[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

Student strategies for categorizing IT-related terms

Published: 01 May 2019 Publication History

Abstract

The ability to categorize concepts is an essential capability for human thinking and action. On the one hand, the investigation of such abilities is the purview of psychology; on the other hand, subject-specific educational research is also of interest, as a number of research works in the field of science education show. For computer science education, no corresponding studies are currently available. However, investigating how learners build categories from a choice of given terms may be useful for several reasons; for example, learners’ perspectives on relations between terms, as well as potential misconceptions, can be detected and made available to educators aiming to improve lesson planning. Therefore, we conducted an empirical study with 490 German students from primary to higher education, in which we presented them with 23 information technology-related terms (such as computer, Facebook, hard drive, virus) on a questionnaire, with the task of assigning these to self-defined categories (and then giving their categories individual names). In the results, we identified a number of potential categorization strategies the participants might have used to categorize the given terms; these include generalization, purpose, place of use, state, part-whole relationships, and association. Recognizing and defining such categorization strategies can help teachers construct learner-adequate concept maps of the domain, which helps foster the elaboration of learners’ knowledge structures in this field. We found that the younger participants used less abstract names for their categories, and observed that some participants had difficulty categorizing some terms (such as robot and 3D).

References

[1]
Anderson JR The adaptive nature of human categorization Psychological Review 1991 98 3 409-429
[2]
Anderson JR Cognitive psychology and its implications 2015 8th edn. New York Macmillan Learning
[3]
Anderson JR and Betz J A hybrid model of categorization Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2001 8 4 629-647
[4]
Ashcraft MH Property norms for typical and atypical items from 17 categories: a description and discussion Memory & Cognition 1978 6 3 227-232
[5]
Baacke D Die 13- bis 18-Jahrigen:̈ Einführung in die Probleme des Jugendalters 2005 9th edn. Weinheim Beltz
[6]
Bengston JK and Cohen SJ Concept acquisition and the perception of meaning Contemporary Educational Psychology 1979 4 4 348-365
[7]
Borowski, C, Diethelm, I, Wilken, H. (2016). What children ask about computers, the internet, robots, mobiles, games etc. In Proceedings of the 11th workshop in primary and secondary computing education, WiPSCE ’16 (pp. 72–75). New York: ACM, DOI 10.1145/2978249.2978259, (to appear in print).
[8]
Brinda, T., Napierala, S., Behler, G.A. (2018). What do secondary school students associate with the digital world?. In Proceedings of the 13th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education, WiPSCE ’18. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3265757.3265763 (pp. 6:1–6:10). New York: ACM, DOI 10.1145/3265757.3265763, (to appear in print).
[9]
Cao R, Nosofsky RM, and Shiffrin RM The development of automaticity in short-term memory search: Item-response learning and category learning Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2017 43 5 669-679
[10]
Diethelm, I, Hubwieser, P, Klaus, R. (2012). Students, teachers and phenomena: educational reconstruction for computer science education. In Proceedings of the 12th Koli calling international conference on computing education research, Koli Calling ’12 (pp. 164–173). New York: ACM, DOI 10.1145/2401796.2401823, (to appear in print).
[11]
Diethelm, I., Brinda, T., Schneider, N. (2017). How pupils classify digital artifacts. In Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Primary and Secondary Computing Education, WiPSCE ’17 (pp. 99–100). New York: ACM, DOI 10.1145/3137065.3137079, (to appear in print).
[12]
Donkin C, Newell BR, Kalish M, Dunn JC, and Nosofsky RM Identifying strategy use in category learning tasks: a case for more diagnostic data and models Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2015 41 4 933-948
[13]
Edwards DJ, Pothos EM, and Perlman A Relational versus absolute representation in categorization The American Journal of Psychology 2012 125 4 481-497
[14]
Gagné RM The Conditions of Learning 1985 4th edn. New York Holt, Rinehart & Winston
[15]
Gallese V and Lakoff G The brain’s concepts: the role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge Cognitive Neuropsychology 2005 22 3-4 455-479
[16]
Hampton James A. Stability in Concepts and Evaluating the Truth of Generic Statements Kinds, Things, and Stuff 2009 80-99
[17]
Kattmann U and Schmitt A Elementares Ordnen: Wie Schuler̈ Tiere klassifizieren Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften 1996 2 21-38
[18]
Kattmann, U., Duit, R., Gropengiesser, H., Komorek, M. (1996). Educational reconstruction – bringing together issues of scientific clarification and students‘ conceptions. In Annual meeting of the national association of research in science teaching (pp. 1–19). St. Louis: NARST.
[19]
Krüger D and Burmester A Wie Schuler̈ Pflanzen ordnen Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften 2005 11 85-102
[20]
Lieto A, Radicioni D, and Rho V Dual PECCS: a cognitive system for conceptual representation and categorization Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 2017 29 1-24
[21]
Mahon BZ and Caramazza A Concepts and categories: a cognitive neuropsychological perspective Annual Review of Psychology 2009 60 1 27-51
[22]
Matlin MW Cognitive psychology 2014 8th edn. Singapore Wiley
[23]
Mayring P Qualitative content analysis - theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution 2014 Klagenfurt Social Science Open Access Repository
[24]
Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest. (2013). KIM-Studie 2012. Tech. rep. MPFS. Stuttgart, Germany.
[25]
Murphy GL The big book of concepts 2004 Cambridge MIT Press
[26]
Nguyen SP and Murphy GL An apple is more than just a fruit: cross-classification in children’s concepts Child Development 2003 74 6 1783-1806
[27]
Piaget J and Inhelder B The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence: an essay on the construction of formal operational structures, digital printed in 2007 edn 1958 Abingdon Routledge
[28]
Rosch E and Mervis CB Family resemblances: studies in the internal structure of categories Cognitive Psychology 1975 7 4 573-605
[29]
Rubin DB Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys, wiley classics library edn 2004 Hoboken Wiley
[30]
Smith EE and Medin DL Categories and concepts 1981 9th edn. Cambridge Harvard University Press
[31]
Studer, T. (2008). Verschiedene Strategien der Objektkategorisierung: Evidenz durch funktionelle Gehirnasymmetrien. PhD thesis University Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
[32]
Tobinski David A. Kognitive Psychologie 2017 Berlin, Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)A Recurrent Temporal Model for Semantic Levels Categorization Based on Human Visual SystemComputational Intelligence and Neuroscience10.1155/2021/88955792021Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Education and Information Technologies
Education and Information Technologies  Volume 24, Issue 3
May 2019
291 pages

Publisher

Kluwer Academic Publishers

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 May 2019
Accepted: 08 January 2019
Received: 17 August 2018

Author Tags

  1. Digital artifacts
  2. Categorization
  3. Students’ conceptions
  4. Computing education
  5. Digital literacy
  6. K-12
  7. Higher education

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 21 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)A Recurrent Temporal Model for Semantic Levels Categorization Based on Human Visual SystemComputational Intelligence and Neuroscience10.1155/2021/88955792021Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media