Rethinking Information Systems Projects Using Actor‐Network Theory: : A Case of Malawi
Pages 1 - 32
Abstract
Organisations invest heavily in Information Systems (IS) projects in the hope of realising business benefits. Yet reports persist of IS projects that all too often fail. Efforts to rescue the situation have so far yielded unsatisfactory results. A number of calls have hence been made to rethink and deepen understanding of IS project management practice. The purpose of this study is to contribute towards this rethink by exploring and describing the as‐lived experiences of stakeholders in IS projects. A case study approach was adopted wherein in‐depth analysis was carried out on an IS project executed in Malawi. Using a developing country such as Malawi as empirical source is novel, as much of the research on IS project management emanates from the developed world. Yet IS project failure is endemic in all contexts. Data was collected and analysed qualitatively using Actor‐Network Theory (ANT) as the lens of enquiry. Key findings were that (1) starting up an IS project is neither simple nor straightforward; it is lengthy and winding; (2) project objectives need not be “cast in stone”, as they may be subject to negotiations as key stakeholders are brought in; (3) project success is achieved only when stakeholder interests are strongly interwoven in the project need; (4) involving operational system end users was oddly not seen as critical in the case, and (5) the experience of the project manager will determine the extent to which formal methodologies are rigidly followed in the project. The use of an ANT lens provides for a deeper understanding of IS project processes and outcomes.
References
[1]
Akrich, M. & Latour, B. (1992) A Summary of a Convenient Vocabulary for the Semiotics of Human and Non‐human Assemblies. in Bijker, W.E. and Law, J. (Eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change (259–264) Manchester: MIT Press.
[2]
Akrich, M. (1992) The Description of Technical Objects. in Bijker, W.E. and Law, J. (Eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change (205–224) Manchester: MIT Press.
[3]
Bijker, W.E., Hughes, T.P. & Pinch, TJ. (1987) The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[4]
Blackburn, S. (2002) The Project Manager and the Project Network, International Journal of Project Management, 20(3), 199–204.
[5]
Callon, M. (1986) Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. in Law, J. (Ed.), Power, Action & Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? (196–229), London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
[6]
Callon, M. (1985) The Sociology of an Actor‐Network: The Case of the Electric Vehicle. in Callon, M., Law, J. and Rip, A. (Eds.), Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology. London: Macmillan.
[7]
Callon, M. (1987) Society in the Making: The Study of Technology as a Tool for Sociological Analysis. In Bijker, W.E., Hughes, T.P. and Pinch, T.J. (Eds.) The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology (83–103The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology., Cambridge, MA.: aMIT Press.
[8]
Callon, M. (1991) Techno‐Economic Networks and Irreversibility. in Law, J. (Ed.), A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. London, Routledge.
[9]
Callon, M. (1997) Actor‐Network Theory: The Market Test (draft). Actor Network and After Workshop. London: Centre for Social Theory and Technology (CSTT); Keele University, UK.
[10]
Charvat, J. (2003) Project Management Methodologies. New Jersey (NJ): John Wiley.
[11]
Checkland, P. (1989) Rational Analysis for a Problematic World. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
[12]
Cicmil, S. & Hodgson, D. (2006) New Possibilities for Project Management Theory: A Critical Engagement, Project Management Journal, 37(3), 111–122.
[13]
Cicmil, S. (2001) Reconstructing the Project Management Knowledge System: A Multiple‐Perspective Agenda. Presented at the Critical Management Studies Conference, UMIST Manchester, UK.
[14]
Collins, A. & Baccarini, D. (2004) Project Success: A Survey, Journal of Construction Research, 5(2), 211–231.
[15]
Crawford, L., Costello, K., Pollack, J. & Bentley, L. (2003) Managing Soft Change Projects in the Public Sector, International Journal of Project Management 21, 443–448.
[16]
Flood, G. (2006) Blueprint for Project Success, IT Training, 25–29.
[17]
Griffiths, M., Harrison, D., Hartell, M., Hay, G., Kent, A. & Messenger, S. (2000) Using DSDM with PRINCE2. London: DSDM Consortium. http://cf.agilealliance.org/articles/system/article/file/904/file.pdf.
[18]
Hodgson, D.E., (2002) Disciplining the Professional: The Case of Project Management. Journal of Management Studies, 39(6), 803–821.
[19]
Huijbers, R., Lemmens, F. Senders, B., Simons, S., Spaan, B., van Tilburg, P. & Vossen, K. (2004) Software Project Management: Methodologies & Techniques. http://paul.luon.net/essays/SEP‐essay‐final.pdf
[20]
Jaffee, S.M. (2003) Malawi's Tobacco Sector: Standing on One Strong Leg is better than on None. Africa Region Working Paper Series No. 55. http://www.worldbank.org/afr/wps/wp55.htm
[21]
Jain, A., Hong, L. & Pankanti, S. (2000) Biometric Identification, Communications of the ACM, 43 (2), 90–98.
