[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3548814.3551456acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessapConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The influence of body orientation relative to gravity on egocentric distance estimates in virtual reality

Published: 22 September 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Virtual reality head mounted displays (VR-HMD) can immerse individuals into a variety of virtual environments while accounting for head orientation to update the virtual environment. VR-HMDs also allow users to explore environments while maintaining different body positions (e.g. sitting and laying down). How discrepancies between real world body position and the virtual environment impact the perception of virtual space or, additionally, how a visual upright with incongruent changes in head orientation affects space perception within VR has not been fully defined. In this study we sought to further understand how changes in head-on-body orientation (laying supine, laying prone, laying on left side and, being upright) while a steady visual virtual upright is maintained can affect the perception of distance. We used a new psychophysics perceptual matching based approach with two different probe configurations (“L” & “T” shape) to extract distance perception thresholds in the four previously mentioned positions at egocentric distances of 4, 5, and 6 virtual meters. Our results indicate that changes in observer orientation with respect to gravity impact the perception of distances with a virtual environment when it is maintained at a visual upright. Here we found significant differences between perceived distances in the upright condition compared to the prone and laying on left side positions. Additionally, we found that distance perception results were impacted by differences in probe configuration. Our results add to a body of work on how changes in head-on-body orientation can affect the perception of distance, while stressing that more research is still needed to fully understand how these changes with respect to gravity affect the perception of space within virtual environments.

