[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
article

The effects of IS resources, capabilities, and qualities on organizational performance: An integrated approach

Published: 01 March 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Several theories, such as the resource-based view (RBV) and the information systems (IS) success model (ISSM), have provided inconclusive results on the impacts of IS on business processes and organizational performance. The current study reviews the effects of these theories in terms of IS resources, capabilities and qualities, and further proposes an integrated approach for examining organizational performance. Our integrated model was statistically tested by using a structural equation modeling (SEM) method. Our results provide an integrated view of the associations among theories and enhance the understanding of IS contributions to organizational performance.

References

[1]
Amit, R. and Schoemaker, P.J.H., Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal. v14 i1. 33-46.
[2]
Anderson, J.C. and Gerbing, D.W., Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin. v103 i3. 411-423.
[3]
Arbuckle, J., AMOS Users' Guide 16.0. 2007. SPSS, Chicago, USA.
[4]
Bagozzi, R.P. and Phillips, L.W., Representing and testing organizational theories: a holistic construal. Administrative Science Quarterly. v27 i3. 459-489.
[5]
On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. v16 i1. 74-94.
[6]
Barney, J., Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management. v17 i1. 99-120.
[7]
Barua, A., Kriebel, C.H. and Mukhopadhyay, T., Information technologies and business value: an analytic and empirical investigation. Information Systems Research. v6 i1. 3-23.
[8]
Benbasat, I. and Zmud, R.W., The identity crisis within the IS discipline: defining and communicating the discipline's core properties. MIS Quarterly. v27 i2. 183-194.
[9]
Bentler, P.M., Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin. v107 i2. 238-246.
[10]
A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: an empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly. v24 i1. 169-196.
[11]
Bhatt, G.D. and Grover, V., Types of information technology capabilities and their role in competitive advantage: an empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems. v22 i2. 253-277.
[12]
Bollen, K.A., Multiple indicators: internal consistency or no necessary relationship?. Quality and Quantity. v18 i4. 377-385.
[13]
Bollen, K.A., Indicator: methodology. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. 7282-7287.
[14]
Brown, T.A., Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. 2006. The Guilford Press, New York and London.
[15]
Browne, M.W. and Cudeck, R., Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen, K.A., Long, J.S. (Eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models, Sage, Newbury Park, CA. pp. 136-162.
[16]
Brynjolfsson, E., The productivity paradox of information technology. Communications of the ACM. v36 i12. 66-77.
[17]
Brynjolfsson, E. and Hitt, L., Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Science. v42 i4. 541-558.
[18]
Campbell, D.T. and Fiske, D.W., Convergent and discriminant validity by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin. v56 i2. 81-105.
[19]
Chang, J.C.J. and King, W.R., Measuring the performance of information systems: a functional scorecard. Journal of Management Information Systems. v22 i1. 85-115.
[20]
Sustaining IT advantage: the role of structural differences. MIS Quarterly. v15 i3. 275-292.
[21]
Building theory about theory building: what constitutes a theoretical contribution?. Academy of Management Review. v36 i1. 12-32.
[22]
Cronbach, L.J., Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. v16 i3. 297-334.
[23]
Croteau, A.M. and Bergeron, F., An information technology trilogy: business strategy, technological deployment and organizational performance. Journal of Strategic Information Systems. v10 i2. 77-99.
[24]
Dawson, G. and Watson, R., A resource-based view of the impact of IS maturity on financial performance. In: Proceedings of the 2005 Southern Association of Information Systems Conference, pp. 241-248.
[25]
DeLone, W.H. and McLean, E.R., Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research. v3 i1. 60-95.
[26]
DeLone, W.H. and McLean, E.R., The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems. v19 i4. 9-30.
[27]
Dess, G.G. and Robinson Jr., R.B., Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: the case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strategic Management Journal. v5 i3. 265-273.
[28]
Where do capabilities come from and how do they matter? A study in the software services industry. Strategic Management Journal. v26 i1. 25-45.
[29]
Feeny, D.F. and Willcocks, L.P., Core IS capabilities for exploiting information technology. Sloan Management Review. v39 i3. 9-21.
[30]
Gao, G.G., Gopal, A. and Agarwal, R., Contingent effects of quality signaling: evidence from the Indian offshore IT services industry. Management Science. v56 i6. 1012-1029.
[31]
Gelderman, M., The relation between user satisfaction, usage of information systems and performance. Information & Management. v34 i1. 11-18.
[32]
Performance Results of CMMI-Based Process Improvement. 2006. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University.
[33]
Grabowski, M. and Lee, S., Linking information systems application portfolios and organizational strategy. In: Banker, R.D., Kauffman, R.J., Mahmood, M.A. (Eds.), Strategic Information Technology Management: Perspectives on Organizational Growth and Competitive Advantage, IGI Publishing, Harrisburg, PA. pp. 33-54.
[34]
Grant, R.M., The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review. v33 i3. 114-135.
[35]
Grover, V., Jeong, S.R., Kettinger, W.J. and Teng, J.T.C., The implementation of business process reengineering. Journal of Management Information Systems. v12 i1. 109-144.
[36]
Grover, V., Teng, J., Segars, A.H. and Fiedler, K., The influence of information technology diffusion and business process change on perceived productivity: the IS executive's perspective. Information & Management. v34 i3. 141-159.
[37]
Hamel, G. and Heene, A., The concept of core competence. In: Hamel, G., Heene, A. (Eds.), Competence-Based Competition, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK. pp. 11-33.
[38]
Harter, D.E. and Slaughter, S.A., Quality improvement and infrastructure activity costs in software development: a longitudinal analysis. Management Science. v49 i6. 784-800.
[39]
Harter, D.E., Krishnan, M.S. and Slaughter, S.A., Effects of process maturity on quality, cycle time, and effort in software product development. Management Science. v46 i4. 451-466.
[40]
Hatcher, L., A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling. 1994. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.
[41]
Herbsleb, J., Zubrow, D., Goldenson, D., Hayes, W. and Paulk, M., Software quality and the capability maturity model. Communications of the ACM. v40 i6. 30-40.
[42]
Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: three different measures of information technology value. MIS Quarterly. v20 i2. 121-142.
[43]
Huber, G.P. and Power, D.J., Retrospective reports of strategic-level managers: guidelines for increasing their accuracy. Strategic Management Journal. v6 i2. 171-180.
[44]
ISO, ISO/IEC 15504-1, Information Technology - Process Assessment - Part 1: Concepts and Vocabulary. 2004. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland.
[45]
ISO, ISO/IEC 15504-5, Information Technology - Process Assessment - Part 5: An Exemplar Process Assessment Model. 2012. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland.
[46]
Jarvis, C.B., MacKenzie, S.B. and Podsakoff, P.M., A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. The Journal of Consumer Research. v30 i2. 199-218.
[47]
Jiang, J.J., Klein, G., Hwang, H.G., Huang, J. and Hung, S.Y., An exploration of the relationship between software development process maturity and project performance. Information & Management. v41 i3. 279-288.
[48]
Jung, H.W. and Goldenson, D.R., The internal consistency and precedence of key process areas in the capability maturity model for software. Empirical Software Engineering. v13 i2. 125-146.
[49]
Evaluating the relationship between process improvement and schedule deviation in software maintenance. Information and Software Technology. v51 i2. 351-361.
[50]
Kilduff, M., Editor's comments: publishing theory. Academy of Management Review. v31 i2. 252-255.
[51]
King, W.R., Grover, V. and Hufnagel, E.H., Using information and information technology for sustainable competitive advantage: some empirical evidence. Information & Management. v17 i2. 87-93.
[52]
Kishton, J.M. and Widaman, K.F., Unidimensional versus domain representative parceling of questionnaire items: an empirical example. Educational and Psychological Measurement. v54 i3. 757-765.
[53]
Kline, R., Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 2005. The Guilford Press, New York and London.
[54]
Krishnan, M.S., Kriebel, C.H., Kekre, S. and Mukhopadhyay, T., An empirical analysis of productivity and quality in software products. Management Science. v46 i6. 745-759.
[55]
Laudon, K.C. and Laudon, J.P., Management Information Systems: Managing the Digital Firm. 2006. 10th ed. Pearson Education, New Jersey.
[56]
Law, K.S., Wong, C.-S. and Mobley, W.M., Toward a taxonomy of multidimensional constructs. The Academy of Management Review. v23 i4. 741-755.
[57]
Lee, T.M. and Park, C., Mobile technology usage and B2B market performance under mandatory adoption. Industrial Marketing Management. v37 i7. 833-840.
[58]
LePine, J.A. and King, A.W., Editor's comments: developing novel theoretical insight from reviews of existing the theory and research. Academy of Management Review. v35 i4. 506-509.
[59]
Lewis, B.R., Templeton, G.F. and Byrd, T.A., A methodology for construct development in MIS research. European Journal of Information Systems. v14 i4. 388-400.
[60]
Lin, C.P. and Ding, C.G., Opening the black box: assessing the mediating mechanism of relationship quality and the moderating effects of prior experience in ISP service. International Journal of Service Industry Management. v16 i1. 55-80.
[61]
Little, T.D., Cunningham, W.A., Shahar, G. and Widaman, K.F., To parcel or not to parcel: exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling. v9 i2. 151-173.
[62]
Y. Lu, 2006. IT Capability, Uncertainty and Organizational Performance: Development of Measures and Empirical Examination. Unpublished Ph D. diss., The University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
[63]
Lucas Jr., H.C., The business value of information technology: a historical perspective and thoughts for future research. In: Banker, R.D., Kauffman, R.J., Mahmood, M.A. (Eds.), Strategic Information Technology Management: Perspectives on Organizational Growth and Competitive Advantage, IGI Publishing, Harrisburg, PA. pp. 359-374.
[64]
Luftman, J., Key issues facing information systems executives. MIS Quarterly Executive. v3 i2. 269-285.
[65]
MacCallum, R.C., Browne, M.W. and Sugawara, H.M., Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods. v1 i2. 130-149.
[66]
Markus, M.L. and Robey, D., Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research. Management Science. v34 i5. 583-598.
[67]
Markus, M.L. and Soh, C., Banking on information technology: converting IT spending into firm performance. In: Banker, R.D., Kauffman, R.J., Mahmood, M.A. (Eds.), Strategic Information Technology Management: Perspectives on Organizational Growth and Competitive Advantage, IGI Publishing, Harrisburg, PA. pp. 375-403.
[68]
Mata, F.J., Fuerst, W.L. and Barney, J.B., Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly. v19 i4. 487-505.
[69]
Melville, N., Kraemer, K. and Gurbaxani, V., Review: information technology and organizational performance: an integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quarterly. v28 i2. 283-322.
[70]
Mooney, J.G., Gurbaxani, V. and Kraemer, K.L., A process oriented framework for assessing the business value of information technology. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems. v27 i2. 68-81.
[71]
Nunnally, J.C. and Bernstein, I.H., Psychometric Theory. 1994. McGraw, New York.
[72]
Orlikowski, W.J., Improvising organizational transformation over time: a situated change perspective. Information Systems Research. v7 i1. 63-92.
[73]
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. and Berry, L.L., A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing. v49 i4. 41-50.
[74]
Pavlou, P.A. and El Sawy, O.A., From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: the case of new product development. Information Systems Research. v17 i3. 198-227.
[75]
Service quality: a measure of information systems effectiveness. MIS Quarterly. v19 i2. 173-187.
[76]
Porter, M.E., Competitive Advantage. 1985. New York, The Free Press.
[77]
Powell, T.C. and Dent-Micallef, A., Information technology as competitive advantage: the role of human, business, and technology resources. Strategic Management Journal. v18 i5. 375-405.
[78]
Ravichandran, T. and Lertwongsatien, C., Effect of information systems resources and capabilities on firm performance: a resource-based perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems. v21 i4. 237-276.
[79]
Ray, G., Muhanna, W.A. and Barney, J.B., Information technology and the performance of the customer service process: a resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly. v29 i4. 625-652.
[80]
Rice, J.A., Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis. 1995. Belmont, CA, Duxbury Press.
[81]
Ross, J.W., Beath, C.M. and Goodhue, D.L., Develop long-term competitiveness through IT assets. Sloan Management Review. v38 i1. 31-42.
[82]
Sabherwal, R. and Chan, Y.E., Alignment between business and IS strategies: a study of prospectors, analyzers, and defenders. Information Systems Research. v12 i1. 11-33.
[83]
Sambamurthy, V. and Zmud, R., At the heart of success: organizationwide management competencies. In: Sauer, C., Yetton, P. (Eds.), Steps to the Future: Fresh Thinking on the Management of IT-Based Organizational Transformation, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco. pp. 143-163.
[84]
Sambamurthy, V. and Zmud, R.W., Arrangements for information technology governance: a theory of multiple contingencies. MIS Quarterly. v23 i2. 261-290.
[85]
Santhanam, R. and Hartono, E., Issues in linking information technology capability to firm performance. MIS Quarterly. v27 i1. 125-153.
[86]
Seddon, P.B., A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Information Systems Research. v8 i3. 240-253.
[87]
Seddon, P.B. and Kiew, M.Y., A partial test and development of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. In: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Information Systems, pp. 99-100.
[88]
Segars, A.H. and Grover, V., Strategic information systems planning success: an investigation of the construct and its measurement. MIS Quarterly. v22 i2. 139-163.
[89]
SEI, CMMI¿ for Development, Version 1.3 (CMU/SEI-2010-TR-033). 2010. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
[90]
Shu, W. and Strassmann, P.A., Does information technology provide banks with profit?. Information & Management. v42 i5. 781-787.
[91]
Soh, C. and Markus, M.L., How IT creates business value: a process theory synthesis. In: Proceedings of the 16th Annual International Conference on Information Systems, pp. 29-42.
[92]
Strassmann, P.A., The Squandered Computer: Evaluating the Business Alignment of Information Technologies. 1997. Information Economics Press, New Haven, CT.
[93]
Straub, D., Boudreau, M.C. and Gefen, D., Validation guidelines for IS positivist research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. v13. 380-427.
[94]
Tallon, P.P., Kraemer, K.L. and Gurbaxani, V., Executives' perceptions of the business value of information technology: a process-oriented approach. Journal of Management Information Systems. v16 i4. 145-173.
[95]
Trochim, W.M.K. and Donnelly, J.P., Research Methods Knowledge Base. 2001. 2nd ed. Atomic Dog Pub, Cincinnati, OH.
[96]
Venkatraman, N. and Ramanujam, V., Measurement of business performance in strategy research: a comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review. 801-814.
[97]
Wade, M. and Hulland, J., The resource-based view information systems research: review, extension, suggestions for future research. MIS Quarterly. v28 i1. 107-142.
[98]
Whetten, D.A., What constitutes a theoretical contribution?. Academy of Management Review. v14 i4. 490-495.

Cited By

View all
  1. The effects of IS resources, capabilities, and qualities on organizational performance: An integrated approach

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Information and Management
    Information and Management  Volume 50, Issue 2-3
    March, 2013
    68 pages

    Publisher

    Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

    Netherlands

    Publication History

    Published: 01 March 2013

    Author Tags

    1. IS capabilities
    2. IS process
    3. IS qualities
    4. Performance
    5. Resource-based view
    6. SEM

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 24 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Economic Crisis and Government Digital Transformation – Some Positive EvidenceElectronic Government10.1007/978-3-031-70274-7_6(81-98)Online publication date: 3-Sep-2024
    • (2021)The role of IT in organizational innovation – A systematic literature reviewThe Journal of Strategic Information Systems10.1016/j.jsis.2021.10169630:4Online publication date: 1-Dec-2021
    • (2019)Search Engine Advertising Perceived EffectivenessJournal of Organizational and End User Computing10.4018/JOEUC.201910010331:4(46-73)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2019
    • (2017)Cloud Computing Business Value and Human DeterminantsProceedings of the 21st Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics10.1145/3139367.3139485(1-6)Online publication date: 28-Sep-2017
    • (2017)Impact of information technology capability on financial performance during the period of economic downturnElectronic Commerce Research10.1007/s10660-016-9248-117:3(403-423)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2017
    • (2016)Toward the development of a big data analytics capabilityInformation and Management10.1016/j.im.2016.07.00453:8(1049-1064)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2016
    • (2016)The impact of the frequency of usage of IT artifacts on predevelopment performance in the NPD processInformation and Management10.1016/j.im.2015.10.00853:4(422-434)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2016
    • (2015)Barebone cloud IaaSInternational Journal of Business Information Systems10.1504/IJBIS.2015.06613018:1(107-126)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2015
    • (2014)IaaS cloud optimisation during economic turbulence for Malaysia small and medium enterpriseInternational Journal of Business Information Systems10.1504/IJBIS.2014.06283816:2(196-208)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2014

    View Options

    View options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media