[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

The Critical Success Factors for Robotic Process Automation

Published: 01 June 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) is a comparably new phenomenon in process digitalization and automation. Prior research has identified a clear need to analyze Critical Success Factors (CSF) for RPA. In this study, we set out to derive a corresponding framework. Based on a structured review of the literature and an analysis of 19 expert interviews, we identify 32 CSFs which we subsume in several contextual clusters. Building on prior literature on CSF, we critically discuss how far the success factors we found are RPA-specific or hold for other process automation technologies or process improvement efforts in general, too. Based on this, we highlight implications for both theory and practice and areas for future research.

Highlights

Critical success factors (CSFs) are aspects organizations should focus on with regards to Robotic Process Automation (RPA).
Based on scholarly articles and expert interviews, several CSF for RPA can be identified.
RPA shares several CSF with other technologies and projects in general, e.g., top management support.
RPAhas several distinct technology specific CSF, e.g., the early inclusion of business and IT professionals.

References

[1]
ABBYY, 2020. State of Process Mining and Robotic Process Automation 2020: Process mining and RPA trends of 2020. 〈www.abbyy.com/en-us/solutions/process-intelligence/research-report-2020〉 (accessed 24 November 2020).
[2]
S. Aguirre, A. Rodriguez, Automation of a business process using Robotic Process Automation (RPA): a case study, in: J.C. Figueroa-García, E.R. López-Santana, J.L. Villa-Ramírez, R. Ferro-Escobar (Eds.), Applied Computer Sciences in Engineering, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017, pp. 65–71.
[3]
Z. Alias, E.M. Zawawi, K. Yusof, N.M. Aris, Determining critical success factors of project management practice: a conceptual framework, Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 153 (2014) 61–69.
[4]
M.G. Alles, G.L. Gray, Will the medium become the message? A framework for understanding the coming automation of the audit process, J. Inf. Syst. 34 (2020) 109–130.
[5]
A. Asatiani, E. Penttinen, Turning robotic process automation into commercial success – case OpusCapita, 6 (2016) 67–74,.
[6]
Asatiani, A., Penttinen, E., Rinta-Kahila, T., Salovaara, A., 2019. Organizational implementation of intelligent automation as distributed cognition: six recommendations for managers. In: Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Information Systems, Munich, Germany.
[7]
Automation Anywhere, 2020. Casestudy - MAXIMUS. 〈https://www.automationanywhere.com/casestudy-maximus〉 (accessed 25 November 2020).
[8]
Blue Prism Limited, 2020. Global RPA Survey Report | Blue Prism. 〈https://www.blueprism.com/resources/white-papers/global-rpa-survey-report-1/?selected-locale=%E2%9C%93〉 (accessed 25 November 2020).
[9]
J. vom Brocke, W. Maaß, P. Buxmann, A. Maedche, J.M. Leimeister, G. Pecht, Future work and enterprise systems, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 60 (2018) 357–366.
[10]
C.V. Bullen, J.F. Rockart, A Primer on Critical Success Factors, CISR Working Paper 69, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 1981, pp. 383–423.
[11]
Bygstad, B., 2015. The coming of lightweight IT. In: Proceedings on the 23rd European Conference of Information Systems, Münster, Germany.
[12]
B. Bygstad, Generative innovation: a comparison of lightweight and heavyweight IT, J. Inf. Technol. 32 (2017) 180–193.
[13]
C. Cewe, D. Koch, R. Mertens, Minimal effort requirements engineering for robotic process automation with test driven development and screen recording, in: E. Teniente, M. Weidlich (Eds.), Business Process Management Workshops, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018, pp. 642–648.
[14]
T. Chow, D.-B. Cao, A survey study of critical success factors in agile software projects, J. Syst. Softw. 81 (2008) 961–971.
[15]
L.A. Cooper, D.K. Holderness, T.L. Sorensen, D.A. Wood, Robotic Process Automation in public accounting, Account. Horiz. 33 (2019) 15–35,.
[16]
W.H. Delone, E. McLean, Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable, Inf. Syst. Res. 3 (1992) 60–95.
[17]
Denagama Vitharanage, I., Bandara, W., Syed, R., Toman, D., 2020. An empirically supported conceptualisation of Robotic Process Automation (RPA) benefits. In: Proceedings of the 28th European Conference on Information Systems, Marrakech, Morocco.
[18]
S. Dezdar, A. Sulaiman, Successful enterprise resource planning implementation: taxonomy of critical factors, Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 109 (2009) 1037–1052.