[22]
Kaplan, B. & Maxwell, J.A. (1994) Qualitative Research Methods for Evaluating Computer Information Systems. In Anderson, J.G., Aydin, C.E. & Jay, S.J. (Eds.) Evaluating Health Care Information Systems: Methods and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[23]
Karlsen, J. T., Andersen, J., Birkely, L.S. & Ødegård, E. (2006) An Empirical Study of Critical Success Factors in IT Projects, International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 3 (4), 297–311.
[24]
Kerzner, H. (2003) Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling and Controlling. Ohio: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
[25]
Klein, H.K. & Myers, M.D. (1999) A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems, MIS Quarterly, 23 (1), 67–94.
[26]
Knights, D. & Murray, F. (1994) Managers Divided: Organisation Politics and Information Technology Management. Chichester: John Wiley.
[27]
Kreiner, K. (1995) In Search of Relevance: Project Management in Drifting Environments. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(4), 335–346.
[28]
Larsen, M.H., Pedersen, M.K. & Andersen, K.V. (2006) IT Governance: Reviewing 17 IT Governance Tools and Analysing the Case of Novozymes A/S. 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii. http://csdl2.computer.org/comp/proceedings/hicss/2006/2507/08/250780195c.pdf.
[29]
Latour, B. (1986) The Powers of Association. in Law, J. (Ed.), Power, Action & Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? (264–280), London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
[30]
Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[31]
Latour, B. (1991) Technology is Society made Durable. In Law, J. (Ed.), A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination (103–131), London, Routledge.
[32]
Latour, B. (1993) We Have Never been Modern. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester, Wheatsheaf.
[33]
Latour, B. (1999) Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, Harvard University Press
[34]
Latour, B. (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor‐Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[35]
Law, J. & Callon, M. (1988) Engineering and Sociology in a Military Aircraft Project: A Network Analysis of Technological Change. Social Problems, 35(3), 284–297.
[36]
Law, J. (1992) Notes on the Theory of the Actor‐Network: Ordering, Strategy and Heterogeneity, Systems Practice 5(4), 379–393.
[37]
Law, J. (Ed.) (1991) A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. London: Routledge
[38]
Leybourne, S. A. (2007) The Changing Bias of Project Management Research: A Consideration of the Literatures and an Application of Extant Theory. Project Management Journal, 38(1), 61–73.
[39]
Linde, A. & Linderoth, H.C.J. (2006) An Actor network Theory Perspective on IT Projects. In Hodgson, D. & Cicmil, S. Management, Work & Organisations: Making Projects Critical (155–170), New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
[40]
Linderoth, H.C.J. & Pellegrino, G. (2005) Frames and Inscriptions: Tracing a Way to Understand IT‐dependent Change Projects. International Journal of Project Management, 23 (2005), 415–420.
[41]
Mahaney, R.C. & Lederer, A.L. (2006) The Effect of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Rewards for Developers on Information Systems Project Success. Project Management Journal, 37(4), 42–54.
[42]
Mähring, M., Holmström, J., Keil, M. & Montealegre, R. (2004) Trojan Actor‐Networks and Swift Translation: Bringing Actor‐Network Theory to IT Project Escalation Studies. Information Technology & People, 17 (2), 210–238.
[43]
Malawi. The Tobacco Control Commission (2005) The Strategic plan. [N.p: The Commission).
[44]
Marchewka, J.T. (2003) Information Technology Project Management. Hoboken NJ: Wiley.
[45]
Marshall, C. & Rossman, G.B. (1999) Designing Qualitative Research. California: Sage.
[46]
Mataya, C., Chulu, O., Khaila, S., Kumwenda, I., Machinjiri, C. & Mthindi, G. (1989) Country Note for Malawi. In 2020 Vision Network for East Africa. Kampala, Uganda: International Food Policy Research Institute.
[47]
McManus, J. & Wood‐Harper, T. (2003) Information Systems Project Management: The Price of Failure. Management Services 47(5), 16–19.
[48]
Mpazanje, F., Brown, I, & Sewchurran, K. (2008) The impact of PMBoK® Tools, Techniques and Complementary Factors on Information Systems Project Success. 2nd European Conference on Information Management and Evaluation, London, UK.
[49]
Mpazanje, F., Chigona, W. & Roode, D. (2008) Weblogging: A Promising Form of Mass‐to‐Mass Communication? 10th Annual Conference on World Wide Web Applications, Cape Town, South Africa.
[50]
Nienaber, R. & Cloete, E. (2003) A Software Agent Framework for the Support of Software Project Management. Annual Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists Johannesburg, South Africa.
[51]
Nijland, M.H. (2004) Understanding the Use of IT Evaluation Methods in Organisations. PhD Thesis. Department of Information Systems, London School of Economics and Political Science.
[52]
Nocker, M. (2006) The Contested Object: On Projects as an Emergent Space. in Hodgson, D. & Cicmil, S. (Eds.) Management, Work & Organisations: Making Projects Critical (155–170). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
[53]
Nogeste, K. (2005) Defining Intangible IS Project Products Using PRINCE2 Product Descriptions. PhD Thesis. RMIT University, Melbourne. from http://www.pacis‐net.org/file/2005/187.pdf.
[54]
Nyberg, A. & Henfridsson, O. (2001) Going for the Online Customer: An Interpretive Case Study of Internetworked Customer Reach in Online Entertainment. 9th European Conference on Information Systems, Bled, Slovenia.
[55]
Orlikowski, W.J. & Baroudi, J.J., (1991) Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions, Information Systems Research 2(1), 1–28.
[56]
Packendorff, I. (1995) Inquiring into the Temporary Organisation: New Directions for Project Management Research. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11 (4), 319–333.
[57]
Pollack, J. (2007) The Changing Paradigms of Project Management. International Journal of Project Management. 25, 266–274.
[58]
Project Management Institute (2004) A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® guide) Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
[59]
Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2003) Research Methods for Business Students. Harlow, London: Pearson Education.
[60]
Schwalbe, K. (2006) Information Technology Project Management. Boston: Thomson Course Technology.
[61]
Shenhar, A.J., Dvir, D., Levy, O. & Maltz, A.C. (2001) Project Success: A Multidimensional Strategic Concept. Long Range Planning, 34, 699–725.
[62]
SIAST (2008) About Malawi and Malawians. http://www.siast.sk.ca/international/malawietop/resources.htm.
[63]
Standing, C., Guilfoyle, A., Lin, C. & Love, P.E.D. (2006) The Attribution of Success and Failure in IT Projects. Industrial Management & Data Systems 106(8), 1148–1165.
[64]
Stanforth, C.M. (2006) Using Actor‐Network Theory to Analyse E‐Government Implementation in Developing Countries. Information Technologies and International Development, 3(3), 35–60.
[65]
Stretton, A. (2007) A Short History of Modern Project Management. PM World Today IX (X) http://www.pmforum.org/library/second‐edition/2007/PDFs/Stretton‐10‐07.pdf
[66]
Tatnall, A. & Gilding, A. (1999) Actor‐Network Theory and Information Systems Research. Proceedings of the 10th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, 955–966. Wellington, NZ.
[67]
The Standish Group International Inc (2004) The Chaos Report. http://www.standishgroup.com/sample_research/index.php
[68]
Thie, L. & Fried, E. (2005) Acclairism: Questioning Biometric Technology through an Airport Security Clearance System. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Portland, Oregon, USA. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1056808.1056856
[69]
Vaagaasar, A.L. (2006) From Tool to Actor: How a Project Came to Orchestrate its own Life and that of Others. PhD Thesis. Department of Leadership and Organisation, BI Norwegian School of Management.
[70]
Walsham, G. (2006) Doing Interpretive Research. European Journal of Information Systems, 15, 320–330.
[71]
White, D. & Fortune, J. (2002) Current Practice in Project Management: An Empirical Study. International Journal of Project Management, 20 (1), 1–11.
[72]
Wideman, R. M. (2002) Comparing PRINCE2 with PMBoK®. Vancouver: AEW Services. http://maxwideman.com/papers/comparing/comparing.pdf
[73]
Winch, G. (2004) Rethinking Project Management: Project Organizations as Information Processing Systems? 2004 Project Management Institute Research Conference, London, United Kingdom.
[74]
Winter, M., Smith, C., Morris, P. & Cicmil, S. (2006a) Directions for Future Research in Project Management: The Main Findings of a UK Government‐funded Research Network. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 638–649.
[75]
Winter, M., Andersen, E. S., Elvin, R. & Levene, R. (2006b) Focusing on Business Projects as an Area of Future Research: An Exploratory Discussion of Four Different Perspectives. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 699–709.
[76]
Yeo, K.T. (1993) Systems Thinking and Project Management: Time to Reunite. International Journal of Project Management, 11 (2), 111–117.
Recommendations
Rethinking IS project boundaries in practice: A multiple-projects perspective
Information systems research and prescriptive IS project management methodologies are dominated by a perspective on single projects that treats the unit of analysis as a lonely phenomenon with strictly defined boundaries. This study questions this ...
Expediting ICT Policy Implementation in Malawi Through Public-Private Partnership
This paper analysed the role of public private partnership (PPP) in expediting ICT policy implementation. The study used the case of Malawi as an example of a low-income status country in Africa. Data for the study was gathered through key informant ...
Using the Actor-Network Theory to interpret e-government implementation barriers
ICEGOV '09: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Theory and practice of electronic governanceThis paper describes a research approach based on the Actor-Network Theory (ANT) to interpret or understand the implementation barriers as they emerged during the real implementation of large scale project in Palestine for the benefit of Ministry of ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons.
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
United States
Publication History
Published: 05 December 2017
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 0Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 29 Jan 2025