[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

Becoming more specific

Published: 01 October 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Studies on teachers' acceptance and use of information and communication technology (ICT) have revealed perceived usefulness to be a crucial determinant for integrating ICT in classrooms. In consequence, the present study focuses on teachers' perceived usefulness of ICT for teaching and learning and is aimed at describing its structure and relations to self-efficacy, ICT use, and teachers' age. By means of Bayesian analysis, we specified confirmatory factor-analytic and structural equation models to a large-scale data set of N = 1190 Norwegian teachers. Our results supported the hypothesized four-factor structure of teachers' perceived usefulness of ICT, signifying different facets of ICT-related teaching goals in classrooms. Moreover, it was possible to disentangle general and specific components of the construct in nested factor models. In support of existing research, we found positive relations to self-efficacy and ICT use, but a negative relation to teachers' age. Our study provides evidence on a multidimensional conceptualization of teachers' perceived usefulness of ICT for teaching and learning, and verifies the relations to teacher-related characteristics. Implications for the measurement and modeling of the construct, and future research directions are discussed. Teachers' perceived usefulness of ICT for teaching and learning is multifaceted.A general factor and specific factors can be distinguished.Bayesian models with cross-loadings represent the structure of the construct.Perceived usefulness is positively related to self-efficacy and ICT use.Perceived usefulness is negatively related to teachers' age.

