Supporting Awareness of Visual Impairments and Accessibility Reflections through Video Demos and Design Cards
Article No.: 67, Pages 1 - 15
Abstract
Disabled people’s experiences and knowledge are oftentimes not central in design processes. Further, the burden of outreach and sensitising others to these experiences and knowledge is frequently not recognised. This paper offers a workshop approach for including disabled people in the early stages of design and supporting accessibility awareness among non-disabled design practitioners. Our approach and associated tools—designed to help support this deeper participatory work—bring together users, researchers and design specialists with different visual abilities (blind, partially sighted and sighted). We describe how these groups were engaged with video demos and reflective design cards for prompting conversations about technology, accessibility, and visual impairments (VI). Eight online workshops were conducted with 17 participants (2-3 participants per session) and found varied types of interactions between them. Overall, the approach and tools enabled participants to learn about, share, and reflect on how technologies are used by visually impaired people (VIP).
References
[1]
Tessa Aarts, Linas K. Gabrielaitis, Lianne C. de Jong, Renee Noortman, Emma M. van Zoelen, Sophia Kotea, Silvia Cazacu, Lesley L. Lock, and Panos Markopoulos. 2020. Design Card Sets: Systematic Literature Survey and Card Sorting Study. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 419–428. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395516
[2]
Ali Abdolrahmani, Kevin M. Storer, Antony Rishin Mukkath Roy, Ravi Kuber, and Stacy M. Branham. 2020. Blind Leading the Sighted: Drawing Design Insights from Blind Users towards More Productivity-Oriented Voice Interfaces. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 12, 4, Article 18 (Jan. 2020), 35 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3368426
[3]
C. Andrews. 2014. Accessible Participatory Design: Engaging and Including Visually Impaired Participants. In Inclusive Designing, P. M. Langdon, J. Lazar, A. Heylighen, and H. Dong (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 201–210.
[4]
Lisa Anthony, YooJin Kim, and Leah Findlater. 2013. Analyzing User-Generated Youtube Videos to Understand Touchscreen Use by People with Motor Impairments. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1223–1232. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466158
[5]
Mark S Baldwin, Sen H Hirano, Jennifer Mankoff, and Gillian R Hayes. 2019. Design in the Public Square: Supporting Assistive Technology Design Through Public Mixed-Ability Cooperation. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW(2019), 1–22.
[6]
Jeffrey Bardzell and Shaowen Bardzell. 2013. What is ”Critical” about Critical Design?Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3297–3306. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466451
[7]
Cynthia L. Bennett, Erin Brady, and Stacy M. Branham. 2018. Interdependence as a Frame for Assistive Technology Research and Design. In Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility(Galway, Ireland) (ASSETS ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1145/3234695.3236348
[8]
Cynthia L. Bennett, Burren Peil, and Daniela K. Rosner. 2019. Biographical Prototypes: Reimagining Recognition and Disability in Design. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (San Diego, CA, USA) (DIS ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322376
[9]
Cynthia L. Bennett and Daniela K. Rosner. 2019. The Promise of Empathy: Design, Disability, and Knowing the ”Other”. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300528
[10]
Cynthia L. Bennett, Daniela K. Rosner, and Alex S. Taylor. 2020. The Care Work of Access. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376568
[11]
Cynthia L. Bennett, Kristen Shinohara, Brianna Blaser, Andrew Davidson, and Kat M. Steele. 2016. Using a Design Workshop To Explore Accessible Ideation. In Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Reno, Nevada, USA) (ASSETS ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 303–304. https://doi.org/10.1145/2982142.2982209
[12]
Mark Blythe and Paul Cairns. 2009. Critical Methods and User Generated Content: The IPhone on YouTube. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1467–1476. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518923
[13]
Erin Brady, Meredith Ringel Morris, Yu Zhong, Samuel White, and Jeffrey P. Bigham. 2013. Visual Challenges in the Everyday Lives of Blind People. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2117–2126. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481291
[14]
