[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Ontology-Based Descriptions for Semantic Discovery and Composition of Geoprocessing Services

  • Published:
GeoInformatica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ability to process geospatial data will be a great benefit for spatial data infrastructures. This requires the ability to compose data providing services with geoprocessing services. Discovering suitable geoprocessing services is a major challenge in this endeavour. Current (keyword-based) approaches to service discovery are inherently restricted by the ambiguities of natural language, which can lead to low precision and/or recall. To alleviate these problems, we propose to use an ontology-based approach to GI service discovery, which rests on two ideas. Ontologies describing geospatial operations are used to create descriptions of requirements and service capabilities; matches between these descriptions are identified based on function subtyping. We use a running example from the geospatial domain to analyse which problems can occur in existing keyword- and ontology-based approaches and how the discovery of geoprocessing services differs from other service discovery tasks. The example is also used for illustrating the prototypical implementation of the proposed approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. Antoniou and F. Van Harmelen.“Web ontology language: Owl,” in S. Staab and R. Studer (Eds.), Handbook on Ontologies, Springer, pp. 67–92, 2003.

  2. T. Bellwood, L. Clément, D. Ehnebuske, A. Hately, M. Hondo, Y.L. Husband, K. Januszewski, S. Lee, B. McKee, J. Munter, and C. von Riegen. Uddi version 3.0. published specification, 19 July 2002.

  3. L. Bernard, U. Einspanier, M. Lutz, and C. Portele. “Interoperability in gi service chains—The way forward,” in M. Gould, R. Laurini, and S. Coulondre (Eds.), 6th AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science, Lyon, France, 2003.

  4. L. Bernard. “Experiences from an implementation testbed to set up a national sdi,” in M. Ruiz, M. Gould, and J. Ramon (Eds.), 5th AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science 2002, Palma de Mallorca, pp. 315–321, 2002.

  5. A. Bernstein and M. Klein. “Towards high-precision service retrieval,” in I. Horrocks and J. Hendler (Eds.), The Semantic Web–First International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2002), Springer: Sardinia, Italy, pp. 84–101, 2002.

  6. S. Bowers and B. Ludäscher. “An ontology-driven framework for data transformation in scientific workflows,” in International Workshop on Data Integration in the Life Sciences (DILS'04), Springer: Leipzig, Germany, 2004.

  7. F. Baader and W. Nutt. “Basic description logics,” in F. Baader, D. Calvanese, D. Mcguinnes, D. Nardi, and P. Patel-Schneider (Eds.), The Description Logic Handbook. Theory, Implementation and Applications, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, pp 43–95, 2003.

  8. L. Cabral, J. Domingue, E. Motta, T.R. Payne, and F. Hakimpour. “Approaches to semantic web services: an overview and comparisons,” in 1st European Semantic Web Symposium (ESWS2004), Heraklion: Crete, Greece, 2004.

  9. T.H. Cormen, C.E. Leiserson, and R.L. Rivest. “Introduction to algorithms.” MIT Press, 1990.

  10. M. Egenhofer. “Towards the semantic geospatial web,” in The 10th ACM International Symposium on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (ACM-GIS), Institute for Geoinformatics, Münster, Germany, 2002.

  11. U. Einspanier, M. Lutz, K. Senkler, I. Simonis, and A. Sliwinski. “Toward a process model for gi service composition,” in GI-Tage (GI Days) 2003, Institute for Geoinformatics: Münster, Germany, 2003.

  12. R. Groot and J. McLaughin (Eds.). Geospatial Data Infrastructure—Concepts, Cases, and Good Practice, Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2000.

  13. H. Gallaire, J. Minker, and J.-M. Nicolas. “Logic and databases: A deductive approach.” ACM Computing Surveys, Vol. 16(2):153–185, 1984.

  14. T. Gruber. “Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 43(5/6):907–928, 1995.

  15. V. Haarslev and R. Möller. “Racer: A core inference engine for the semantic web,” in 2nd International Workshop on Evaluation of Ontology-based Tools (EON2003), located at the 2nd International Semantic Web Conference ISWC 2003, Sanibel Island, FL, USA, pp. 27–36, 2003.

  16. C.A.R. Hoare. “An axiomatic basis for computer programming,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 12(10):576–583, 1969.

  17. ISO/TC-211. “Text for dis 19107 geogaphic information–spatial schema,” Technical Report, International Organization for Standardization, 2002.

  18. ISO/TC-211. “Text for fdis 19111 geogaphic information–spatial referencing by coordinates,” Final draft version, Technical Report, International Organization for Standardization, 2002.

  19. ISO/TC-211. “Text for fdis 19115 geogaphic information-metadata,” Final draft version, Technical Report, International Organization for Standardization, 2003.

  20. ISO/TC-211. “Geographic information-services (iso 19119:2005),” Technical Report, International Organization for Standardization, 2005.

  21. M. Klein and A. Bernstein. “Searching for the services on the semantic web using process ontologies.” in I.F. Cruz, S. Decker, J. Euzanat, and D. Mcguinness (Eds.), The first Semantic Web Working Symposium (SWWS), Stanford University, California, USA, pp. 431–446, 2001.

  22. T. Kawamura, J.-A. De Blasio, T. Hasegawa, M. Paolucci, and K. Sycara. “Preliminary report of public experiment of semantic service matchmaker with uddi business registry,” in M.E. Orlowska, S. Weerawarana, M. Papazoglou, and J. Yang (Eds.), First International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing (ICSOC 2003), Springer Verlag (LNCS 2910): Trento, Italy, 2003.

  23. M. Klein and B. König-Ries. “A process and a tool for creating service descriptions based on daml-s,” in 4th VLDB Workshop on Technologies for E-Services (TES'03), Springer: Berlin, 2003.

  24. M. Klein and B. König-Ries. “Combining query and preference–an approach to fully automatize dynamic service binding,” in IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS'04), San Diego, California, USA, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 788–791, 2004.

  25. M. Klein and B. König-Ries. “Coupled signature and specification matching for automatic service binding,” in L.-J. Zhang (Ed.), European Conference on Web Services (ECOWS'04), Erfurt, Germany, Springer, pp. 183–197, 2004.

  26. U. Keller, R. Lara, H. Lausen, A. Polleres, and D. Fensel. “Automatic location of services,” in 2nd European Semantic Web Conference 2005, Heraklion: Greece, 2005.

  27. M. Lutz, U. Einspanier, E. Klien, and S. Hübner. “An architecture for ontology-based discovery and retrieval of geographic information,” in P. Dadam, and M. Reichert (Eds.), Informatik 2004—Informatik verbindet, Beitr¨age der 34. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft f¨ur Informatik e.V. (GI), Band 2, Gesellschaft für Informatik: Ulm, Germany, pp. 574–578, 2004.

  28. L. Li and I. Horrocks. “A software framework for matchmaking based on semantic web technology,” in The Twelfth International World Wide Web Conference, Budapest, Hungary, ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, pp. 331–339, 2003.

  29. B. Liskov. “Data abstraction and heirarchy,” ACM Sigplan Notices, Vol. 23(5):17–34, 1987.

  30. M. Lutz and E. Klien. “Ontology-based retrieval of geographic information,” International Journal of Geographic Information Science, Vol. 20(3):233–260, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  31. M. Lutz. “Non-taxonomic relations in semantic service discovery and composition,” in 1st “Ontology in Action” Workshop, in conjunction with 16th Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE 2004), Banff, Canada, pp. 482–485, 2004.

  32. M. Lutz. “Ontology-based service discovery in spatial data infrastructures,” in Workshop on Geographic Information Retrieval (GIR 2005), Bremen, Germany. ACM Press: New York, 2005.

  33. T.W. Malone, K. Crowstone, and G.A. Herman. “Organizing business knowledge: The MIT process handbook,” MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2003.

  34. L. Mckee. “Who wants a gdi?” in R. Groot and J. McLaughlin (Eds.), Geospatial data infrastructure–Concepts, cases, and good practice, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 13–24, 2000.

  35. D. Martin, M. Paolucci, S. McIlraith, M. Burstein, D. McDermott, D. McGuinness, B. Parsia, T. Payne, M. Sabou, M. Solanki, N. Srinivasan, and K. Sycara. “Bringing semantics to web services: The owls approach,” in First International Workshop on Semantic Web Services and Web Process Composition (SWSWPC 2004), San Diego, CA, USA, 2004.

  36. J. Munkres. Topology. 2nd edition, Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 2000.

  37. D. Nebert. “Developing spatial data infrastructures: The SDI cookbook, Version 1.1.,” Global Spatial Data Infrastructure, Technical Comittee, 2001.

  38. OGC. “Web feature service implementation specification,” version 1.0.0 (opengis implementation specification), Technical Report OGC 02-058, Open GIS Consortium, 2002.

  39. OGC. “Web map server interface implementation specification,” version 1.1.1 opengis project, 2002.

  40. OGC. “Ows1.2 uddi experiment,” Technical Report OGC 03-028, OpenGIS Consortium, 2003.

  41. OGC. “Web coverage service (wcs)”, version 1.0.0 (ogc implementation specification), Technical Report OGC 03-065r6, Open Geospatial Consortium, 2003.

  42. OGC. “Catalogue services specification,” version 2.0 (ogc implementation specification), Technical Report OGC 04-021r2, Open GIS Consortium, 2004.

  43. OGC. “Web processing service (wps) specification,” version 0.2.1 (ogc discussion paper), Technical Report OGC 05-007, Open Geospatial Consortium, 2005.

  44. J. Penix and P. Alexander. “Toward automated component adaptation,” in 9th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 1997.

  45. M. Paolucci, T. Kawamura, T.R. Payne, and K. Sycara. “Semantic matching of web service capabilities,” in I. Horrocks and J. Hendler (Eds.), 1st International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC2002), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2342, Sardinia, Italy, Springer, pp. 333–347, 2002.

  46. J. Riecken, L. Bernard, C. Portele, and A. Remke. “North-rhine westphalia: Building a regional sdi in a cross-border environment/ad-hoc integration of sdis: Lessons learnt,” in 9th EC-GI and GIS Workshop—ESDI: Serving the User, A Coruña: Spain, 2003.

  47. D. Roman, H. Lausen, U. Keller, J. de Bruijn, C. Bussler, J. Domingue, D. Fensel, M. Kifer, J. Kopecky, R. Lara, E. Oren, A. Polleres, and M. Stollberg. “Web service modeling ontology (wsmo),” version 1.1, 2005.

  48. S. Russel and P. Norvig. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. 2nd edition, Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 2003.

  49. R. Richardson and A.F. Smeaton. “Using wordnet in a knowledge-based approach to information retrieval (technical report ca-0395),” Technical Report, Dublin City University, 1995.

  50. R. Studer, V.R. Benjamins, and D. Fensel. “Knowledge engineering: Principles and methods,” Data and Knowledge Engineering, Vol. 25(1-2):161–197, 1998.

  51. U. Sattler, D. Calvanese, and R. Molitor. “Relationships with other formalisms,” in F. Baader, D. Calvanese, D. Nardi, and P. Patel-Schneider (Eds.), The Description Logic Handbook. Theory, Implementation and Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 142–183, 2003.

  52. A.J.H. Simons. “The theory of classification. part2: The scratch-built typechecker,” Journal of Object Technology, Vol. 1(2):47–52, 2002.

  53. A.J.H. Simons. “The theory of classification. part4: Object types and subtyping,” Journal of Object Technology, Vol. 1(5):27–35, 2002.

  54. K. Sivashanmugam, K. Verma, A. Sheth, and J. Miller. “Adding semantics to web services standards,” in D. Fensel, K. Sycara, and J. Mylopoulos (Eds.), The SemanticWeb—ISWC 2003. 2nd International Semantic Web Conference (LNCS 2870), Sundial Resort, Sanibel Island, Florida, USA, Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag, pp. 395–401, 2003.

  55. K. Sycara, S. Widoff, M. Klusch, and J. Lu. “Larks: Dynamic matchmaking among heterogeneous software agents in cyberspace,” in First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, Bologna, Italy, Kluwer, pp. 173–203, 2002.

  56. D. Trastour, C. Bartolini, and J. Gonzalez-Castillo. “A semantic web approach to service description for matchmaking of services,” in I.F. Cruz, S. Decker, J. Euzenat, and D. McGuinness (Eds.), The first Semantic Web Working Symposium, Stanford University, California, USA, pp. 447–461, 2001.

  57. M. Uschold, “Knowledge level modelling: Concepts and terminology.”. The Knowledge Engineering Review 13 (1998) 5-29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. K. Verma, K. Sivashanmugam, A. Sheth, and A. Patil. “Meteor-s wsdi: A scalable p2p infrastructure of registries for semantic publication and discovery of web services,” Journal of Information Technology and Management, 2004.

  59. W3C. “W3c: Web services description language (wsdl) 1.1,” Technical Report, W3C, in http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl, March 2001.

  60. M. Worboys and M. Duckham. “GIS–A computing perspective,” CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2004.

  61. C. Weidenbach. “Combining superposition, sorts and splitting,” in Handbook of Automated Reasoning, Elsevier and MIT Press, pp. 1965-2013, 2001.

  62. H. Wache, T. Vögele, U. Visser, H. Stuckenschmidt, G. Schuster, H. Neumann, and S. Hübner. “Ontology-based integration of information–a survey of existing approaches,” in IJCAI-01 Workshop: Ontologies and Information Sharing, CA, Seattle, WA. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers: San Francisco, CA, pp. 108–117, 2001.

  63. A.M. Zaremski and J.M. Wing. “Signature matching: A tool for using software libraries,” ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, Vol. 4(2):146–170, 1995.

  64. A.M. Zaremski and J.M. Wing. “Specification matching of software components,” ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, Vol. 6(4):333–369, 1997.

Download references

I would like to thank Werner Kuhn, Sven Schade, Eva Klien, Udo Einspanier, Herbert Kuchen, Jörn Witte and Sebastian Hübner for their input at various stages of the work presented in this paper. The work presented in this paper has been supported by the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) as part of the GEOTECHNOLOGIEN programme (grant number 03F0369A). It can be referenced as publication no. GEOTECH-193.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. European Commission - DG Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Via E. Fermi 1, 21020, Ispra (VA), Italy

    Michael Lutz

Authors
  1. Michael Lutz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Lutz.

Additional information

The work presented in this paper was carried out while the author was still working with the Institute for Geoinformatics, University of Münster, Germany.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lutz, M. Ontology-Based Descriptions for Semantic Discovery and Composition of Geoprocessing Services. Geoinformatica 11, 1–36 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10707-006-7635-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10707-006-7635-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation