[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3674558.3674560acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicctaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Conceptual Framework Introducing the Success Factors for Implementing Intelligent Automation-A Qualitative Multiple Case Study

Published: 26 August 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Productivity increases in administration remained partially untapped during recent years. At the same time, the pressure on existing professions is being exacerbated by demographic trends in industrialized countries. This reveals the potential offered by process automation in the administrative area. Technological progress can help to overcome this situation. In the recent past, Robotic Process Automation (RPA), automating simple and rule-based tasks, gained traction. RPA alone is not sufficient for more complex tasks. Therefore, supplementing or substituting AI-based technologies such as Machine Learning up to fully autonomous AI solutions, which we refer to as Intelligent Automation at its highest level, can be adopted. While RPA is regarded as an established technology, Intelligent Automation is still in its infancy. Therefore, research on successful practical examples is necessary for its dissemination. To this end, this paper conducts a qualitative multiple case study analysis based on guided semi-structured interviews aiming to identify success factors in the adoption of Intelligent Automation. To unravel the key factors, a framework comprising 45 success factors is introduced. This framework, along with its novelty to the scientific community, has the potential to facilitate practical implementation of Intelligent Automation. Yet, our investigation revealed that the identified use cases in the analyzed companies haven't reached the maturity level expected for Intelligent Automation. Consequently, the findings pertain to the early stages of Intelligent Automation development. This study distinguishes itself from prior research by incorporating additional cases from various institutions and sectors, utilizing a study design rooted in a broader scientific knowledge base. Given that a limited number of companies could be recruited despite extensive systematic acquisition efforts, this subject area deserves further research efforts.

References

[1]
‘Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) 2022 | Shaping Europe's digital future’, European Commission. Accessed: Jan. 17, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/digital-economy-and-society-index-desi-2022
[2]
‘Digital Decade DESI visualisation tool’, European Commission. Accessed: Jan. 17, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://digital-decade-desi.digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/datasets/desi-2022/charts/desi-compare-countries-progress?indicator=desi_total&breakdown=desi_total&country=EU&unit=pc_desi
[3]
M. Röglinger, D. Fischer, and F. Baumgarte, ‘Prozessdigitalisierung für das „New Normal“’. Fraunhofer FIT & ABBY, Oct. 20, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.abbyy.com/de/company/news/studie-von-abbyy-und-fraunhofer-untersucht-prozessdigitalisierung-in-unternehmen/
[4]
S. L. Roth and T. Heimann, ‘Studie IT-Trends 2023 - Datenpotenziale endlich ausschöpfen’. Capgemini, 2023. Accessed: Jan. 17, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://prod.ucwe.capgemini.com/de-de/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2022/03/Studie-IT-Trends-2023.pdf
[5]
‘Schlendrian im Büro - Studie belegt 30 Prozent Verschwendung in der Administration’, OTS.at. Accessed: Jan. 17, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.ots.at/presseaussendung/OTS_20100503_OTS0023/schlendrian-im-buero-studie-belegt-30-prozent-verschwendung-in-der-administration
[6]
M. Höhne, P. Fahr, T. Schabicki, S. Schnägelberger, and U. Feddern, ‘Prozesse effizient managen und nachhaltig verbessern - Process Management & Analytics Studie’. BearingPoint & BPM&O, 2021. Accessed: Jan. 17, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.bearingpoint.com/de-de/downloadformular/
[7]
M. Maloni, M. S. Hiatt, and S. Campbell, ‘Understanding the work values of Gen Z business students’, The International Journal of Management Education, vol. 17, no. 3, p. 100320, Nov. 2019.
[8]
E. S. W. Ng and J. M. Johnson, ‘Millennials: who are they, how are they different, and why should we care?’, in The Multi-generational and Aging Workforce, R. J. Burke, C. Cooper, and A.-S. Antoniou, Eds., Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015.
[9]
K. K. H. Ng, C.-H. Chen, C. K. M. Lee, J. (Roger) Jiao, and Z.-X. Yang, ‘A systematic literature review on intelligent automation: Aligning concepts from theory, practice, and future perspectives’, Advanced Engineering Informatics, vol. 47, p. 101246, Jan. 2021.
[10]
M. Gotthardt, D. Koivulaakso, O. Paksoy, C. Saramo, M. Martikainen, and O. Lehner, ‘Current State and Challenges in the Implementation of Smart Robotic Process Automation in Accounting and Auditing’, ACRN Journal of Finance and Risk Perspectives, vol. 9, pp. 90–102, May 2020.
[11]
Kofax, ‘Intelligent Automation Benchmark Study’. Accessed: Jan. 25, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.tungstenautomation.com/learn/reports/kofax-2022-intelligent-automation-benchmark-study
[12]
C. Coombs, ‘Will COVID-19 be the tipping point for the Intelligent Automation of work? A review of the debate and implications for research’, International Journal of Information Management, vol. 55, p. 102182, Jul. 2020.
[13]
M. N. K. Saunders, P. Lewis, and A. Thornhill, Research methods for business students, Eighth Edition. New York: Pearson, 2019.
[14]
C. Flechsig, ‘The Impact of Intelligent Process Automation on Purchasing and Supply Management – Initial Insights from a Multiple Case Study’, pp. 67–89, 2021.
[15]
‘IEEE Guide for Terms and Concepts in Intelligent Process Automation’, IEEE Std 2755-2017, pp. 1–16, Sep. 2017.
[16]
Christian Langmann and Daniel Turi, Robotic Process Automation (RPA) - Digitalisierung und Automatisierung von Prozessen. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien. Accessed: Jan. 25, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.springerprofessional.de/robotic-process-automation-rpa-digitalisierung-und-automatisieru/19654776
[17]
R. Syed, ‘Robotic Process Automation: Contemporary themes and challenges’, Computers in Industry, vol. 115, p. 103162, Feb. 2020.
[18]
S. Moreira, H. S. Mamede, and A. Santos, ‘Process automation using RPA – a literature review’, Procedia Computer Science, vol. 219, pp. 244–254, Jan. 2023.
[19]
P. Hofmann, C. Samp, and N. Urbach, ‘Robotic process automation’, Electron Markets, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 99–106, Mar. 2020.
[20]
D. Kedziora, ‘Botsourcing, Roboshoring or Virtual Backoffice? Perspectives on Implementing Robotic Process Automation (RPA) and Artificial Intelligence (AI)’, Human Technology, vol. 18, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Oct. 2022.
[21]
F. A. Lievano-Martínez, J. D. Fernández-Ledesma, D. Burgos, J. W. Branch-Bedoya, and J. A. Jimenez-Builes, ‘Intelligent Process Automation: An Application in Manufacturing Industry’, Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 14, Art. no. 14, Jan. 2022.
[22]
W. M. P. van der Aalst, M. Bichler, and A. Heinzl, ‘Robotic Process Automation’, Bus Inf Syst Eng, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 269–272, Aug. 2018.
[23]
P. S. Kholiya, A. Kapoor, M. Rana, and M. Bhushan, ‘Intelligent Process Automation: The Future of Digital Transformation’, in 2021 10th International Conference on System Modeling & Advancement in Research Trends (SMART), Dec. 2021, pp. 185–190.
[24]
M. Lacity and L. Willcocks, ‘Becoming Strategic with Intelligent Automation’, MIS Quarterly Executive, vol. 20, no. 2, Jun. 2021, [Online]. Available: https://aisel.aisnet.org/misqe/vol20/iss2/7
[25]
A. Perdana and K. Yong, ‘Intelligent Automation’, May 2021.
[26]
T. Chakraborti, ‘From Robotic Process Automation to Intelligent Process Automation’, in Business Process Management: Blockchain and Robotic Process Automation Forum, A. Asatiani, J. M. García, N. Helander, A. Jiménez-Ramírez, A. Koschmider, J. Mendling, G. Meroni, and H. A. Reijers, Eds., in Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 215–228.
[27]
S. Richardson, ‘Cognitive automation: A new era of knowledge work?’, Business Information Review, Nov. 2020.
[28]
G. Shidaganti, S. Salil, P. Anand, and V. Jadhav, ‘Robotic Process Automation with AI and OCR to Improve Business Process: Review’. Accessed: Jun. 03, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencegate.app/document/10.1109/icesc51422.2021.9532902
[29]
I. Stuart, D. McCutcheon, R. Handfield, R. McLachlin, and D. Samson, ‘Effective case research in operations management: a process perspective’, Journal of Operations Management, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 419–433, 2002.
[30]
C. Züll and N. Menold, ‘Offene Fragen’, in Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung, N. Baur and J. Blasius, Eds., Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien, 2022, pp. 1127–1134.
[31]
B. von dem Berge, ‘Teilstandardisierte Experteninterviews’, in Fortgeschrittene Analyseverfahren in den Sozialwissenschaften: Ein Überblick, M. Tausendpfund, Ed., in Grundwissen Politik., Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien, 2020, pp. 275–300.
[32]
J. Gläser and G. Laudel, Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse als Instrumente rekonstruierender Untersuchungen, 3., Überarb. Aufl. in Lehrbuch. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2009.
[33]
M. Hilz and H. R. Otten, ‘Qualitative Expert*inneninterviews’, in Empirische Sozialforschung für die Polizei- und Verwaltungswissenschaften: Eine Einführung, S. Hollenberg and C. Kaup, Eds., Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien, 2023, pp. 169–198.
[34]
U. Kuckartz, Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung, 4th ed. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa, 2012.
[35]
P. Mayring, Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken, 12., Überarbeitete Auflage. Weinheim Basel: Beltz, 2015.
[36]
E. Best and M. Weth, Process Excellence. Wiesbaden: Gabler, 2010.
[37]
R. Hierzer, Prozessoptimierung 4.0: den digitalen Wandel als Chance nutzen, 1. Auflage. in Haufe Fachbuch. Freiburg München Stuttgart: Haufe Gruppe, 2017.
[38]
M. Sevilla, ‘Esoar - A unique and straightforward transformation methodology’, Capgemini. Accessed: Mar. 09, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.capgemini.com/solutions/esoar/

Index Terms

  1. Conceptual Framework Introducing the Success Factors for Implementing Intelligent Automation-A Qualitative Multiple Case Study

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICCTA '24: Proceedings of the 2024 10th International Conference on Computer Technology Applications
    May 2024
    324 pages
    ISBN:9798400716386
    DOI:10.1145/3674558
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 26 August 2024

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Artificial Intelligence
    2. BPM
    3. Business Process Management
    4. Empirical Study
    5. Framework
    6. IPA
    7. Intelligent Automation
    8. Process Automation
    9. Qualitative Study
    10. Semi-structured Interviews

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    ICCTA 2024

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 203
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)203
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)56
    Reflects downloads up to 20 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media