[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
article

Community-oriented network measurement infrastructure (CONMI) workshop report

Published: 28 April 2006 Publication History

Abstract

This report summarizes issues discussed at the first CONMI workshop held on 30 March 2005 in Boston, Massachusetts. Sponsored by the National Science Foundation's Office of Cyberinfrastructure (OCI-0532233), the workshop was intended to begin a discussion regarding the viability and utility of a community-oriented network measurement infrastructure. This report was published 20 December 2005 online at: http://www.caida.org/workshops/conmi/.

References

[1]
Dimitris Achlioptas, Aaron Clauset, David Kempe, and Cristopher Moore. On the bias of traceroute sampling, or: Power-law degree distributions in regular graphs. In ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), Baltimore, MD, May 2005.]]
[2]
Active Measurement Project. http://amp.nlanr.net/.]]
[3]
José Ignacio Alvarez-Hamelin, Alain Barrat, Mark Crovella, Benoit Donnet, Timur Friedman, Matthieu Latapy, Philippe Raoult, and Alessandro Vespignani. traceroute@home. http://tracerouteathome.net.]]
[4]
David G. Andersen, Hari Balakrishnan, M. Frans Kaashoek, and Robert Morris. Resilient overlay networks. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles (SOSP), pages 131--145, Banff, Alberta, Canada, October 2001.]]
[5]
Ran Atkinson and Sally Floyd, editors. IAB concerns and recommendations regarding Internet research and evolution. Internet Engineering Task Force Request for Comments RFC-3869, August 2004.]]
[6]
Suman Banerjee, Timothy G. Griffin, and Marcelo Pias. The interdomain connectivity of PlanetLab nodes. In Proceedings of Passive & Active Measurement (PAM), pages 73--82, Antibes Juan-les-Pins, France, April 2004.]]
[7]
Paul Barford, Azer Bestavros, John Byers, and Mark Crovella. On the marginal utility of network topology measurements. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Workshop (IMW), pages 5--18, San Francisco, CA, November 2001.]]
[8]
kc claffy, Tracie E. Monk, and Daniel McRobb. Internet tomography. Nature, Web Matters, January 1999.]]
[9]
Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, National Research Council. Looking Over the Fence at Networks: A Neighbor's View of Networking Research. The National Academies Press, 2001.]]
[10]
Benoit Donnet, Philippe Raoult, Timur Friedman, and Mark Crovella. Efficient algorithms for large-scale topology discovery. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMETRICS International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems, Banff, Canada, June 2005.]]
[11]
Gianluca Iannaccone, Christophe Diot, Derek McAuley, Andrew Moore, Ian Pratt, and Luigi Rizzo. Como: An open infrastructure for network monitoring -- research agenda. http://como.intel-research.net/pubs/como.agenda.pdf, September 2004.]]
[12]
Jinliang Fan and Jun Xu and Mostafa H. Ammar. Crypto-PAn: Cryptography-based Prefix-preserving Anonymization. Computer Networks, 46(2), October 2004.]]
[13]
Sunil Kalidindi and Matthew J. Zekauskas. Surveyor: An infrastructure for Internet performance measurements. In INET'99, June 1999.]]
[14]
Anukool Lakhina, John Byers, Mark Crovella, and Peng Xie. Sampling biases in IP topology measurements. In Proceedings of the IEEE Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM), pages 332--341, San Francisco, CA, April 2003.]]
[15]
Ratul Mahajan, Neil Spring, David Wetherall, and Thomas Anderson. Inferring link weights using end-to-end measurements. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Workshop (IMW), pages 231--236, Marseille, France, November 2002.]]
[16]
David Meyer. University of Oregon Route Views project. http://www.routeviews.org/.]]
[17]
Ruoming Pang and Vern Paxson. A high-level programming environment for packet trace anonymization and transformation. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication, pages 339--351, Karlsruhe, Germany, August 2003.]]
[18]
Vern Paxson. Strategies for sound Internet measurement. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Conference (IMC), pages 263--271, Taormina, Sicily, Italy, October 2004.]]
[19]
Vern Paxson, Andrew Adams, and Matt Mathis. Experiences with NIMI. In Proceedings of Passive & Active Measurement (PAM), April 2000.]]
[20]
Larry Peterson, Thomas Anderson, David Culler, and Timothy Roscoe. A blueprint for introducing disruptive technology into the Internet. In Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (HotNets), pages 59--64, Princeton, NJ, October 2002.]]
[21]
PlanetLab Consortium. Planetlab acceptable use policy. https://www.planet-lab.org/php/aup/PlanetLab_AUP.pdf, February 2004.]]
[22]
Y. Shavitt and E. Shir. DIMES: Let the internet measure itself. SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 35(5):71--74, 2005.]]
[23]
Charles Robert Simpson, Jr. and George F. Riley. NETI@home: A distributed approach to collecting end-to-end network performance measurements. In Proceedings of Passive & Active Measurement (PAM), Antibes Juan-les-Pins, France, April 2004.]]
[24]
Neil Spring, Larry Peterson, Andy Bavier, and Vivek Pai. Using PlanetLab for network research: myths, realities, and best practices. In Proceedings of the Second USENIX Workshop on Real, Large Distributed Systems (WoRLDS), San Francisco, CA, December 2006.]]
[25]
Neil Spring, David Wetherall, and Thomas Anderson. Scriptroute: A public Internet measurement facility. In Proceedings of the USENIX Symposium on Internet Technologies and Systems (USITS), pages 225--238, Seattle, WA, March 2003.]]
[26]
Stuart Staniford, Vern Paxson, and Nicholas Weaver. How to 0wn the Internet in your spare time. In Proceedings of the USENIX Security Symposium, 2002.]]
[27]
Jacob Strauss, Dina Katabi, and Frans Kaashoek. A measurement study of available bandwidth estimation tools. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Conference (IMC), pages 39--44, Miami, FL, October 2003.]]

Cited By

View all
  • (2012)Open Source Platforms for Internet Monitoring and MeasurementProceedings of the 2012 Eighth International Conference on Signal Image Technology and Internet Based Systems10.1109/SITIS.2012.87(563-570)Online publication date: 25-Nov-2012
  • (2012)How's My Network? Predicting performance from within a Web browser sandboxProceedings of the 2012 IEEE 37th Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN 2012)10.1109/LCN.2012.6423670(521-528)Online publication date: 22-Oct-2012
  • (2011)The 3rd workshop on active internet measurements (AIMS-3) reportACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review10.1145/2002250.200225741:3(37-42)Online publication date: 5-Jul-2011
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review  Volume 36, Issue 2
April 2006
57 pages
ISSN:0146-4833
DOI:10.1145/1129582
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 28 April 2006
Published in SIGCOMM-CCR Volume 36, Issue 2

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. annotations
  2. community
  3. data sharing
  4. internet
  5. measurement
  6. metadata
  7. monitoring
  8. performance
  9. routing
  10. topology
  11. workload

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 18 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2012)Open Source Platforms for Internet Monitoring and MeasurementProceedings of the 2012 Eighth International Conference on Signal Image Technology and Internet Based Systems10.1109/SITIS.2012.87(563-570)Online publication date: 25-Nov-2012
  • (2012)How's My Network? Predicting performance from within a Web browser sandboxProceedings of the 2012 IEEE 37th Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN 2012)10.1109/LCN.2012.6423670(521-528)Online publication date: 22-Oct-2012
  • (2011)The 3rd workshop on active internet measurements (AIMS-3) reportACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review10.1145/2002250.200225741:3(37-42)Online publication date: 5-Jul-2011
  • (2011)Quantifying the Importance of Vantage Point Distribution in Internet Topology Mapping (Extended Version)IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications10.1109/JSAC.2011.11100829:9(1837-1847)Online publication date: Oct-2011
  • (2010)ScamperProceedings of the 10th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement10.1145/1879141.1879171(239-245)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2010
  • (2010)Measurement labACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review10.1145/1823844.182385340:3(53-56)Online publication date: 22-Jun-2010
  • (2009)The workshop on active internet measurements (AIMS) reportACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review10.1145/1629607.162961439:5(32-36)Online publication date: 7-Oct-2009
  • (2009)Quantifying the Importance of Vantage Points Distribution in Internet Topology MeasurementsIEEE INFOCOM 2009 - The 28th Conference on Computer Communications10.1109/INFCOM.2009.5061988(792-800)Online publication date: Apr-2009
  • (2009)How's My Network? A Java Approach to Home Network MeasurementProceedings of the 2009 Proceedings of 18th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks10.1109/ICCCN.2009.5235346(1-7)Online publication date: 3-Aug-2009
  • (2009)DTSProceedings of the First International Workshop on Traffic Monitoring and Analysis10.1007/978-3-642-01645-5_15(126-134)Online publication date: 11-May-2009
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media