[19]
K. Dikert, M. Paasivaara, C. Lassenius, Challenges and success factors for large-scale agile transformations: a systematic literature review, J. Syst. Softw. 119 (2016) 87–108.
[20]
D. Fernandez, A. Aman, Impacts of Robotic Process Automation on global accounting services, Asian J. Account. Gov. 9 (2018) 123–132.
[21]
S. Finney, M. Corbett, ERP implementation: a compilation and analysis of critical success factors, Bus. Process Manag. J. 13 (2007) 329–347.
[22]
O. Françoise, M. Bourgault, R. Pellerin, ERP implementation through critical success factors’ management, Bus. Process Manag. J. 15 (2009) 371–394,.
[23]
S. Gregor, The nature of theory in information systems, MIS Q. 30 (2006) 611–642.
[24]
Güner, E., Han, S., Juell-Skielse, S., 2020. Robotic Process Automation as routine capability: a literature review. In: Proceedings of the 28th European Conference on Information Systems, Marrakech, Morocco.
[25]
P. Hallikainen, R. Bekkhus, S.L. Pan, How OpusCapita used internal RPA capabilities to offer services to clients, MIS Q. Exec. 17 (2018) 41–52.
[26]
Helm, A., Herm, L.-V., Imgrund, F., Janiesch, C., 2020. Interview Guideline, Transcriptions, and Coding for "A Consolidated Framework for Implementing Robotic Process Automation Projects", Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg.
[27]
L.-V. Herm, C. Janiesch, A. Helm, F. Imgrund, K. Fuchs, A. Hofmann, A. Winkelmann, A consolidated framework for implementing robotic process automation projects, in: D. Fahland, C. Ghidini, J. Becker, M. Dumas (Eds.), Business Process Management, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2020, pp. 471–488.
[28]
J. Iden, T.R. Eikebrokk, Implementing IT service management: a systematic literature review, Int. J. Inf. Manag. 33 (2013) 512–523.
[29]
A. Jimenez-Ramirez, H.A. Reijers, I. Barba, C. Del Valle, A method to improve the early stages of the robotic process automation lifecycle, in: P. Giorgini, B. Weber (Eds.), Advanced Information Systems Engineering, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019, pp. 446–461.
[30]
Jurisch, M.C., Ikas, C., Palka, W., Wolf, P., Krcmar, H., 2012. A review of success factors and challenges of public sector BPR implementations. In: Proceedings of 45th Hawaii International International Conference on Systems Science, Grand Wailea, Maui, HI, USA, 4–7 January 2012, pp. 2603–2612.
[31]
F. Kanakov, I. Prokhorov, Research and development of software robots for automating business processes of a commercial bank, Procedia Comput. Sci. 169 (2020) 337–341,.
[32]
A.A. Khan, J. Keung, Systematic review of success factors and barriers for software process improvement in global software development, IET Softw. 10 (2016) 125–135.
[33]
Khan, S.U., Niazi, M., Ahmad, R., 2009. Critical success factors for offshore software development outsourcing vendors: a systematic literature review. In: Fourth IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering, IEEE, Limerick, Ireland, pp. 207–216.
[34]
Khandelwal, V.K., Ferguson, J.R., 1999. Critical success factors (CSFs) and the growth of IT in selected geographic regions. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences., Maui, HI, USA, p. 13.
[35]
A. Kieser, A.T. Nicolai, Success factor research: overcoming the trade-off between rigor and relevance?, J. Manag. Inq. 14 (2005) 275–279.
[36]
B. Kitchenham, O. Pearl Brereton, D. Budgen, M. Turner, J. Bailey, S. Linkman, Systematic literature reviews in software engineering – a systematic literature review, Inf. Softw. Technol. 51 (2009) 7–15.
[37]
Koch, J., Trampler, M., Kregel, I., Coners, A., 2020. Mirror, mirror on the wall: robotic process automation in th epublic sector using a digital twin. In: Proceedings on the 28th European Conference of Information Systems, Marrakesh, Marokko.
[38]
J. Kokina, S. Blanchette, Early evidence of digital labor in accounting: innovation with Robotic Process Automation, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst. 35 (2019).
[39]
J. Kokina, R. Gilleran, S. Blanchette, D. Stoddard, Accountant as digital innovator: roles and competencies in the age of automation, SSRN Electron. J. (2019).
[40]
I. Kregel, J. Koch, R. Plattfaut, Beyond the hype: robotic process automation’s public perception over time, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer. 31 (2021) 130–150,.
[41]
M.C. Lacity, L.P. Willcocks, Robotic process automation at Telefónica O2, MIS Q. Exec. 15 (2016) 21–35.
[42]
M.C. Lacity, S. Khan, E. Carmel, Employing U.S. military families to provide business process outsourcing services: a case study of impact sourcing and reshoring, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 39 (2016) 150–175.
[43]
