[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

Theories of Software Reliability: How Good Are They and How Can They Be Improved?

Published: 01 September 1980 Publication History

Abstract

An examination of the assumptions used in early bug-counting models of software reliability shows them to be deficient. Suggestions are made to improve modeling assumptions and examples are given of mathematical implementations. Model verification via real-life data is discussed and minimum requirements are presented. An example shows how these requirements may be satisfied in practice. It is suggested that current theories are only the first step along what threatens to be a long road.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering  Volume 6, Issue 5
September 1980
107 pages

Publisher

IEEE Press

Publication History

Published: 01 September 1980

Author Tags

  1. Debugging software
  2. program error
  3. reliability growth
  4. software bug count
  5. software failure
  6. software failure rate
  7. software life-cycle cost
  8. software reliability measurement

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 17 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2016)Software reliability modeling based on ISO/IEC SQuaREInformation and Software Technology10.1016/j.infsof.2015.09.00670:C(18-29)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2016
  • (2016)On deterministic chaos in software reliability growth modelsApplied Soft Computing10.1016/j.asoc.2016.08.00649:C(1256-1269)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2016
  • (2014)A study on software reliability prediction based on triple exponential smoothing method (WIP)Proceedings of the 2014 Summer Simulation Multiconference10.5555/2685617.2685678(1-9)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2014
  • (2006)Analysis of a software reliability growth modelsProceedings of the 17th IASTED international conference on Modelling and simulation10.5555/1167113.1167209(540-545)Online publication date: 24-May-2006
  • (1998)An experiment in estimating reliability growth under both representative and directed testingACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes10.1145/271775.27178423:2(32-41)Online publication date: 1-Mar-1998
  • (1998)An experiment in estimating reliability growth under both representative and directed testingProceedings of the 1998 ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on Software testing and analysis10.1145/271771.271784(32-41)Online publication date: 1-Mar-1998
  • (1997)Modeling reliability growth during non-representativeAnnals of Software Engineering10.5555/590565.5905924:1-4(11-29)Online publication date: 29-Jan-1997
  • (1997)Re-estimation of software reliability after maintenanceProceedings of the 19th international conference on Software engineering10.1145/253228.253245(79-85)Online publication date: 1-May-1997
  • (1996)Parameter Estimation of the Manifold Growth Model Using Z-graphProceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Software Metrics: From Measurement to Empirical Results10.5555/525586.823873Online publication date: 25-Mar-1996
  • (1993)Software Reliability Model with Optimal Selection of Failure DataIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/32.25685619:11(1095-1104)Online publication date: 1-Nov-1993
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media