[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

Scientific productivity and cooperation in Turkic world: a bibliometric analysis

Published: 01 June 2018 Publication History

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to gain insight about scientific productivity and cooperation among Turkish language speaking countries in today’s conditions in which scientific cooperation has gained ever-increasing significance. The basic problematic of the current research is as follows: although scientific production and cooperation has gained a strategic importance and bibliometric studies have become popular on scientific production processes with reference to the number of academic publications and citations, academic studies on this field have not been carried out yet in Turkish language speaking countries. In the current study, a bibliometric analysis was done with reference to co-authored scientific documents and citations between 2000 and 2016 years in the countries being a member of “Turkic Council” which is one of the main international organizations aiming to institutionalize scientific cooperation in Turkic world. In the analyses obtained from Web of Science, the following phenomena were highlighted the number of academic documents, the number of citations, the number of academic documents per academic staff, the number of academic documents per institutions, the impact factors of the studies, the main research fields, the number of co-authored academic studies which the member countries carried out together and with the other countries and finally the languages used in these academic studies. The basic research question in the present research focuses on what kind of evolution appeared in the number of academic documents, their impact factors, co-authoring matter and their main research fields in Turkic Council member countries. The essential findings of this interdisciplinary study in which scientific research statistics of the member countries are presented in analyses along with geopolitical descriptions can be listed as follows; Turkey is the main research partner of Turkic Council member countries, Turkey has still kept its preliminary role in the process of scientific cooperation in Turkic world together with the end of the cold war, the other member countries except for Turkey have fallen behind considerably in the rank of publication and citation performance, the scientific cooperation among other member countries has not been activated yet despite the institutional moves of the Council, the use of Turkish language in the examined documents is rather scarce although Turkey occupies the scientific preliminary position and the Council is an international organization which is shaped under the framework of common language axis.

References

[1]
Abdiraiymova, G., Duisenova, S., & Shayakhmetov, S. (2013). Reforming of system of the higher education in Kazakhstan (based on results of sociological research). Procedia, 82, 397–403.
[2]
Agion, P., & Akçiğit, U. (2014). What do we learn from Schumpeterian growth theory. Handbook of Economic Growth, 2, 515–563.
[3]
Al, U. (2012). Publication and citation performances of European Union countries and Turkey. Bilig, 62, 1.
[4]
Alasehir, O., Cakir, M. P., Acarturk, C., Baykal, N., & Akbulut, U. (2014). URAP-TR: A national ranking for Turkish universities based on academic performance. Scientometrics, 101, 159–178.
[5]
Aman, V. (2016). How collaboration impacts citation flows within the German science system. Scientometrics, 109, 2195–2216.
[6]
Anwar, M. A., & Abu Bakar, A. B. (1997). Current state of science and technology in the Muslim world. Scientometrics, 40(1), 23–44.
[7]
Aytac, S. (2011). Scientific International Collaboration of Turkey, Greece, Poland, and Portugal: A bibliometric analysis. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47, 1.
[8]
Bagcı, H., & Doganlar, A. A. (2009). Changing geopolitics and Turkish foreign policy. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie—Sklodowska Lublin-Polonia, XVI(2), 97–115.
[9]
Bar-İlan, J. (2008). Which h-index? A comparison of WoS Scopus and Google Scholar. Sciontometrics, 74(2), 257–271.
[10]
Biyikli, M. (2016).The roles and collaborations of international Turkic Academy (TWESCO). Dumlupınar University Journal of Social Sciences, Special Number of Afro-Eurasia, 404–418.
[11]
Bozeman, B., Dietz, J. S., & Gaughan, M. (2001). Scientific and technical human capital: An alternative model for research evaluation. International Journal of Technology Management, 22(7–8), 716–740.
[12]
Cavacini, A. (2016). Recent trends in Middle Eastern scientific production. Scientometrics, 109, 423–432.
[13]
Chadegani, A. A., Salehi, H., Yunus, M. M., Farhadi, H., Fooladi, M., Farhadi, M., et al. (2013). A comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of science and scopus databases. Asian Social Science, 9(5), 18–26.
[14]
Choi, S. (2012). Core-periphery, new clusters, or rising stars? International scientific collaboration among advanced countries in the era of globalization. Scientometrics, 90, 25–41.
[16]
Clarivate Analytics, Web of Science. (2017b). Accessed November 23, 2017, from http://images.webofknowledge.com/WOKRS59B4/help/WOS/hs_document_type.html.
[17]
Drucker, P. F. (2002). Managing in the next society. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
[18]
Dugin, A. (1997). The foundations of geopolitics: The geopolitical future of Russia. Moscow: Arktogeya.
[19]
Economic Development Foundation (IKV). (2016). Accessed February 22, 2016, from http://ikv.org.tr/images/upload/data/files/8-avrupa_arastirma_alani.pdf.
[20]
Elsevier Scopus. Accessed November 23, 2017, https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus.
[21]
Eom, S. (2009). Author cocitation analysis: Quantitative methods for mapping the intellectual structure of an academic discipline. New York: Information Science Reference, Hershey.
[22]
ERA (European Research Area). (2017).Optimal circulation, access to and transfer of scientific knowledge. Accessed July 2, 2017, http://ec.europa.eu/research/era/optimal-circulation_en.htm.
[23]
Featherstone, K., & Kazamias, G. (2014). Europeanization and the southern periphery. Newyork: Routledge.
[24]
Fuller, G. E., & Lesser, I. (1993). Turkey’s new geopolitics: From the Balkans to Western China (RAND studies). Boulder: Westview Press.
[25]
Georghiou, L. (1998). Global cooperation in research. Research Policy, 27, 611–626.
[26]
Giddens, A. (2000). Runaway world: How globalization is reshaping our lives. NewYork: Routledge.
[27]
Gonzales, L. R., Gonzales, C. N., & Veleso, F. (2016). Using co-authorship and citation analysis to identify research groups: A new way to assess performance. Scientometrics, 108, 1171–1191.
[28]
Gossart, C., & Ozman, M. (2009). Co-authorship networks in social sciences: The case of Turkey. Scientometrics, 78(2), 323–345.
[29]
Gul, S., Nisa, N. T., Shah, T. A., Gupta, S., Jan, A., & Ahmad, S. (2015). Middle East: Research productivity and performance across nations. Scientometrics, 105, 1157–1166.
[30]
Gzoyan, E. G., Hovhannisyan, L. A., Aleksanyan, S. A., Ghazaryan, N. A., Hunanyan, S. R., Bourghida, A., et al. (2015). Comparative analysis of the scientific output of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia. Scientometrics, 102, 195–212.
[31]
Hagel, J., & Brown, J. S. (2005). Innovation Blowback: Disruptive management practices from Asia. McKinsey Quarterly. Accessed July 10, 2017, from http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/innovation-blowback-disruptive-management-practices-from-asia.
[32]
Hess, C., Ostrom, E. (Ed.). (2007). A framework for analyzing the knowledge commons. In Understanding knowledge as a commons: From theory to practice. Cambridge: MIT Press.
[33]
Incites-Essential Science Indicators. Accessed November 23, 2017, from https://esi.incites.thomsonreuters.comAccessed.
[34]
Kato, M., & Ando, A. (2017). Nationalities of international scientific collaboration and researcher mobility found in Nature and Science. Scientometrics, 110, 673–694.
[35]
Kotsemir, M., & Shashnov, S. (2017). Measuring, analysis and visualization of research capacity of university at the level of departments and staff members. Scientometrics, 112, 1659–1689.
[36]
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
[37]
Kumar, S., & Jan, J. M. (2014). Research collaboration networks of two OIC nations: Comparative study between Turkey and Malaysia in the field of Energy Fuels, 2009–2011. Scientometrics, 98, 387–414.
[38]
Mei, X., Zhu, X., Zhang, T., Jia, Z., & Wan, C. (2016). Worldwide productivity in the hand and wrist literature: A bibliometric analysis of four highly cited subspecialty journals. International Journal of Surgery, 28, 8–12.
[39]
Mert, O. (2015). The first general committee of the Turkish Council Union of the Turkish Universities and the Union of Turkish Universities. Journal of Turkish Research Institute, 53, 273–290.
[40]
Miotke, J. (2008). International science and technology cooperation. Accessed July 10, 2017, from https://2001-2009.state.gov/g/oes/rls/rm/102995.htm.
[41]
Onder, C., Sevkli, M., Altinok, T., & Tavukcuoglu, C. (2008). Institutional change and scientific research: A preliminary bibliometric analysis of institutional influences on Turkey’s recent social science publications. Scientometrics, 76(3), 543–560.
[42]
Pinto, M. J., & Fernandez, S. (2015). New questions arise: Are bibliometric indicators adequate for evaluating the scientific production of the social sciences and humanities? Qualitative and Quantitive Methods in Libraries (QQML) Special Issue Bibliometrics and Scientometrics, 161–169.
[43]
Russell, J. M. (1995). The increasing role of international cooperation in science and technology research in Mexico. Scientometrics, 34(1), 45–61.
[44]
Rymer, B. C., & Choa, R. M. (2015). A worldwide bibliometric analysis of published literature in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 68, 1304–1308.
[45]
Sahin, K. (2009). The nation state under the light of globalization discussions. In Turkish: KüreselleşmeTartışmalarıIşığındaUlusDevlet, 2nd edn. İstanbul:Yeniyüzyıl Press.
[46]
Sahin, K. (2016). Science, geopolitics and the Turkish world. Journal of Süleyman Demirel University Institute of Social Sciences, CIEP Special Edition, 1091–1100.
[47]
Sarwar, R., & Hassan, S. U. (2015). A bibliometric assessment of scientific productivity and international collaboration of the Islamic World in science and technology (S&T) areas. Scientometrics, 105, 1059–1077.
[48]
SCImago. (2007). SJR—SCImago Journal&Country Rank. Accessed November 23, 2017, http://www.scimagojr.com.
[49]
Sooryamoorthy, R. (2017). Do types of collaboration change citation? A scientometric analysis of social science publications in South Africa. Scientometrics, 111, 379–400.
[50]
Sweileh, W. M., Shraim, N. Y., Zyoud, S. H., & Al-Jabi, S. H. (2016). Worldwide research productivity on tramadol: A bibliometric analysis. SpringerPlus, 5, 1108.
[51]
TDIK (Cooperation Council of Turkic Speaking States). (2017). Accessed July 28, 2017, http://www.turkkon.org/tr-TR/genel_bilgi/1/10.
[52]
Toffler, A. (1980). The third wave. New York: William Morrow & Company.
[53]
Turkic Universities Union. (2017a). Directive. Accessed June 8, 2017, from http://www.turkunib.org/static/images/directive.pdf.
[54]
Turkic Universities Union. (2017b). Orhun process. Accessed June 8, 2017, from http://www.turkunib.org/orhun/.
[55]
TWESCO (International Turkic Akademy). (2017). Accessed June 5, 2017, from http://twesco.org/tr/about/.
[56]
ULAKBIM. (2017). Turkey’s scientific publication map. Accessed June 24, 2017, from http://cabim.ulakbim.gov.tr/wpcontent/uploads/sites/4/2016/03/T%C3%BCrkiye_Bilim_Haritas%C4%B1-1981-2006.pdf.
[57]
Uzun, A. (2006). Science and technology policy in Turkey. National strategies for innovation and change during the 1983–2003 period and beyond. Scientometrics, 66(3), 551–559.
[58]
YOK (Council of Higher Education). (2017a). Accessed June 5, 2017, from https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/.
[59]
[60]
Zavareh, M. S. R., & Alavian, S. M. (2017). Ten-year analysis of hepatitis-related papers in the Middle East: A web of science-based scientometric study. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, 28, 20–25.
[61]
Zhou, P., & Glanzel, W. (2010). In-depth analysis on China’s international cooperation in science. Scientometrics, 82, 597–612.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Unveiling the loss of exceptional women in scienceInformation Processing and Management: an International Journal10.1016/j.ipm.2024.10382961:6Online publication date: 1-Nov-2024
  • (2020)Efficiency and performance analysis of economics research using hesitant fuzzy AHP and OCRA methodsScientometrics10.1007/s11192-020-03584-5124:3(2645-2659)Online publication date: 25-Jun-2020

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Scientometrics
Scientometrics  Volume 115, Issue 3
Jun 2018
534 pages

Publisher

Springer-Verlag

Berlin, Heidelberg

Publication History

Published: 01 June 2018

Author Tags

  1. Turkic world
  2. Bibliometrics
  3. Scientific productivity
  4. Cooperation

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 11 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Unveiling the loss of exceptional women in scienceInformation Processing and Management: an International Journal10.1016/j.ipm.2024.10382961:6Online publication date: 1-Nov-2024
  • (2020)Efficiency and performance analysis of economics research using hesitant fuzzy AHP and OCRA methodsScientometrics10.1007/s11192-020-03584-5124:3(2645-2659)Online publication date: 25-Jun-2020

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media