 20

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Collaborative Working, Crowdsourcing, Partnering and NetworkingEncyclopedia of Libraries, Librarianship, and Information Science10.1016/B978-0-323-95689-5.00207-8(59-72)Online publication date: 2025
  • (2024)Facilitating effective collaboration to prevent aquatic invasive species spreadBiological Conservation10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110449290(110449)Online publication date: Feb-2024
  • (2023)Fork Entropy: Assessing the Diversity of Open Source Software Projects' ForksProceedings of the 38th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering10.1109/ASE56229.2023.00168(204-216)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Collaboration Drives Individual Productivity

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
    Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 3, Issue CSCW
    November 2019
    5026 pages
    EISSN:2573-0142
    DOI:10.1145/3371885
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 07 November 2019
    Published in PACMHCI Volume 3, Issue CSCW

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. collaboration
    2. github
    3. productivity
    4. software development
    5. teamwork
    6. wikipedia

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)450
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)61
    Reflects downloads up to 13 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2025)Collaborative Working, Crowdsourcing, Partnering and NetworkingEncyclopedia of Libraries, Librarianship, and Information Science10.1016/B978-0-323-95689-5.00207-8(59-72)Online publication date: 2025
    • (2024)Facilitating effective collaboration to prevent aquatic invasive species spreadBiological Conservation10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110449290(110449)Online publication date: Feb-2024
    • (2023)Fork Entropy: Assessing the Diversity of Open Source Software Projects' ForksProceedings of the 38th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering10.1109/ASE56229.2023.00168(204-216)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2023
    • (2023)Positioning in a collaboration network and performance in competitions: a case study of KaggleJournal of Computer-Mediated Communication10.1093/jcmc/zmad02428:4Online publication date: 29-Jun-2023
    • (2023)Efficient collective action for tackling time-critical cybersecurity threatsJournal of Cybersecurity10.1093/cybsec/tyad0219:1Online publication date: 7-Nov-2023
    • (2023)Building Collaborative Cybersecurity for Critical Infrastructure Protection: Empirical Evidence of Collective Intelligence Information Sharing Dynamics on ThreatFoxCritical Information Infrastructures Security10.1007/978-3-031-35190-7_10(140-157)Online publication date: 8-Jun-2023
    • (2022)“I updated the <ref>”: The evolution of references in the English Wikipedia and the implications for altmetricsQuantitative Science Studies10.1162/qss_a_001713:1(147-173)Online publication date: 12-Apr-2022
    • (2022)The penumbra of open source: projects outside of centralized platforms are longer maintained, more academic and more collaborativeEPJ Data Science10.1140/epjds/s13688-022-00345-711:1Online publication date: 21-May-2022
    • (2022)EveryBOTy Counts: Examining Human–Machine Teams in Open Source Software DevelopmentTopics in Cognitive Science10.1111/tops.1261316:3(450-484)Online publication date: 5-May-2022
    • (2022)Mining the online infosphere: A surveyWIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery10.1002/widm.145312:5Online publication date: 28-Feb-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Login options

    Full Access

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media