[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.5555/647355.724922guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

Learning How to Combine Sensory-Motor Modalities for a Robust Behavior

Published: 21 October 2001 Publication History

Abstract

We are proposing here an approach and a system, called robel, that enables a designer to specify and build a robot supervision system which learns from experience very robust ways of performing a task such as "navigate to". The designer specifies a collection of Hierarchical Tasks Networks (HTN) that are complex plans, called modalities, whose primitives are sensory-motor functions. Each modality is a possible combination these functions for achieving the task. The relationship between supervision states and the appropriate modality for pursuing a task is learned through experience as a Markov Decision Process (MDP) which provides a general policy for the task. This MDP is independent of the environment; it characterizes the robot abilities for the task.

References

[1]
F. Ingrand and F. Py. Online execution control checking for autonomous systems. In IAS-7, Marina del Rey, California, USA, 2002.
[2]
R. Alami, R. Chatila, S. Fleury, M. Ghallab, and F. Ingrand. An Architecture for Autonomy. International Journal of Robotics Research, 17(4):315-337, April 1998.
[3]
S. Fleury, M. Herrb, and R. Chatila. Genom: A tool for the specification and the implementation of operating modules in a distributed robot architecture. In IROS, Grenoble, France, volume 2, pages 842-848, September 1997.
[4]
F. F. Ingrand, R. Chatila, R. Alami, and F. Robert. PRS: A High Level Supervision and Control Language for Autonomous Mobile Robots. In IEEE ICRA, St Paul, (USA), 1996.
[5]
K. Erol, J. Hendler, and D.S. Nau. HTN planning: Complexity and expressivity. In AAAI, 1994.
[6]
K. Erol, J. Hendler, and D.S. Nau. Complexity results for hierarchical task-network planning. In Annals of Mathematics and AI, pages 18:69-93, 1996.
[7]
E. Sacerdoti. A structure for plans and behavior. In American Elsevier Publishing, 1977.
[8]
D.J. White. Markov decision processes. In John Wiley and Sons, 1993.
[9]
P. Moutarlier and R. G. Chatila. Stochastic Multisensory Data Fusion for Mobile Robot Location and Environment Modelling. In Proc. International Symposium on Robotics Research, Tokyo, 1989.
[10]
J.B. Hayet, F. Lerasle, and M. Devy. Planar landmarks to localize a mobile robot. In SIRS 2000, Berkshire, England, pages 163-169, July 2000.
[11]
V. Ayala, J.B. Hayet, F. Lerasle, and M. Devy. Visual localization of a mobile robot in indoor environments using planar landmarks. In IEEE IRS'2000, Takamatsu, Japan, pages 275-280, November 2000.
[12]
S. Fleury, T. Baron, and M. Herrb. Monocular localization of a mobile robot. In IAS-3, Pittsburgh, USA, 1994.
[13]
J.P. Laumond, P.E. Jacobs, M. Taix, and R.M. Murray. A motion planner for nonholonomic mobile robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 10(5):577-593, 1994.
[14]
S. Quinlan and O. Khatib. Towards real-time execution of motion tasks. In R. Chatila and G. Hirzinger, editors, Experimental Robotics 2. Springer Verlag, 1992.
[15]
M. Khatib. Contrôle du mouvement d'un robot mobile par retour sensoriel. PhD thesis, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, December 1996.
[16]
J. Minguez and L. Montano. Nearness diagram navigation (ND): A new real time collision avoidance approach. In IROS Takamatsu, Japan, pages 2094-2100, 2000.
[17]
R. Alami, R. Chatila, S. Fleury, M. Herrb, F. Ingrand, M. Khatib, B. Morisset, P. Moutarlier, and T. Siméon. Around the lab in 40 days... In IEEE ICRA, San Francisco, (USA), 2000.
[18]
R. Alami, I. Belousov, S. Fleury, M. Herrb, F. Ingrand, J. Minguez, and B. Morisset. Diligent: Towards a human-friendly navigation system. In IROS 2000, Takamatsu, Japan, 2000.
[19]
M. Beetz. Structured reactive controllers - A computational model of everyday activity. In 3rd Int. Conf. on Autonomous Agents, pages 228-235, 1999.
[20]
H. Levesque et al. Golog: A logic programming language for dynamic domains. In J. of Logic Programming, pages 31:59-84, 1997.
[21]
R. Reiter. Natural actions, concurrency, and continuous time in the situation calculus. In KR, pages 2-13, 1996.
[22]
D.C. MacKenzie, R.C. Arkin, and J.M. Cameron. Multiagent mission specification and execution. In Autonomous Robots, 4(1):29 V52, 1997.
[23]
J. Hertzberg, H. Jaeger, Ph. Morignot, and U.R. Zimmer. A framework for plan execution in behavior-based robots. In ISIC-98 Gaithersburg MD, pages 8-13.
[24]
S. Thrun et al. Map-learning and high speed navigation in rhino. In ai-based mobile robots: case studies of successful robot systems. In (Eds.), MIT Press,, 1998.
[25]
L. Kaelbling et al. Acting under uncertainty: Discrete bayesian models for mobile-robot navigation. In IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 1996.
[26]
T. Dean and M. Wellman. Planning and control. In Morgan Kaufmann, 1991.
[27]
M. Beetz and T. Belker. Environment and task adaptation for robotics agents. In ECAI, 2000.
[28]
K.Z. Haigh and M. Veloso. Learningsituation-dependent costs: Improving planning from probabilistic robot execution. In In 2nd Int. Conf.on Autonomous Agents, 1998.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Guide Proceedings
Revised Papers from the International Seminar on Advances in Plan-Based Control of Robotic Agents,
October 2001
289 pages

Publisher

Springer-Verlag

Berlin, Heidelberg

Publication History

Published: 21 October 2001

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

View options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media