References

[1]
K. Aesaert, D. van Nijlen, R. Vanderlinde, J. van Braak, Direct measures of digital information processing and communication skills in primary education: using item response theory for the development and validation of an ICT competence scale, Computers & Education, 76 (2014) 168-181.
[2]
K. Aesaert, R. Vanderlinde, J. Tondeur, J. van Braak, The content of educational technology curricula: a cross-curricular state of the art, Educational Technology Research and Development, 61 (2013) 131-151.
[3]
A. Anjewierden, H. Gijlers, B. Kolloffel, N. Saab, R. de Hoog, Examining the relation between domain-related communication and collaborative inquiry learning, Computers & Education, 57 (2011) 1741-1748.
[4]
A. Antonietti, M. Giorgetti, Teachers' beliefs about learning from multimedia, Computers in Human Behavior, 22 (2006) 267-282.
[5]
P. Aubusson, P. Burke, S. Schuck, M. Kearney, B. Frischknecht, Teachers choosing rich tasks: the moderating impact of technology on student learning, enjoyment, and preparation, Educational Researcher, 43 (2014) 219-229.
[6]
S.A. Baldwin, G.W. Fellingham, Bayesian methods for the analysis of small sample multilevel data with a complex variance structure, Psychological Methods, 18 (2013) 151-164.
[7]
M. Bong, E.M. Skaalvik, Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: how different are they really?, Educational Psychology Review, 15 (2003) 1-40.
[8]
R. Carstens, W.J. Pelgrum, Second information and technology in education study - SITES 2006 Technical report, IEA, Amsterdam, 2009.
[9]
R. Cheung, D. Vogel, Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: an extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning, Computers & Education, 63 (2013) 160-175.
[10]
S.-P. Chien, H.-K. Wu, Y.-S. Hsu, An investigation of teachers' beliefs and their use of technology-based assessments, Computers in Human Behavior, 31 (2014) 198-210.
[11]
M. Claro, D.D. Preiss, E. San Martin, I. Jara, J.E. Hinostroza, S. Valenzuela, Assessment of 21st century ICT skills in Chile: test design and results from high school students, Computers & Education, 59 (2012) 1042-1063.
[12]
F.D. Davis, Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Quartely, 13 (1989) 319-340.
[13]
D. Donnelly, O. McGarr, J. O'Reilly, A framework for teachers' integration of ICT into their classroom practice, Computers & Education, 57 (2011) 1469-1483.
[14]
P.A. Ertmer, A.T. Ottenbreit-Leftwich, O. Sadik, E. Sendurur, P. Sendurur, Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: a critical relationship, Computers & Education, 59 (2012) 423-435.
[15]
A. Ferrari, DIGCOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2013.
[16]
J. Fraillon, J. Ainley, W. Schulz, T. Friedman, E. Gebhardt, Preparing for life in a digital age - The IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study International report, IEA, Amsterdam, 2014.
[17]
J. Fraillon, W. Schulz, J. Ainley, International computer and information literacy Study: Assessment framework, IEA, Amsterdam, 2013.
[18]
D. Govender, I. Govender, The relationship between Information and Communications Technology (ICT) integration and teachers' self-efficacy about ICT, Education as Change, 13 (2009) 153-165.
[19]
P. Griffin, E. Care, B. McGaw, The changing role of education and schools, in: Assessment and teaching of 21st Century skills, Springer, Dordrecht, 2012, pp. 1-15.
[20]
J.-E. Gustafsson, L. Åberg-Bengtsson, Unidimensionality and interpretability of psychological instruments, in: Measuring psychological constructs: Advances in model-based approaches, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, 2010, pp. 97-121.
[21]
T. Hermans, J. Tondeur, J. van Braak, M. Valcke, The impact of primary school teachers' educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers, Computers & Education, 51 (2008) 1499-1509.
[22]
J.P. Hernández-Ramos, F. Martínez-Abad, F.J. García Peñalvo, M.E. Herrera García, M.J. Rodríguez-Conde, Teachers' attitude regarding the use of ICT. A factor reliability and validity study, Computers in Human Behavior, 31 (2014) 509-516.
[23]
A.M. Ibrahim, Differential responding to positive and negative items: the case of a negative item in a questionnaire for course and faculty evaluation, Psychological Reports, 88 (2001) 497-500.
[24]
D. Ifenthaler, V. Schweinbenz, The acceptance of Tablet-PCs in classroom instruction: the teachers' perspectives, Computers in Human Behavior, 29 (2013) 525-534.
[25]
M.T. Kane, Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores, Journal of Educational Measurement, 50 (2013) 1-73.
[26]
D. Kaplan, S. Depaoli, Bayesian structural equation modeling, in: Handbook of structural equation modeling, Guilford Press, New York, NY, 2012, pp. 650-673.
[27]
K. Kikis, F. Scheuermann, E. Villalba, A framework for understanding and evaluating the impact of information and communication technologies in education, in: Assessing the effects of ICT in education, Publication Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2009, pp. 69-82.
[28]
R. Klassen, V. Tze, Teachers' self-efficacy, personality, and teacher effectiveness: a meta-analysis, Educational Research Review, 12 (2014) 59-76.
[29]
K. Kreijns, F. Van Acker, M. Vermeulen, H. van Buuren, What stimulates teachers to integrate ICT in their pedagogical practices? The use of digital learning materials in education, Computers in Human Behavior, 29 (2013) 217-225.
[30]
J.K. Kruschke, Bayesian data analysis, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1 (2010) 658-676.
[31]
J.K. Kruschke, Doing Bayesian data analysis, Elsevier, Burlington, MA, 2011.
[32]
J.K. Kruschke, Posterior predictive checks can and should be Bayesian: comment on Gelman and Shalizi, 'Philoshophy and the practice of Bayesian statistics', British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 66 (2013) 45-56.
[33]
Y. Lee, J. Lee, Enhancing pre-service teachers' self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration through lesson planning practice, Computers & Education, 73 (2014) 121-128.
[34]
S.-S. Liaw, H.-M. Huang, Perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness and interactive learning environments as predictors to self-regulation in e-learning environments, Computers & Education, 60 (2013) 14-24.
[35]
M. Lloyd, Toward a definition of the integration of ICT in the classroom, in: Proceedings AARE '05 education research - Creative Dissent: Constructive Solutions, AARE, Parramatta, 2005. eprints.qut.edu.au/3553/1/3553.pdf
[36]
K. Mac Callum, L. Jeffrey, Kinshuk, Comparing the role of ICT literacy and anxiety in the adoption of mobile learning, Computers in Human Behavior, 39 (2014) 8-19.
