[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article
Open access

Towards long-term social child-robot interaction: using multi-activity switching to engage young users

Published: 23 March 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Social robots have the potential to provide support in a number of practical domains, such as learning and behaviour change. This potential is particularly relevant for children, who have proven receptive to interactions with social robots. To reach learning and therapeutic goals, a number of issues need to be investigated, notably the design of an effective child-robot interaction (cHRI) to ensure the child remains engaged in the relationship and that educational goals are met. Typically, current cHRI research experiments focus on a single type of interaction activity (e.g. a game). However, these can suffer from a lack of adaptation to the child, or from an increasingly repetitive nature of the activity and interaction. In this paper, we motivate and propose a practicable solution to this issue: an adaptive robot able to switch between multiple activities within single interactions. We describe a system that embodies this idea, and present a case study in which diabetic children collaboratively learn with the robot about various aspects of managing their condition. We demonstrate the ability of our system to induce a varied interaction and show the potential of this approach both as an educational tool and as a research method for long-term cHRI.

References

[1]
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261--271.
[2]
Baillie, J.-C. (2005). URBI: Towards a universal robotic low-level programming language. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2005) (p. 820--825).
[3]
Baillie, J.-C., Demaille, A., Hocquet, Q., Nottale, M., & Tardieu, S. (2008). The Urbi universal platform for robotics. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Standards and Common Platform for Robotics (SIMPAR 2008) (pp. 580--591). Venice, Italy.
[4]
Baroni, I., Nalin, M., Baxter, P., Pozzi, C., Oleari, E., Sanna, A., & Belpaeme, T. (2014). What a robotic companion could do for a diabetic child. In Proceedings the 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RoMan '14) (pp. 936--941). Edinburgh, U.K.: IEEE Press.
[5]
Bartneck, C. (2003). Interacting with an embodied emotional character. In Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces (DPPI '03) (pp. 55--60). Pittsburgh, USA: ACM Press.
[6]
Baxter, P., Baroni, I., Nalin, M., Sanna, A., & Belpaeme, T. (2013). Touchscreens as mediators for social human--robot interactions: A focus group evaluation involving diabetic children. In Proceedings of the CmIS workshop at ITS '13. St Andrews, U.K.
[7]
Baxter, P., deGreeff, J., & Belpaeme, T. (2013). Cognitive architecture for human--robot interaction: Towards behavioural alignment. Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures, 6, 30--39.
[8]
Baxter, P., Kennedy, J., Vollmer, A.-L., de Greeff, J., & Belpaeme, T. (2014). Tracking gaze over time in hri as a proxy for engagement and attribution of social agency. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI'14) (pp. 126--127). Bielefeld, Germany: ACM Press.
[9]
Baxter, P., Wood, R., & Belpaeme, T. (2012). A touchscreen-based "sandtray" to facilitate, mediate and contextualise human-robot social interaction. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot interaction (HRI) (pp. 105--106). Boston, MA, U.S.A.: ACM/IEEE Press.
[10]
Beck, A., Canamero, L., & Bard, K. (2010). Towards an affect space for robots to display emotional body language. In Proceedings of the 19th IEEE International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RoMan 2010).
[11]
Beck, A., Hiolle, A., & Canamero, L. (2013). Using Perlin noise to generate emotional expressions in a robot. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2013) (pp. 1845--1850). Berlin, Germany.
[12]
Belpaeme, T., Baxter, P., Greeff, J. D., Kennedy, J., Looije, R., Neerincx, M., ... Coti, M. (2013). Child-robot interaction: Perspectives and challenges. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Social Robotics (ICSR 2013) (pp. 452--459). Bristol, U.K.: Springer.
[13]
Belpaeme, T., Baxter, P., Read, R., Wood, R., Cuay, H., Kiefer, B., ... Humbert, R. (2012). Multimodal child-robot interaction: Building social bonds. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 1(2), 33--53.
[14]
Beran, T. N., Ramirez-Serrano, A., Kuzyk, R., Fior, M., & Nugent, S. (2011). Understanding how children understand robots : Perceived animism in child robot interaction. Journal of Human Computer Studies, 69(7-8), 539--550.
[15]
Billard, A. (2002). Play, dreams and imitation in robota. In K. Dautenhahn, A. Bond, L. Caamero, & B. Edmonds (Eds.), Socially intelligent agents (Vol. 3, pp. 165--172). Springer.
[16]
Blanson Henkemans, O. A., Bierman, B. P. B., Janssen, J., Neerincx, M. A., Looije, R., van der Bosch, H., & van der Giessen, J. A. M. (2013). Using a robot to personalise health education for children with diabetes type 1: A pilot study. Patient education and counseling, 92(2), 174--81.
