Unveiling the loss of exceptional women in science
References
[1]
A. Al Mosawi, The scientific productivity and academic output of elite Iraqi pediatricians: H-index reliability indicator, International Journal of Research Studies in Medical and Health Sciences 4 (8) (2019) 3–6.
[2]
J. Alper, The pipeline is leaking women all the way along, Science 260 (5106) (1993) 409–411,.
[3]
S.L. Archer, The making of a physician-scientist–the process has a pattern: Lessons from the lives of Nobel laureates in medicine and physiology, European Heart Journal 28 (4) (2007) 510–514,.
[4]
I. Basson, C. Ni, G. Badia, N. Tufenkji, C.R. Sugimoto, V. Lariviere, Gender differences in submission behavior exacerbate publication disparities in elite journals, bioRxiv (2023),.
[5]
M.H.K. Bendels, M.C. Dietz, D. Brüggmann, G.M. Oremek, N. Schöffel, D.A. Groneberg, Gender disparities in high-quality dermatology research: A descriptive bibliometric study on scientific authorships, BMJ open 8 (4) (2018),.
[6]
J.M. Box-Steffensmeier, R.C. Cunha, R.A. Varbanov, Y.S. Hoh, M.L. Knisley, M.A. Holmes, Survival analysis of faculty retention and promotion in the social sciences by gender, PloS one 10 (11) (2015),.
[7]
D.M. Britton, Beyond the chilly climate: the salience of gender in women's academic careers, Gender & Society 31 (1) (2017) 5–27,.
[8]
P. Bronstein, L. Farnsworth, Gender differences in faculty experiences of interpersonal climate and processes for advancement, Research in Higher Education 39 (5) (1998) 557–585,.
[9]
C. Buckman, A. Flowers, S. Syed, D. Tumin, Gender differences in research productivity of academic physicians before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic, Journal of Women's Health 32 (7) (2023) 801–807,.
[10]
M. Caliendo, S. Kopeinig, Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching, Journal of Economic Surveys 22 (1) (2008) 31–72,.
[11]
N. Caplar, S. Tacchella, S. Birrer, Quantitative evaluation of gender bias in astronomical publications from citation counts, Nature Astronomy 1 (6) (2017) 1–5,.
[12]
B.J. Casad, J.E. Franks, C.E. Garasky, M.M. Kittleman, A.C. Roesler, D.Y. Hall, et al., Gender inequality in academia: Problems and solutions for women faculty in STEM, Journal of Neuroscience Research 99 (1) (2021) 13–23,.
[13]
S.J. Ceci, D.K. Ginther, S. Kahn, W.M. Williams, Women in academic science: A changing landscape, Psychological Science in the Public Interest 15 (3) (2014) 75–141,.
[14]
H.F. Chan, B. Torgler, Gender differences in performance of top cited scientists by field and country, Scientometrics 125 (3) (2020) 2421–2447,.
[15]
H. Chen, J. Chen, H. Nguyen, Demystifying COVID-19 publications: Institutions, journals, concepts, and topics, Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA 109 (3) (2021) 395,.
[16]
M. de Rond, A.N. Miller, Publish or perish: Bane or boon of academic life?, Journal of Management Inquiry 14 (4) (2005) 321–329,.
[17]
A.H. Eagly, W. Wood, The nature–nurture debates: 25 Years of challenges in understanding the psychology of gender, Perspectives on Psychological Science 8 (3) (2013) 340–357,.
[18]
J.D. Feramisco, J.J. Leitenberger, S.I. Redfern, A. Bian, X.J. Xie, J.S. Resneck, A gender gap in the dermatology literature? Cross-sectional analysis of manuscript authorship trends in dermatology journals during 3 decades, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 60 (1) (2009) 63–69,.
[19]
S.P. Fraiberger, R. Sinatra, M. Resch, C. Riedl, A.L. Barabási, Quantifying reputation and success in art, Science 362 (6416) (2018) 825–829,.
[20]
T.F. Frandsen, R.H. Jacobsen, J. Ousager, Gender gaps in scientific performance: A longitudinal matching study of health sciences researchers, Scientometrics 124 (2) (2020) 1511–1527,.
[21]
T.F. Frandsen, R.H. Jacobsen, J.A. Wallin, K. Brixen, J. Ousager, Gender differences in scientific performance: A bibliometric matching analysis of Danish health sciences Graduates, Journal of Informetrics 9 (4) (2015) 1007–1017,.
[22]
P. Gaule, M. Piacentini, An advisor like me? Advisor gender and post-graduate careers in science, Research Policy 47 (4) (2018) 805–813.
[23]
A. Geuna, Global mobility of research scientists: The economics of who goes where and why, Elsevier Science, 2015.
[24]
G. Ghiasi, V. Larivière, C.R. Sugimoto, Gender differences in synchronous and diachronous self-citations, in: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on science and technology indicators, Valencia, Spain, 2016.
[25]
A. Gordon, Transient and continuant authors in a research field: The case of terrorism, Scientometrics 72 (2) (2007) 213–224.
[26]
M. Goulden, M.A. Mason, K. Frasch, Keeping women in the science pipeline, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 638 (1) (2011) 141–162,.
[27]
Hard and soft science, Wikipedia, January 27 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_and_soft_science.
[28]
B. Hemmings, R. Kay, Research self-efficacy, publication output, and early career development, International Journal of Educational Management 24 (7) (2010) 562–574,.
[29]
Higashide, N., Miura, T., Tomokiyo, Y., Asatani, K., & Sakata, I. (2024). Mid-career pitfall of consecutive success in science. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.05824. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.05824.
[30]
C. Hill, C. Corbett, A. St Rose, Why so few?, Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics, American Association of University Women, 2010, p. 20036.
[31]
L. Hou, Q. Wu, Y. Xie, Does early publishing in top journals really predict long-term scientific success in the business field?, Scientometrics 127 (11) (2022) 6083–6107,.
[32]
J. Huang, A.J. Gates, R. Sinatra, A.L. Barabási, Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117 (9) (2020) 4609–4616,.
[33]
J.P. Ioannidis, J. Baas, R. Klavans, K.W. Boyack, A standardized citation metrics author database annotated for scientific field, PLoS Biology 17 (8) (2019),.
[34]
M. Jadidi, F. Karimi, H. Lietz, C. Wagner, Gender disparities in science? Dropout, productivity, collaborations and success of male and female computer scientists, Advances in Complex Systems 21 (03n04) (2018),.
[35]
B.F. Jones, B.A. Weinberg, Age dynamics in scientific creativity, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108 (47) (2011) 18910–18914,.
[36]
M.T. Kalcioglu, Y. Ileri, O.I. Ozdamar, U. Yilmaz, M. Tekin, Evaluation of the academic productivity of the top 100 worldwide physicians in the field of otorhinolaryngology and head and neck surgery using the Google Scholar h-index as the bibliometrics ranking system, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology 132 (12) (2018) 1097–1101,.
[37]
D. Kaminski, C. Geisler, Survival analysis of faculty retention in science and engineering by gender, Science 335 (6070) (2012) 864–866,.
[38]
Karimi, F., Oliveira, M., & Strohmaier, M. (2022). Minorities in networks and algorithms. arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.07113.
[39]
H. Kong, S. Martin-Gutierrez, F. Karimi, Influence of the first-mover advantage on the gender disparities in physics citations, Communications Physics 5 (1) (2022) 243,.
[40]
Kwiek, M. (2023). Quantifying attrition in science: A cohort-based, longitudinal study of scientists in 38 OECD countries. arXiv. https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/8kzb7.
[41]
M. Lai, L. Shi, I. Lam, How academics interpret and deal with performance measures: A case study of two universities in Mainland China, Higher Education Research & Development (2023) 1–15,.
[42]
V. Larivière, E. Vignola-Gagné, C. Villeneuve, P. Gélinas, Y. Gingras, Sex differences in research funding, productivity and impact: An analysis of Québec university professors, Scientometrics 87 (3) (2011) 483–498,.
[43]
D. Lee, Exploring the determinants of research performance for early-career researchers: A literature review, Scientometrics 129 (1) (2024) 181–235,.
[44]
M.J. Lerchenmueller, O. Sorenson, The gender gap in early career transitions in the life sciences, Research Policy 47 (6) (2018) 1007–1017,.
[45]
W. Li, T. Aste, F. Caccioli, G. Livan, Early coauthorship with top scientists predicts success in academic careers, Nature Communications 10 (1) (2019) 5170,.
[46]
F. Liu, P. Holme, M. Chiesa, B. AlShebli, T. Rahwan, Gender inequality and self-publication are common among academic editors, Nature Human Behaviour 7 (3) (2023) 353–364,.
[47]
M. Liu, S. Yang, Y. Bu, N. Zhang, Female early-career scientists have conducted less interdisciplinary research in the past six decades: Evidence from doctoral theses, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 10 (2023) 918,.
[48]
Q. Liu, L. Guo, Y. Sun, L. Ren, X. Wang, X. Han, Do scholars' collaborative tendencies impact the quality of their publications? A generalized propensity score matching analysis, Journal of Informetrics 18 (1) (2024),.
[49]
L. Lucas, N. Turner, Early career academics and their perceptions and experiences of linking research and teaching, International Policies and Practices for Academic Enquiry, Marwell Conference Centre, Winchester, UK, 2017.
[50]
E.B. Madsen, M.W. Nielsen, J. Bjørnholm, R. Jagsi, J.P. Andersen, Author-level data confirm the widening gender gap in publishing rates during COVID-19, eLife 11 (2022) e76559,.
[51]
A.V. Maltese, R.H. Tai, Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among U.S. students, Science Education 95 (5) (2011) 877–907,.
[52]
J.S. Meuleners, B.J. Neuhaus, J. Eberle, The role of scholarly identity and basic needs support during doctoral studies on career aspirations of early career scientists, Studies in Higher Education 48 (12) (2023) 1–14,.
[53]
M. Mills, Introducing survival and event history analysis, Introducing Survival and Event History Analysis (2010) 1–300.
[54]
S. Milojević, F. Radicchi, J.P. Walsh, Changing demographics of scientific careers: The rise of the temporary workforce, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (50) (2018) 12616–12623,.
[55]
Natural science. (2024, April 23). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_science.
[56]
L. Neumayer, Female surgeons in the 1990s: Academic role models, Archives of Surgery 128 (6) (1993) 669,.
[57]
T.L. O'Brien, Change in academic coauthorship, 1953–2003. Science, Technology, & Human Values 37 (3) (2012) 210–234,.
[58]
S. Parvazian, J. Gill, B. Chiera, Higher education, women, and sociocultural change: A closer look at the statistics, SAGE open 7 (2) (2017),.
[59]
J.V. Pedersen, M.W. Nielsen, Gender, self-efficacy and attrition from STEM programmes: Evidence from Danish survey and registry data, Studies in Higher Education 49 (1) (2024) 47–61,.
[60]
W. Quan, F. Shu, M. Yang, V. Larivière, Publish and flourish: Investigating publication requirements for PhD students in China, Scientometrics 128 (12) (2023) 6675–6693,.
[61]
F. Sachs, In defence of small science, Nature 390 (6656) (1997) 203,.
[62]
K. Şahin, G. Candan, Scientific productivity and cooperation in Turkic world: A bibliometric analysis, Scientometrics 115 (2018) 1199–1229,.
[63]
J.M. Santos, H. Horta, L. Amâncio, Research agendas of female and male academics: A new perspective on gender disparities in academia, Gender and Education 33 (5) (2021) 625–643,.
[64]
S. Shapin, Hard science, soft science: A political history of a disciplinary array, History of Science 60 (3) (2022) 287–328,.
[65]
A.K. Shaw, D.E. Stanton, Leaks in the pipeline: Separating demographic inertia from ongoing gender differences in academia, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 279 (1743) (2012) 3736–3741,.
[66]
A. Sinha, Z. Shen, Y. Song, H. Ma, D. Eide, B.J Hsu, et al., An overview of microsoft academic service (MAS) and applications, in: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, 2015, pp. 243–246,.
[67]
C.A.S. Smith, Assessing academic STEM women's sense of isolation in the workplace, Alliances for advancing academic women, Brill, 2014, pp. 97–113. https://brill.com/display/book/edcoll/9789462096042/BP000010.xml.
[68]
Social science. (2024, May 6). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_science.
[69]
F. Squazzoni, G. Bravo, M. Farjam, A. Marusic, B. Mehmani, M. Willis, et al., Peer review and gender bias: A study on 145 scholarly journals, Science Advances 7 (2) (2021) eabd0299,.
[70]
C. Star, Engaged academics? Dilemmas for early career academics, in: Papers and abstracts, education and social action conference, 1, Sydney University of Technology, Centre for Popular Education, 2004, pp. 401–405.
[71]
N.W. Storer, The hard sciences and the soft: Some sociological observations, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 55 (1) (1967) 75–84.
[72]
C.R. Sugimoto, Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science, Nature 504 (7479) (2013) 211–213,.
[73]
C.R. Sugimoto, T.J. Sugimoto, A. Tsou, S. Milojević, V. Larivière, Age stratification and cohort effects in scholarly communication: A study of social sciences, Scientometrics 109 (2) (2016) 997–1016,.
[74]
N. Tovanich, P. Dragicevic, P. Isenberg, Gender in 30 years of IEEE visualization, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 28 (1) (2022) 497–507,.
[75]
N. Tripathi, M.K. Goshisht, Advancing women in chemistry: A step toward gender parity, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 62 (24) (2022) 6386–6397,.
[76]
P. van den Besselaar, U. Sandström, Early career grants, performance, and careers: A study on predictive validity of grant decisions, Journal of Informetrics 9 (4) (2015) 826–838,.
[77]
R. van Veelen, B. Derks, Academics as agentic superheroes: Female academics’ lack of fit with the agentic stereotype of success limits their career advancement, British Journal of Social Psychology 61 (3) (2022) 748–767,.
[78]
C. Walters, G.G. Mehl, P. Piraino, J.D. Jansen, S. Kriger, The impact of the pandemic-enforced lockdown on the scholarly productivity of women academics in South Africa, Research Policy 51 (1) (2022),.
[79]
M.T. Wang, J. Degol, Motivational pathways to STEM career choices: Using expectancy–value perspective to understand individual and gender differences in STEM fields, Developmental Review 33 (4) (2013) 304–340,.
[80]
Y. Xing, A. Zeng, Y. Fan, Z. Di, The strong nonlinear effect in academic dropout, Scientometrics 120 (2) (2019) 793–805,.
[81]
A. Zeng, Z. Shen, J. Zhou, J. Wu, Y. Fan, Y. Wang, et al., The science of science: From the perspective of complex systems, Physics Reports 714–715 (2017) 1–73,.
[82]
L. Zhang, Y. Shang, Y. Huang, G. Sivertsen, Gender differences among active reviewers: An investigation based on publons, Scientometrics 127 (1) (2022) 145–179,.
[83]
Y. Zhang, H. Li, J. Mao, G. He, Y. Yang, Z. Jiang, et al., COVID-19: A disruptive impact on the knowledge support of references, Scientometrics 128 (2023) 4791–4823,.
[84]
Zhao, Z., Bu, Y., & Li, J. (2021). Characterizing scientists leaving science before their time: Evidence from mathematics. Information Processing & Management, 58(5), 102661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102661.
[85]
S. Zhou, S. Chai, R.B. Freeman, Gender homophily: In-group citation preferences and the gender disadvantage, Research Policy 53 (1) (2024),.
[86]
Q. Zong, Y. Xie, J. Liang, Does open peer review improve citation count? Evidence from a propensity score matching analysis of PeerJ, Scientometrics 125 (2020) 607–623,. 2020.
Index Terms
- Unveiling the loss of exceptional women in science
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Life scientists’ experience with posting preprints during the COVID-19 pandemic
AbstractIn the COVID-19 pandemic, it was much more critical for many life science researchers to rapidly disseminate research results—so they used preprints as upstream publication opportunities. This was rather new to the life sciences where preprint ...
Preference for Smartphone-Based Internet Applications and Smartphone Addiction Among Young Adult Addicts: Gender Difference in Psychological Network
Young adults are a high-risk population for developing smartphone addiction (SA), which bring about social issues. One theoretically and empirically supported proximal risk factor of SA is preference for smartphone-based internet applications (PSIA). ...
On the relationship between supervisor–supervisee gender difference and scientific impact of doctoral dissertations: Evidence from Humanities and Social Sciences in China
This article explores the relationships between supervisor–supervisee gender difference and the scientific impact of doctoral dissertations. We use the China Doctoral Dissertations Full-text Database and pay special attention to the fields of Humanities ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Copyright © 2024.
Publisher
Pergamon Press, Inc.
United States
Publication History
Published: 01 November 2024
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 0Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 24 Jan 2025