Lamberton, C., Gillard, A., Kaczmarskyj, G., 2016. Get ready for robots-Why planning makes the difference between success and disappointment. 〈https://assets.ey.com/content/dam/ey-sites/ey-com/en_gl/topics/emeia-financial-services/ey-get-ready-for-robots.pdf〉 (Accessed 27 November 2020).
[44]
C. Lamberton, D. Brigo, D. Hoy, Impact of Robotics, RPA and AI on the insurance industry: challenges and opportunities, J. Financ. Perspect. 4 (2017) 8–20.
[45]
M. Lande, R.L. Shrivastava, D. Seth, Critical success factors for Lean Six Sigma in SMEs (small and medium enterprises), TQM J. 28 (2016) 613–635.
[46]
C.S. Lim, M.Z. Mohamed, Criteria of project success: an exploratory re-examination, Int. J. Proj. Manag. 17 (1999) 243–248.
[47]
S. Madakam, R.M. Holmukhe, D. Kumar Jaiswal, The future digital work force: Robotic Process Automation (RPA), J. Inf. Syst. Technol. Manag. 16 (2019) 1–17.
[48]
J. Mendling, N. Berente, S. Seidel, T. Grisold, The Philosopher’s corner, SIGMIS Database 52 (2021) 127–140,.
[49]
J. Morse, Principles of mixed methods and multimethod research design, in: A. Tashakkori, C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California, USA, 2007.
[50]
R. Müller, K. Jugdev, Critical success factors in projects: Pinto, Slevin, and Prescott‐the elucidation of project success, Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus. 5 (2012) 757–775.
[51]
M.C. Munro, B.R. Wheeler, Planning, critical success factors, and management’s information requirements, MIS Q. 4 (1980) 27–38.
[52]
F.F.-H. Nah, K.M. Zuckweiler, J. Lee-Shang Lau, ERP implementation: chief information officers’ perceptions of critical success factors, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 16 (2003) 5–22.
[53]
M. Niazi, A comparative study of software process improvement implementation success factors, J. Softw. Evol. Process 27 (2015) 700–722.
[54]
M. Niazi, D. Wilson, D. Zowghi, Critical success factors for software process improvement implementation: an empirical study, Softw. Process. Improv. Pract. 11 (2006) 193–211.
[55]
Oesterreich, M., Avasthy, T., 2020. Forrester: The Future of Work: A Pandemic Spotlight. 〈https://www.uipath.com/resources/automation-analyst-reports/pandemic-impacting-future-of-work-forrester-report〉. (Accessed 5 November 2020).
[56]
Osmundsen, K., Iden, J., Bygstad, B., 2020. Organizing robotic process automation: balancing loose and tight coupling. In: Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Honolulu, Maui, Hawaii, USA, pp. 6918–6926.
[57]
Penttinen, E., Kasslin, H., Asatiani, A., 2018. How to choose between robotic process automation and back-end system automation? In: Proceedings of the 26th European Conference on Information Systems, Portsmouth, UK.
[58]
K. Pfeffers, C. Gengler, Tuunanen, extending critical success factors methodology to facilitate broadly participative information systems planning, J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 20 (2003) 51–85.
[59]
J.K. Pinto, J.E. Prescott, Variations in critical success factors over the stages in the project life cycle, J. Manag. 14 (1988) 5–18.
[60]
R. Plattfaut, J. Koch, Preserving the legacy – why do professional soccer clubs (not) adopt innovative process technologies? A grounded theory study, J. Bus. Res. 136 (2021) 237–250,.
[61]
R. Plattfaut, Vincent Borghoff, Robotic Process Automation – A Literature-Based Research Agenda, Journal of Information Systems (2022),.
[62]
P. Polak, C. Nelischer, H. Guo, D.C. Robertson, "Intelligent” finance and treasury management: what we can expect, AI Soc. 35 (2020) 715–726.
[63]
PricewaterhouseCoopers, PwC’s, 2019. Actuarial robotic process automation (RPA) survey report, 2019. 〈https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/industries/financial-services/publications/pwc-2019-actuarial-robotic-process-automation-survey-report.html〉. (Accessed 24 November 2020).
[64]
A. Rainer, T. Hall, Key success factors for implementing software process improvement: a maturity-based analysis, J. Syst. Softw. 62 (2002) 71–84.
[65]
J. Ram, D. Corkindale, M.-L. Wu, Implementation critical success factors (CSFs) for ERP: do they contribute to implementation success and post-implementation performance?, Int. J. Prod. Econ. 144 (2013) 157–174.
[66]
A. Ranerup, H.Z. Henriksen, Value positions viewed through the lens of automated decision-making: the case of social services, Gov. Inf. Q. 36 (2019).
[67]
Ratia, M., Myllärniemi, J., Helander, N., 2015. Robotic Process Automation - creating value by digitalizing work in the private healthcare? In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Academic Mindtrek Conference, Tampere Finland, The Association for Computing Machinery, New York, New York, pp. 222–227.
[68]
Ravn, R., Halberg, P., Gustafsson, J., Groes, J., 2016. Hearing impairment and renal failure associated with RMND1 mutations, Get ready for robots: why planning makes the difference between success and disappointment, 170A, 142–147. https://assets.ey.com/content/dam/ey-sites/ey-com/en_gl/topics/emeia-financial-services/ey-get-ready-for-robots.pdf.
[69]
Raza, H., Baptista, J., Constantinides, P., 2019. Conceptualizing the role of IS security compliance in projects of digital transformation: tensions and shifts between prevention and response modes. In: Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Information Systems, Munich, Germany.
[70]
U. Remus, M. Wiener, A multi-method, holistic strategy for researching critical success factors in IT projects, Inf. Syst. J. 20 (2010) 25–52.
[71]
J.F. Rockart, Chief executives define their own data needs, Harv. Bus. Rev. 52 (1979) 81–93.
[72]
M. Romao, J. Costa, C.J. Costa, Robotic Process Automation: A Case Study in the Banking Industry, 2019.
[73]
M. Rosemann, J. vom Brocke, The six core elements of business process management, in: J. vom Brocke, M. Rosemann (Eds.), Handbook on Business Process Management 1, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2015, pp. 105–122.
[74]
L. Rutaganda, R. Bergstrom, A. Jayashekhar, D. Jayasinghe, J. Ahmed, Avoiding pitfalls and unlocking real business value with RPA, J. Financ. Transform. 46 (2017) 104–115.
[75]
M. Schmitz, C. Dietze, C. Czarnecki, Enabling digital transformation through robotic process automation at Deutsche Telekom, Digit. Cases (2019) 15–33.
[76]
J. Soldani, D.A. Tamburri, W.-J. van den Heuvel, The pains and gains of microservices: a systematic grey literature review, J. Syst. Softw. 146 (2018) 215–232.
[77]
R. Syed, M.T. Wynn, How to trust a bot: an RPA user perspective, in: A. Asatiani, J.M. García, N. Helander, A. Jiménez-Ramírez, A. Koschmider, J. Mendling, G. Meroni, H.A. Reijers (Eds.), Business Process Management: Blockchain and Robotic Process Automation Forum: BPM 2020 Blockchain and RPA Forum, Seville, Spain, September 13-18, 2020, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2020, pp. 147–160. (Proceedings, firstst ed. twentiethtwentieth).
[78]
R. Syed, S. Suriadi, M. Adams, W. Bandara, S.J.J. Leemans, C. Ouyang, A.H.M. ter Hofstede, I. van de Weerd, M.T. Wynn, H.A. Reijers, Robotic Process Automation: contemporary themes and challenges, Comput. Ind. 115 (2020).
[79]
Tarafdar, M., Beath, C., 2018. Wipro Limited: developing a cognitive DNA. In: Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Information Systems: Bridging the Internet of People, Data, and Things, San Francisco, California, USA.
[80]
P. Trkman, The critical success factors of business process management, Int. J. Inf. Manag. 30 (2010) 125–134.
[81]
Tsaih, R.-H., Hsu, C., 2018. Artificial intelligence in smart tourism: a conceptual framework. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Electronic Business, Guilin, China.
[82]
UiPath Inc, 2020. The robots coming to our rescue – how work changed forever in 2020 | UiPath. 〈https://www.blueprism.com/uploads/resources/white-papers/Global-Survey_Automate-or-Stagnate_full-report.pdf〉. (Accessed 25 November 2020).
[83]
F. Urbach, T. Ahlemann, P. Böhmann, W. Drews, F. Brenner, R. Schaudel, Schütte, The impact of digitalization on the IT department, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 61 (2019) 123–131.
[84]
R. Uskenbayeva, Z. Kalpeyeva, R. Satybaldiyeva, A. Moldagulova, A. Kassymova, Applying of RPA in Administrative Processes of Public Administration, 2019.
[85]
J. Webster, R. Watson, Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review, MIS Q. 26 (2002) 13–23.
[86]
L.P. Willcocks, I. Oshri, J. Kotlarsky, Dynamic Innovation in Outsourcing, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018.
[87]
R.K. Yin, Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods, sixth ed, Sage Publications, Los Angeles, USA, 2018.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)RPA Ready? Unlocking Organizational RPA ReadinessDisruptive Innovation in a Digitally Connected Healthy World10.1007/978-3-031-72234-9_2(14-28)Online publication date: 11-Sep-2024
  • (2024)From Routine to Automation: How RPA Advances Administrative Practices in Swedish UniversitiesElectronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective10.1007/978-3-031-68211-7_7(73-87)Online publication date: 26-Aug-2024
  • (2023)Increasing RPA Adoption: An Experiment on Countermeasures for Status Quo BiasBusiness Process Management10.1007/978-3-031-41620-0_19(323-340)Online publication date: 11-Sep-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Computers in Industry
Computers in Industry  Volume 138, Issue C
Jun 2022
326 pages

Publisher

Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

Netherlands

Publication History

Published: 01 June 2022

Author Tags

  1. Robotic Process Automation
  2. RPA
  3. Critical Success Factors
  4. CSF
  5. Empirical study
  6. Qualitative research

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 19 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)RPA Ready? Unlocking Organizational RPA ReadinessDisruptive Innovation in a Digitally Connected Healthy World10.1007/978-3-031-72234-9_2(14-28)Online publication date: 11-Sep-2024
  • (2024)From Routine to Automation: How RPA Advances Administrative Practices in Swedish UniversitiesElectronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective10.1007/978-3-031-68211-7_7(73-87)Online publication date: 26-Aug-2024
  • (2023)Increasing RPA Adoption: An Experiment on Countermeasures for Status Quo BiasBusiness Process Management10.1007/978-3-031-41620-0_19(323-340)Online publication date: 11-Sep-2023
  • (2023)Robot Colleagues in Swedish Municipalities: How RPA Affects the Work Situation of EmployeesElectronic Government10.1007/978-3-031-41138-0_11(160-173)Online publication date: 5-Sep-2023
  • (2023)Applying Experiential Learning to Deliver Industry-Ready Business AnalystsInnovative Technologies and Learning10.1007/978-3-031-40113-8_35(356-366)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2023
  • (2022)The performance assessment framework (PPAFR) for RPA implementation in a loan application process using process miningInformation Systems and e-Business Management10.1007/s10257-022-00602-221:2(277-321)Online publication date: 30-Dec-2022
  • (2022)Why Companies Use RPA: A Critical Reflection of GoalsBusiness Process Management10.1007/978-3-031-16103-2_26(399-417)Online publication date: 11-Sep-2022

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media