References

[1]
Claudia Armbruster, Marc Wolter, Torsten W. Kuhlen, W Spijkers, and Bruno Fimm. 2008. Depth perception in virtual reality: Distance estimations in peri- and extrapersonal space. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.9935
[2]
George Berkeley. 1732. An essay towards a new theory of vision (4th ed.). Dublin.
[3]
Gunnar Blohm, Aarlenne Khan, Lei Ren, Kai Schreiber, and Douglas Crawford. 2008. Depth estimation from retinal disparity requires eye and head orientation signals. Journal of Vision, 8(16), 3–3. https://doi.org/10.1167/8.16.3
[4]
Lauren Buck, Mary Young, and Bobby Bodenheimer. 2018. A comparison of distance estimation in HMD-based virtual environments with different HMD-based conditions. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 15(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196885
[5]
David Carter. 1977. The moon illusion: A test of the vestibular hypothesis under monocular viewing conditions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 45, 1127–1130. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1977.45.3f.1127
[6]
Gilles Clement, Angie Bukley, Nuno Loureiro, Louise Lindblad, Duarte Sousa, and Andre Zandvilet. 2020. Horizontal and vertical distance perception in Altered Gravity. Scientific Reports, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62405-0
[7]
Timofey Grechkin, Tien Dat Nguyen, Jodie Plumert, James Cremer, and Joseph Kearney. 2010. How does presentation method and measurement protocol affect distance estimation in real and virtual environments? ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 7(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/1823738.1823744
[8]
Laurence Harris, and Charles Mander. 2014. Perceived distance depends on the orientation of both the body and the visual environment. Journal of Vision, 14(12), 17–17. https://doi.org/10.1167/14.12.17
[9]
Atsuki Higashiyama, and Kohei Adachi. 2006. Perceived size and perceived distance of targets viewed from between the legs: Evidence for proprioceptive theory. Vision Research, 46(23), 3961–3976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2006.04.002
[10]
Rebecca Hornsey, Paul Hibbard, and Peter Scarfe. 2020. Size and shape constancy in consumer virtual reality. Behavior Research Methods, 52(4), 1587–1598. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01336-9
[11]
Ian Howard, and Brian Rogers. 2012. Perceiving in depth. Oxford University Press.
[12]
Adam Jones, Edward Swan II, and Mark Bolas. 2013. Peripheral stimulation and its effect on perceived spatial scale in Virtual Environments. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19(4), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2013.37
[13]
Adam Jones, Edward Swan II, Gurjot Singh, Eric Kolstad, and Stephen Ellis. 2008. The effects of virtual reality, augmented reality, and motion parallax on egocentric depth perception. 2008 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference. https://doi.org/10.1109/vr.2008.4480794
[14]
Jonathan Kelly, Lucia Cherep, and Zachary Siegel. 2017. Perceived space in the HTC vive. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 15(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3106155
[15]
Joshua Knapp, and Jack Loomis. 2003. Visual perception of Egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. Virtual and Adaptive Environments, 21–46. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781410608888.pt1
[16]
Jonathan Kelly. 2022. Distance perception in virtual reality: A meta-analysis of the effect of head-mounted display characteristics. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/6fps2
[17]
Joshua Knapp, and Jack Loomis. 2004. Limited field of view of head-mounted displays is not the cause of distance underestimation in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 13(5), 572–577. https://doi.org/10.1162/1054746042545238
[18]
Markus Leyrer. 2014. Understanding and Manipulating Eye Height to Change the User's Experience of Perceived Space in Virtual Reality. Logos Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
[19]
Zhi Li, John Phillips, and Frank Durgin. 2011. The underestimation of egocentric distance: Evidence from frontal matching tasks. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(7), 2205–2217.
[20]
Sina Masnadi, Kevin Pfeil, Jose-Valentin Sera-Josef, and Joseph LaViola. 2022. Effects of field of view on egocentric distance perception in virtual reality. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517548
[21]
Mark Mon-Williams, and James Tresilian. 1999. Some recent studies on the extraretinal contribution to distance perception. Perception, 28(2), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1068/p2737
[22]
Abdeldjallil Naceri, Ryad Chellali, Fabien Dionnet, and Simone Toma. 2010. Depth Perception Within Virtual Environments: Comparison Between two Display Technologies. International Journal on Advances in Intelligent Systems, 3, 51–64.
[23]
Etienne Peillard, Ferran Argelaguet, Jean-Marie Normand, Anatole Lecuyer, and Guillaune Moreau. 2019. Studying exocentric distance perception in Optical See-through augmented reality. 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). https://doi.org/10.1109/ismar.2019.00-13
[24]
Jonathan Pfautz. 2000. Depth perception in Computer Graphics. University of Cambridge.
[25]
Rebekka Renner, Boris Velichkovsky, and Jens Helmert. 2013. The perception of egocentric distances in Virtual Environments - A Review. ACM Computing Surveys, 46(2), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1145/2543581.2543590
[26]
Irvin Rock, and Lloyd Kaufman. 1962. The moon Illusion, II: The moon's apparent size is a function of the presence or absence of terrain. Science, 136(3521), 1023–1031. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.136.3521.1023
[27]
Cecile Scotto Di Cesare, Fabrice Sarlegna, Christophe Bourdin, Daniel Mestre, and Lionel Bringoux. 2014. Combined influence of visual scene and Body tilt on ARM Pointing movements: Gravity Matters! PLoS ONE, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099866
[28]
Jeffrey Wagman, Julia Blau, and William Warren. 2020. Perceiving surface layout: ground theory, affordances, and the objects of perception. In Perception as information detection: Reflections on Gibson's ecological approach to visual perception (pp. 151–173). essay, Routledge.
[29]
Peter Willemsen, Mark Colton, Sarah Creem-Regehr, and William Thompson. 2004. The effects of head-mounted display mechanics on distance judgments in virtual environments. Proceedings of the 1st Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization - APGV '04. https://doi.org/10.1145/1012551.1012558
[30]
William Thompson, Roland Fleming, Sarah Creem-Regehr, and Jeanine Stefanucci. 2011. Visual perception from a computer graphics perspective. CRC Press.
[31]
William Thompson, Peter Willemsen, Amy Gooch, Sarah Creem-Regehr, Jack Loomis, and Andrew Beall. 2004. Does the quality of the computer graphics matter when judging distances in visually immersive environments? Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 13(5), 560–571. https://doi.org/10.1162/1054746042545292
[32]
Oliver Toskovic. 2010. Brave upside down world: Does looking between the legs elongate or shorten the perceived distance. Psihologija, 43(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.2298/psi1001021t
[33]
Agoston Torok, Elisa R. Ferrè, Elena Kokkinara, Valeria Csépe, David Swapp, and Patrick Haggard. 2017. Up, down, near, far: An online vestibular contribution to distance judgement. PLOS ONE, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169990
[34]
Bjorn Van der Hoort, Arvid Guterstam, and Henrik Ehrsson. 2011. Being Barbie: The size of One's own Body determines the perceived size of the world. PLoS ONE, 6(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020195
[35]
Jeremy Wolfe, Keith Kluender, and Dennis Levi. 2018. Sensation & Perception. Oxford University Press.
[36]
Russell Wood, Peter Zinkus, and Paul Mountjoy. 1968. The vestibular hypothesis of the moon illusion. Psychonomic Science, 11(10), 356–356. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03328235
[37]
Bing Wu, Zijiang He, and Teng L. Ooi. 2007. The linear perspective information in ground surface representation and distance judgment. Perception & Psychophysics, 69(5), 654–672. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193769
[38]
Peter Zinkus, and Paul Mountjoy. 1969. The effect of head position on size discrimination. Psychonomic Science, 14(2), 80–80. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03336440

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Simulated eye height impacts size perception differently depending on real-world postureScientific Reports10.1038/s41598-023-47364-613:1Online publication date: 16-Nov-2023

Index Terms

  1. The influence of body orientation relative to gravity on egocentric distance estimates in virtual reality

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SAP '22: ACM Symposium on Applied Perception 2022
    September 2022
    86 pages
    ISBN:9781450394550
    DOI:10.1145/3548814
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 22 September 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Funding Sources

    • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Grant

    Conference

    SAP '22
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 43 of 94 submissions, 46%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)47
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
    Reflects downloads up to 12 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Simulated eye height impacts size perception differently depending on real-world postureScientific Reports10.1038/s41598-023-47364-613:1Online publication date: 16-Nov-2023

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media