More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

article

The Geoprocessing Web

Authors:

Theodor Foerster,

Peng YueAuthors Info & Claims

Computers & Geosciences, Volume 47

Pages 3 - 12

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.04.021

Published: 01 October 2012 Publication History

Abstract

As Web services technology has matured in recent years, an increasing amount of geospatial resources and processing functions are available in the form of online Web services. Consequently, effective and efficient data processing methods for geospatial information extraction and knowledge discovery over the Web are a major challenge for research and industry. The Geoprocessing Web, which consists of light-weight protocols, crowd-sourcing capability, and the capability to process real-time geospatial data sources provided by sensors, enables distributed, interoperable and collaborative processing of geospatial data for information and knowledge discovery. This paper provides a comprehensive overview about the state-of-the-art architecture and technologies, and the most recent developments in the Geoprocessing Web.

References

[1]

YAWL: Yet Another Workflow Language. Information Systems. v30 i4. 245-275.

[2]

An exploration of GIS architectures for internet environments. Computer, Environment and Urban Systems. v22 i1. 7-23.

[3]

Akram, A., Meredith, D., Allan, R., 2006. Evaluation of BPEL to Scientific Workflows. In: Proceedings 6th IEEE International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid, pp. 269-274.

Digital Library

[4]

Chaining geographic information Web services. IEEE Internet Computing. v7 i5. 22-29.

[5]

Altintas, I., Barney, O., Jaeger-Frank, E., 2006. Provenance Collection Support in the Kepler Scientific Workflow System. In: Proceedings International Provenance, annotation Workshop (IPAW'06), Chicago, USA, pp. 118-132.

[6]

Anand, M., Bowers, S., Ludascher, B., 2010. Provenance Browser: Displaying and Querying Scientific Workflow Provencance Graphs. In: Proceedings 26th IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering, Long Island, CA, USA, pp. 1201-1204.

[7]

Above the Clouds: A Berkeley View of Cloud Computing. EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley.

[8]

Matching INSPIRE quality of service requirements with hybrid c louds. Transactions in GIS. v15 i1. 125-142.

[9]

Beaujardiere, J., 2006. OpenGIS Web Map Server Implementation Specification OGC 06-042. Wayland, USA, 85 pp.

[10]

A framework for Web science. Foundations and Trends in Web Science. v1 i1. 1-130.

[11]

Creating a science of the Web. Science. v311 i5788. 769-771.

[12]

The semantic Web. Scientific America. v284 i5. 34-43.

[13]

Giovanni: a web service workflow-based data visualization and analysis system. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. v47 i1. 106-113.

[14]

GeoDRM: towards digital management of intellectual property rights for spatial data infrastructures. In: Onsrud, H. (Ed.), Research and Theory in Advancing Spatial Data Infrastructure Concepts, ESRI Press, Redlands. pp. 245-260.

[15]

Overcoming the semantic and other barriers to GIS interoperability. International Journal Of Geographical Information Science. v12 i4. 299-314.

[16]

Brauner, J., 2008. Providing GRASS with a Web Processing Service Interface. In: Proceedings 6th Geographic Information Days, Muenster, Germany, pp. 91-116.

[17]

Brauner, J., Foerster, T., Schaeffer, B., Baranski, B., 2009. Towards a Research Agenda for Geoprocessing Services. In:Proceedings 12th AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science, Hannover, Germany, pp. 1-12. {http://www.ikg.uni-hannover.de/agile/fileadmin/agile/paper/124.pdf}

[18]

New generation sensor Web enablement. Sensors. v11 i3. 2652-2699.

[19]

XML Web service-based development model for internet GIS applications. International Journal Of Geographical Information Science. v20 i4. 371-399.

[20]

Use of grid computing for modeling virtual geospatial products. International Journal Of Geographical Information Science. v23 i5. 581-604.

[21]

Chen, N., Hu, C., Chen, Y., Wang, C., Gong, J., 2011. Using SensorML to Construct a Geoprocessing e-Science Workflow Model under a Sensor Web Environment. Computers & Geosciences.

