More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

article

Review: Integrating cognitive load theory and concepts of human-computer interaction

Authors:

Nina Hollender,

Cristian Hofmann,

Michael Deneke,

Bernhard SchmitzAuthors Info & Claims

Computers in Human Behavior, Volume 26, Issue 6

Pages 1278 - 1288

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.031

Published: 01 November 2010 Publication History

Abstract

With the continually increasing complexity of e-learning environments, there is a need for integrating concepts of cognitive load theory (CLT) with concepts of human-computer interaction (HCI). Basic concepts of both fields were reviewed and contrasted. A literature review was conducted within the literature database ''The Guide to Computing Literature,'' searching for ''cognitive load theory'' and ''Sweller.'' Sixty-five publications contained ''cognitive load'' in their titles or abstracts. Each publication was checked to see whether it contained the concepts of intrinsic, extraneous, or germane cognitive load. The review showed that CLT concepts have been adopted in HCI. However, the concept of germane cognitive load has attracted less attention up to the present time. Two conceptual models are proposed. The first model divides extraneous cognitive load into load induced by the instructional design and load caused by software usage. The model clarifies the focus of traditional usability principles and of existing instructional design principles derived from CLT. The second model fits CLT concepts into the basic components of user-centered design. The concept of germane cognitive load illustrates that an increase of cognitive load can be desirable when designing e-learning environments. Areas for future interdisciplinary research are sketched.

References

[1]

Alkhalifa, E. M. (2008). Towards demonstrating limited cognitive reception bandwidth. In Proceedings of the 8th IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies (pp. 913-916).

Digital Library

[2]

Prior knowledge in learning from a non-linear electronic document: Disorientation and coherence of the reading sequences. Computers in Human Behavior. v25 i2. 381-388.

Digital Library

[3]

A model of cognitive loads in massively multiplayer online role playing games. Interacting with Computers. v19 i2. 167-179.

Digital Library

[4]

Field dependence-independence and instructional-design effects on learners' performance with a computer-modeling tool. Computers in Human Behavior. v25 i6. 1355-1366.

Digital Library

[5]

Ardito, C., De Marsico, M., Lanzilotti, R., Levialdi, S., Roselli, T., Rossano, V., et al. (2004). Usability of e-learning tools. In Paper presented at the AVI 2004 - Advanced visual interfaces, May 25-28, 2004, Gallipoli, Italy.

Digital Library

[6]

Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In: Spence, K.W., Spence, J.T. (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Academic Press, New York, NY. pp. 89-195.

[7]

Transitioning from studying examples to solving problems: Combining fading with prompting fosters learning. Journal of Educational Psychology. v95. 774-783.

[8]

Multimedia learning: Cognitive individual differences and display design techniques predict transfer learning with multimedia learning modules. Computers & Education. v53 i4. 1339-1354.

Digital Library

[9]

Editorial: State of the art research into Cognitive Load Theory. Computers in Human Behavior. v25 i2. 253-257.

Digital Library

[10]

Learning hand manipulative tasks: When instructional animations are superior to equivalent static representations. Computers in Human Behavior. v25 i2. 348-353.

Digital Library

[11]

The split-attention principle in multimedia learning. In: Mayer, R.E. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. pp. 135-146.

[12]

State of the art research into Cognitive Load Theory. Computers in Human Behavior. v25. 253-257.

Digital Library

[13]

The psychology of memory. Basic Books, New York, NY.

[14]

Working memory: The interface between memory and cognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. v4 i3. 281-288.

Digital Library

[15]

Managing cognitive load. Recent trends in cognitive load theory. Learning and Instruction. v12. 139-146.

[16]

Cao, Y., Theune, M., & Nijholt, A. (2009). Modality effects on cognitive load and performance in high-load information presentation. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces (pp. 335-344).

Digital Library

[17]

The psychology of human-computer interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.

Digital Library

[18]

The Nurnberg funnel: Designing minimalist instruction for practical computer skill. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Digital Library

[19]

Caspersen, M. E., & Bennedsen, J. (2007). Instructional design of a programming course: a learning theoretic approach. In Proceedings of the third international workshop on computing education research (pp. 111-122).

Digital Library

[20]

Cognitive load while learning to use a computer program. Applied Cognitive Psychology. v10. 151-170.

[21]

The role of cognitive theory in human-computer interface. Computers in Human Behavior. v19 i5. 593-607.