[37]
R.C. MacCallum, M.C. Edwards, L. Cai, Hopes and cautions in implementing Bayesian structural equation modeling, Psychological Methods, 17 (2012) 340-345.
[38]
H.W. Marsh, A.J.S. Morin, P.D. Parker, G. Kaur, Exploratory structural equation modeling: an integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10 (2014) 85-110.
[39]
B. Muthén, T. Asparouhov, Bayesian structural equation modeling: a more flexible representation of substantive theory, Psychological Methods, 17 (2012) 313-335.
[40]
B. Muthén, T. Asparouhov, Rejoinder to MacCallum, Edwards, and Cai (2012) and Rindskopf (2012): Mastering a new method, Psychological Methods, 17 (2012) 346-353.
[41]
B. Muthén, L. Muthén, Mplus 7.3 Computer software, Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA, 1998-2014.
[42]
D.S. Niederhauser, S. Perkmen, Beyond self-efficacy: measuring pre-service teachers' instructional technology outcome expectations, Computers in Human Behavior, 26 (2010) 436-442.
[43]
OECD, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2014.
[44]
G. Ottestad, I. Throndsen, O. Hatlevik, A. Rohatgi, Digitale Ferdigheter for Alle? Norske Resultater Fra ICILS 2013, Senter for IKT i utdanningen, Oslo, 2014.
[45]
N.D. Oye, N.A. Iahad, N.A. Rahim, The history of UTAUT model and its impact on ICT acceptance and usage by academicians, Education and Information Technologies, 19 (2014) 251-270.
[46]
B.W. O'Bannon, K. Thomas, Teacher perceptions of using mobile phones in the classroom: age matters!, Computers & Education, 74 (2014) 15-25.
[47]
C. Player-Koro, Factors influencing teachers' use of ICT in education, Education Inquiry, 3 (2012) 93-108.
[48]
F. Preckel, Assessing need for cognition in early adolescence, European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30 (2014) 65-72.
[49]
M.D. Proctor, Y. Marks, A survey of exemplar teachers' perceptions, use, and access of computer-based games and technology for classroom instruction, Computers & Education, 62 (2013) 171-180.
[50]
B. Pynoo, P. Devolder, J. Tondeur, J. van Braak, W. Duyck, P. Duyck, Predicting secondary school teachers' acceptance and use of digital learning environment: a cross-sectional study, Computers in Human Behavior, 27 (2011) 568-575.
[51]
G. Sang, M. Valcke, J. van Braak, J. Tondeur, Student teachers' thinking processes and ICT integration: predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology, Computers & Education, 54 (2010) 103-112.
[52]
R. van de Schoot, D. Kaplan, J. Denissen, J. Asendorpf, F. Neyer, M. van Aken, A gentle introduction to Bayesian analysis: applications to developmental research, Child Development, 85 (2014) 842-860.
[53]
U. Schroeders, O. Wilhelm, Computer usage questionnaire: structure, correlates, and gender differences, Computers in Human Behavior, 27 (2011) 899-904.
[54]
C. Smarkola, Efficacy of a planned behavior model: beliefs that contribute to computer usage intentions of student teachers and experienced teachers, Computers in Human Behavior, 24 (2008) 1196-1215.
[55]
H.-J. So, H. Choi, W.Y. Lim, Y. Xiong, Little experience with ICT: are they really the Net Generation student-teachers?, Computers & Education, 59 (2012) 1234-1245.
[56]
X.-Y. Song, S.-Y. Lee, A tutorial on the Bayesian approach for analyzing structural equation models, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56 (2012) 135-148.
[57]
T. Teo, Modelling technology acceptance in education: a study of pre-service teachers, Computers & Education, 52 (2009) 302-312.
[58]
T. Teo, Factors influencing teachers' intention to use technology: model development and test, Computers & Education, 57 (2011) 2432-2440.
[59]
T. Teo, Modeling technology acceptance among pre-service teachers, in: Technology acceptance in education: research and issues, Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, 2011, pp. 79-99.
[60]
T. Teo, Unpacking teachers' acceptance of technology: tests of measurement invariance and latent mean differences, Computers & Education, 75 (2014) 127-135.
[61]
T. Teo, C.B. Lee, C.S. Chai, S.L. Wong, Assessing the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers in Singapore and Malaysia: a multigroup invariance analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Computers & Education, 53 (2009) 1000-1009.
[62]
T. Teo, J. Noyes, An assessment of the influence of perceived enjoyment and attitude on the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: a structural equation modeling approach, Computers & Education, 57 (2011) 1645-1653.
[63]
V. Terzis, A.A. Economides, The acceptance and use of computer based assessment, Computers & Education, 56 (2011) 1032-1044.
[64]
J. Tondeur, M. Valcke, J. van Braak, A multidimensional approach to determinants of computer use in primary education: teacher and school characteristics, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24 (2008) 494-506.
[65]
R. Toomey, Information and communication technology for teaching and learning, 2001.
[66]
A. Tristán-López, M.A. Ylizaliturri-Salcedo, Evaluation of ICT competencies, in: Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, Springer, New York, NY, 2014, pp. 323-336.
[67]
R. Vanderlinde, K. Aesaert, J. van Braak, Institutionalised ICT use in primary education: a multilevel analysis, Computers & Education, 72 (2014) 1-10.
[68]
V. Venkatesh, M.G. Morris, M.G. Davis, F.D. Davis, User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified theory, MIS Quartely, 27 (2003) 425-478.
[69]
G. Wikan, T. Molster, Norwegian secondary school teachers and ICT, European Journal of Teacher Education, 34 (2011) 209-218.
[70]
Y. Yang, S. Green, Coefficient Alpha: a reliability coefficient for the 21st Century?, Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29 (2011) 377-392.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Digital learning for preschools: Validation of basic ICT competence beliefs of preschool teachers in Hong Kong and the PhilippinesEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-024-12591-529:14(1-15)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2024
  • (2023)Perceptions of Students About the Use of Webinars in ClassroomsInternational Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education10.4018/IJICTE.32279319:1(1-17)Online publication date: 12-May-2023
  • (2023)Digital competence test for learning in schoolsComputers & Education10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104830203:COnline publication date: 1-Oct-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Computers & Education
Computers & Education  Volume 88, Issue C
October 2015
408 pages

Publisher

Elsevier Science Ltd.

United Kingdom

Publication History

Published: 01 October 2015

Author Tags

  1. Bayesian analysis
  2. Measurement
  3. Perceived usefulness of ICT
  4. Structural equation modeling
  5. Technology acceptance

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 07 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Digital learning for preschools: Validation of basic ICT competence beliefs of preschool teachers in Hong Kong and the PhilippinesEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-024-12591-529:14(1-15)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2024
  • (2023)Perceptions of Students About the Use of Webinars in ClassroomsInternational Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education10.4018/IJICTE.32279319:1(1-17)Online publication date: 12-May-2023
  • (2023)Digital competence test for learning in schoolsComputers & Education10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104830203:COnline publication date: 1-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Fostering pre-service teachers’ technology acceptance – does the type of engagement with tool-related information matter?Education and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-023-12047-229:5(6139-6161)Online publication date: 29-Jul-2023
  • (2023)Comparison of pre- and in-service primary teachers’ dispositions towards the use of ICTEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-023-11793-728:11(14857-14876)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2023
  • (2022)Women and digital government in rural IndiaInformation Polity10.3233/IP-20030227:1(59-78)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022
  • (2022)An Empirical Study on the Factors Influencing Users’ Continuance Intention of Using Online Learning Platforms for Secondary School Students by Big Data AnalyticsMobile Information Systems10.1155/2022/95086682022Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022
  • (2022)Determinants of higher education teachers’ intention to use technology-based examsEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-022-11435-428:6(6485-6513)Online publication date: 17-Nov-2022
  • (2022)A multilevel modeling approach to investigating factors impacting computer and information literacy: ICILS Korea and Finland sampleEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-021-10690-127:2(1675-1703)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2022
  • (2021)Self-reported technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) of pre-service teachers in relation to digital technology use in lesson plansComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2020.106586115:COnline publication date: 1-Feb-2021
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media