[22]

All for one and one for all. Science. v308 i5723. 809

[23]

A framework for ubiquitous geospatial information integration on mobile device using orchestration of geoservices. International Journal of UbiComp. v1 i3. 69-88.

[24]

The Development of A Prototype Geospatial Web Service System for Remote Sensing Data. International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ISPRS) 2004, Istanbul, Turkey.

[25]

Di, L., 2004. GeoBrain-A Web Services based Geospatial Knowledge Building System. In:Proceedings NASA Earth Science Technology Conference 2004, Palo Alto, CA, USA, (on CDROM) pp. 1-8. {http://esto.nasa.gov/conferences/estc2004/papers/a1p5.pdf}

[26]

Di, L., 2011. Use of ISO 19115 and ISO 19115-2 Lineage Models for Geospatial Web Service Provenance. In: Proceedings 2011 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS11), Vancouver, Canada, pp. 4.

[27]

Di, L., Zhao, P., Yang, W., Yu, G., Yue, P., 2005. Intelligent Geospatial Web Services. In: Proceedings 2005 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium pp. 1229-1232.

[28]

Donaubauer, A., Kutzner, T., Straub, F., 2008. Towards a Quality Aware Web Processing Service, 6th Geographic Inforamtion Days, Münster, Germany.

[29]

ESA, 2012. European Space Agency (ESA) Grid Processing on Demand (G-POD) for Earth Observation Applications. http://gpod.eo.esa.int/, {accessed March 24, 2012}.

[30]

Functional description of geoprocessing services as conjunctive datalog queries. Geoinformatica. v15 i1. 191-221.

[31]

Fleuren, T., Muller, P., 2008. BPEL Workflows Combining Standard OGC Web Services and Grid-enabled OGC Web Services In:Proceedings Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, 2008, Parma, Italy, pp. 337-344.

[32]

Foerster, T., Bruhl, A., Schaffer, B., 2011a. RESTful Web Processing Service. In:Proceedings 14th AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science, Utrecht, Netherlands, pp. 8.

[33]

Geospatial Web services for distributed processing: applications and scenarios. In: Zhao, P., Di, L. (Eds.), Geospatial Web Services: Advances in Information Interoperability, IGI-Global, Hershey. pp. 245-286.

[34]

Service-oriented science. Science. v308 i5723. 814-817.

[35]

Service chaining architectures for applications implementing distributed geographic information processing. International Journal Of Geographical Information Science. v23 i5. 561-580.

[36]

Designing service architectures for distributed geoprocessing: challenges and future directions. Transactions in GIS. v11 i6. 799-818.

[37]

Gao, S., Mioc, D., Yi, X., 2009. The Measurement of Geospatial Web Service Quality in SDIs. In: Proceedings 17th International Conference on Geoinformatics, Fairfax, USA, pp. 1-6.

[38]

GENESI-DEC, 2012. The European Commission Ground European Network for Earth Science Interoperations-Digital Earth Communities (GENESI-DEC) project. {http://www.genesi-dec.eu} {accessed March 24, 2012}.

[39]

GEON, 2012. A Research Project to Create Cyberinfrastructure for the Geosciences. {http://www.geongrid.org}, {accessed March 24, 2012}.

[40]

GEOSS, 2012. Geo Portal. {http://www.geoportal.org/web/guest/geo_home}, {accessed March 24, 2012}.

[41]

Gong, J., Yue, P., Zhou, H., 2010. Geoprocessing in the Microsoft Cloud Computing Platform - Azure. In:Proceedings the Joint Symposium of ISPRS Technical Commission IV & AutoCarto 2010, Orlando, USA, pp.6.

[42]

Granell, C., Gould, M., Ramos, F., 2005. Service Composition for SDIs: Integrated Components Creation. In: Proceedings 16th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, pp. 475-479.

[43]

Gui, Z., Wu, H., Liu, W., Chen, Y., 2009. The Research on QoS Assessment and Optimization for Geospatial Service Chain. In: Proceedings 17th International Conference on Geoinformatics, Fairfax, VA USA, pp. 1-5.

[44]

Han, W., Di, L., Zhao, P., Wei, Y., Li, X., 2008. Design and Implementation of GeoBrain Online Analysis System (GeOnAS). In: Proceedings the 8th International Symposium on Web and Wireless Geographical Information Systems Shanghai, China, pp. 27-36.

[45]

Herrmann, J., 2010. Access Control Systems for Spatial Data Infrastructures and Their Administration. In: Proceedings 1st International Conference and Exhibition on Computing for Geospatial Research and Application, Washington, DC, pp. 47.

[46]

INSPIRE, 2008. INSPIRE Network Services Architecture. 30 pp.

[47]

ISO, 2002. ISO 19113:2002 Geographic Information - Quality Principles. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 29 pp.

[48]

ISO, 2003. ISO 19115:2003: Geographic Information - Metadata. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 140 pp.

[49]

ISO, 2005. ISO 19119:2005 Geographic Information - Services. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 67 pp.

[50]

Jacobs, I., Walsh, N., 2004. Architecture of the World Wide Web. {http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/}, {accessed March 8, 2011}.

[51]

Jager, E., Altintas, I., Zhang, J., Ludascher, B., Pennington, D., Michener, W., 2005. A Scientific Workflow Approach to Distributed Geospatial Data Processing using Web Services. In: Proceedings 17th International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management, Santa Barbara, USA, pp. 87-90.

[52]

Semantic enablement for spatial data infrastructure. Transactions in GIS. v14 i2. 111-129.

[53]

Kammersell, W., Dean, M., 2006. Conceptual Search: Incorporating Geospatial Data Into Semantic Queries. In:Proceedings Terra Cognita 2006, Workshop of 5th International Semantic Web Conference, Athens, USA, pp. 10.

[54]

OWS-4 Workflow IPR: Workflow Descriptions and Lessons Learned. Open Geospatial Consortium Inc, Wayland, MA, USA.

[55]

Kiehle, C., Greve, K., Heier, C., 2006. Standardized Geoprocessing - Taking Spatial Data Infrastructures One Step Further. In: Proceedings 9th AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science, Visegrad, Hungary, pp. 273-282.

[56]

Requirements for next generation spatial Data Infrastructures - standardized Web based geoprocessing and Web service orchestration. Transactions in GIS. v11 i6. 819-834.

[57]

Kolas, D., Hebeler, J., Dean, M., 2005. Geospatial Semantic Web: Architecture of Ontologies. In: Proceedings 1st International Conference on GeoSpatial Semantics Mexico City, Mexico, pp. 183-194.

[58]

Geospatial semantics: why, of what, and how?. Journal on Data Semantics III. LNCS. v3534 i587. 1-24.

[59]

Li, X., Di, L., Han, W., Zhao, P., Dadi, U., 2009. Sharing and Reuse of Service-based Geospatial Processing through a Web Processing Service. In: Proceedings 17th International Confernce on Geoinformatics, Fairfax, Virginia, USA, pp. 1-5.

[60]

Sharing geoscience algotithms in a Web service-oriented environment. Computer & Geosciences. v36 i8. 1060-1068.

[61]

Lin, J., Tao, H., Zhu, G., 2009. An Access Control Mechanism for Geosptial Information Services. In: Proceedings 1st IEEE International Conference on Information Science and Engineering, Nanjing, China, pp. 1971-1974.

[62]

Ontology-based descriptions for semantic discovery and composition of geoprocessing services. Geoinformatica. v11 i1. 1-36.

[63]

Rule-based discovery in spatial data infrastructure. Transactions in GIS. v11 i3. 317-336.

[64]

The emergence of geoportals and their role in spatial data infrastructures. Computer, Environment and Urban Systems. v29 i1. 3-14.

[65]

Geospatial eXtensible Access Control Markup Language (GeoXACML). Open Geospatial Consortium Inc., Wayland.

[66]

Meng, X., Bian, F., Xie, Y., 2009. Research and Realization of Geospatial Information Service Orchestration Based on BPEL. In: Proceedings 2009 International Conference on Environmental Science and Information Application Technology, Wuhan, China, pp. 642-645.

Digital Library

[67]

Evaluation and implementation of the OGC Web processing service for use in client-side GIS. Geoinformatica. v13 i1. 109-120.

[68]

Enabling Quality of Geospatial Web Services. In: Zhao, P., Di, L. (Eds.), Geospatial Web Services: Advances in Information Interoperability, IGI-Global, Hershey. pp. 33-63.

[69]

Sensor Observation Service. Open Geospatial Consortium Inc., Wayland.

[70]

Editorial: think global. Nature. v439 i7078. 763

[71]

Big data special issue. Nature. v455. 1

[72]

NIST, 2009. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Definition of Cloud Computing. National Institute of Standards and Technology, {http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/SNS/cloud-computing/index.html} {accessed 16 August, 2010}.

[73]

Web Services Business Process Execution Language Version 2.0. Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards, Burlington, USA.

[74]

Onchaga, R., 2004. Modelling for Quality of Services in Distributed Geoprocessing. In: Proceedings XXth ISPRS Congress, Istanbul, Turkey, pp. 212-217 (part B212).

[75]

Client/Server Survival Guide. Wiley, Hoboken.

[76]

Web services orchestration and choreography. Computer. v36 i10. 46-52.

[77]

Access, visualization, and interoperability of air quality remote sensing data sets via the Giovanni online tool. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing. v3 i3. 359-370.

[78]

Dynamic run-time application development using CORBA objects and XML in the field of distributed GIS. International Journal Of Geographical Information Science. v17 i4. 321-341.

[79]

Roman, D., Klien, E., Skogan, D., 2006. A Semantic Web Services Framework for the Geospatial Domain. In: Proceedings Terra Cognita Directions to the Geospatial Semantic Web Workshop at the ISWC 2006, Athens, USA, pp. 1-4.

[80]

Schade, S., Granell, C., Diaz, L., 2010. Augmenting SDI with Linked Data. In: Proceedings Workshop on Linked Spatiotemporal Data 2010, Zurich, Swiss, pp. 1-12.

[81]

Schaeffer, B., 2008. Towards a Transactional Web Processing Service (WPS-T). In: Proceedings 6th Geographic Information Days 2008, Munster, Germany, pp. 91-116.

[82]

OGC OWS-6 Geoprocessing Workflow Architecture Engineering Report. Open Geospatial Consortium Inc., Wayland, MA, USA.

[83]

Schaffer, B., Baranski, B., Foerster, T., 2010. Towards Spatial Data Infrastructure in the Clouds. In: Proceedings 13th AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science, Guimarães, Portugal, pp. 399-418.

[84]

Security and licensing for geospatial Web services. In: Zhao, P., Di, L. (Eds.), Geospatial Web Services: Advances in Information Interoperability, IGI-Global, Hershey. pp. 64-95.

[85]

. In: Scharl, A., Tochtermann, K. (Eds.), Springer, London.

[86]

Evaluating performance in spatial data infrastructures for geoprocessing. IEEE Internet Computing. v10 i5. 34-41.

[87]

OpenGIS Web Processing Service. Open Geospatial Consortium Inc., Wayland, MA, USA.

[88]

Changing Focus on Interoperability in Information Systems: From System, Syntax, Structure to Semantics. In: Goodchild, M., Egenhofer, M., Fegeas, R., Kottman, C. (Eds.), The Interoperting Geographic Information Systems, Kluwer, New York. pp. 5-30.

[89]

Stollberg, B., Zipf, A., 2007. OGC Web Processing Service Interface for Web Service Orchestration: Aggregating Geo-processing Services in a Bomb Threat Scenario. In: Proceedings 7th International Symposium on Web and Wireless Geographical Information Systems, Cardiff, UK, pp. 239-251.

[90]

A dynamic architecture for distributing geographic information services. Transactions in GIS. v6 i4. 355-381.

[91]

Tu, S., Flanagin, M., Wu, Y., Abdelguerfi, M., Normand, E., Mahadevan, V., 2004. Design Strategies to Improve Performance of GIS Web Services. In: Proceedings International Conference on Information Technology: Coding and Computing (ITCC 04), Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, pp. 444-448.

[92]

A break in the clouds: towards a cloud definition. ACM SIGCOMM. Computer Communication Review. v39 i1. 50-55.

Digital Library

[93]

Geospatial Digital Rights Management Reference Model. Open Geospatial Consortium Inc., Wayland.

[94]

OpenGIS Web Feature Service 2.0 Interface Standard. Open Geospatial Consortium Inc., Wayland.

[95]

A theoretical approach to the use of cyberinfrastructure in geographic analysis. International Journal Of Geographical Information Science. v23 i2. 169-193.

[96]

Wang, S., Padmanabhan, A., Myers, J., Tang, W., Liu, Y., 2008. Towards Provenance-Aware Geographic Information Systems In: Proceedings 16th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, Irvine, CA, USA, pp.70.

[97]

Web service orchestration of OGC Web services for disaster management. In: Li, J., Zlatanova, S., Fabbri, A. (Eds.), GeoMatics Solutions for Disater Management, Springer Verlag, Berlin. pp. 239-254.

[98]

OGC OWS-5 GeoProcessing Workflow Architecture Engineering Report. 2008. Open Geospatial Consortium Inc., Wayland, MA, USA.

[99]

WfMC, 2008. Process Definition Interface - XML Process Definition Language. Workflow Management Coalition, Cohasset, USA, 217 pp.

[100]

Web Coverage Service (WCS) Implementation Standard OGC 07-067r5. Open Geospatial Consortium Inc., Wayland, USA.

[101]

Spatial cloud computing: how can geospatial sciences use and help shape cloud computing. International Journal of Digital Earth. v4 i4. 305-329.

[102]

Introduction to distributed geographic information processing research. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. v23 i5. 553-560.

[103]

Geospatial cyberinfrastructure: past, present and future. Environment and Urban Systems. v34 i4. 264-277.

[104]

Yu, G., Di, L., Moses, J., Li, P., Zhao, P., 2008. Geospatial Workflow in a Sensor Web Environment: Transactions, Events, and Asynchrony. In: Proceedings 2008 IEEE International Geoscience & Remote Sensing Symposium, Boston, MA USA, pp.132-135.

[105]

Coordination through geospatial Web service workflow in the sensor Web environment. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing. v3 i4. 433-441.

[106]

Semantics-based automatic composition of geospatial Web services chains. Computers & Geosciences. v33 i5. 649-665.

[107]

Semantic Web services based process planning for Earth science applications. International Journal Of Geographical Information Science. v23 i9. 1139-1163.

[108]

Yue, P., Gong, J., Di, L., He, L., Wei, Y., 2010a. Semantic Provenance Registration and Discovery Using Geospatial Catalogue Service. In:Proceedings 2nd International Workshop on the Role of Semantic Web in Provenance Management, Shanghai, China, pp. 23-28. {http://people.csail.mit.edu/pcm/tempISWC/workshops/SWPM2010/completeSWPM10Proceedings}

[109]

GeoPW: laying blocks for geospatial processing Web. Transactions in GIS. v14 i6. 755-772.

[110]

Sharing geospatial provenance in a service-oriented environment. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. v35. 333-343.

[111]

Semantic execution meets geospatial Web services: a pilot application. Transactions in GIS. v12 i1. 59-73.

[112]

Zhao, P., Di, L., Han, W., Li, X., in press. Building a Web-Services Based Geospatial Online Analysis System. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 10.1109/JSTARS.2012.2197372, in press

[113]

Zhao, P., Di, L., Yu, G., 2011. Building Asynchronous Geospatial Processing Workflows with Web Services. Computers & Geosciences.