Stacy M. Branham and Shaun K. Kane. 2015. The Invisible Work of Accessibility: How Blind Employees Manage Accessibility in Mixed-Ability Workplaces. In Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility (Lisbon, Portugal) (ASSETS ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1145/2700648.2809864
[15]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2019. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 11, 4 (2019), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
[16]
Virginia Braun, Victoria Clarke, Nikki Hayfield, and Gareth Terry. 2019. Thematic Analysis. Springer Singapore, Singapore, 843–860. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_103
[17]
Robin N. Brewer. 2018. Facilitating Discussion and Shared Meaning: Rethinking Co-Design Sessions with People with Vision Impairments. In Proceedings of the 12th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (New York, NY, USA) (PervasiveHealth ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 258–262. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240925.3240981
[18]
Elizabeth Buie and Mark Blythe. 2013. Meditations on YouTube. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces (Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom) (DPPI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1145/2513506.2513511
[19]
Daniel G. Cabrero, Heike Winschiers-Theophilus, and José Abdelnour-Nocera. 2016. A Critique of Personas as Representations of ”the Other” in Cross-Cultural Technology Design. In Proceedings of the First African Conference on Human Computer Interaction (Nairobi, Kenya) (AfriCHI’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 149–154. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998581.2998595
[20]
Sasha Costanza-Chock. 2020. Design justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds we need. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
[21]
Clare Cullen and Oussama Metatla. 2019. Co-Designing Inclusive Multisensory Story Mapping with Children with Mixed Visual Abilities. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Boise, ID, USA) (IDC ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311927.3323146
[22]
Rodrigo de Oliveira, Christopher Pentoney, and Mika Pritchard-Berman. 2018. YouTube Needs: Understanding User’s Motivations to Watch Videos on Mobile Devices. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (Barcelona, Spain) (MobileHCI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 36, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3229434.3229448
[23]
Emory James Edwards, Cella Monet Sum, and Stacy M. Branham. 2020. Three Tensions Between Personas and Complex Disability Identities. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI EA ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3382931
[24]
Yasmine N. El-Glaly. 2020. Teaching Accessibility to Software Engineering Students. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Portland, OR, USA) (SIGCSE ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366914
[25]
Heather A Faucett, Kate E Ringland, Amanda LL Cullen, and Gillian R Hayes. 2017. (In) visibility in disability and assistive technology. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS) 10, 4 (2017), 1–17.
[26]
Centre for Accessibility and Inclusion Research (CAIR). 2018. Tools and Techniques to Encourage Inclusion in Design Thinking. Retrieved 04 August 2021 from https://cair.rit.edu/projects.html#tools
[27]
Jodi Forlizzi. 2018. Moving beyond User-Centered Design. Interactions 25, 5 (aug 2018), 22–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3239558
[28]
Christopher Frauenberger. 2015. Disability and Technology: A Critical Realist Perspective. In Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers &; Accessibility(Lisbon, Portugal) (ASSETS ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1145/2700648.2809851
[29]
Christopher Frauenberger. 2019. Entanglement HCI The Next Wave?ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 27, 1, Article 2 (Nov. 2019), 27 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3364998
[30]
Michael Golembewski and Mark Selby. 2010. Ideation Decks: A Card-Based Design Ideation Tool. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Aarhus, Denmark) (DIS ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 89–92. https://doi.org/10.1145/1858171.1858189
[31]
Aimi Hamraie. 2016. Universal Design and the Problem of “Post-Disability” Ideology. Design and Culture 8, 3 (2016), 285–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2016.1218714 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2016.1218714
[32]
Aimi Hamraie and Kelly Fritsch. 2019. Crip technoscience manifesto. Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience 5, 1 (2019), 1–33.
[33]
Christina Harrington, Sheena Erete, and Anne Marie Piper. 2019. Deconstructing Community-Based Collaborative Design: Towards More Equitable Participatory Design Engagements. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 216 (Nov. 2019), 25 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359318
[34]
Megan Hofmann, Devva Kasnitz, Jennifer Mankoff, and Cynthia L Bennett. 2020. Living Disability Theory: Reflections on Access, Research, and Design. In The 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Virtual Event, Greece) (ASSETS ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 4, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3373625.3416996
[35]
Seray B. Ibrahim, Asimina Vasalou, and Michael Clarke. 2020. Can Design Documentaries Disrupt Design for Disability?. In Proceedings of the Interaction Design and Children Conference (London, United Kingdom) (IDC ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1145/3392063.3394403
[36]
IDEO. 2018. Unlocking Creativity in the Name of Inclusion. Retrieved 20 January 2022 from https://www.ideo.org/perspective/creative-inclusion-and-bias-breaking
[37]
Netta Iivari and Kari Kuutti. 2017. Critical Design Research and Information Technology: Searching for Empowering Design. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Edinburgh, United Kingdom) (DIS ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 983–993. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064747
[38]
Liz Jackson, Alex Haagaard, and Rua Williams. 2022. Disability Dongle. Retrieved 04 August 2021 from https://blog.castac.org/2022/04/disability-dongle/
[39]
Richard E. Ladner. 2015. Design for User Empowerment. Interactions 22, 2 (feb 2015), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/2723869
[40]
Alex Lasker. 2020. Blind teen captivates social media with reading and writing lesson: ’This blows my mind’. Retrieved 04 August 2021 from https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/teen-reveals-she-able-read-150657934.html
[41]
Megan Lawrence and Mary Bellard. 2017. Teach Access: Preparing Computing Students for Industry (Abstract Only). In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Seattle, Washington, USA) (SIGCSE ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 700. https://doi.org/10.1145/3017680.3022392
[42]
Amanda Lazar, Jonathan Lazar, and Alisha Pradhan. 2019. Using Modules to Teach Accessibility in a User-Centered Design Course. In The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility(Pittsburgh, PA, USA) (ASSETS ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 554–556. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308561.3354632
[43]
Andrés Lucero, Peter Dalsgaard, Kim Halskov, and Jacob Buur. 2016. Designing with Cards. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 75–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29155-0_5
[44]
Charlotte Magnusson, Per-Olof Hedvall, and Héctor Caltenco. 2018. Co-designing together with Persons with Visual Impairments. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 411–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54446-5_14
[45]
Jennifer Mankoff, Gillian R. Hayes, and Devva Kasnitz. 2010. Disability Studies as a Source of Critical Inquiry for the Field of Assistive Technology. In Proceedings of the 12th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Orlando, Florida, USA) (ASSETS ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/1878803.1878807
[46]
Oussama Metatla, Nick Bryan-Kinns, Tony Stockman, and Fiore Martin. 2015. Designing with and for people living with visual impairments: audio-tactile mock-ups, audio diaries and participatory prototyping. CoDesign 11, 1 (2015), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2015.1007877 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2015.1007877
[47]
Oussama Metatla, Alison Oldfield, Taimur Ahmed, Antonis Vafeas, and Sunny Miglani. 2019. Voice User Interfaces in Schools: Co-Designing for Inclusion with Visually-Impaired and Sighted Pupils. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300608
[48]
Microsoft. 2018. Inclusive Design. Retrieved 04 August 2021 from https://www.microsoft.com/design/inclusive/
[49]
Cecily Morrison, Edward Cutrell, Anupama Dhareshwar, Kevin Doherty, Anja Thieme, and Alex Taylor. 2017. Imagining Artificial Intelligence Applications with People with Visual Disabilities Using Tactile Ideation. In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Baltimore, Maryland, USA) (ASSETS ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132525.3132530
[50]
Brad A. Myers. 1998. A Brief History of Human-Computer Interaction Technology. Interactions 5, 2 (March 1998), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/274430.274436
[51]
Isabel Neto, Hugo Nicolau, and Ana Paiva. 2021. Community Based Robot Design for Classrooms with Mixed Visual Abilities Children. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 31, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445135
[52]
A F Newell, P Gregor, M Morgan, G Pullin, and C Macaulay. 2011. User-Sensitive Inclusive Design. Universal Access in the Information Society 10, 3 (2011), 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-010-0203-y
[53]
Rohan Patel, Pedro Breton, Catherine M. Baker, Yasmine N. El-Glaly, and Kristen Shinohara. 2020. Why Software is Not Accessible: Technology Professionals’ Perspectives and Challenges. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI EA ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3383103
[54]
Hans Persson, Henrik Åhman, Alexander Arvei Yngling, and Jan Gulliksen. 2015. Universal design, inclusive design, accessible design, design for all: different concepts—one goal? On the concept of accessibility—historical, methodological and philosophical aspects. Universal Access in the Information Society 14, 4 (2015), 505–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0358-z
[55]
Helen Petrie and Alistair Edwards. 2006. Inclusive design and assistive technology as part of the HCI curriculum. In Proceedings of HCI Educators Workshop, Vol. 2006. ., ., 23–24.
[56]
Jenny Preece. 2015. Interaction design : beyond human-computer interaction / Preece, Rogers, Sharp. (4th ed. ed.). Wiley, Chichester.
[57]
Cynthia Putnam, Christina Hanschke, and Anuradha Rana. 2019. Efficacy of Film for Raising Awareness of Diverse Users. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI EA ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3312992
[58]
Gisela Reyes-Cruz, Joel E. Fischer, and Stuart Reeves. 2020. Reframing Disability as Competency: Unpacking Everyday Technology Practices of People with Visual Impairments. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376767
[59]
Gisela Reyes-Cruz, Joel E. Fischer, and Stuart Reeves. 2022. Demonstrating Interaction: The Case of Assistive Technology. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. (jan 2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3514236 Just Accepted.
[60]
Nuzhah Gooda Sahib, Tony Stockman, Anastasios Tombros, and Oussama Metatla. 2013. Participatory Design with Blind Users: A Scenario-Based Approach. In Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2013, Paula Kotzé, Gary Marsden, Gitte Lindgaard, Janet Wesson, and Marco Winckler (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 685–701.
[61]
Morgan Klaus Scheuerman, Katta Spiel, Oliver L. Haimson, Foad Hamidi, and Stacy M. Branham. 2020. HCI Guidelines for Gender Equity and Inclusivity (Version 1.1). Retrieved 04 August 2021 from https://www.morgan-klaus.com/gender-guidelines.html
[62]
Woosuk Seo and Hyunggu Jung. 2017. Exploring the Community of Blind or Visually Impaired People on YouTube. In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility(Baltimore, Maryland, USA) (ASSETS ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 371–372. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132525.3134801
[63]
Kristen Shinohara, Cynthia L Bennett, Wanda Pratt, and Jacob O Wobbrock. 2018. Tenets for social accessibility: Towards humanizing disabled people in design. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS) 11, 1 (2018), 1–31.
[64]
Kristen Shinohara, Cynthia L. Bennett, and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2016. How Designing for People With and Without Disabilities Shapes Student Design Thinking. In Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Reno, Nevada, USA) (ASSETS ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1145/2982142.2982158
[65]
Kristen Shinohara, Nayeri Jacobo, Wanda Pratt, and Jacob O Wobbrock. 2020. Design for Social Accessibility Method Cards: Engaging Users and Reflecting on Social Scenarios for Accessible Design. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS) 12, 4 (2020), 1–33.
[66]
Kristen Shinohara and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2016. Self-Conscious or Self-Confident? A Diary Study Conceptualizing the Social Accessibility of Assistive Technology. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 8, 2, Article 5 (Jan. 2016), 31 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2827857
[67]
Kristen Shinohara, Jacob O. Wobbrock, and Wanda Pratt. 2018. Incorporating Social Factors in Accessible Design. In Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Galway, Ireland) (ASSETS ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1145/3234695.3236346
[68]
Irina Shklovski and Erik Grönvall. 2020. CreepyLeaks: Participatory Speculation Through Demos. In Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society (Tallinn, Estonia) (NordiCHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 21, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3419249.3420168
[69]
ACM SIGCHI. 2021. Chieko Asakawa: ”See What I Mean: Making Waves with the Blind” (ACM CHI 2021 Opening Keynote). Retrieved 04 August 2021 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3LqCsIvYmX4
[70]
Katta Spiel, Kathrin Gerling, Cynthia L. Bennett, Emeline Brulé, Rua M. Williams, Jennifer Rode, and Jennifer Mankoff. 2020. Nothing About Us Without Us: Investigating the Role of Critical Disability Studies in HCI. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI EA ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3375150
[71]
Cella M Sum, Rahaf Alharbi, Franchesca Spektor, Cynthia L Bennett, Christina Harrington, Katta Spiel, and Rua M Williams. 2022. Dreaming Disability Justice in HCI. In Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://disabilityjusticeinhci.org/assets/pdfs/chi22m-sub1216-cam-i31.pdf
[72]
Garreth W. Tigwell. 2021. Nuanced Perspectives Toward Disability Simulations from Digital Designers, Blind, Low Vision, and Color Blind People. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 378, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445620
[73]
Sylvaine Tuncer, Barry Brown, and Oskar Lindwall. 2020. On Pause: How Online Instructional Videos Are Used to Achieve Practical Tasks. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376759
[74]
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI). 2020. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) Overview. Retrieved 04 August 2021 from https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/
[75]
Richard Wetzel, Tom Rodden, and Steve Benford. 2017. Developing ideation cards for mixed reality game design. Transactions of the Digital Games Research Association 3, 2(2017), 175–211.
[76]
Michele A. Williams, Caroline Galbraith, Shaun K. Kane, and Amy Hurst. 2014. “just Let the Cane Hit It”: How the Blind and Sighted See Navigation Differently. In Proceedings of the 16th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility (Rochester, New York, USA) (ASSETS ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1145/2661334.2661380
[77]
Mark Wilson. 2020. Meet the YouTuber who’s schooling developers on how blind people really use tech. Retrieved 04 August 2021 from https://www.fastcompany.com/90535264/meet-the-youtuber-whos-schooling-developers-on-how-blind-people-really-use-tech
[78]
Jacob O Wobbrock, Shaun K Kane, Krzysztof Z Gajos, Susumu Harada, and Jon Froehlich. 2011. Ability-based design: Concept, principles and examples. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS) 3, 3 (2011), 1–27.
[79]
Christiane Wölfel and Timothy Merritt. 2013. Method Card Design Dimensions: A Survey of Card-Based Design Tools. In Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2013, Paula Kotzé, Gary Marsden, Gitte Lindgaard, Janet Wesson, and Marco Winckler (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 479–486.
[80]
Alice Wong. [n.d.]. Disability Visibility Project. Retrieved 20 July 2022 from https://disabilityvisibilityproject.com/
[81]
Stella Young. 2014. I’m not your inspiration, thank you very much. https://www.ted.com/talks/stella_young_i_m_not_your_inspiration_thank_you_very_much?language=en
[82]
Chien Wen Yuan, Benjamin V. Hanrahan, Sooyeon Lee, Mary Beth Rosson, and John M. Carroll. 2017. I Didn’t Know That You Knew I Knew: Collaborative Shopping Practices between People with Visual Impairment and People with Vision. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, CSCW, Article 118 (Dec. 2017), 18 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134753
Index Terms
- Supporting Awareness of Visual Impairments and Accessibility Reflections through Video Demos and Design Cards
Recommendations
Supporting spatial awareness and independent wayfinding for pedestrians with visual impairments
ASSETS '11: The proceedings of the 13th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibilityMuch of the information designed to help people navigate the built environment is conveyed through visual channels, which means it is not accessible to people with visual impairments. Due to this limitation, travelers with visual impairments often have ...
Investigating touchscreen accessibility for people with visual impairments
NordiCHI '08: Proceedings of the 5th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: building bridgesTouchscreen computing devices such as the iPhone are becoming more common. However this technology is largely inaccessible to people with visual impairments. We present the results of a requirements capture study that illustrates the problems with ...
Design for Social Accessibility Method Cards: Engaging Users and Reflecting on Social Scenarios for Accessible Design
Regular Papers and Special Issue on ASSETS 2018This article is an extended version of our 2018 ASSETS paper entitled, “Incorporating Social Factors in Accessible Design.” In our ASSETS paper, we demonstrated the viability of the Design for Social Accessibility perspective through a series of user-...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
October 2022
1091 pages
ISBN:9781450396998
DOI:10.1145/3546155
Copyright © 2022 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 08 October 2022
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Funding Sources
Conference
NordiCHI '22
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 379 of 1,572 submissions, 24%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 145Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)49
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
Reflects downloads up to 12 Dec 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format