[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3610978.3640730acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Touch from Robots Loses to Chatting via Text: A Comparative Study of Sympathy Demonstrated Using Text, Robot Arm, and Qoobo

Published: 11 March 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Social touch is helpful for improving social connection, and it is one potential method to improve online communication with people at a distance. Although prior work examined if social touch from robot is effective for communicating sympathy compared to text and GIFs, the results indicated that touch from a robotic arm was not effective as a means of conveying sympathy. Therefore, in order to examine how to make social touch from robots more effective, we conducted an experiment using Qoobo a more lifelike robot. Results (50 dyads) indicate that the touching method we used was not effective for conveying sympathy. Interviews with participants suggested the ways to improve robot; that is, making the robot look like an animal, such as Qoobo, with adding warmth would be effective.

References

[1]
K. Afridi, J. A. Turi, B. Zaufishan, and J. Rosak-szyrocka. Impact of digital communications on project efficiency through ease of use and top management support. Heliyon, 9(7):1--2, 2023.
[2]
Katrina M. Ling, Danielle Langlois, Harrison R. Preusse, Jennifer Rheman, Danya Parson, Sarah Kuballa, Martin Simecek, Katherine M. Tsui, and Marlena R. Fraune. "if you weren't connected to the internet, you were not alive": experience of using social technology during covid-19 in adults 50. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 2023.
[3]
M. R. Fraune, T. Komatsu, H. R. Preusse, D. K. Langlois, R. H. Y. Au, K. Ling, S. Suda, K. Nakamura, and K. M. Tsui. Socially facilitative robots for older adults to alleviate social isolation: A participatory design workshop approach in the us and japan. Frontiers in Psychology, 13:Article 904019, 2022.
[4]
R. Kurzban. The social psychophysics of cooperation: Nonverbal communication in a public goods game. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 25(4):241--259, 2001.
[5]
F. A. Geldard. Some neglected possibilities of communication: For some kinds of messages the skin offers a valuable supplement to ears and eyes. Science, 131(3413):1583--1588, 1960.
[6]
K. Cordes, I. Egmose, J. Smith-Nielsen, S. Køppe, and M. S. Væver. Maternal touch in caregiving behavior of mothers with and without postpartum depression. Infant Behavior and Development, 49:182--191, 2017.
[7]
A. Debrot, D. Schoebi, M. Perrez, and A. B. Horn. Touch as an interpersonal emotion regulation process in couples' daily lives: The mediating role of psychological intimacy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(10):1373--1385, 2013.
[8]
M. J. Hertenstein, J. M. Verkamp, A. M. Kerestes, and R. M. Holmes. The communicative functions of touch in humans, nonhuman primates, and rats: A review and synthesis of the empirical research. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132(1):5--94, 2006.
[9]
M. von Mohr, L. P. Kirsch, and A. Fotopoulou. The soothing function of touch: Affective touch reduces feelings of social exclusion. Scientific Reports, 7(1):1--9, 2017.
[10]
T. W. Bickmore, R. Fernando, L. Ring, and D. Schulman. Empathic touch by relational agents. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 1(1):60--71, 2010.
[11]
A. E. Block, S. Christen, R. Gassert, O. Hilliges, and K. J. Kuchenbecker. The six hug commandments: Design and evaluation of a human-sized hugging robot with visual and haptic perception. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 380--388, 2021.
[12]
S. Yohanan, M. Chan, J. Hopkins, H. Sun, and K. MacLean. Hapticat: Exploration of affective touch. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, pages 222--229, 2005.
[13]
Alexis E. Block. HuggieBot: An Interactive Hugging Robot With Visual and Haptic Perception. PhD thesis, ETH Zürich, Zürich, August 2021. Department of Computer Science.
[14]
Steve Yohanan and Karon E. MacLean. The role of affective touch in human-robot interaction: Human intent and expectations in touching the haptic creature. International Journal of Social Robotics, 4(2):163--180, April 2012.
[15]
Rachel Hoi Yan Au, Katherine M. Tsui, and Marlena R. Fraune. Showing sympathy via embodied affective robot touch, gifs, and texts: People are In Companion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI '23, page 161--166, New York, NY, USA, 2023. Association for Computing Machinery.
[16]
R. H. Au, K. Ling, M. R. Fraune, and K. M. Tsui. Robot touch to send sympathy: Divergent perspectives of senders and recipients. In 2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pages 372--382. IEEE, 2022.
[17]
Yukai Engineering Inc. DEMONSTRATION TEST About the Healing Effects Experiment. QooboPetit Qoobo | A Tailed Cushion That Heals Your Heart. https: //qoobo.info/index-en/, September 2017.
[18]
R. Baecker, K. Sellen, S. Crosskey, V. Boscart, and B. Barbosa Neves. Technology to reduce social isolation and loneliness. In Proceedings of the 16th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility, pages 27--34, 2018.
[19]
M. A. Pett and M. J. M. Johnson. Development and psychometric evaluation of the revised university student hassles scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65(6):984--1010, 2005.
[20]
A. V. Carron, W. N. Widmeyer, and L. R. Brawley. Group cohesion and individual adherence to physical activity. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 10(2):127-- 138, 1988.
[21]
G. D. Zimet, N. W. Dahlem, S. G. Zimet, and G. K. Farley. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1):30--41, 1988.
[22]
M. E. Hughes, L. J. Waite, L. C. Hawkley, and J. T. Cacioppo. A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys: Results from two population-based studies. Research on Aging, 26(6):655--672, 2004.
[23]
D. Watson, L. A. Clark, and A. Tellegen. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The panas scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6):1063, 1988.

Index Terms

  1. Touch from Robots Loses to Chatting via Text: A Comparative Study of Sympathy Demonstrated Using Text, Robot Arm, and Qoobo

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    HRI '24: Companion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
    March 2024
    1408 pages
    ISBN:9798400703232
    DOI:10.1145/3610978
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 11 March 2024

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Qoobo
    2. robot touch
    3. sympathy

    Qualifiers

    • Short-paper

    Conference

    HRI '24
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 268 of 1,124 submissions, 24%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 67
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)67
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
    Reflects downloads up to 12 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media