[114]

Building asynchronous geospatial processing workflows with web services. Computers & Geosciences. v39 i2. 34-41.

[115]

Geospatial Web services. In: Hilton, B. (Ed.), Emerging Spatial Information Systems and Applications, Idea Group Publishing, Hershey. pp. 1-35.

[116]

Zyl, T.v., Vahed, A., 2009. Using SensorML to Describe Scientific Workflows in Distributed Web Service Environments. In: Proceedings 2009 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Johannesburg, South Africa pp. 375-377.

Cited By

Liang JJin FZhang XWu H(2023)WS4GEEEnvironmental Modelling & Software10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105636161:COnline publication date: 1-Mar-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105636
Gürsel ETarek A(2019)Analysis Of Interoperability In Cloud ComputingProceedings of the 2019 5th International Conference on Computer and Technology Applications10.1145/3323933.3324089(189-192)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3323933.3324089
Adenaw LKreibich JWittmann MMerkle LWaclaw ALienkamp M(2019)MAGIS – A Geographic Information System for Mobility Data Analysis2019 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC)10.1109/ITSC.2019.8917054(135-141)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/ITSC.2019.8917054
Show More Cited By

The Geoprocessing Web
1. Information systems
  1. World Wide Web
2. Software and its engineering
  1. Software organization and properties
    1. Software system structures

Recommendations

Semantics-based automatic composition of geospatial Web service chains

Recent developments in Web service technologies and the semantic Web have shown promise for automatic discovery, access, and use of Web services to quickly and efficiently solve particular application problems. One such application area is in the ...
Sharing geoscience algorithms in a Web service-oriented environment (GRASS GIS example)

Effective use of the large amounts of geospatial data available for geospatial research and applications is needed. In this paper, the emerging SOAP-based Web service technologies have been used to develop a large number of standard compliant, chainable ...
Identifying orthoimages in Web Map Services

Orthoimages are essential in many Web applications to facilitate the background context that helps to understand other georeferenced information. Catalogues and service registries of Spatial Data Infrastructures do not necessarily register all the ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Computers & Geosciences

Computers & Geosciences Volume 47, Issue

October, 2012

168 pages

ISSN:0098-3004

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © Elsevier Ltd © 2012.

Publisher

Pergamon Press, Inc.

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 October 2012

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

7
Total Citations
View Citations
0
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 13 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Liang JJin FZhang XWu H(2023)WS4GEEEnvironmental Modelling & Software10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105636161:COnline publication date: 1-Mar-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105636
Gürsel ETarek A(2019)Analysis Of Interoperability In Cloud ComputingProceedings of the 2019 5th International Conference on Computer and Technology Applications10.1145/3323933.3324089(189-192)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3323933.3324089
Adenaw LKreibich JWittmann MMerkle LWaclaw ALienkamp M(2019)MAGIS – A Geographic Information System for Mobility Data Analysis2019 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC)10.1109/ITSC.2019.8917054(135-141)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/ITSC.2019.8917054
Barik R(2018)Development and Implementation of Interoperable Secure SDI Model Using Open Source GISInternational Journal of Applied Geospatial Research10.4018/IJAGR.20180401049:2(55-85)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.4018/IJAGR.2018040104
Swain NLatu KChristensen SJones NNelson EAmes DWilliams G(2015)A review of open source software solutions for developing water resources web applicationsEnvironmental Modelling & Software10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.01.01467:C(108-117)Online publication date: 1-May-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.01.014
Evangelidis KNtouros KMakridis SPapatheodorou C(2014)Geospatial services in the CloudComputers & Geosciences10.5555/2745546.274559863:C(116-122)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2014
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2745546.2745598
Zhou ZCheng ZNing KLi WZhang L(2014)A Sub-Chain Ranking and Recommendation Mechanism for Facilitating Geospatial Web Service CompositionInternational Journal of Web Services Research10.4018/ijwsr.201407010311:3(52-75)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2014
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.4018/ijwsr.2014070103

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents