Cited By
View all- Ghosh SDe D(2021): energy-efficient massive MIMO–MISO 5G HetNet using Stackelberg gameThe Journal of Supercomputing10.1007/s11227-021-03809-177:11(13549-13583)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2021
A Simple and Enriched Closed-Form Formula for Cell Residence Time in 5G Heterogeneous Networks
Pages 491 - 509
Abstract
Cell residence time is a key system parameter for the performance analysis of cellular mobile systems and their related applications. In order to save cost and time before wide implementation and deployment of a mobile system, various network performance metrics, such as network resource occupancy probabilities, should be calculated through analytical results of the mean cell residence time. However, this is difficult to estimate in 5G heterogeneous networks, due to irregular-shaped multi-tier heterogeneous network topologies introduced by a diverse set of small cells. In order to find an efficient way of calculating the cell residence time for 5G heterogeneous networks, we first examine the well-known conventional formula. Then we propose an enhanced closed-form formula for cell residence time by considering more generalized cellular mobile systems, as well as more generic mobility models. The proposed closed-form formula can be directly applied to various complex and reliable network scenarios. It can be adapted to multi-tier heterogeneous networks with randomly positioned irregular-shaped small cells, even though they overlap with each other. Our simulation results show that the proposed formula provides excellent estimation accuracy for general random mobility models, including the Levy walk, which is known to realistically reflect human mobility.
References
[1]
Chen, Z., Li, T., Fan, P., Quek, T. Q., & Letaief, K. B. (2016). Cooperation in 5G heterogeneous networking: Relay scheme combination and resource allocation. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 64(8), 3430---3443.
[2]
Chin, W. H., Fan, Z., & Haines, R. (2014). Emerging technologies and research challenges for 5G wireless networks. IEEE Wireless Communications, 21(2), 106---112.
[3]
Ku, B. H., Ren, Y., Weng, J. F., Chen, J. C., & Chen, W. T. (2017). Modeling and analysis of channel holding time and handoff rate for packet sessions in all-IP cellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 66(4), 3331---3344.
[4]
Corral-Ruiz, A. L. E., Cruz-Perez, F. A., Hernandez-Valdez, G., & Eksim, A. (2012). Cell dwell time and channel holding time relationship in mobile cellular networks. In A. Eksim (Ed.), Wireless communications and networks--Recent advances, InTech. Rijeka. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/wireless-communications-and-networks-recent-advances/cell-dwell-andchannel-holding-times-relationships-in-cellular-networks.
[5]
Hermann, S. D., Wolisz, A., & Sortais, M. (2006). Expected number of area exits, entrances and crossovers for the investigation of area based push service utilization. In Proceedings of the IEEE ICN/ICONS/MCL 2006 (pp. 136---142).
[6]
Tang, S. (2012). Performance modeling of an integrated wireless network using WiMAX as Backhaul support for WiFi traffic. International Journal of Wireless Information Networks, 19(1), 73---83.
[7]
El-Atty, S. M. A., & Gharsseldien, Z. M. (2017). Performance analysis of an advanced heterogeneous mobile network architecture with multiple small cell layers. Wireless Networks,23(4), 1169---1190.
[8]
Navaratnarajah, S., Dianati, M., & Imran, M. A. (2015). Performance analysis of Cellular-WLAN heterogeneous network based on continuous time markov chain. In Proceedings of the IEEE CAMAD 2015 (pp. 221---225).
[9]
Xie, H., & Goodman, D. J. (1993). Mobility models and biased sampling problem. In Proceedings of the IEEE ICUPC93 (Vol. 2, pp. 803---807).
[10]
Yeung, K. L., & Nanda, S. (1996). Channel management in microcell/macrocell cellular radio systems. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 45(4), 601---612.
[11]
Zonoozi, M. M., & Dassanayake, P. (1997). User mobility modeling and characterization of mobility patterns. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 15(7), 1239---1252.
[12]
Hyytia, E., & Virtamo, J. (2007). Random waypoint mobility model in cellular networks. Wireless Networks, 13(2), 177---188.
[13]
Zola, E., & Barcelo-Arroyo, F. (2009). Impact of mobility models on the cell residence time in WLAN networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE SARNOFF09 (pp. 1---5).
[14]
Lin, X., Ganti, R. K., Fleming, P. J., & Andrews, J. G. (2013). Towards understanding the fundamentals of mobility in cellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 12(4), 1686---1698.
[15]
Shin, S., Lee, U., Dressler, F., & Yoon, H. (2016). Analysis of cell sojourn time in heterogeneous networks with small cells. IEEE Communications Letters, 20(4), 788---791.
[16]
Fang, Y. (2005). Modeling and performance analysis for wireless mobile networks: A new analytical approach. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 13(5), 989---1002.
[17]
Ghaderi, M., & Boutaba, R. (2006). Call admission control in mobile cellular networks: A comprehensive survey. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 6(1), 69---93.
[18]
Xiao, L., Fuja, T. E., & Costello, D. J. (2010). Mobile relaying: Coverage extension and throughput enhancement. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 58(9), 2709---2717.
[19]
Casares-Giner, V., Pla, V., & Escalle-Garca, P. (2011). Mobility models for mobility management. In Proceedings of the Springer Network performance engineering (pp. 716---745). Berlin: Springer.
[20]
Ge, X., Ye, J., Yang, Y., & Li, Q. (2016). User mobility evaluation for 5G small cell networks based on individual mobility model. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 34(3), 528---541.
[21]
Rhee, I., Shin, M., Hong, S., Lee, K., Kim, S. J., & Chong, S. (2011). On the levy-walk nature of human mobility. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON), 19(3), 630---643.
[22]
Lee, K., Hong, S., Kim, S. J., Rhee, I., & Chong, S. (2012). SLAW: Self-similar least-action human walk. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON), 20(2), 515---529.
[23]
Fu, H. L., Lin, P., & Lin, Y. B. (2013). Reducing signaling overhead for femtocell/macrocell networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 12(8), 1587---1597.
[24]
Yu, Y., & Gu, D. (2013). The cost efficient location management in the LTE picocell/macrocell network. IEEE Communications Letters, 17(5), 904---907.
[25]
Maksymyuk, T., Brych, M., & Pelishok, V. (2015). Stochastic geometry models for 5G heterogeneous mobile networks. Smart CR, 5(2), 89---101.
[26]
Cox, D. R. (1969). Some sampling problems in technology. In N. L. Johnson & H. Smith Jr. (Eds.), New developments in survey sampling (pp. 506---527). New York: Wiley.
[27]
Papoulis, A., & Pillai, S. U. (2002). One function of two random variables. In Probability, random variables, and stochastic processes (Ch. 6---2, pp. 180---197), McGraw-Hill Education.
- A Simple and Enriched Closed-Form Formula for Cell Residence Time in 5G Heterogeneous Networks
Recommendations
Impact of mobility models on the cell residence time in WLAN networks
SARNOFF'09: Proceedings of the 32nd international conference on Sarnoff symposiumSeveral mobility models are available for simulating WLAN, with different impacts on network performance. This work deals with the impact of the assumed mobility model on two key teletraffic variables involved in the planning of the network: the cell ...
Handoff Performance in Wireless Mobile Networks with Unreliable Fading Channel
Handoff is an indispensable operation in wireless networks to guarantee continuous, effective, and resilient services during a Mobile Station (MS) mobility. Handoff counting, handoff rate, and handoff probability are important metrics to characterize ...
Mode selection map‐based vertical handover in D2D enabled 5G networks
One of the promising features of 5G networks is device‐to‐device (D2D) communication that enables direct transmission between D2D user equipments (UEs). Besides the traditional cellular transmission mode, UEs can select between the reuse and dedicated ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Copyright © Copyright © 2018 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Publisher
Kluwer Academic Publishers
United States
Publication History
Published: 01 July 2018
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- View Citations1Total Citations
- 0Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 19 Dec 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View all- Ghosh SDe D(2021): energy-efficient massive MIMO–MISO 5G HetNet using Stackelberg gameThe Journal of Supercomputing10.1007/s11227-021-03809-177:11(13549-13583)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2021