[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

The workshop on active internet measurements (AIMS) report

Published: 07 October 2009 Publication History

Abstract

Measuring the global Internet is a perpetually challenging task for technical, economic and policy reasons, which leaves scientists as well as policymakers navigating critical questions in their field with little if any empirical grounding. On February 12-13, 2009, CAIDA hosted the Workshop on Active Internet Measurements (AIMS) as part of our series of Internet Statistics and Metrics Analysis (ISMA) workshops which provide a venue for researchers, operators, and policymakers to exchange ideas and perspectives. The two-day workshop included presentations, discussion after each presentation, and breakout sessions focused on how to increase potential and mitigate limitations of active measurements in the wide area Internet. We identified relevant stakeholders who may support and/or oppose measurement, and explored how collaborative solutions might maximize the benefit of research at minimal cost. This report describes the findings of the workshop, outlines open research problems identified by participants, and concludes with recommendations that can benefit both Internet science and communications policy. Slides from workshop presentations are available at http://www.caida.org/workshops/isma/0902/.

References

[1]
Planetlab. http://www.planet-lab.org/consortium.
[2]
Mark Allman and Vern Paxson. Issues and etiquette concerning use of shared measurement data. In IMC, 2007.
[3]
Rob Beverly. Spoofer project. http://spoofer.csail.mit.edu/index.php.
[4]
Marian Bogun a, Dmitri Krioukov, and K.C. Claffy. Navigability of complex networks. Nature Physics, 5:74--80, 2009.
[5]
CAIDA. The DHS PREDICT project. http://www.caida.org/projects/predict/.
[6]
CAIDA. Netgeo ref. http://www.caida.org/utilities/netgeo/.
[7]
CAIDA. Workshop on Internet Topology, 2006. http://www.caida.org/workshops/isma/0605/.
[8]
Vint Cerf. Guidelines for Internet Measurement Activities. IETF, RFC 1262, Oct 1991.
[9]
National Research Council Committee on Research Horizons in Networking. Looking Over the Fence at Networks: A Neighbor's View of Networking Research. National Academies Press, 2001.
[10]
S.N. Dorogovtsev and J.F.F. Mendes. Evolution of Networks: From Biological Nets to the Internet and WWW. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003.
[11]
Google. Measurement lab (m-lab). http://www.measurementlab.net/about.
[12]
Grenouille. Collaborative monitoring. http://wiki.grenouille.com/index.php/CMON\#Technical_and_scientific_description_of_the_activities.
[13]
Ethan Katz-Bassett, John P. John, Arvind Krishnamurthy, David Wetherall, Tom Anderson, and Yatin Chawathe. Towards IP geolocation using delay and topology measurements. In IMC '06: Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement, pages 71--84, 2006.
[14]
Ethan Katz-Bassett, Harsha V. Madhyastha, John P. John, Arvind Krishnamurthy, and Thomas Anderson. Studying black holes in the Internet with Hubble. 2008. http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/ethan/papers/hubble-nsdi08.pdf.
[15]
kc claffy. Ten things lawyers should know about the internet. http://www.caida.org/publications/papers/2008/lawyers_top_ten/.
[16]
kc claffy, Mark Crovella, Timur Friedman, Colleen Shannon, and Neil Spring. Community-Oriented Network Measurement Infrastructure (CONMI) Workshop Report. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 36(2):41--48, 2006.
[17]
kc claffy, Young Hyun, Ken Keys, Marina Fomenkov, and Dmitri Krioukov. Internet mapping: from art to science. In CATCH, 2009.
[18]
Erin Kenneally and kc claffy. What's belmont got to do with it?, May 2009. http://blog.caida.org/best_available_data/2009/06/12/whats-belmont-got-to-do-with-it/.
[19]
Matthew Luckie, Young Hyun, and Bradley Huffaker. Traceroute probe method and forward IP path inference. In Internet Measurement Conference, October 2008. http://www.caida.org/publications/papers/2008/traceroute_probe_method/.
[20]
Priya Mahadevan, Dmitri Krioukov, Marina Fomenkov, Bradley Huffaker, Xenofontas Dimitropoulos, kc claffy, and Amin Vahdat. The Internet AS-level topology: Three data sources and one definitive metric. Computer Communication Review, 36(1), 2006.
[21]
MaxMind. Maxmind geolocation technology. http://www.maxmind.com/.
[22]
D. Morato, E. Magana, M. Izal, J. Aracil, F. Naranjo, F. Astiz, U. Alonso, I. Csabai, P. Haga, G. Simon, J. Steger, and G. Vattay. The European traffic observatory measurement infraestructure (ETOMIC). In TRIDENTCOM, 2005. http://www.etomic.org/.
[23]
Saverio Niccolini, Sandra Tartarelli, Juergen Quittek, Thomas Dietz, and Martin Swany. Information model and XML data model for traceroute measurements. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5388.txt.
[24]
National Institutes of Health. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research (the belmont report), Apr 1979. http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/belmont.html.
[25]
Ricardo Oliveira, Dan Pei, Walter Willinger, Beichuan Zhang, and Lixia Zhang. Quantifying the completeness of the observed AS-level structure. http://www.cs.ucla.edu/rveloso/papers/completeness_tr.pdf.
[26]
Romualdo Pastor-Satorras, Alexei Vazquez, and Alessandro Vespignani. Dynamical and correlation properties of the internet. Physical Review Letters, 87:258701, 2001.
[27]
Pedram Pedarsani, Daniel R. Figueiredo, and Matthias Grossglauser. Densification arising from sampling fixed graphs. In Proceedings of ACM SigMetrics, June 2008. http://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/126463/files/1569084170-pedarsani.pdf.
[28]
Yuji Sekiya, Kenjiro Cho, and Yohei Kuga. Gulliver project. http://gulliver.wide.ad.jp/.
[29]
Y. Shavitt and E. Shir. DIMES: Let the Internet measure itself. Computer Communication Review, 35(5), 2005.
[30]
Duane Wessels. DNS survey: Open resolvers, 2009. http://dns.measurement-factory.com/surveys/openresolvers.html.

Cited By

View all
  • (2012)The 4th workshop on active internet measurements (AIMS-4) reportACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review10.1145/2317307.231731542:3(34-38)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2012
  • (2011)The 3rd workshop on active internet measurements (AIMS-3) reportACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review10.1145/2002250.200225741:3(37-42)Online publication date: 5-Jul-2011
  • (2010)The 2nd workshop on active internet measurements (AIMS-2) reportACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review10.1145/1880153.188016240:5(53-58)Online publication date: 22-Oct-2010

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review  Volume 39, Issue 5
October 2009
49 pages
ISSN:0146-4833
DOI:10.1145/1629607
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 October 2009
Published in SIGCOMM-CCR Volume 39, Issue 5

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. active measurement
  2. codes of ethics
  3. codes of good practice
  4. management techniques
  5. measurement techniques
  6. validation

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 18 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2012)The 4th workshop on active internet measurements (AIMS-4) reportACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review10.1145/2317307.231731542:3(34-38)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2012
  • (2011)The 3rd workshop on active internet measurements (AIMS-3) reportACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review10.1145/2002250.200225741:3(37-42)Online publication date: 5-Jul-2011
  • (2010)The 2nd workshop on active internet measurements (AIMS-2) reportACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review10.1145/1880153.188016240:5(53-58)Online publication date: 22-Oct-2010

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media