[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3461778.3462013acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Sensory Probes: An Exploratory Design Research Method for Human-Food Interaction

Published: 28 June 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Designing interactions with food holds potential for rich multisensory experiences but their pervasiveness can challenge our understanding of them. This paper presents the design and evaluation of Sensory probes, a novel, exploratory design research method aimed to sensitize participants towards their food experiences. We report on workshops with 8 participants for co-designing the probes, followed by iterative revision through two-week diary studies with 18 participants. Findings indicate strong engagement with the sensory probes and how they brought forward the bodily and sensory aspects of these experiences, alongside emotional and social ones. We highlight the design rationale for the sensory probes which has been both empirically- and theoretically-grounded, provide reflections on the value of these probes for enabling novel perspectives on food experiences, and on probes’ ability to capture what we called sensory fragments of participants’ experience reflecting distinct sensory aspects form both internal and external senses.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental files (p666-gayler-supplements.zip)

References

[1]
Miquel Alfaras, Vasiliki Tsaknaki, Pedro Sanches, Charles Windlin, Muhammad Umair, Corina Sas, and Kristina Höök. 2020. From Biodata to Somadata. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’20), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376684
[2]
Ferran Altarriba Bertran, Jared Duval, Elena Márquez Segura, Laia Turmo Vidal, Yoram Chisik, Marina Juanet Casulleras, Oscar Garcia Pañella, Katherine Isbister, and Danielle Wilde. 2020. Chasing Play Potentials in Food Culture: Learning from Traditions to Inspire Future Human-Food Interaction Design. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS ’20), 979–991. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395575
[3]
Ferran Altarriba Bertran, Samvid Jhaveri, Rosa Lutz, Katherine Isbister, and Danielle Wilde. 2018. Visualising the Landscape of Human-Food Interaction Research. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS ’18 Companion), 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1145/3197391.3205443
[4]
Gastón Ares, Cecilia Barreiro, Rosires Deliza, Ana Giménez, and Adriana Gámbaro. 2010. Application of a Check-All-That-Apply Question to the Development of Chocolate Milk Desserts. Journal of Sensory Studies 25: 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.2010.00290.x
[5]
Eshita Sri Arza, Harshitha Kurra, Rohit Ashok Khot, and Florian “Floyd” Mueller. 2018. Feed the food monsters! Helping co-diners chew their food better with augmented reality. In Proceedings of the 2018 annual symposium on computer-human interaction in play companion extended abstracts (CHI PLAY ’18 extended abstracts), 391–397. https://doi.org/10.1145/3270316.3271520
[6]
L. M. Bartoshuk. 1978. The psychophysics of taste. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 31, 6: 1068–1077. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/31.6.1068
[7]
Kirsten Boehner, Janet Vertesi, Phoebe Sengers, and Paul Dourish. 2007. How HCI Interprets the Probes. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’07), 1077–1086. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240789
[8]
David A. Booth. 2013. Configuring of extero- and interoceptive senses in actions on food. Multisensory Research 26, 1–2: 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134808-00002395
[9]
Rita Maldonado Branco, Joana Quental, and Óscar Ribeiro. 2016. Playing with personalisation and openness in a codesign project involving people with dementia. In Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Full papers - Volume 1 (PDC ’16), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1145/2940299.2940309
[10]
Wender L. P. Bredie, Hui Shan Grace Tan, and Karin Wendin. 2014. A Comparative Study on Facially Expressed Emotions in Response to Basic Tastes. Chemosensory Perception 7, 1: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-014-9163-6
[11]
Serena Camere, Hendrik NJ Schifferstein, and Monica Bordegoni. 2015. The experience map. A tool to support experience-driven multisensory design. In DeSForM 2015 Aesthetics of Interaction, Dynamic, Multisensory, Wise; Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Design and Semantics of Form and Movement, Milano (Italy) 13-17 Oct. 2015. https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid%3A37baebea-a682-4ce2-8f82-c56fe592c150
[12]
Claudia Daudén Roquet and Corina Sas. 2020. Body Matters: Exploration of the Human Body as a Resource for the Design of Technologies for Meditation. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS ’20), 533–546. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395499
[13]
Claudia Dauden Roquet and Corina Sas. 2021. Interoceptive Interaction: An Embodied Metaphor Inspired Approach to Designing for Meditation. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445137
[14]
Claudia De Giorgi, Beatrice Lerma, Cristina Allione, and Eleonora Buiatti. 2011. Sensory evolution: sensory and sustainable design strategies. In Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces (DPPI ’11), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/2347504.2347512
[15]
Markéta Dolejšová and Denisa Kera. 2017. Soylent diet self-experimentation: Design challenges in extreme citizen science projects. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing (CSCW ’17), 2112–2123. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998365
[16]
Markéta Dolejšová, Danielle Wilde, Ferran Altarriba Bertran, and Hilary Davis. 2020. Disrupting (More-than-) Human-Food Interaction: Experimental Design, Tangibles and Food-Tech Futures. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS ’20), 993–1004. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395437
[17]
Jennifer Fereday and Eimear Muir-Cochrane. 2006. Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5, 1: 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107
[18]
Bill Gaver, Tony Dunne, and Elena Pacenti. 1999. Design: Cultural Probes. interactions 6, 1: 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/291224.291235
[19]
William W. Gaver, Andrew Boucher, Sarah Pennington, and Brendan Walker. 2004. Cultural Probes and the Value of Uncertainty. interactions 11, 5: 53–56. https://doi.org/10.1145/1015530.1015555
[20]
Tom Gayler. 2017. Towards edible interfaces: Designing interactions with food. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on multimodal interaction (ICMI ’17), 623–627. https://doi.org/10.1145/3136755.3137030
[21]
Tom Gayler and Corina Sas. 2017. An Exploration of Taste-emotion Mappings from the Perspective of Food Design Practitioners. In Proceedings of the 2Nd ACM SIGCHI International Workshop on Multisensory Approaches to Human-Food Interaction (MHFI 2017), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3141788.3141793
[22]
Tom Gayler, Corina Sas, and Vaiva Kalnikaite. 2019. Taste Your Emotions: An Exploration of the Relationship Between Taste and Emotional Experience for HCI. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS ’19), 1279–1291. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322336
[23]
Tom Gayler, Corina Sas, and Vaiva Kalnikaite. 2020. Material Food Probe: Personalized 3D Printed Flavors for Emotional Communication in Intimate Relationships. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS ’20), 965–978. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395533
[24]
Tom Gayler, Corina Sas, and Vaiva Kalnikaite. 2021. Framing the Design Space for Food-Human-Technology Interaction. Forthcoming publication. Under revision for ToCHI.
[25]
Connor Graham, Mark Rouncefield, Martin Gibbs, Frank Vetere, and Keith Cheverst. 2007. How Probes Work. In Proceedings of the 19th Australasian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Entertaining User Interfaces (OZCHI ’07), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1145/1324892.1324899
[26]
Seo Yoon Han and Eun Ji Kang. 2017. ChilDish: The Smart Plate and Cup for Children. In Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI ’17), 391–392. https://doi.org/10.1145/3029798.3034946
[27]
Adam W. Hanley, Wolf E. Mehling, and Eric L. Garland. 2017. Holding the body in mind: Interoceptive awareness, dispositional mindfulness and psychological well-being. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 99: 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.05.014
[28]
Kristina Höök. 2018. Designing with the Body: Somaesthetic Interaction Design. MIT Press.
[29]
Youjin Hwang, Siyoung Lee, Hyeong Seok Jeon, Jung Han Yoon Park, Ki Won Lee, and Joonhwan Lee. 2018. “Eat What You Want and Be Healthy!”: Comfort food effects: Human-food interaction in view of celebratory technology. In Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on multisensory approaches to human-food interaction (MHFI’18). https://doi.org/10.1145/3279954.3279958
[30]
Katherine Isbister, Kristina Höök, Michael Sharp, and Jarmo Laaksolahti. 2006. The Sensual Evaluation Instrument: Developing an Affective Evaluation Tool. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’06), 1163–1172. https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124946
[31]
Azusa Kadomura, Cheng-Yuan Li, Koji Tsukada, Hao-Hua Chu, and Itiro Siio. 2014. Persuasive technology to improve eating behavior using a sensor-embedded fork. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing (UbiComp ’14), 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1145/2632048.2632093
[32]
Silke Manuela Kärcher, Sandra Fenzlaff, Daniela Hartmann, Saskia Kathi Nagel, and Peter König. 2012. Sensory Augmentation for the Blind. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00037
[33]
Rohit Ashok Khot, Deepti Aggarwal, Ryan Pennings, Larissa Hjorth, and Florian “Floyd” Mueller. 2017. EdiPulse: Investigating a playful approach to self-monitoring through 3D printed chocolate treats. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI ’17), 6593–6607. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025980
[34]
Naoya Koizumi, Hidekazu Tanaka, Yuji Uema, and Masahiko Inami. 2011. Chewing jockey: Augmented food texture by using sound based on the cross-modal effect. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on advances in computer entertainment technology (ACE ’11). https://doi.org/10.1145/2071423.2071449
[35]
Dannie Korsgaard, Thomas Bjørner, Pernille Krog Sørensen, and Jon Ram Bruun-Pedersen. 2019. Older adults eating together in a virtual living room: Opportunities and limitations of eating in augmented virtuality. In Proceedings of the 31st european conference on cognitive ergonomics (ECCE 2019), 168–176. https://doi.org/10.1145/3335082.3335093
[36]
Stacey Kuznetsov, Christina J. Santana, and Elenore Long. 2016. Everyday food science as a design space for community literacy and habitual sustainable practice. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI ’16), 1786–1797. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858363
[37]
Yujin Lee, Jee Bin Yim, Daye Kang, HyeonBeom Yi, and Daniel Saakes. 2019. Designing internal structure of chocolate and its effect on food texture. In Companion publication of the 2019 on designing interactive systems conference 2019 companion (DIS ’19 companion), 231–235. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301019.3323896
[38]
Jin-Ling Lo, Tung-Yun Lin, Hao-Hua Chu, Hsi-Chin Chou, Jen-Hao Chen, Jane Yung-Jen Hsu, and Polly Huang. 2007. Playful tray: Adopting ubicomp and persuasive techniques into play-based occupational therapy for reducing poor eating behavior in young children. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on ubiquitous computing (UbiComp ’07), 38–55. https://doi-org.ezproxy.lancs.ac.uk/10.1007/978-3-540-74853-3_3
[39]
Anna Luusua, Johanna Ylipulli, Marko Jurmu, Henrika Pihlajaniemi, Piia Markkanen, and Timo Ojala. 2015. Evaluation Probes. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’15, 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702466
[40]
Kate McLean. Sensory Maps. Sensory Maps. Retrieved April 22, 2021 from https://sensorymaps.com/
[41]
Morten C. Meilgaard, B. Thomas Carr, and Gail Vance Civille. 2006. Sensory Evaluation Techniques, Fourth Edition. CRC Press.
[42]
Sevi Merter. 2017. Synesthetic Approach in the Design Process for Enhanced Creativity and Multisensory Experiences. The Design Journal 20, sup1: S4519–S4528. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352948
[43]
Bruno Mesz, Kevin Herzog, Juan Cruz Amusategui, Lucas Samaruga, and Sebastián Tedesco. 2017. Let's drink this song together: Interactive taste-sound systems. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGCHI international workshop on multisensory approaches to human-food interaction (MHFI 2017), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3141788.3141791
[44]
Christiane Moser and Manfred Tscheligi. 2013. Playful Taste Interaction. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’13), 340–343. https://doi.org/10.1145/2485760.2485828
[45]
Florian “Floyd” Mueller, Josh Andres, Joe Marshall, Dag Svanæs, m. c. schraefel, Kathrin Gerling, Jakob Tholander, Anna Lisa Martin-Niedecken, Elena Márquez Segura, Elise van den Hoven, Nicholas Graham, Kristina Höök, and Corina Sas. 2018. Body-centric Computing: Results from a Weeklong Dagstuhl Seminar in a German Castle. Interactions 25, 4: 34–39. https://doi.org/10.1145/3215854
[46]
Marianna Obrist, Rob Comber, Sriram Subramanian, Betina Piqueras-Fiszman, Carlos Velasco, and Charles Spence. 2014. Temporal, affective, and embodied characteristics of taste experiences: A framework for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI ’14), 2853–2862. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557007
[47]
Marianna Obrist, Yunwen Tu, Lining Yao, and Carlos Velasco. 2019. Space Food Experiences: Designing Passenger's Eating Experiences for Future Space Travel Scenarios. Frontiers in Computer Science 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2019.00003
[48]
Marianna Obrist, Carlos Velasco, Chi Vi, Nimesha Ranasinghe, Ali Israr, Adrian Cheok, Charles Spence, and Ponnampalam Gopalakrishnakone. 2016. Sensing the future of HCI: touch, taste, and smell user interfaces. Interactions 23, 5: 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1145/2973568
[49]
Gaurav Patekar, Karan Dudeja, Himanshu Bablani, and Debanshu Bhaumik. 2018. Data Jalebi Bot. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’18), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3186528
[50]
Sarah Pink, Kerstin Leder Mackley, Val Mitchell, Marcus Hanratty, Carolina Escobar-Tello, Tracy Bhamra, and Roxana Morosanu. 2013. Applying the lens of sensory ethnography to sustainable HCI. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 20, 4: 25:1-25:18. https://doi.org/10.1145/2494261
[51]
Mirjana Prpa, Sarah Fdili-Alaoui, Thecla Schiphorst, and Philippe Pasquier. 2020. Articulating Experience: Reflections from Experts Applying Micro-Phenomenology to Design Research in HCI. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’20), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376664
[52]
Stephen Rayner and Richard Riding. 1997. Towards a Categorisation of Cognitive Styles and Learning Styles. Educational Psychology 17, 1–2: 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341970170101
[53]
Joanne Riekhoff and Panos Markopoulos. 2008. Sampling young children's experiences with cultural probes. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Interaction design and children (IDC ’08), 145–148. https://doi.org/10.1145/1463689.1463742
[54]
Corina Sas, Kobi Hartley, and Muhammad Umair. 2020. ManneqKit Cards: A Kinesthetic Empathic Design Tool Communicating Depression Experiences. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS ’20), 1479–1493. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395556
[55]
Corina Sas and Chenyan Zhang. 2010. Do emotions matter in creative design? In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, 372–375 https://dl.acm.org/doi/epdf/10.1145/1858171.1858241.
[56]
Hendrik N. J. Schifferstein. 2011. Multi sensory design. In Procedings of the Second Conference on Creativity and Innovation in Design (DESIRE ’11), 361–362. https://doi.org/10.1145/2079216.2079270
[57]
Thecla Schiphorst, Lian Loke, and Kristina Höök. 2020. Designing for Sensory Appreciation: Cultivating Somatic Approaches to Experience Design. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’20), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3375056
[58]
Dag Svanæs and Louise Barkhuus. 2020. The Designer's Body as Resource in Design: Exploring Combinations of Point-of-view and Tense. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–13.https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831
[59]
Laia Turmo Vidal, Elena Márquez Segura, and Annika Waern. 2018. Sensory bodystorming for collocated physical training design. In Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (NordiCHI ’18), 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240167.3240224
[60]
Paula Varela and Gastón Ares. 2012. Sensory profiling, the blurred line between sensory and consumer science. A review of novel methods for product characterization. Food Research International 48, 2: 893–908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2012.06.037
[61]
Chi Thanh Vi, Daniel Arthur, and Marianna Obrist. 2018. TasteBud: Bring taste back into the game. In Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on multisensory approaches to human-food interaction (MHFI’18). https://doi.org/10.1145/3279954.3279955
[62]
Jayne Wallace, John McCarthy, Peter C. Wright, and Patrick Olivier. 2013. Making Design Probes Work. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’13), 3441–3450. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466473
[63]
Beverley Merle Watts, G. L. Ylimaki, L. E. Jeffery, and Luiz G. Elias. 1989. Basic sensory methods for food evaluation. IDRC, Ottawa, ON, CA. Retrieved from https://idl-bnc-idrc.dspacedirect.org/bitstream/handle/10625/2844/IDL-2844.pdf?sequence=1
[64]
Jun Wei, Adrian David Cheok, and Ryohei Nakatsu. 2012. Let's have dinner together: Evaluate the mediated co-dining experience. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on multimodal interaction (ICMI ’12), 225–228. https://doi.org/10.1145/2388676.2388721
[65]
Danielle Wilde, Anna Vallgårda, and Oscar Tomico. 2017. Embodied Design Ideation Methods: Analysing the Power of Estrangement. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’17, 5158–5170. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025873
[66]
GUESS WHO | Hasbro Games. Retrieved July 7, 2020 from https://products.hasbro.com/en-gb/product/guess-who:2CE41484-19B9-F369-D94A-A92637F6C809

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A Systematic Review of the Probes Method in Research with Children and FamiliesProceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3628516.3655814(157-172)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
  • (2024)“Can you be with that feeling?”: Extending Design Strategies for Interoceptive Awareness for the Context of Mental HealthProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3643054(1-21)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Human-Computer InteractionThe Palgrave Encyclopedia of Memory Studies10.1007/978-3-030-93789-8_28-1(1-9)Online publication date: 13-Mar-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
DIS '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference
June 2021
2082 pages
ISBN:9781450384766
DOI:10.1145/3461778
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 28 June 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Experience
  2. Exploratory Design Research Methods
  3. Flavor
  4. Food
  5. Multisensory Design
  6. Probes

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Conference

DIS '21
Sponsor:
DIS '21: Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021
June 28 - July 2, 2021
Virtual Event, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,158 of 4,684 submissions, 25%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)150
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)14
Reflects downloads up to 28 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A Systematic Review of the Probes Method in Research with Children and FamiliesProceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3628516.3655814(157-172)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
  • (2024)“Can you be with that feeling?”: Extending Design Strategies for Interoceptive Awareness for the Context of Mental HealthProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3643054(1-21)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Human-Computer InteractionThe Palgrave Encyclopedia of Memory Studies10.1007/978-3-030-93789-8_28-1(1-9)Online publication date: 13-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Dietary Intervention Studies: Design, Follow-Up, and InterpretationExtraction, Characterization, and Functional Assessment of Bioactive Compounds10.1007/978-1-0716-3942-9_1(1-16)Online publication date: 14-Jul-2024
  • (2023)ÇOKLU DUYUSAL ÜRÜN TASARIMINDA FİKİR GELİŞTİRME İÇİN SİNESTETİK DÜŞÜNMESYNESTHETIC THINKING FOR IDEATION IN MULTISENSORY PRODUCT DESIGNTurkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication10.7456/tojdac.136935714:1(232-241)Online publication date: 28-Dec-2023
  • (2022)QuintEssence: A Probe Study to Explore the Power of Smell on Emotions, Memories, and Body Image in Daily LifeACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/352695029:6(1-33)Online publication date: 16-Nov-2022
  • (2022)The TAC Toolkit: Supporting Design for User Acceptance of Health Technologies from a Macro-Temporal PerspectiveProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3502039(1-18)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
  • (2022)From-The-Wild: Towards Co-Designing For and From NatureExtended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491101.3519811(1-7)Online publication date: 27-Apr-2022
  • (2022)Exploring the Design Space for Human-Food-Technology Interaction: An Approach from the Lens of Eating ExperiencesACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/348443929:2(1-52)Online publication date: 16-Jan-2022
  • (2021)Exploring Personalized Vibrotactile and Thermal Patterns for Affect RegulationProceedings of the 2021 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3461778.3462042(891-906)Online publication date: 28-Jun-2021

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media