[22]

Chang, D., Dooley, L., & Tuovinen, J. E. (2002). Gestalt theory in visual screen design: A new look at an old subject. In Proceedings of the world conference on computers in education: Australian topics (pp. 5-12).

Digital Library

[23]

Computer-assisted learning for mathematical problem solving. Computers & Education. v46 i2. 140-151.

Digital Library

[24]

A human-centered approach for improving world wide web browsers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers. v29 i2. 172-179.

[25]

Web designers and web users: Influence of the ergonomic quality of the web site on the information search. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. v64 i10. 1031-1048.

Digital Library

[26]

Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science. v13. 145-182.

[27]

Expertise in problem solving. In: Sternberg, R.J. (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence, Vol. 1. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. pp. 7-75.

[28]

Explaining the split-attention effect: Is the reduction of extraneous cognitive load accompanied by an increase in germane cognitive load?. Computers in Human Behavior. v25 i2. 315-324.

Digital Library

[29]

Clarebout, G., & Elen, J. (2005). The effects of a pedagogical agent in an open learning environment. In Proceeding of the conference on artificial intelligence in education: Supporting learning through intelligent and socially informed technology (pp. 168-175).

Digital Library

[30]

The impact of sequencing and prior knowledge on learning mathematics through spreadsheet applications. Educational Technology Research and Development. v53. 15-24.

[31]

Dynamic task selection: Effects of feedback and learner control on efficiency and motivation. Learning and Instruction. v19. 455-465.

[32]

Courtemanche, F., Najjar, M., & Mayers, A. (2008). Cognitive load estimation for optimizing learning within intelligent tutoring systems. In B. P. Woolf, E. Aïmeur, R. Nkambou, & S. Lajoie (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science: Vol. 5091. Proceedings of the 9th international conference on intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 719-721). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.

Digital Library

[33]

De Jong, T. (2009). Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: Some food for thought. Instructional Science.

[34]

Cognitive load in hypertext reading: A review. Computers in Human Behavior. v23 i3. 1616-1641.

Digital Library

[35]

Elting, C., Zwickel, J., & Malaka, R. (2002). Device-dependant modality selection for user-interfaces: An empirical study. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on intelligent user interfaces (pp. 55-62).

Digital Library

[36]

Fan, X., & Yen, J. (2007). Realistic cognitive load modeling for enhancing shared mental models in human-agent collaboration. In Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems (pp. 1-8). Honolulu, Hawaii: ACM.

Digital Library

[37]

Feinberg, S., & Murphy, M. (2000). Applying cognitive load theory to the design of web-based instruction. In Proceedings of the 18th annual ACM international conference on computer documentation: Technology & teamwork (pp. 353-360).

Digital Library

[38]

Information comparisons in example-based hypertext environments: Supporting learners with processing prompts and an interactive comparison tool. Educational Technology, Research & Development. v56. 73-92.

[39]

Gray, S., Clair, C. S., James, R., & Mead, J. (2007). Suggestions for graduated exposure to programming concepts using fading worked examples. In Proceedings of the third international workshop on computing education research (pp. 99-110).

Digital Library

[40]

Grudin, J. (1990). The computer reaches out: the historical continuity of interface design. In Paper presented at the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems: Empowering people, Seattle, WA.

Digital Library

[41]

Revising (multi-) media learning principles by applying a differentiated knowledge concept. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. v64 i10. 1061-1070.

Digital Library

[42]

Hewett, T. T., Baecker, R., Card, S., Carey, T., Gasen, J., Mantei, M., et al. (1996). ACM SIGCHI curricula for human-computer interaction; ACM. Retrieved from http://old.sigchi.org/sigchi/cdg/.

[43]

Learning how to use a computer-based concept-mapping tool: Self-explaining examples helps. Computers in Human Behavior. v25 i2. 267-274.

Digital Library

[44]

Learning performance with interactive simulations in medical education: Lessons learned from results of learning complex physiological models with the HAEMOdynamics SIMulator. Computers & Education. v52 i2. 292-301.

Digital Library

[45]

The effects of video on cognitive load and social presence in multimedia-learning. Computers in Human Behavior. v24 i3. 786-797.

Digital Library

[46]

Current practice in measuring usability: Challenges to usability studies and research. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. v64 i2. 79-102.

Digital Library

[47]

Differential benefits of situated instructional prompts. Computers in Human Behavior. v25 i4. 818-828.

Digital Library

[48]

Hsu, P.-S., Chang, T.-J., Chuang, C.-P., & Wu, M.-H. (2008). A dynamic, real time and non-interference quantitative measurement technique on diagnosing instructional condition for adaptive e-learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE Asia-Pacific services computing conference (pp. 1471-1476).

Digital Library

[49]

Huang, W., Hong, S.-H., & Eades, P. (2006). Predicting graph reading performance: a cognitive approach. In Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific symposium on information visualisation (pp. 207-216).

Digital Library

[50]

Do students benefit equally from interactive computer simulations regardless of prior knowledge levels?. Computers & Education. v52 i3. 649-655.

Digital Library

[51]

ISO (1998). ISO 9241-11 Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) - Part 11: Guidance on usability.

[52]

Kalyuga, S. (1997). Cognitive load effects and design of computer based instruction. In Poster session presented at the second ACM international conference on digital libraries, Philadelphia, PA.

Digital Library

[53]

Relative effectiveness of animated and static diagrams: An effect of learner prior knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior. v24 i3. 852-861.

Digital Library

[54]

The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist. v38 i1. 23-31.

[55]

Designing support to facilitate learning in powerful electronic learning environments: Introduction. Computers in Human Behavior. v23. 1047-1054.

Digital Library

[56]

Khawaja, M. A., Ruiz, N., & Chen, F. (2007). Potential speech features for cognitive load measurement. In Proceedings of the 19th Australasian conference on computer-human interaction: Entertaining user interfaces, Adelaide, Australia.

Digital Library

[57]

Khawaja, M. A., Ruiz, N., & Chen, F. (2008). Think before you talk: An empirical study of relationship between speech pauses and cognitive load. In Proceedings of the 20th Australasian conference on computer-human interaction: Designing for habitus and habitat (pp. 335-338).

Digital Library

[58]

Towards a participatory multimedia learning model. Education and Information Technologies. v11 i1. 21-32.

Digital Library

[59]

Kim, S., & Dey, A. K. (2009). Simulated augmented reality windshield display as a cognitive mapping aid for elder driver navigation. In Proceedings of the 27th international SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 133-142).

Digital Library

[60]

Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2008). Individual versus group learning as a function of task complexity: An exploration into the measurement of group cognitive load. In J. Zumbach, N. Schwartz, T. Seufert, & L. Kester (Eds.), Beyond knowledge: The legacy of competence - meaningful computer-based learning environments (1st ed., pp. 21-28). Netherlands: Springer.

[61]

A cognitive load approach to collaborative learning: United brains for complex tasks. Educational Psychology Review. v21 i1. 31-42.

[62]

Individual and group-based learning from complex cognitive tasks: Effects on retention and transfer efficiency. Computers in Human Behavior. v25 i2. 306-314.

Digital Library

[63]

Expanding the concept of usability. Informing Science Journal. v7. 129-141.

[64]

Architecting usability properties in the e-learning instructional design process. International Journal on ELearning. v3 i3. 38-44.

[65]

3D visualization types in multimedia applications for science learning: A case study for 8th grade students in Greece. Computers & Education. v52 i2. 390-401.

Digital Library

[66]

Apparent usability vs. inherent usability: Experimental analysis on the determinants of the apparent usability. In: Katz, I., Mack, R., Marks, L. (Eds.), Conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, Denver, Colorado. pp. 292-293.

Digital Library

[67]

Lawrence, C. (2006). Take a load off: cognitive considerations for game design. In Proceedings of the 3rd Australasian conference on Interactive entertainment (pp. 91-95). Perth, Australia: Murdoch University.

Digital Library

[68]

Cognitive load and science text comprehension: Effects of drawing and mentally imagining text content. Computers in Human Behavior. v25 i2. 284-289.

Digital Library

[69]

Lim, J., & Reiser, R. A. (2006). Effects of part-task and whole-task instructional approaches and levels of learner expertise on learner acquisition and transfer of a complex cognitive skill. In Proceedings of the seventh international conference on learning sciences (pp. 425-431).

Digital Library

[70]

The modality principle in multimedia learning. In: Mayer, R.E. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. pp. 147-158.

[71]

Lyons, L., Lee, J., Quintana, C., & Soloway, E. (2006). MUSHI: A multi-device framework for collaborative inquiry learning. In Proceedings of the seventh international conference on learning sciences (pp. 453-459).

Digital Library

[72]

The effects of the number of links and navigation support on cognitive load and learning with hypertext: The mediating role of reading order. Computers in Human Behavior. v25 i1. 66-75.

Digital Library

[73]

Elements of user interface design. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.

Digital Library

[74]

Learning technology and usability: A framework for understanding courseware. Interacting with Computers. v11. 485-497.

[75]

Mehlenbacher, B., Bennett, L., Bird, T., Ivey, M., Lucas, J., Morton, J., et al. (2005). Usable e-learning: A conceptual model for evaluation and design. In Paper presented at the HCI international 2005: 11th international conference on human-computer-interaction, Las Vegas, NV.

[76]

The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review. v63. 81-97.

[77]

Note-taking while learning hypermedia: Cognitive and motivational considerations. Computers in Human Behavior. v25 i5. 1120-1128.

Digital Library

[78]

Evaluating a CALL software on the learning of English prepositions. Computers & Education. v47 i1. 41-55.

Digital Library

[79]

Usability engineering. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.

[80]

Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics. In: Conference companion on human factors in computing systems, ACM, Boston, MA. pp. 152-158.

Digital Library

[81]

Oviatt, S. (2006). Human-centered design meets cognitive load theory: Designing interfaces that help people think. In Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM international conference on multimedia (pp. 871-880).

Digital Library

[82]

Oviatt, S., Arthur, A., & Cohen, J. (2006). Quiet interfaces that help students think. In Proceedings of the 19th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology (pp. 191-200).

Digital Library

[83]

Oviatt, S., Coulston, R., & Lunsford, R. (2004). When do we interact multimodally? Cognitive load and multimodal communication patterns. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Multimodal interfaces (pp. 129-136). State College, PA: ACM.

Digital Library

[84]

A motivational perspective on the relation between mental effort and performance. Optimizing learner involvement in instruction. Educational Technology, Research & Development. v53. 25-33.

[85]

Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist. i38. 63-71.

[86]

Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology. v86 i1. 122-133.

[87]

Assimilating complex information. Learning and Instruction. v12. 61-86.

[88]

Interaction design. Beyond human-computer interaction. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.

Digital Library

[89]

Enabling cognitive load-aware AR with rateless coding on a wearable network. Advances in Multimedia. 1-12.

Digital Library

[90]

Implicit learning in problem solving: The role of working memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology. v126 i2. 178-203.

[91]

New theoretical approaches for HCI. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. v38. 87-143.

[92]

Ruiz, N., Taib, R., & Chen, F. (2006). Examining the redundancy of multimodal input. In Proceedings of the 18th Australia conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Design: Activities, Artefacts and Environments (pp. 389-392). Sydney, Australia: ACM.

Digital Library

[93]

Ruiz, N., Taib, R., Shi, Y., Choi, E., & Chen, F. (2007). Using pen input features as indices of cognitive load. In Proceedings of the ninth international conference on multimodal interfaces (pp. 315-318).

Digital Library

[94]

E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online. Kogan Page, London, UK.

[95]

Samaras, H., Bousiou, D., Giouvanakis, T., & Tarabanis, K. (2007). Multimedia learning design based on learning object technology. In Proceedings of the IASTED European conference internet and multimedia systems and applications (pp. 248-253).

Digital Library

[96]

Dynamics of cognitive load theory: A model-based approach. Computers in Human Behavior. v24 i3. 1041-1066.

Digital Library

[97]

Sawicka, A., Kopainsky, B., & Gonzalez, J.J., 2008. Learning about dynamic problems with computer simulators: A case of system dynamics simulation models. In Proceedings of the 2008 eighth IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies (pp. 569-571). IEEE Computer Society.

Digital Library

[98]

Motivational aspects of cognitive load theory. In: Wosnitza, M., Karabenick, S., Efklides, A., Nenniger, P. (Eds.), Contemporary motivation research: From global to local perspectives, Hogrefe & Huber, Göttingen, Germany. pp. 69-96.

[99]

A reconsideration of cognitive load theory. Educational Psychology Review. v19 i4. 469-508.

[100]

Schreiber, J. (2009). Bridging the gap between useful and aesthetic maps in car navigation systems. In Proceedings of the 11th international conference on human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services (pp. 1-4).

Digital Library

[101]

The worked-example effect: Not an artefact of lousy control conditions. Computers in Human Behavior. v25 i2. 258-266.

Digital Library

[102]

The impact of intrinsic cognitive load on the effectiveness of graphical help for coherence formation. Computers in Human Behavior. v23 i3. 1055-1071.

Digital Library

[103]

Memory characteristics and modality in multimedia learning: An aptitude-treatment-interaction study. Learning and Instruction. v19 i1. 28-42.

[104]

Interaction design. Beyond human-computer interaction. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.

Digital Library

[105]

Shi, Y., Ruiz, N., Taib, R., Choi, E., & Chen, F. (2007). Galvanic skin response (GSR) as an index of cognitive load. In CHI'07 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 2651-2656).

Digital Library

[106]

Controlled and automatic human information processing II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review. v84. 127-190.

[107]

Designing the user interface. Strategies for effective human-computer interaction. 3rd ed. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

[108]

Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction. 4th ed. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

[109]

Improving computer-assisted instruction in teaching higher-order skills. Computers & Education. v42 i2. 169-180.

Digital Library

[110]

Computer based testing using "digital ink": Participatory design of a Tablet PC based assessment application for secondary education. Computers & Education. v52 i4. 811-819.

Digital Library

[111]

Predicting quality in educational software: Evaluating for learning, usability and the synergy between them. Interacting with Computers. v11. 467-483.

[112]

Conditions and effects of example elaboration. Learning and Instruction. v12. 39-60.

[113]

Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In: Mayer, R.E. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. pp. 19-30.

[114]

The redundancy principle in multimedia learning. In: Mayer, R.E. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. pp. 159-168.

[115]

The worked example effect and human cognition. Learning and Instruction. v16. 165-169.

[116]

Sweller, J. (2008). Evolutionary bases of human cognitive architecture: Implications for computing education. In Proceedings of the fourth international workshop on computing education research (pp. 1-2).

Digital Library

[117]

Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction. v12 i3. 185-233.

[118]

Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review. v10. 251-296.

[119]

Aesthetics and apparent usability: Empirically assessing cultural and methodological issues. In: Pemberton, S. (Ed.), SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Atlanta, Georgia. pp. 115-122.

Digital Library

[120]

Evaluation of distance-learning environments: Impact of usability on student performance. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications. v7 i4. 355-378.

[121]

The effective combination of hybrid usability methods in evaluating educational applications of ICT: Issues and challenges. Education and Information Technologies. v13 i1. 55-76.

Digital Library

[122]

Balanced cognitive load significantly improves the effectiveness of algorithm animation as a problem-solving tool. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing. v19 i5. 598-616.

Digital Library

[123]

Tuovinen, J. E. (2000). Optimising student cognitive load in computer education. In Proceedings of the Australasian conference on computing education (pp. 235-241).

Digital Library

[124]

Uncovering cognitive processes: Different techniques that can contribute to cognitive load research and instruction. Computers in Human Behavior. v25 i2. 325-331.

Digital Library

[125]

Research on cognitive load theory and its design implications for e-learning. Educational Technology, Research & Development. v53 i3. 5-13.

[126]

Teaching complex rather than simple tasks: Balancing intrinsic and germane load to enhance transfer of learning. Applied Cognition Psychology. v20. 343-352.

[127]

Redirecting learners attention during training: Effects on cognitive load, transfer test performance and training efficiency. Learning and Instruction. v12. 11-37.

[128]

Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review. v17 i2. 147-177.

[129]

Does an interface with less assistance provoke more thoughtful behavior?. In: 7th international conference on learning sciences, International Society of the Learning Sciences, Bloomington, Indiana. pp. 785-791.

Digital Library

[130]

Learning by exploration: Thinking aloud while exploring an information system. Instructional Science. v27. 269-284.

[131]

Learning and mental development at school age. In: Simon, B., Simon, J. (Eds.), Educational psychology in the U.S.S.R., Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, UK. pp. 21-34.

[132]

The impact of goal specificity and goal type on learning outcome and cognitive load. Computers in Human Behavior. v25 i2. 299-305.

Digital Library

[133]

Instructional animations can be superior to statics when learning human motor skills. Computers in Human Behavior. v25 i2. 339-347.

Digital Library

[134]

Yin, B., Ruiz, N., Chen, F., & Khawaja, M. A. (2007). Automatic cognitive load detection from speech features. In Proceedings of the 19th Australasian conference on computer-human interaction: Entertaining user interfaces (pp. 249-255).

Digital Library

[135]

Developing a usability evaluation method for e-learning applications: Beyond functional usability. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. v25 i1. 75-98.

[136]

Cognitive load in hypermedia reading comprehension: Influence of text type and linearity. Computers in Human Behavior. v24 i3. 875-887.

Digital Library

Cited By

Wen SPing SWang JLiang HXu XYan Y(2024)AdaptiveVoice: Cognitively Adaptive Voice Interface for Driving AssistanceProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642876(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642876
Chen SLiu XBakhir NYu Y(2024)A study of the effects of different animations on germane cognitive load during intangible cultural heritage instructionEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-024-12567-529:14(19163-19196)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10639-024-12567-5
Alleysson DMeary D(2024)Toward Individual Displays, the Role of Color VisionHCI International 2024 – Late Breaking Papers10.1007/978-3-031-76821-7_1(3-16)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-031-76821-7_1
Show More Cited By

Review: Integrating cognitive load theory and concepts of human-computer interaction
1. Human-centered computing

Recommendations

A Proposed Design of a Lecture Material to Reduce Learning Complexity
ICCA '22: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computing Advancements

Cognitive Load Theory (CLT) and Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) concepts need to be combined to understand better how students learn in more complex environments. For this reason, this paper combines Cognitive Load Theory (CLT) and Human-Computer ...
Cognitive Mechanisms and Optimization Strategies in Interactive Evolutionary Design Based on Cognitive Load Theory
HCI International 2022 - Late Breaking Papers. Design, User Experience and Interaction
Abstract
The interactive evolutionary design (IED) approach is a human-centered design method with the design domain, which requires users to evaluate their overall satisfaction with evolutionary individuals. However, due to repeated and continuous ...
Instructional design of a programming course: a learning theoretic approach
ICER '07: Proceedings of the third international workshop on Computing education research

We present a brief overview of a model for the human cognitive architecture and three learning theories based on this model: cognitive load theory, cognitive apprenticeship, and worked examples (a key area of cognitive skill acquisition). Based on this ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Computers in Human Behavior

Computers in Human Behavior Volume 26, Issue 6

November, 2010

651 pages

ISSN:0747-5632

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © Elsevier Ltd © 2010.

Publisher

Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

Netherlands

Publication History

Published: 01 November 2010

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

47
Total Citations
View Citations
0
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 22 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Wen SPing SWang JLiang HXu XYan Y(2024)AdaptiveVoice: Cognitively Adaptive Voice Interface for Driving AssistanceProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642876(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642876
Chen SLiu XBakhir NYu Y(2024)A study of the effects of different animations on germane cognitive load during intangible cultural heritage instructionEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-024-12567-529:14(19163-19196)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10639-024-12567-5
Alleysson DMeary D(2024)Toward Individual Displays, the Role of Color VisionHCI International 2024 – Late Breaking Papers10.1007/978-3-031-76821-7_1(3-16)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-031-76821-7_1
Reinhard PNeis NKolb LWischer DLi MWinkelmann ATeuteberg FLechner ULeimeister J(2024)Augmenting Frontline Service Employee Onboarding via Hybrid Intelligence: Examining the Effects of Different Degrees of Human-GenAI InteractionDesign Science Research for a Resilient Future10.1007/978-3-031-61175-9_26(384-397)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-031-61175-9_26
Kosch TKarolus JZagermann JReiterer HSchmidt AWoźniak P(2023)A Survey on Measuring Cognitive Workload in Human-Computer InteractionACM Computing Surveys10.1145/358227255:13s(1-39)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3582272
Park KWeill-Tessier PBrown NSharif BJensen NKölling M(2023)An eye tracking study assessing the impact of background styling in code editors on novice programmers’ code understandingProceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3568813.3600133(444-463)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3568813.3600133
Westphal MVössing MSatzger GYom-Tov GRafaeli A(2023)Decision control and explanations in human-AI collaborationComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2023.107714144:COnline publication date: 1-Jul-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107714
Wu XZhou Y(2023)Integrated Visual Cognition Performance Evaluation Model of Intelligent Control System InterfaceEngineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics10.1007/978-3-031-35392-5_26(331-340)Online publication date: 23-Jul-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-031-35392-5_26
Szabo CSheard J(2022)Learning Theories Use and Relationships in Computing Education ResearchACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/348705623:1(1-34)Online publication date: 29-Dec-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3487056
Wang WLin YLu H(2022)Exploring the effect of improved learning performance: A mobile augmented reality learning systemEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-022-11487-628:6(7509-7541)Online publication date: 5-Dec-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10639-022-11487-6
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents