A hybrid model of categorization

• Ackley, D. H., Hinton, G. E., &Sejnowsky, T. J. (1985). A learning algorithm for Boltzmann machines.Cognitive Science,9, 147–169.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Anderson, J. R. (1976).Language, memory, and thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Anderson, J. R. (1983).The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Anderson, J. R. (1991). The adaptive nature of human categorization.Psychological Review,98, 409–429.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Anderson, J. R. (1993).Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Lebiere, C., &Matessa, M. (1998). An integrated theory of list memory.Journal of Memory & Language,38, 341–380.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Anderson, J. R., Fincham, J. M., &Douglass, S. (1999). Practice and retention: A unifying analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 1120–1136.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Anderson, J. R., Kline, P. J., &Beasley, C. M. (1979). A general learning theory and its application to schema abstraction. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation ( pp. 277–318). New York: Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Anderson, J. R., &Lebiere, C. (1998).The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Ashby, F. G., Alfonso-Reese, L. A., Turken, A. U., &Waldron, E. M. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning.Psychological Review,107, 442–481.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ashcraft, M. H. (1995). Cognitive psychology and simple arithmetic: A review and summary for new directions.Mathematical Cognition,1, 3–34.

  Google Scholar 

• Bower, G. H., &Trabasso, T. R. (1963). Reversals prior to solution in concept identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology,66, 409–418.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Campbell, J. I. D. (1997). On the relation between skilled performance of simple division and multiplication.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 1140–1159.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Delaney, P., Reder, L. M., Staszewski, J., &Ritter, F. (1998). The strategy specific nature of improvement: The power law applies by strategy within task.Psychological Science,9, 1–7.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Erickson, M. A., &Kruschke, J. K. (1998). Rules and exemplars in category learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,127, 107–140.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Erickson, M. A., & Kruschke, J. K. (in press). Rule-based extrapolation in perceptual categorization.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

• Garner, W. R. (1974).The processing of information and structure. New York: Wiley.

  Google Scholar 

• Gillund, G., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall.Psychological Review,91, 1–67.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Gluck, M. A., &Bower, G. H. (1988). From conditioning to category learning: An adaptive network model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,8, 37–50.

  Google Scholar 

• Gobet, F., Richman, H., Staszewski, J., &Simon, H. A. (1997). Goals, representations, and strategies in a concept attainment task: The EPAM model. In D. L. Medin (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 37, pp. 265–290). San Diego: Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Heathcote, A., Brown, S., &Mewhort, D. J. K. (2000). The power law repealed: The case for an exponential law of practice.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,7, 185–207.

  Google Scholar 

• Hinton, G. E., &Sejnowsky, T. J. (1986). Learning and relearning in Boltzmann machines. In D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland, & the PDP group (Eds.),Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition: Vol. 1. Foundations (pp. 282–317). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Hull, C. L. (1920). Quantitative aspects of the evolution of concepts.Psychological Monographs(Whole No. 123).

• Just, M. A., &Carpenter, P. N. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory.Psychological Review,99, 122–149.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Kieras, D. E., &Meyer, D. E. (1997). An overview of the EPIC architecture for cognition and performance and application to human-computer interaction.Human—Computer Interaction,12, 391–438.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Knowlton, B. J., &Squire, L. R. (1993). The learning of categories: Parallel brain systems for item memory and category knowledge.Science,262, 1747–1749.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Lamberts, K. (1998). The time course of categorization.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 695–711.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lamberts, K., &Freeman, R. P. J. (1998). Building object representations from parts: Tests of a stochastic sampling model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 904–926.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lebiere, C. (1998).The dynamics of cognition: An ACT-R model of cognitive arithmetic. (CMU Computer Science Dept. Technical Report CMU-CS-98-186). Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University.

  Google Scholar 

• Levine, M. (1975).A cognitive theory of learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization.Psychological Review,95, 492–527.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lovett, M. C. (1998). Choice. In J. R. Anderson & C. Lebiere (Eds.),Atomic components of thought (pp. 255–296). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Medin, D. L., &Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning.Psychological Review,85, 207–238.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Newell, A. (1991).Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Nosofsky, R. M. (1988). Similarity, frequency, and category representations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 54–65.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Nosofsky, R. M., &Alfonso-Reese, L. A. (1999). Effects of similarity and practice on speeded classification response times and accuracies: Further tests of an exemplar-retrieval model.Memory & Cognition,27, 78–93.

  Google Scholar 

• Nosofsky, R. M., &Johansen, M. K. (2000). Exemplar-based accounts of “multiple-system” phenomena in perceptual categorization.Psychological Bulletin & Review,7, 375–402.

  Google Scholar 

• Nosofsky, R. M., &Palmeri, T. J. (1997a). Comparing exemplarretrieval and decision-bound models of speeded perceptual classif ication.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 1027–1048.

  Google Scholar 

• Nosofsky, R. M., &Palmeri, T. J. (1997b). An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classif ication.Psychological Review,104, 266–300.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Nosofsky, R. M., &Palmeri, T. J. (1998). A rule-plus-exception model for classifying objects in continuous-dimension spaces.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 345–369.

  Google Scholar 

• Nosofsky, R. M., Palmeri, T. J., &McKinley, S. (1994). Rule-plusexception model of classif ication learning.Psychological Review,101, 53–79.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Nosofsky, R. M., &Zaki, S. R. (1998). Dissociations between categorization and recognition in amnesic and normal individuals: An exemplar-based interpretation.Psychological Science,9, 247–255.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Palmeri, T. J., &Flanery, M. A. (1999). Learning about categories in the absence of training: Profound amnesia and the relationship between perceptual categorization and recognition memory.Psychological Science,10, 526–530.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Palmeri, T. J., &Johansen, M. K. (1999). Prototypes, rules, and instances in category learning.Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society,4, 98.

  Google Scholar 

• Poldrack, R. A., Prabhakaran, V., Seger, C. A., &Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1999). Striatal activation during acquisition of a cognitive skill.Neuropsychology,13, 564–574.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Raaijmakers, J. G. W., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1981). Search of associative memory.Psychological Review,88, 93–134.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Reder, L. M. (1987). Strategy selection in questions answering.Cognitive Psychology,19, 90–138.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Reder, L. M. (1988). Strategic control of retrieval strategies. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 227–259). San Diego: Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Reder, L. M., &Ritter, F. (1992). What determines initial feeling of knowing? Familiarity with question terms, not with the answer.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 435–451.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Reder, L. M., &Schunn, C. D. (1996). Metacognition does not imply awareness: Strategy choice is governed by implicit learning and memory. In L. M. Reder (Ed.),Implicit memory and metacognition (pp. 45–77). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Reed, S. K. (1972). Pattern recognition and categorization.Cognitive Psychology,3, 382–407.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rickard, T. C. (1997). Bending the power law: A CMPL theory of strategy shifts and the automatization of cognitive skills.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,126, 288–311.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,104, 192–223.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Siegler, R. S. (1988). Strategy choice procedures and the development of multiplication skill.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,117, 258–275.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Smith, E. E. (1989). Concepts and induction. In M. I. Posner (Ed.),Foundations of cognitive science (pp.501–526). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Smith, E. E., Patalano, A. L., &Jonides, J. (1998). Alternative strategies of categorization.Cognition,65, 167–196.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Smith, J. D., &Minda, J. P. (1998). Prototypes in the mist: The early epochs of category learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1411–1436.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Smith, J. D., Murray, M. J., &Minda, J. P. (1997). Straight talk about linear separability.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 659–680.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Squire, L. R., &Knowlton, B. J. (1995). Learning about categories in the absence of memory.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,92, 12470–12474.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Vandierendonck, A. (1995). A parallel rule activation and rule synthesis model for generalization in category learning.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 442–459.

  Google Scholar 

• Wixted, J. T., Ghadisha, H., &Vera, R. (1997). Recall latency following pure- and mixed-strength lists: A direct test of the relative strength model of free recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 523–538.

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references