[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2930238.2930243acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesumapConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Interactive Modeling of Concept Drift and Errors in Relevance Feedback

Published: 13 July 2016 Publication History

Abstract

In exploratory search tasks, users usually start with considerable uncertainty about their search goals, and so the search intent of the user may be volatile as the user is constantly learning and reformulating her search hypothesis during the search. This may lead to a noticeable concept drift in the relevance feedback given by the user. We formulate a Bayesian regression model for predicting the accuracy of each individual user feedback and thus find outliers in the feedback data set. To accompany this model, we introduce a timeline interface that visualizes the feedback history to the user and gives her suggestions on which past feedback is likely in need of adjustment. This interface also allows the user to adjust the feedback accuracy inferences made by the model. Simulation experiments demonstrate that the performance of the new user model outperforms a simpler baseline and that the performance approaches that of an oracle, given a small amount of additional user interaction. A user study shows that the proposed modeling technique, combined with the timeline interface, made it easier for the users to notice and correct mistakes in their feedback, resulted in better and more diverse recommendations, allowed users to easier find items they liked, and was more understandable.

References

[1]
J. Ahn and P. Brusilovsky. Adaptive visualization of search results: Bringing user models to visual analytics. Information Visualization, 8(3):167--179, 2009.
[2]
J. Ahn, P. Brusilovsky, J. Grady, D. He, and S. Y. Syn. Open user profiles for adaptive news systems: Help or harm? In Proc. of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW '07, pages 11--20. ACM, 2007.
[3]
H. Attias. Inferring parameters and structure of latent variable models by variational Bayes. In Proc. of the Fifteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, UAI'99, pages 21--30. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 1999.
[4]
F. Bakalov, M.-J. Meurs, B. König-Ries, B. Sateli, R. Witte, G. Butler, and A. Tsang. An approach to controlling user models and personalization effects in recommender systems. In Proc. of the 2013 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, IUI '13, pages 49--56. ACM, 2013.
[5]
J. Brooke. SUS--A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Evaluation in Industry, 189:194, 1996.
[6]
S. Bull. Supporting learning with open learner models. In Proc. of 4th Hellenic Conference on Information and Communication Technologies in Education, pages 47--61, 2004. Keynote.
[7]
M. Cakmak, C. Chao, and A. L. Thomaz. Designing interactions for robot active learners. Autonomous Mental Development, IEEE Transactions on, 2(2):108--118, 2010.
[8]
S. Chowdhury, F. Gibb, and M. Landoni. Uncertainty in information seeking and retrieval: A study in an academic environment. Information Processing & Management, 47(2):157--175, 2011.
[9]
V. Dimitrova, J. Self, and P. Brna. Applying interactive open learner models to learning technical terminology. In Proc. of User Modeling, pages 148--157. Springer, 2001.
[10]
J. A. Fails and D. R. Olsen Jr. Interactive machine learning. In Proc. of the 8th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, pages 39--45. ACM, 2003.
[11]
J. Fogarty, D. Tan, A. Kapoor, and S. Winder. CueFlik: Interactive concept learning in image search. In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 29--38. ACM, 2008.
[12]
J. Gama, I.vZliobait\.e, A. Bifet, M. Pechenizkiy, and A. Bouchachia. A survey on concept drift adaptation. ACM Computing Surveys, 46(4):1--37, 2014.
[13]
D. Glowacka, T. Ruotsalo, K. Konuyshkova, K. Athukorala, S. Kaski, and G. Jacucci. Directing exploratory search: Reinforcement learning from user interactions with keywords. In Proc. of the 2013 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, IUI '13, pages 117--128. ACM, 2013.
[14]
A. Kangasraasiö, Y. Chen, D. Glowacka, and S. Kaski. Dealing with concept drift in exploratory search: An interactive Bayesian approach. In Companion Publication of the 21st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, IUI '16 Companion, pages 62--66. ACM, 2016.
[15]
A. Kangasraasiö, D. Glowacka, and S. Kaski. Improving controllability and predictability of interactive recommendation interfaces for exploratory search. In Proc. of the 20th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, IUI '15, pages 247--251. ACM, 2015.
[16]
A. Kapoor, B. Lee, D. Tan, and E. Horvitz. Interactive optimization for steering machine classification. In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1343--1352. ACM, 2010.
[17]
W. B. Knox and P. Stone. Reinforcement learning from human reward: Discounting in episodic tasks. In RO-MAN, 2012 IEEE, pages 878--885. IEEE, 2012.
[18]
T. Kulesza, M. Burnett, W.-K. Wong, and S. Stumpf. Principles of explanatory debugging to personalize interactive machine learning. In Proc. of the 20th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pages 126--137. ACM, 2015.
[19]
S. Lehmann, U. Schwanecke, and R. Dörner. Interactive visualization for opportunistic exploration of large document collections. Information Systems, 35(2):260--269, 2010.
[20]
D. J. C. MacKay. Bayesian nonlinear modeling for the prediction competition. ASHRAE transactions, 100(2):1053--1062, 1994.
[21]
G. Marchionini. Exploratory search: From finding to understanding. Communications of the ACM, 49(4):41--46, 2006.
[22]
P. Pu, L. Chen, and R. Hu. A user-centric evaluation framework for recommender systems. In Proc. of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems, pages 157--164. ACM, 2011.
[23]
J. Rennie and K. Lang. The 20 Newsgroups dataset, January 2008. http://qwone.com/ jason/20Newsgroups/.
[24]
S. Stumpf, V. Rajaram, L. Li, W.-K. Wong, M. Burnett, T. Dietterich, E. Sullivan, and J. Herlocker. Interacting meaningfully with machine learning systems: Three experiments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67(8):639--662, 2009.
[25]
J. Ting, A. D'Souza, and S. Schaal. Automatic outlier detection: A Bayesian approach. In Robotics and Automation, IEEE International Conference on, pages 2489--2494. IEEE, 2007.
[26]
M. Tipping and N. Lawrence. A variational approach to robust Bayesian interpolation. In Neural Networks for Signal Processing, IEEE 13th Workshop on, NNSP '03, pages 229--238. IEEE, 2003.
[27]
A. Tsymbal. The problem of concept drift: Definitions and related work. Technical Report TCD-CS-2004--15, Computer Science Department, Trinity College Dublin, 2004.
[28]
R. W. White, B. Kules, S. M. Drucker, and M. C. Schraefel. Supporting exploratory search. Communications of the ACM, 49(4):36--39, 2006.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)The State of the Art in User‐Adaptive VisualizationsComputer Graphics Forum10.1111/cgf.15271Online publication date: 4-Dec-2024
  • (2021)Towards a User Integration Framework for Personal Health Decision Support and Recommender SystemsProceedings of the 29th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization10.1145/3450613.3456816(65-76)Online publication date: 21-Jun-2021
  • (2020)Iterative learning to rank from explicit relevance feedbackProceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing10.1145/3341105.3374002(698-705)Online publication date: 30-Mar-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
UMAP '16: Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on User Modeling Adaptation and Personalization
July 2016
366 pages
ISBN:9781450343688
DOI:10.1145/2930238
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 July 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. concept drift
  2. exploratory search
  3. interactive user modeling
  4. probabilistic user models
  5. user interfaces

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

UMAP '16
Sponsor:
UMAP '16: User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization Conference
July 13 - 17, 2016
Nova Scotia, Halifax, Canada

Acceptance Rates

UMAP '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 21 of 123 submissions, 17%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 162 of 633 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

UMAP '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 18 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)The State of the Art in User‐Adaptive VisualizationsComputer Graphics Forum10.1111/cgf.15271Online publication date: 4-Dec-2024
  • (2021)Towards a User Integration Framework for Personal Health Decision Support and Recommender SystemsProceedings of the 29th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization10.1145/3450613.3456816(65-76)Online publication date: 21-Jun-2021
  • (2020)Iterative learning to rank from explicit relevance feedbackProceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing10.1145/3341105.3374002(698-705)Online publication date: 30-Mar-2020
  • (2019)Using Machine Learning and Visualization for Qualitative Inductive Analyses of Big Data2019 IEEE Workshop on Machine Learning from User Interaction for Visualization and Analytics (MLUI)10.1109/MLUI52769.2019.10075566(1-7)Online publication date: 20-Oct-2019
  • (2019)Integrating neurophysiologic relevance feedback in intent modeling for information retrievalJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/asi.2416170:9(917-930)Online publication date: 2-Aug-2019
  • (2018)Enhancing Rating Prediction Quality Through Improving the Accuracy of Detection of Shifts in Rating PracticesTransactions on Large-Scale Data- and Knowledge-Centered Systems XXXVII10.1007/978-3-662-57932-9_5(151-191)Online publication date: 2-Aug-2018
  • (2017)Bandit Algorithms in Interactive Information RetrievalProceedings of the ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval10.1145/3121050.3121108(327-328)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2017

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media