[17]
Blanson-Henkemans, O., Hoondert, V., Schrama-Groot, F., Looije, R., Alpay, L., & Neerincx, M. (2012). "I just have diabetes": Children's need for diabetes self-management support and how a social robot can accommodate their needs. Patient Intelligence, 4, 51--61.
[18]
Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39(4), 323--340.
[19]
Cosi, P., Paci, G., Sommavilla, G., Tesser, F., Nalin, M., & Baroni, I. (2012). An Italian event-based ASR-TTS system for the Nao robot. In Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the Italian Association of Speech Sciences (pp. 177--198). Rome, Italy.
[20]
Csala, E., Németh, G., & Zainkó, C. (2012). Application of the NAO humanoid robot in the treatment of marrow-transplanted children. In Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (pp. 655--659). Kosice, Slovakia.
[21]
Dautenhahn, K. (2004). Robots we like to live with?! A developmental perspective on a personalized, life-long robot companion. In Proceedings the 13th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RoMan'14) (pp. 17--22). Kurashiki, Japan: IEEE Press.
[22]
Dautenhahn, K. (2007). Socially intelligent robots: Dimensions of human-robot interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 362, 679--704.
[23]
Draper, T. W., & Clayton, W. W. (1992). Using a personal robot to teach young children. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 153(3), 269--273.
[24]
Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040--1048.
[25]
European Food Information Council. (2009, October). Food-based dietary guidelines in Europe. Website. Retrieved from http://www.eufic.org/article/en/expid/food-based-dietary-guidelines-in-europe
[26]
Fine, A. (2010). Handbook on animal-assisted therapy (3rd ed.). San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press.
[27]
Gough, H. G., & Heilbrun, A. B. (1980). The adjective check list manual: ACL. Palo Alto, CA, USA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.
[28]
Hiolle, A., Lewis, M., & Cañamero, L. (2014). Arousal regulation and affective adaptation to human responsiveness by a robot that explores and learns a novel environment. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 8, 17.
[29]
Hyun, E., & Son, S. (2010). Relationships between user experiences and children's perceptions of the education robot. In Proceedings of 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction - HRI'10 (pp. 199--200). Osaka, Japan: ACM/IEEE Press.
[30]
Janssen, J. B., van der Wal, C. C., Neerincx, M. A., & Looije, R. (2011). Motivating children to learn arithmetic with an adaptive robot game. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Social Robotics (pp. 153--162). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
[31]
Kanda, T., Hirano, T., & Eaton, D. (2004). Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children: A field trial. Human-Computer Interaction, 19, 61--84.
[32]
Kanda, T., Sato, R., Saiwaki, N., & Ishiguro, H. (2007). A two-month field trial in an elementary school for long-term human-robot interaction. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 23(5), 962--971.
[33]
Keller, J. (1987). Strategies for stimulating the motivation to learn. Performance and Instruction, 1--7.
[34]
Kelley, J. F. (1984). An iterative design methodology for user-friendly natural language office information applications. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 2(1), 26--41.
[35]
Kennedy, J., Baxter, P., & Belpaeme, T. (2013). Constraining content in mediated unstructured social interactions: Studies in the wild. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Affective Interaction in Natural Environments at ACII 2013. IEEE Press.
[36]
Kennedy, J., Baxter, P., & Belpaeme, T. (2014). Children comply with a robot's indirect requests. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction - HRI'14 (pp. 198--199). Bielefeld, Germany: ACM Press.
[37]
Kennedy, J., Baxter, P., & Belpaeme, T. (2015). Comparing robot embodiments in a guided discovery learning interaction with children. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7(2), 293--308.
[38]
Kidd, C. D., & Breazeal, C. (2008). Robots at home: Understanding long-term human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the 21st IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2008) (pp. 22--26). Nice, France: IEEE Press.
[39]
Komatsu, T., & Abe, Y. (2008). Comparing an on-screen agent with a robotic agent in non-face-to-face interactions. In H. Prendinger, J. Lester, & M. Ishizuka (Eds.), Intelligent virtual agents (lecture notes in computer science 5208) (Vol. 5208, pp. 498--504). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
[40]
Kose-Bagci, H., Ferrari, E., Dautenhahn, K., Syrdal, D. S., & Nehaniv, C. L. (2009). Effects of embodiment and gestures on social interaction in drumming games with a humanoid robot. Advanced Robotics, 23(14), 1951--1996.
[41]
Kozima, H., & Nakagawa, C. (2006). Social robots for children: Practice in communication-care. In Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control (pp. 768--773). Istanbul, Turkey: IEEE Press.
[42]
Kruijff-Korbayova, I., Cuayahuitl, H., Kiefer, B., Schroder, M., Cosi, P., Paci, G., ... Verhelst, W. (2012). Spoken language processing in a conversational system for child-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Child-Computer Interaction (WOCCI). Portland, USA.
[43]
Kruijff-Korbayova, I., Kiefer, B., Baroni, I., & Zelati, M. C. (2013, December). Making human-robot quiz dialogue more conversational by adding non-quiz talk. In The 17th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue (DialDam) (p. Poster). Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
[44]
Kruijff-Korbayova, I., Oleari, E., Baroni, I., Kiefer, B., Zelati, M. C., Pozzi, C., & Sanna, A. (2014, August). Effects of off-activity talk in human-robot interaction with diabetic children. In Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RoMan 2014) (pp. 649--654). IEEE Press.
[45]
Lee, K. M., Jung, Y., Kim, J., & Kim, S. R. (2006). Are physically embodied social agents better than disembodied social agents? The effects of physical embodiment, tactile interaction, and people's loneliness in humanrobot interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(10), 962--973.
[46]
Leite, I., Castellano, G., Pereira, A., Martinho, C., & Paiva, A. (2012). Modelling empathic behaviour in a robotic game companion for children: An ethnographic study in real-world settings. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction - HRI'12 (pp. 367--374). Boston, MA, U.S.A.: ACM Press.
[47]
Leite, I., Martinho, C., & Paiva, A. (2013). Social robots for long-term interaction: A survey. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5(2), 291--308.
[48]
Leyzberg, D., Spaulding, S., Toneva, M., & Scassellati, B. (2012). The physical presence of a robot tutor increases cognitive learning gains. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1882--1887). Sapporo, Japan.
[49]
Looije, R., van der Zalm, A., Neerincx, M. a., & Beun, R.-J. (2012). Help, I need some body: The effect of embodiment on playful learning. In Proceedings of the 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RoMan 2012) (pp. 718--724). IEEE Press.
[50]
Lu, a. S., Baranowski, J., Islam, N., & Baranowski, T. (2012). How to engage children in self-administered dietary assessment programmes. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 1--5.
[51]
Markus, H., Eichberg, J., & Andre, E. (2012). Studies on grounding with gaze and pointing gestures in human-robot-interaction. In 4th International Conference on Social Robotics (ICSR 2012) (pp. 378--387). Chengdu, China.
[52]
Meltzer, D. E. (2002). The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual learning gains in physics: A possible hidden variable in diagnostic pretest scores. American Journal of Physics, 70(12), 1259.
[53]
Nalin, M., Baroni, I., Kruijff-Korbayova, I., Canamero, L., Lewis, M., Beck, A., ... Sanna, A. (2012). Children's adaptation in multi-session interaction. In Proceedings of the 21st IEEE International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RoMan 2012).
[54]
Nalin, M., Baroni, I., Sanna, A., & Pozzi, C. (2012). Robotic companion for diabetic children. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children - IDC'12 (p. 260). New York, New York, USA: ACM Press.
[55]
Nalin, M., Verga, M., Sanna, A., & Saranummi, N. (2013). Directions for ICT research in disease prevention. In M. Cruz-Cunha, I. Miranda, & P. Goncalves (Eds.), Handbook of research on ICTs for human-centered healthcare and social care services (pp. 229--247). Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA: IGI Global Press.
[56]
Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (2013). Physical activity guidelines. Website. Retrieved from http://www.health.gov/paguidelines
[57]
Richman, W. L., Kiesler, S., Weisband, S., & Drasgow, F. (1999). A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires, and interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(5), 754.
[58]
Riek, L. (2012). Wizard of Oz studies in HRI: A systematic review and new reporting guidelines. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 1(1), 119--136.
[59]
Ros, R., Baroni, I., & Demiris, Y. (2014). Adaptive humanrobot interaction in sensorimotor task instruction: From human to robot dance tutors. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 62(6), 707--720.
[60]
Ros, R., Coninx, A., Demiris, Y., Patsis, G., Enescu, V., & Sahli, H. (2014). Behavioral accommodation towards a dance robot tutor. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction - HRI'14 (pp. 278--279). New York, New York, USA: ACM Press.
[61]
Ros, R., & Demiris, Y. (2013). Creative dance: An approach for social interaction between robots and children. In A. A. Salah, H. Hung, O. Aran, & H. Gunes (Eds.), Human behavior understanding (Lecture Notes in Computer Science) (Vol. 8212, pp. 40--51). Springer.
[62]
Ros, R., Nalin, M., Wood, R., Baxter, P., Looiije, R., Demiris, Y., ... Pozzi, C. (2011). Child-robot interaction in the wild: Advice to the aspiring experimenter. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (pp. 335--342). Alicante, Spain: ACM Press.
[63]
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68--78.
[64]
Saerbeck, M., Schut, T., Bartneck, C., & Janse, M. D. (2010). Expressive robots in education: Varying the degree of social supportive behavior of a robotic tutor. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2010) (pp. 1613--1622). Atlanta, USA: ACM Press.
[65]
Salter, T., Werry, I., & Michaud, F. (2007). Going into the wild in child-robot interaction studies. Intelligent Service Robotics, 1(2), 93--108.
[66]
Salter, T., Werry, I., & Michaud, F. (2008). Going into the wild in childrobot interaction studies: Issues in social robotic development. Intelligent Service Robotics, 1(2), 93--108.
[67]
Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 299--323.
[68]
Segura, E. M., Kriegel, M., Aylett, R., Deshmukh, A., & Cramer, H. (2012). How do you like me in this: User embodiment preferences for companion agents. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (Lecture Notes in Computer Science) (Vol. 7502, pp. 112--125). Santa Cruz, CA, USA: Springer Berlin / Heidelberg.
[69]
Shibata, T. (2011). Importance of physical interaction between human and robot for therapy. In C. Stephanidis (Ed.), Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction: Applications and Services (Vol. 6768, pp. 437--447). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
[70]
Short, E., Swift-spong, K., Greczek, J., Ramachandran, A., Litoiu, A., Grigore, E. C., ... Scassellati, B. (2014). How to train your dragonbot: Socially assistive robots for teaching children about nutrition through play. In 23rd IEEE Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RoMan). Edinburgh, U.K.: IEEE Press.
[71]
Sidner, C. L. (2012). Engagement: Looking and not looking as evidence for disengagement. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Gaze in HRI (at HRI'12). Boston, MA, USA.
[72]
Sidner, C. L., Lee, C., Kidd, C. D., Lesh, N., & Rich, C. (2005). Explorations in engagement for humans and robots. Artificial Intelligence, 166(1-2), 140--164.
[73]
Stiehl, W. D., Lee, J. K., Breazeal, C., Nalin, M., Morandi, A., & Sanna, A. (2009). The huggable: A platform for research in robotic companions for pediatric care. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children - IDC'09 (p. 317). New York, New York, USA: ACM Press.
[74]
Tanaka, F., Cicourel, A., & Movellan, J. R. (2007). Socialization between toddlers and robots at an early childhood education center. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (Vol. 104, pp. 17954--8).
[75]
Tanaka, F., Movellan, J. R., Fortenberry, B., & Aisaka, K. (2006). Daily HRI evaluation at a classroom environment: Reports from dance interaction experiments. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '06) (pp. 3--9). Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
[76]
Tapus, A., Tapus, C., & Matarić, M. J. (2008, February). Userrobot personality matching and assistive robot behavior adaptation for post-stroke rehabilitation therapy. Intelligent Service Robotics, 1(2), 169--183.
[77]
Tesser, F., Sommavilla, G., Paci, G., & Cosi, P. (2013). Experiments with signal-driven symbolic prosody for statistical parametric speech synthesis. In Proceedings of the 8th ISCA Speech Synthesis Workshop (pp. 2--6). Barcelona, Spain.
[78]
Thill, S., Pop, C. A., Belpaeme, T., Ziemke, T., & Vanderborght, B. (2012). Robot-assisted therapy for autism spectrum disorders with (partially) autonomous control: Challenges and outlook. Paladyn Journal of Behavioral Robotics, 3(4), 209--217.
[79]
Turkle, S., Breazeal, C., Dasté, O., & Scassellati, B. (2006). Encounters with Kismet and Cog: Children respond to relational artifacts. In P. Messaris & L. Humphreys (Eds.), Digital media: Transformations in human communication (pp. 1--20). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
[80]
Wainer, J., Feil-Seifer, D. J., Shell, D. A., & Mataric, M. J. (2007). Embodiment and human-robot interaction: A task-based perspective. In Proceedings of the 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RoMan 2007) (pp. 872--877). IEEE.
[81]
Wang, W., Enescu, V., & Sahli, H. (2013). Towards real-time continuous emotion recognition from body movements. Human Behavior Understanding, 8212, 1--11.
[82]
Wood, L. J., Dautenhahn, K., Rainer, A., Robins, B., Lehmann, H., & Syrdal, D. S. (2013). Robot-mediated interviews---How effective is a humanoid robot as a tool for interviewing young children? PloS ONE, 8(3), e59448.
[83]
World Health Organization. (2014). A healthy lifestyle. Website. Retrieved from http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/disease-prevention/nutrition/a-healthy-lifestyle

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Children's Acceptance of a Domestic Social Robot: How It Evolves over TimeACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/363806613:2(1-20)Online publication date: 14-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Back to School - Sustaining Recurring Child-Robot Educational Interactions After a Long BreakProceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610977.3635001(433-442)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
  • (2024)“He Can Walk, He Just Doesn’t Want To” - On Machine/Human-Likeness of Robots in Polish Children’s PerceptionHuman-Computer Interaction10.1007/978-3-031-60412-6_17(221-239)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2024
  • Show More Cited By
  1. Towards long-term social child-robot interaction: using multi-activity switching to engage young users

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Journal of Human-Robot Interaction
    Journal of Human-Robot Interaction  Volume 5, Issue 1
    March 2016
    125 pages

    Publisher

    Journal of Human-Robot Interaction Steering Committee

    Publication History

    Published: 23 March 2016

    Author Tags

    1. case study
    2. child-robot interaction
    3. integrated system
    4. knowledge gain
    5. long-term interaction
    6. motivation
    7. multi-objective support
    8. multiple activities

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • EU Integrated Project ALIZ-E

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)144
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7
    Reflects downloads up to 11 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Children's Acceptance of a Domestic Social Robot: How It Evolves over TimeACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/363806613:2(1-20)Online publication date: 14-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Back to School - Sustaining Recurring Child-Robot Educational Interactions After a Long BreakProceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610977.3635001(433-442)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
    • (2024)“He Can Walk, He Just Doesn’t Want To” - On Machine/Human-Likeness of Robots in Polish Children’s PerceptionHuman-Computer Interaction10.1007/978-3-031-60412-6_17(221-239)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2024
    • (2022)Long-Term Interaction with Relational SIAsThe Handbook on Socially Interactive Agents10.1145/3563659.3563667(195-260)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2022
    • (2022)Creating Informative and Successful Human Robot Interaction in a Real-World Service Environment2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)10.1109/RO-MAN53752.2022.9900846(950-955)Online publication date: 29-Aug-2022
    • (2022)Personalised socially assistive robot for cardiac rehabilitation: Critical reflections on long-term interactions in the real worldUser Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction10.1007/s11257-022-09323-033:2(497-544)Online publication date: 19-Jul-2022
    • (2022)A social robot-based platform for health behavior change toward prevention of childhood obesityUniversal Access in the Information Society10.1007/s10209-022-00922-722:4(1405-1415)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2022
    • (2021)A Cloud-based Robot System for Long-term Interaction: Principles, Implementation, Lessons LearnedACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/348158511:1(1-27)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2021
    • (2021)Predictable Robots for Autistic Children—Variance in Robot Behaviour, Idiosyncrasies in Autistic Children’s Characteristics, and Child–Robot EngagementACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/346884928:5(1-42)Online publication date: 20-Aug-2021
    • (2021)Let's Talk It OutProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34491715:CSCW1(1-32)Online publication date: 22-Apr-2021
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media