More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

Freedom to Personalize My Digital Classroom: Understanding Teachers' Practices and Motivations

Authors:

Laton Vermette,

Joanna McGrenere,

Parmit K. ChilanaAuthors Info & Claims

CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Paper No.: 318, Pages 1 - 14

https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300548

Published: 02 May 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Although modern classrooms are increasingly moving towards digital immersion and personalized learning, we have few insights into K-12 teachers' current practices, motivations, and barriers in setting up their digital classroom ecosystems. We interviewed 20 teachers on their process of discovering and integrating a vast range of productivity software and educational platforms in their classrooms, with a particular focus on how they personalize the UI and content of these tools (e.g., with plugins, templates, or option menus). We found that teachers largely depended on their own experimentation and professional circles to find, personalize, and troubleshoot software tools to support student needs or their own preferences. Teachers were often hesitant to attempt more advanced personalizations due to concerns over student confusion and increased troubleshooting load. We derive several design implications for HCI to better support teachers in sharing their personalized setups and helping their students benefit from digital immersion.

References

[1]

Erik van Alphen and Saskia Bakker. 2016. Lernanto: Using an Ambient Display During Differentiated Instruction. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA `16. ACM Press, Santa Clara, California, USA, 2334--2340.

Digital Library

[2]

Pengcheng An, Saskia Bakker, and Berry Eggen. 2017. FeetForward: On Blending New Classroom Technologies into Secondary School Teachers' Routines. In Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT 2017. Vol. 10514. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 327--347.

[3]

Yun-Jo An and Charles Reigeluth. 2011. Creating Technology-Enhanced, Learner-Centered Classrooms: K--12 Teachers' Beliefs, Perceptions, Barriers, and Support Needs. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, Vol. 28, 2 (Dec. 2011), 54--62.

[4]

Saskia Bakker, Elise van den Hoven, and Berry Eggen. 2012a. FireFlies: supporting primary school teachers through open-ended interaction design. In Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on - OzCHI `12. ACM Press, Melbourne, Australia, 26--29.

Digital Library

[5]

Saskia Bakker, Elise van den Hoven, Berry Eggen, and Kees Overbeeke. 2012b. Exploring peripheral interaction design for primary school teachers. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction - TEI `12. ACM Press, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, 245.

Digital Library

[6]

Andrea Bunt, Cristina Conati, and Joanna McGrenere. 2004. What role can adaptive support play in an adaptable system?. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Intelligent user interface - IUI `04. ACM Press, Funchal, Madeira, Portugal, 117.

Digital Library

[7]

Sean Cavanagh. 2014. What Is `Personalized Learning' Educators Seek Clarity - Education Week. Education Week (Oct. 2014). https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2014/10/22/09pl-overview.h34.html

[8]

Ahmet Naci cCoklar and Isil Kabakcci Yurdakul. 2017. Technology Integration Experiences of Teachers. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, Vol. 8, 1 (June 2017), 19--31.

[9]

Michelle Coulombe. 2013. New Survey Finds 85 Percent of Educational Institutions Allow BYOD Despite Security Concerns. https://www.bradfordnetworks.com/new-survey-finds-85-percent-of-educational-institutions-allow-byod

[10]

Meg Cramer and Gillian R. Hayes. 2013. The digital economy: a case study of designing for classrooms. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children - IDC `13. ACM Press, New York, New York, 431--434.

Digital Library

[11]

Larry Cuban, Heather Kirkpatrick, and Craig Peck. 2001. High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American educational research journal, Vol. 38, 4 (2001), 813--834.

[12]

Craig Desson. 2018. As Google for Education tools enter classrooms across Canada, some parents are asking to opt-out. https://www.cbc.ca/radio/spark/episode-401--1.4694935/as-1.4694939

[13]

Viv Ellis. 2007. Taking subject knowledge seriously: from professional knowledge recipes to complex conceptualizations of teacher development. Curriculum Journal, Vol. 18, 4 (Dec. 2007), 447--462.

[14]

Michael Eraut. 2004. Informal learning in the workplace. Studies in Continuing Education, Vol. 26, 2 (July 2004), 247--273.

[15]

Peggy A. Ertmer and Anne T. Ottenbreit-Leftwich. 2010. Teacher Technology Change: How Knowledge, Confidence, Beliefs, and Culture Intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, Vol. 42, 3 (March 2010), 255--284.

[16]

Leah Findlater, Karyn Moffatt, Joanna McGrenere, and Jessica Dawson. 2009. Ephemeral adaptation: the use of gradual onset to improve menu selection performance. In Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI 09. ACM Press, Boston, MA, USA, 1655.

Digital Library

[17]

Geoffrey Fletcher, Dian Schaffhauser, and Douglas Levin. 2012. Out of Print: Reimagining the K-12 Textbook in a Digital Age. State Educational Technology Directors Association. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED536747

[18]

Alison Fuller, Heather Hodkinson, Phil Hodkinson, and Lorna Unwin. 2005. Learning as peripheral participation in communities of practice: a reassessment of key concepts in workplace learning. British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 31, 1 (Feb. 2005), 49--68.

[19]

Krzysztof Gajos and Daniel S. Weld. 2004. SUPPLE: automatically generating user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Intelligent user interface - IUI `04. ACM Press, Funchal, Madeira, Portugal, 93.

Digital Library

[20]

Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Jing Jing Long, and Daniel S. Weld. 2006. Automatically generating custom user interfaces for users with physical disabilities. In Proceedings of the 8th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility - Assets `06. ACM Press, Portland, Oregon, USA, 243.

Digital Library

[21]

Lynette Molstad Gorder. 2008. A Study of Teacher Perceptions of Instructional Technology Integration in the Classroom. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, Vol. 50, 2 (2008), 63--76.

[22]

Christian Greiffenhagen. 2012. Making rounds: The routine work of the teacher during collaborative learning with computers. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, Vol. 7, 1 (March 2012), 11--42.

[23]

Mona Haraty and Joanna McGrenere. 2016. Designing for Advanced Personalization in Personal Task Management. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS `16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 239--250.

Digital Library

[24]

Mona Haraty, Joanna McGrenere, and Andrea Bunt. 2017. Online Customization Sharing Ecosystems: Components, Roles, and Motivations. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing - CSCW `17. ACM Press, Portland, Oregon, USA, 2359--2371.

Digital Library

[25]

Judith B. Harris and Mark J. Hofer. 2011. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) in Action. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, Vol. 43, 3 (March 2011), 211--229.

[26]

Ruben Hermans, Jo Tondeur, Johan van Braak, and Martin Valcke. 2008. The impact of primary school teachers' educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computers & Education, Vol. 51, 4 (Dec. 2008), 1499--1509.

Digital Library

[27]

Phil Hodkinson and Heather Hodkinson. 2003. Individuals, Communities of Practice and the Policy Context: School teachers' learning in their workplace. Studies in Continuing Education, Vol. 25, 1 (May 2003), 3--21.

[28]

Annemarieke Hoekstra, Fred Korthagen, Mieke Brekelmans, Douwe Beijaard, and Jeroen Imants. 2009. Experienced teachers' informal workplace learning and perceptions of workplace conditions. Journal of Workplace Learning, Vol. 21, 4 (May 2009), 276--298.

[29]

Jung Won Hur and Thomas A. Brush. 2009. Teacher Participation in Online Communities: Why Do Teachers Want to Participate in Self-generated Online Communities of K--12 Teachers? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, Vol. 41, 3 (March 2009), 279--303.

[30]

Gwo-Jen Hwang, Hui-Chun Chu, Ju-Ling Shih, Shu-Hsien Huang, and Chin-Chung Tsai. 2010. A Decision-Tree-Oriented Guidance Mechanism for Conducting Nature Science Observation Activities in a Context-Aware Ubiquitous Learning. Educational Technology & Society, Vol. 13, 2 (2010), 53--64.

[31]

Sarah Jenkins, Matt Williams, Jesse Moyer, Melinda George, and Elizabeth Foster. 2018. The Shifting Paradigm of Teaching: Personalized Learning According to Teachers. https://knowledgeworks.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/teacher-conditions.pdf

[32]

Andrew Jones. 2004. A review of the research literature on barriers to the uptake of ICT by teachers. http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/1603/1/becta_2004_barrierstouptake_litrev.pdf

[33]

Rock Leung, Leah Findlater, Joanna McGrenere, Peter Graf, and Justine Yang. 2010. Multi-Layered Interfaces to Improve Older Adults' Initial Learnability of Mobile Applications. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, Vol. 3, 1 (Sept. 2010), 1--30.

Digital Library

[34]

Rock Leung, Charlotte Tang, Shathel Haddad, Joanna Mcgrenere, Peter Graf, and Vilia Ingriany. 2012. How Older Adults Learn to Use Mobile Devices: Survey and Field Investigations. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, Vol. 4, 3 (Dec. 2012), 1--33.

Digital Library

[35]

Bianca Lochner, Rita-Marie Conrad, and Edward Graham. 2015. Secondary Teachers' Concerns in Adopting Learning Management Systems: A U. S. Perspective. TechTrends, Vol. 59, 5 (Sept. 2015), 62--70.

[36]

Margaret C. Lohman. 2009. A Survey of Factors Influencing the Engagement of Information Technology Professionals in Informal Learning Activities. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, Vol. 25 (Jan. 2009).

[37]

Karen Seashore Louis, Helen M. Marks, and Sharon Kruse. 1996. Teachers' Professional Community in Restructuring Schools. American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 33, 4 (Jan. 1996), 757--798.

[38]

Jennifer R. Luetkemeyer. 2016. Applying the Quadratic Usage Framework to Research on K-12 STEM Digital Learning Resources. School Library Research, Vol. 19 (2016). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1120865

[39]

Wendy E. Mackay. 1990. Patterns of sharing customizable software. In Proceedings of the 1990 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work - CSCW `90. ACM Press, Los Angeles, California, United States, 209--221.

Digital Library

[40]

Wendy E. Mackay. 1991. Triggers and barriers to customizing software. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI `91. ACM Press, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 153--160.

Digital Library

[41]

Allan MacLean, Kathleen Carter, Lennart Lövstrand, and Thomas Moran. 1990. User-tailorable Systems: Pressing the Issues with Buttons. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI `90). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 175--182.

Digital Library

[42]

Jesse Maida. 2016. Digital Classroom Market Will Grow at an Impressive CAGR of Almost 13% until 2020, Says Technavio. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161208005416/en/Digital-Classroom-Market-Grow-Impressive-CAGR-13

[43]

Sampada Marathe and S. Shyam Sundar. 2011. What Drives Customization?: Control or Identity?. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI `11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 781--790.

Digital Library

[44]

Keith E Maull, Manuel Gerardo Saldivar, and Tamara Sumner. 2010. Online curriculum planning behavior of teachers. In Educational Data Mining 2010 .

[45]

Joanna McGrenere, Ronald M. Baecker, and Kellogg S. Booth. 2002. An evaluation of a multiple interface design solution for bloated software. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems Changing our world, changing ourselves - CHI `02. ACM Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, 164.

Digital Library

[46]

Joanna McGrenere, Ronald M. Baecker, and Kellogg S. Booth. 2007. A Field Evaluation of an Adaptable Two-interface Design for Feature-rich Software. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., Vol. 14, 1 (May 2007).

Digital Library

[47]

Erin Millar. 2013. How teachers and students are adjusting to the digital classroom. (Aug. 2013). https://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/teachers-and-students-adjust-to-the-digital-classroom/article14012464/

[48]

Helena P. Miranda and Michael Russell. 2012. Understanding factors associated with teacher-directed student use of technology in elementary classrooms: A structural equation modeling approach: Understanding TDS. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 43, 4 (July 2012), 652--666.

[49]

Emerson Murphy-Hill, Da Young Lee, Gail C. Murphy, and Joanna McGrenere. 2015. How Do Users Discover New Tools in Software Development and Beyond? Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), Vol. 24, 5 (Oct. 2015), 389--422.

Digital Library

[50]

Fotini Paraskeva, Hara Bouta, and Aik Papagianni. 2008. Individual characteristics and computer self-efficacy in secondary education teachers to integrate technology in educational practice. Computers & Education, Vol. 50, 3 (April 2008), 1084--1091.

Digital Library

[51]

Stephen L. Parente and Edward C. Prescott. 1994. Barriers to Technology Adoption and Development. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 102, 2 (April 1994), 298--321.

[52]

Anne Marie Perrault. 2007 a. An Exploratory Study of Biology Teachers' Online Information Seeking Practices. School Library Media Research, Vol. 10 (2007). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ851701

[53]

Anne Marie Perrault. 2007 b. The School as an Information Ecology: A Framework for Studying Changes in Information Use. School Libraries Worldwide, Vol. 13, 2 (July 2007), 49. https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1P3--1511379601/the-school-as-an-information-ecology-a-framework

[54]

Tiffani Pittman and Trudi Gaines. 2015. Technology integration in third, fourth and fifth grade classrooms in a Florida school district. Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 63, 4 (Aug. 2015), 539--554.

[55]

Antoine Ponsard and Joanna McGrenere. 2016. Anchored Customization: Anchoring Settings to the Application Interface to Afford Customization. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI `16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4154--4165.

Digital Library

[56]

Susan M. Printy. 2008. Leadership for Teacher Learning: A Community of Practice Perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 44, 2 (April 2008), 187--226.

[57]

Charley Rogers. 2018. Teachers want more help choosing tech. https://edtechnology.co.uk/Article/teachers-want-more-help-choosing-tech

[58]

Ronny Scherer, Fazilat Siddiq, and Timothy Teo. 2015. Becoming more specific: Measuring and modeling teachers' perceived usefulness of ICT in the context of teaching and learning. Computers & Education, Vol. 88 (Oct. 2015), 202--214.

Digital Library

[59]

Ju-Ling Shih, Chien-Wen Chuang, and Gwo-Jen Hwang. 2010a. An Inquiry-based Mobile Learning Approach to Enhancing Social Science Learning Effectiveness. Educational Technology & Society, Vol. 13, 4 (Oct. 2010), 50--62.

[60]

Ju-Ling Shih, Gwo-Jen Hwang, Chien-Wen Chuang, and Jia-Jia Cheng. 2010b. Using a Mobile Learning System for Field Investigative Learning About the Local History and Geography of Southern Taiwan. Int. J. Mob. Learn. Organ., Vol. 4, 4 (Dec. 2010), 360--377.

Digital Library

[61]

Anselm Strauss and Juliet Corbin. 1990. Basics of qualitative research. Vol. 15. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

[62]

Timothy Teo. 2011. Factors influencing teachers' intention to use technology: Model development and test. Computers & Education, Vol. 57, 4 (Dec. 2011), 2432--2440.

Digital Library

[63]

Theophanis Tsandilas and m. c. schraefel. 2005. An empirical assessment of adaptation techniques. In CHI `05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems - CHI `05. ACM Press, Portland, OR, USA, 2009.

Digital Library

[64]

Etienne Wenger. 1999. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity .Cambridge university press.

[65]

Yong Zhao, Kevin Pugh, Stephen Sheldon, and Joe L. Byers. 2002. Conditions for Classroom Technology Innovations. Teachers College Record, Vol. 104, 3 (2002), 482--515.

Cited By

Venn-Wycherley MKharrufa ALechelt SNicholson RHowland KAlmjally ATrory ASarangapani V(2024)The Realities of Evaluating Educational Technology in School SettingsACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/363514631:2(1-33)Online publication date: 5-Feb-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3635146
Silva MRoberto RRadu ICavalcante PSchneider BTeichrieb V(2024)Development of Design Principles for AR Authoring Tools for Education Based on Teacher's PerspectivesIEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies10.1109/TLT.2023.332759217(677-690)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2023.3327592
Lau L(2023)A Study of the Effects of E-learning on the Learning Effectiveness of StudentsJournal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences10.54097/ehss.v8i.46238(1961-1968)Online publication date: 7-Feb-2023
https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v8i.4623
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Freedom to Personalize My Digital Classroom: Understanding Teachers' Practices and Motivations
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. Empirical studies in HCI

Recommendations

Uncovering Instructors’ Diverse Practices and Perceptions: A Field Deployment of a Customization-Sharing Platform that Supports Course Management
CHI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Instructors regularly learn and customize various feature-rich software applications to meet their unique classroom needs. Although instructors often prefer social help from colleagues to navigate this complex and time-consuming learning process, it can ...
A flipped classroom to personalise learning for engineering students

Flipped classrooms, also known as reversed or inverted classroom, has attracted widespread attention in higher education for active engagement and enhanced learning outcomes. It is proposed in the literature that flipped classroom promotes self-directed ...
Readiness of Resources for Flipped Classroom
ICEIT 2019: Proceedings of the 2019 8th International Conference on Educational and Information Technology

The flipped classroom provides students with the learning material enriched with audio and visual technology to facilitate them to acquire knowledge before their classes begin. As they learn themselves, this exercise frees up their class time for other ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

May 2019

9077 pages

ISBN:9781450359702

DOI:10.1145/3290605

General Chairs:
Stephen Brewster
University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK
,
Geraldine Fitzpatrick
TU Wien, Austria
,
Program Chairs:
Anna Cox
University College London, UK
,
Vassilis Kostakos
University of Melbourne, Australia

Copyright © 2019 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 02 May 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

CHI '19

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI '19: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

May 4 - 9, 2019

Glasgow, Scotland Uk

Acceptance Rates

CHI '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 703 of 2,958 submissions, 24%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025

Sponsor:
sigchi

ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

14
Total Citations
View Citations
713
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)83
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)14

Reflects downloads up to 07 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Venn-Wycherley MKharrufa ALechelt SNicholson RHowland KAlmjally ATrory ASarangapani V(2024)The Realities of Evaluating Educational Technology in School SettingsACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/363514631:2(1-33)Online publication date: 5-Feb-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3635146
Silva MRoberto RRadu ICavalcante PSchneider BTeichrieb V(2024)Development of Design Principles for AR Authoring Tools for Education Based on Teacher's PerspectivesIEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies10.1109/TLT.2023.332759217(677-690)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2023.3327592
Lau L(2023)A Study of the Effects of E-learning on the Learning Effectiveness of StudentsJournal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences10.54097/ehss.v8i.46238(1961-1968)Online publication date: 7-Feb-2023
https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v8i.4623
Wong-Aitken DRajabi PCarpendale SChilana P(2023)TangiBooks: Design and Creation of Paper-Based Tangibles with Embedded Electronics for Teaching Programming Concepts2023 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC)10.1109/VL-HCC57772.2023.00010(12-24)Online publication date: 3-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/VL-HCC57772.2023.00010
Rahman YKulshreshth ABorst C(2023)Comparing Visualizations to Help a Teacher Effectively Monitor Students in a VR Classroom2023 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR)10.1109/ISMAR59233.2023.00059(444-453)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR59233.2023.00059
Kotturi YJohnson HSkirpan MFox SBigham JPavel A(2022)Tech Help Desk: Support for Local Entrepreneurs Addressing the Long Tail of Computing ChallengesProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3517708(1-15)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3491102.3517708
Vermette LRamesh KMcGrenere JChilana P(2022)Uncovering Instructors’ Diverse Practices and Perceptions: A Field Deployment of a Customization-Sharing Platform that Supports Course ManagementProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3501846(1-15)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3491102.3501846
Das SChakraborty SMitra B(2021)Quantifying Students’ Involvement during Virtual Classrooms: A Meeting Wrapper for the TeachersProceedings of the 12th Indian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3506469.3506492(133-139)Online publication date: 19-Nov-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3506469.3506492
Ramesh KVermette LChilana PMeinel CPérez-Sanagustín MSpecht MOgan A(2021)Setting up, Troubleshooting, and Innovating on the Delivery of Online Instruction: A Case Study of an LMS Q&A ForumProceedings of the Eighth ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale10.1145/3430895.3460133(59-67)Online publication date: 8-Jun-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3430895.3460133
Hadi Mogavi RZhao YUl Haq EHui PMa XMeinel CPérez-Sanagustín MSpecht MOgan A(2021)Student Barriers to Active Learning in Synchronous Online Classes: Characterization, Reflections, and SuggestionsProceedings of the Eighth ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale10.1145/3430895.3460126(101-115)Online publication date: 8-Jun-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3430895.3460126
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents