[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

Why do young people tag photos on social networking sites? Explaining user intentions

Published: 01 February 2018 Publication History

Abstract

The study investigated the reasons behind why people keep tagging on social media using extended UTAUT2 model.Determinants of user intention to use a specific social media feature were examined with 780 social media users.Habit and hedonic motivation have significant influence on intentions to photo-tag.Self-efficacy, Social Status, Influence and Presence had insignificant influence.Facilitating conditions, Effort and Performance expectancy has no influence. Scholars have emphasized an urgent need to investigate the determinants of user intentions to share content on social networking sites (SNS). A growing share of the content in social media is visual including Photos which users can share by tagging. To improve the understanding of the determinants of social media users behavioral intention to share content, this study investigates why people tag photos on SNS. A comprehensive research model was developed based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2) and Social Cognitive Theory (SCT). The validity of the extended UTAUT2 model was tested on a new form of technology use which is not only timely but is much desired by the scholars engaged in information systems research. The research model investigates the role of habit, hedonic motivation, facilitating conditions, social influence, effort expectancy, performance expectancy, social presence, social status, and self-efficacy in influencing the user intentions to engage in photo-tagging. The research model was tested using a cross-sectional study of 780 adolescent Facebook users. The findings suggest that only habit and hedonic motivation have a significant direct influence on the users intentions to tag photos. The study contributes to the theorizing of the role of habits and hedonic motivations in user behaviors in the SNS and provides new insights into these factors for the managers of social media sites.

References

[1]
M. Al-Debei, E. Al-Lozi, A. Papazafeiropoulou, Why people keep comingbackcoming back to Facebook: Explaining and predicting continuance participation from an extended theory of planned behaviour perspective, Decision Support Systems, 55 (2013) 43-54.
[2]
H. Allam, J. Blustein, M. Bliemel, L. Spiteri, Exploring factors impacting users' attitude and intention towards social tagging systems, Paper Presented at the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (2012).
[3]
M. Ames, M. Naaman, Why we tag: motivations for annotation in mobile and online media, in: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 2007, pp. 971-980.
[4]
J. Arenas-Gaitan, B. Peral-Peral, M.A. Ramon-Jeronimo, Elderly and internet banking: An application of UTAUT2, Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 20 (2015) 1-23.
[5]
J. Arnett, Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties, American Psychologist, 55 (2000) 469-480.
[6]
R.P. Bagozzi, The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift, Journal of the AIS, 8 (2007) 244-254.
[7]
R.K. Baker, K.M. White, Predicting adolescents use of social networking sites from an extended theory of planned behaviour perspective, Computers in Human Behavior, 26 (2010) 1591-1597.
[8]
A. Bandura, Social learning theories, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1977.
[9]
A. Bandura, The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory, Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4 (1986) 359-373.
[10]
G. Baptista, T. Oliveira, Understanding mobile banking: The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology combined with cultural moderators, Computers in Human Behavior, 50 (2015) 418-430.
[11]
I. Benbasat, R.W. Zmud, The identity crisis withinwithin the IS disciplinediscipline: defining and communicating the disciplines core properties, MIS Quarterly, 27 (2003) 183-194.
[12]
A. Besmer, H. Lipford, Moving beyond untagging: Photo privacy in a tagged world, Proceedings of the 28th international conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI) (2010) 1563-1572.
[13]
A. Bhattacherjee, G. Premkumar, Understanding changes in belief and attitude toward information technology usage: A theoretical model and longitudinal test, MIS Quarterly, 28 (2004) 351-370.
[14]
A. Bhattacherjee, Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model, MIS Quarterly, 25 (2001) 351-370.
[15]
A. Bilgihan, A. Barreda, F. Okumus, K. Nusair, Consumer perception of knowledge-sharing in travel-related online social networks, Tourism Management, 52 (2016) 287-296.
[16]
J. Birnholtz, M. Burke, A. Steele, Untagging on social media: Who untags, what do they untag, and why?, Computers in Human Behavior, 69 (2017) 166-173.
[17]
J.D. Borrero, S.Y. Yousafzai, U. Javed, K.L. Page, Expressive participation in internet social movements: Testing the moderating effect of technology readiness and sex on student SNS use, Computers in Human Behavior, 30 (2014) 39-49.
[18]
B.B. Brown, Peer groups and peer culture, in: At the threshold: The developing adolescent, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1990, pp. 171-196.
[19]
M. Burke, R.E. Kraut, Growing closer on Facebook: Changes in tie strength through social network site use, Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (2014) 4187-4196.
[20]
M. Burke, R. Kraut, C. Marlow, Social capital on Facebook: Differentiating uses and users, in: ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2011, pp. 7-12.
[21]
M.B. Byrne, Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming, Routledge, New York, NY, 2001.
[22]
C.M.K. Cheung, P.-Y. Chiu, M.K.O. Lee, Online social networks: Why do students use Facebook?, Computers in Human Behavior, 27 (2011) 1337-1343.
[23]
A.Y. Chong, E.T.W. Ngai, What influences travellers' adoption of a location-based social media service for their travel planning?, Pacific asia conference on information systems (PACIS) (2013).
[24]
D. Compeau, C.A. Hinggins, Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills, Information Systems Research, 6 (1995) 118-143.
[25]
S. Damen, N. Zannone, Privacy implications of privacy settings and tagging in face-book, in: Proceedings of the 10th VLDB workshop on secure data management, 2013.
[26]
F.D. Davis, Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Quarterly, 13 (1989) 319-340.
[27]
R.F. DeVellis, Scale development: Theory and applications, SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2012.
[28]
A. Dhir, M. Al-kahtani, Ubiquitous computing for teenagers: A new perspective on child-computer interaction, IEEE international symposium on technology and society (ISTAS) (2013) 126-135.
[29]
A. Dhir, T. Torsheim, Age and gender differences in photo tagging gratifications, Computers in Human Behavior, 63 (2016) 630-638.
[30]
A. Dhir, G.M. Chen, S. Chen, Why do we tag photographs on Facebook? Proposing a new gratifications scale, New Media & Society (2015) 1-18.
[31]
A. Dhir, S. Pallesen, T. Torsheim, C.S. Andreassen, Do age and gender differences exist in selfie-related behaviours?, Computers in Human Behavior, 63 (2016) 549-555.
[32]
A. Dhir, Exploring online self-presentation in computer-mediated environments: Motives and reasons for photo-tagging and untagging, Aalto University, Finland, 2016.
[33]
A. Dhir, Why do young people avoid photo tagging? A new service avoidance scale, Social Science in Computer Review, 8232 (2016).
[34]
A. Dhir, P. Kaur, S. Chen, K. Lonka, Understanding online regret experience in Facebook use Effects of brand participation, accessibility & problematic use, Computers in Human Behavior, 59 (2016) 420-430.
[35]
A. Dhir, P. Kaur, K. Lonka, M. Nieminen, Why do adolescents untag photos on Facebook?, Computers in Human Behavior, 55 (2016) 1106-1115.
[36]
J.A.G.M. Dijk, O. Peters, W. Ebbers, Explaining the acceptance and use of government internet services: A multivariate analysis of 2006 survey data in the Netherlands, Journal of Government Information Quarterly, 25 (2008) 379-399.
[37]
J.K. Eastman, R.E. Goldsmith, L.R. Flynn, Status consumption in consumer behaviour: Scale development and validation, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 7 (1999).
[38]
A. Eftekhar, C. Fullwood, N. Morris, Capturing personality from Facebook photos and photo-related activities: How much exposure do you need?, Computers in Human Behavior, 37 (2014) 162-170.
[39]
E.H. Erikson, Identity and the life cycle: Selected papers, Psychological Issues, 1 (1959) 1-171.
[40]
T. Escobar-Rodriguez, E. Carvajal-Trujillo, Online drivers of consumer purchase of website airline tickets, Journal of Air Transport Management, 32 (2013) 58-64.
[41]
Facebook Newsroom. (2017). Available at: http://newsroom.fb.com/company-info/ (Last accessed 03, March 2017).
[42]
Facebook Statistics. (2017). https://techvorm.com/facebook-messenger-used-one-billion-people-every-month/ (Last accessed 03. March 2017).
[43]
D. Gefen, D.W. Straub, Consumer trust in B2C e-Commerce andtheand the importance of social presence: Experiments in e-Products and e-Services, Omega, 32 (2004) 407-424.
[44]
D. George, P. Mallery, SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update, Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA, 2003.
[45]
J.F. Hair, R.E. Anderson, R.L. Tatham, W.C. Black, Multivariate data analysis, Prentice Hall, London, UK, 1998.
[46]
N. Hajli, J. Sims, A.H. Zadeh, M.-O. Richard, Richard, A social commerce investigation of the role of trust in a social networking site on purchase intentions, Journal of Business Research, 71 (2017) 133-141.
[47]
Hampton, K. N., Goulet, L. S., Marlow, C., & Rainie, L. (2012). Why most Facebook users get more than they give. Pew Research Centers Internet and American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org//media//Files/Reports/2012/PIP_Facebook%20users_2.3.12.pdf (Last Accessed 03, March 2017).
[48]
J. Hartwick, H. Barki, Explaining the role of user participation in information system use, Management Science, 40 (1994) 440-465.
[49]
. Herrero, H. San Martin, M. del M. Garcia-De los Salmones, Explaining the adoption of social networks sites for sharing user-generated content: a revision of the UTAUT2, Computers in Human Behavior, 71 (2017) 209-217.
[50]
J. Jarvinen, R. Ohtonen, H. Karjaluoto, Consumer acceptance and use of instagram, 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (2016) 2227-2236.
[51]
Y.S. Kang, H. Lee, Understanding the role of an IT artifact in online service continuance: an extended perspective of user satisfaction, Computers in Human Behavior, 26 (2010) 353-364.
[52]
P. Kaur, A. Dhir, S. Chen, R. Rajala, Understanding online regret experience using the theoretical lens of flow experience, Computers in Human Behavior, 57 (2016) 230-239.
[53]
P. Kaur, Underpinnings of user participation in innovation on online communication platforms, Aalto University, Finland, 2016.
[54]
P. Kaur, Underpinnings of user participation in service provider-hosted online communities, Service Science, 8 (2016) 249-262.
[55]
S.S. Kim, N.K. Malhotra, A longitudinal model of continued IS use: An integrative view of four mechanisms underlying postadoption phenomena, Management ScienceScience, 51 (2005) 741-755.
[56]
M.E. Kipp, To read and cool: Tagging for time, task and emotion, 8th Information Architecture Summit (2007).
[57]
V. Krishnaraju, S.K. Mathew, V. Sugumaran, Role of web personalization in consumer acceptance of e-government services, in: Nineteenth Americas conference on information systems, Chicago, 2013, pp. 1-8.
[58]
R. LaRose, Social cognitive theories of media selection, in: Media choice: A theoretical and empirical overview, Taylor & Francis, 2009, pp. 10-31.
[59]
R. Larose, K. DeMaagd, H.E. Chew, H.S. Tsai, C. Steinfield, S.S. Wildman, J.M. Bauer, Measuring sustainable broadband adoption: an innovative approach to understanding broadband adoption and use, International Journal of Communication, 6 (2012) 2576-2600.
[60]
C. Lang, H. Barton, Just untag it: Exploring Exploring the management of undesirable Facebook photos, Computers in Human Behavior, 43 (2015) 147-155.
[61]
P. Laurn, J.-C. Yang, Y.-P. Chiu, Why people check in to social network sites, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 19 (2015) 21-46.
[62]
C.S. Lee, L. Ma, News sharing in social media: The effect of gratifications and prior experience, Computers in Human Behavior, 28 (2012) 331-339.
[63]
D. Lee, H.S. Kim, J.K. Kim, The role of self-construal in consumers electronic word of mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites: A social cognitive approach, Computers in Human BehaviorBehavior, 28 (2012) 1054-1062.
[64]
S.-S. Liaw, W.-C. Chang, W.-H. Hung, H.-M. Huang, Attitudes toward search engines as a learning assisted tool: approach of Liaw and Huang's research model, Computers in Human Behavior, 22 (2006) 177-190.
[65]
E. Liew, Facebook and socioeconomic benefits in the developing world, Behaviour & Information Technology, 33 (2013) 1-41.
[66]
M. Limayem, S.G. Hirt, C.M. Cheung, How habit limits the predictive power of intention: The case of information systems continuance, MIS Quarterly (2007) 705-737.
[67]
R. Louho, M. Kallioja, P. Oittinen, Factors affecting the use of hybrid media applications, Graphic Arts in Finland, 35 (2006) 11-21.
[68]
M. Mntymki, K. Riemer, Digital natives in social virtual worlds: A multi-method study of gratifications and social influences in habbo hotel, International Journal of Information Management, 34 (2014) 210-220.
[69]
M. Mntymki, J. Salo, Purchasing behavior in social virtual worlds: An examination of Habbo Hotel, International Journal of Information Management, 33 (2013) 282-290.
[70]
A. Malik, A. Dhir, M. Nieminen, Uses and gratifications of digital photo sharing on Facebook, Telematics and Informatics, 33 (2016) 129-138.
[71]
C. McLaughlin, J. Vitak, Norm evolution and violation on Facebook, New Media & Society, 14 (2012) 299-315.
[72]
N. Mohamed, I.H. Ahmad, Information privacy concerns, antecedents and privacy measure use in social networking sites: Evidence from Malaysia, Computers in Human Behavior, 28 (2012) 2366-2375.
[73]
C. Morosan, A. DeFranco, It's about time: Revisiting UTAUT2 to examine consumers' intentions to use NFC mobile payments in hotels, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 53 (2016) 17-29.
[74]
S. Mouakket, Factors influencing continuance intention to use social network sites: the Facebook case, Computers in Human Behavior, 53 (2015) 102-110.
[75]
R.W. Naylor, C.P. Lamberton, P.M. West, Beyond the like button: The impact of mere virtual presence on brand evaluations and purchase intentions in social media settings, Journal of Marketing, 76 (2012) 105-120.
[76]
L. Oshlyansky, P. Cairns, T. Harold, Validating the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) tool cross-culturally, Proceeding of the 21st British Computer Society (BCS) HCI group conference, vol. 2 (2007).
[77]
L. Qin, Y. Kim, X. Tan, Understanding the intention of using mobile social networking apps, Twenty-Second Americas Conference on Information Systems (2016).
[78]
L. Rainie, J. Brenner, K. Purcell, Photos and videos as social currency online, Pew Internet & American Life Project (2012).
[79]
W. Reinartz, M. Haenlein, J. Henseler, An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26 (2009) 332-344.
[80]
M. Rey-Moreno, C. Medina-Molina, Social capital in E-services adoption, Psychology & Marketing, 33 (2016) 1151-1158.
[81]
M.M.M.A. Riffai, K. Grant, D. Edgar, Big TAM in Oman: Exploring the promise of on-line banking: Its adoption by customers and the challenges of banking in Oman, International Journal of Information Management, 32 (2012) 239-250.
[82]
Ross, P. (2014). Photos Are Still King on Facebook. www.socialbakers.com/blog/2149-photos-are-stillking-on-facebook (Last Accessed 03, March 2017).
[83]
X. Shao, M. Siponen, Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Adding consumption theory to UTAUT2, Proceedings of SIGSVC Workshop, Working Papers on Information Systems, 11 (2011).
[84]
X.-L. Shen, C.M. Cheung, M.K. Lee, Perceived critical mass and collective intention in social media-supported small group communication, International Journal of Information Management, 33 (2013) 707-715.
[85]
E.L. Slade, M.D. Williams, Y.K. Dwivedi, Extending UTAUT2 to explore consumer adoption of mobile payments, in: Proceedings of the UK academy for information systems conference, 2013.
[86]
D. Sledgianowski, S. Kulviwat, Using social network sites: The effects of playfulness, critical mass and trust in a hedonic context, Journal of Computer Information Systems, 49 (2009) 74-83.
[87]
M.A. Stefanone, D. Lackaff, D. Rosen, Contingencies of self-worth and social-networking-site behavior, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14 (2011) 41-49.
[88]
D. Straub, M.-C. Boudreau, D. Gefen, Validation guidelines for IS positivist research, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 14 (2004) 380-426.
[89]
E.T. Straub, Understanding technology adoption: Theory and future direction for informal learning, Review of Educational Research, 79 (2009) 625-664.
[90]
B.G. Tabachnick, L.S. Fidell, Using multivariate statistics, Pearson, New York NY, 2007.
[91]
V. Venkatesh, F.D. Davis, A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies, Management Science, 46 (2000) 186-204.
[92]
V. Venkatesh, Y.L. Thong James, X. Xu, Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology, MIS Quarterly, 36 (2012) 157-178.
[93]
C.H. Wong, G.W.H. Tan, S.P. Loke, K.B. Ooi, Adoption of mobile social networking sites for learning?, Online Information Review, 39 (2015) 762-778.
[94]
S. Yang, Understanding undergraduate students adoption of mobile learning model: A perspective of the extended UTAUT2, Journal of Convergence Information Technology, 8 (2013) 969-979.
[95]
A.L. Young, A. Quan-Haase, Privacy protection strategies on facebook information, Communication & Society, 16 (2013) 479-500.
[96]
C.S. Yu, Factors affecting individuals to adopt mobile banking: Empirical Empirical evidence from the UTAUT model, Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 13 (2012) 104-121.
[97]
Y.Y. Yuen, P.H.P. Yeow, N. Lim, N. Saylani, Internet banking adoption: Comparing Comparing developed and developing countries, Journal of Computer Information Systems, 51 (2010) 52-61.
[98]
T. Zhou, Y. Lu, B. Wang, Integrating TTF and UTAUT to explain mobile banking user adoption, Computers in Human Behavior, 26 (2010) 760-767.
[99]
C. Zigkolis, S. Papadopoulos, G. Filippou, Y. Kom-patsiaris, A. Vakali, Collaborative event annotation in tagged photo collections, Multimedia Tools and Applications, 70 (2014) 89-118.
[100]
Zollers, A. (2007), Emerging motivations for tagging: Expression, performance and activism, Tagging and Metadata for Social Information Organization, A Workshop at WWW2007 www.ibiblio.org/www_tagging/2007/paper_55.pdf (Last Accessed 03, March 2017).

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image International Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals
International Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals  Volume 38, Issue 1
February 2018
317 pages

Publisher

Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

Netherlands

Publication History

Published: 01 February 2018

Author Tags

  1. Adolescents
  2. Facebook
  3. Photo-tagging
  4. Social cognitive theory
  5. Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology
  6. User intentions

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 01 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)The effects of non-fungible token platform affordances on customer loyaltyComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2023.108013151:COnline publication date: 4-Mar-2024
  • (2022)Drawing goals nearerInternational Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.10252266:COnline publication date: 1-Oct-2022
  • (2022)Examining Co-Owners’ Privacy Consideration in Collaborative Photo SharingComputer Supported Cooperative Work10.1007/s10606-021-09421-431:1(79-109)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2022
  • (2021)Approach or avoid? The dualistic effects of envy on social media users’ behavioral intentionInternational Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.10237460:COnline publication date: 1-Oct-2021
  • (2021)Audience management, online turbulence and lurking in social networking servicesInternational Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.10223356:COnline publication date: 1-Feb-2021
  • (2020)When digitalized customers meet digitalized servicesInternational Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.10220054:COnline publication date: 1-Oct-2020
  • (2020)Acceptance of public cloud storage services in South KoreaInternational Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.11.00351:COnline publication date: 1-Apr-2020
  • (2019)Antecedents and consequences of social media fatigueInternational Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.02148:C(193-202)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2019
  • (2019)Examining continuance use on social network and micro-blogging sitesInternational Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.01047:C(215-232)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2019
  • (2019)Applying a multi-dimensional hedonic concept of intrinsic motivation on social tagging toolsInternational Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.11.00545:C(211-222)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2019
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media